Clinical Study | Open Access
The Effect of LASIK Procedure on Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in Myopic Eyes
Purpose. To evaluate the effect of applied suction during microkeratome-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure on peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness as well as macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness. Methods. 89 patients (124 eyes) with established myopia range from −3.0 to −8.0 diopters and no associated ocular diseases were included in this study. RNFL and GC-IPL thickness measurements were performed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) one day before LASIK and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Results. Mean RNFL thickness prior to LASIK was μm while the first month and the sixth month postoperatively were μm and μm, respectively. Comparing results, there is no significant difference between baseline, one month, and six months postoperatively for mean RNFL (). Mean GC-IPL thickness was μm preoperatively with no significant difference during the follow-up period ( μm versus μm; ). Conclusion. RNFL and GC-IPL complex thickness remained unaffected following LASIK intervention.
Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is currently the most common refractive surgery procedure. However, LASIK application among glaucoma patients or glaucoma suspects still remains controversial, mainly because of the short-term increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the creation of the corneal flap, that is, during the application of the suction ring. At that point, IOP values may reach up to 65 mmHg . It has been suggested that the transient IOP elevation during LASIK may result in short-term retinal and optic nerve ischemia, which therefore may compromise the structural and functional integrity of these ocular structures [2, 3]. Recent studies, implementing contemporary imaging modalities such as scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) and/or optical coherence tomography (OCT), reported that transient IOP spikes during LASIK have no impact on peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness [4, 5].
Spectral domain OCT (SD OCT) represents a prevalent imaging technique that among others enables a valid quantitative and qualitative analysis of the peripapillary RNFL [6–9]. Moreover, recent SD OCT software provides a selective evaluation of the inner retinal layers at the macular represent ganglion cell complex (GCC), which includes the nerve fiber layer (NFL), the ganglion cell layer (GCL), and the inner plexiform layer (IPL), providing valuable information regarding early preperimetric glaucomatous ganglion cell damage [10–13]. Furthermore, latest OCT ganglion cell analysis (GCA) algorithms can demarcate the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) while excluding the NFL.
Purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of microkeratome-assisted LASIK procedure on the peripapillary RNFL and the GC-IPL using spectral domain OCT (SD OCT).
2. Material and Methods
This is a prospective clinic-based observational study that was conducted at the “Maja” Clinic in Nis, Serbia, and was approved by the hospital’s ethics committee. All participants were enrolled in the study from the refractive surgery service in a consecutive-if-eligible basis and obtained written informed consent according to the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration.
Inclusion criteria were that participants should have stable refraction for over a year and a spherical equivalent in the range between −3.00 and −8.00 diopters (D) and to be over 18 years old. Exclusion criteria were the presence of any other associated ocular disease, ocular surface disorder, glaucoma, corneal thickness below 500 microns, and irregular corneal topography, as well as any history of systemic disease. Patients who had previous ocular or refractive surgeries were excluded from the study.
All participants received a complete ophthalmological examination, including best-corrected visual acuity, IOP measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, slit lamp and fundus examinations, Schirmer test, corneal pachymetry, and tomography to rule out any LASIK contraindications.
Peripapillary RNFL was measured using the glaucoma analysis mode of Cirrus® SD OCT device (model 4000, software version 6.0, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.). The optic nerve head (ONH) was automatically scanned over an area of 6 × 6 mm by 200 × 200-pixel resolution axial scan. The RNFL thickness within the whole circle circumference, the linear maps in 12 hour positions, and the circular maps in each quadrant was recorded for each patient. The ganglion cell analysis algorithm of the Cirrus SD OCT was used to process and measure the thickness of macular GC-IPL. The average, minimum, and six sectoral (superotemporal, superior, superonasal, inferonasal, inferior, and inferotemporal) GC-IPL thicknesses were measured from the elliptical annulus centered on the fovea. All measurements were performed by an experienced surgeon. Medicament mydriasis was achieved by tropicamide 1% drops before recording. Images with a signal power more than seven were used for analysis. Measurements were performed one day prior to and 1 and 6 months after LASIK.
All LASIK procedures were performed by the same experienced surgeon. Proxymetacaine hydrochloride 0.5% drops were used for local anesthesia, while lids and lashes were sterilized with povidone-iodine (10%) scrub solution. The Moria One Use-Plus SBK microkeratome was used for the creation of the flap. The negative pressure of the suction ring was set at 600–620 mmHg, and the velocity of the head movement was constant (3 mm/seconds). The hinge was created at the 12 o’clock position. The Alcon WaveLight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q® excimer laser 400 Hz was used for all ablations. After ablation, the flap was repositioned with an irrigation cannula and the interface was thoroughly irrigated. In postoperative period, all patients were administered fixed combination of tobramycin and dexamethasone q.i.d. for a 10 days and preservative free artificial tears for 2 months.
2.1. Statistical Analysis
Kolmogorov-Smirnov testing was applied to the assessment of the normality of the measured data. All parameters were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between pre- and postoperative measurements were evaluated by means of Mann–Whitney test. The level of statistical significance was set at . All statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 for Windows software package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
In total, 89 patients (124 eyes) were included in the study; 56 were female (62.92%), mean age years (range 18–51 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was − D. Preoperative and postoperative RNFL values at all quadrants and in each of the 12 clock-hour sectors (marked as sectors at , adjusted and aligned for the left and right eye) are shown in Table 1. Mean RNFL thickness prior to LASIK was at the baseline, the first postoperative month was , and the sixth postoperative month was μm. Comparing results, there is no significant difference between baseline, one month and six months postoperatively for mean RNFL () as well as regarding the clock hours and quadrants RNFL thickness.
|RNFL Avg, retinal nerve fiber layer average; RNFL T, retinal nerve fiber layer in temporal quadrant; RNFL N, retinal nerve fiber layer in nasal quadrant; RNFL I, retinal nerve fiber layer in inferior quadrant; RNFL S, retinal nerve fiber layer in superior quadrant; 1 h–12 h, retinal nerve fiber layer in 12 RNFL clock hours; SD, standard deviation.|
Preoperative and postoperative mean and minimum values of GC-IPL as well as GC-IPL thickness in the superotemporal (ST), superior (S), superonasal (SN), inferonasal (IN), inferior (I), and inferotemporal (IT) layer have been reported in Table 2. The mean preoperative value of GC-IPL thickness was μm while the minimum value of GC-IPL thickness was μm. The GC-IPL complex thickness did not change significantly from preoperative to any postoperative visit (). In addition, the mean central subfield thickness was , preoperatively, with any significant differences being detected at follow-up visits (Table 2).
|GC-IPL, ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer; Avg, average; Min, minimum; ST, superotemporal; S, superior; SN, superonasal; IN, inferonasal; I, inferior; IT, inferotemporal; CST, central subfield thickness; SD, standard deviation.|
A series of previous studies regarding the influence of transient intraoperative IOP elevation during LASIK on RNFL thickness, implementing conventional SLP with fixed compensator, reported a postoperative thinning of RNFL, raising considerations concerning the safety of LASIK in patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspects. Nevertheless, this finding was attributed to alterations in corneal birefringence following LASIK that affected the accuracy of the instrument’s readings [5, 14–17]. This was further supported by similar reports, which using SLP with variable corneal compensator concluded that RNFL actually remained unaffected following LASIK, when compensating individually for changes in corneal birefringence [17, 18]. In addition, more recent studies utilizing OCT analysis found no LASIK induced peripapillary RNFL alterations [4, 5, 15, 16, 19, 20].
A great importance in establishing glaucoma diagnosis and in monitoring structural changes in glaucomatous patients has lately been attributed to GCC [10–12]. GCC is defined as the sum of NFL, ganglion cell layer, and inner plexiform layers at the macular region. Glaucoma likely preferentially affects these layers rather than all macular layers, because they contain the ganglion cell axons, cell bodies, and dendrites . Moreover, studies supported that GCC analysis has similar glaucoma discriminating performance compared with the peripapillary RNFL thickness evaluation [11, 21], while outbalancing RNFL’s diagnostic capacity in certain cases . However, it was questioned whether the inclusion of NFL thickness in GCC thickness measurements falsely elevated the diagnostic performance of the GCC. Therefore, the latest GCC analysis algorithms facilitate the successful demarcation of the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL), while excluding the NFL [21, 23].
In the current study, we attempted to evaluate the effect of applied suction during microkeratome-assisted LASIK on OCT-derived RNFL and macular GC-IPL thickness, in a cohort of myopic patients without any other ocular pathology. According to our findings, suction-induced IOP elevation during LASIK produces nonsignificant alterations on the OCT-derived peripapillary RNFL, which is in agreement with previous literature reports [4, 5, 16, 19, 20]. Zhang et al.  reported nonsignificant changes in both RNFL and GCC thickness after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction. Our results additionally suggest that GC-IPL thickness, namely, the macular GCC without the NFL thickness, remains unaffected following microkeratome-assisted LASIK, as well.
In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to report on the impact of microkeratome-assisted LASIK on peripapillary RNFL, as well as the macular GC-IPL thickness, excluding influence of macular NFL. Our results suggest that suction-induced IOP elevation has no clinically significant impact on RNFL and macular GC-IPL thickness, namely, the retinal structures that are most susceptible to elevated IOP.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no proprietary or commercial interests in any concept or product discussed in this paper. There are no financial or proprietary interests in any materials or methods described herein.
- A. Shrivastava, A. Madu, and J. Schultz, “Refractive surgery and the glaucoma patient,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 215–221, 2011.
- F. Ghadhfan, A. Al-Rajhi, and M. D. Wagoner, “Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2041–2048, 2007.
- K. P. Bashford, G. Shafranov, S. Tauber, and M. B. Shields, “Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 2005.
- J. T. Whitson, J. P. McCulley, H. D. Cavanagh, J. Song, R. W. Bowman, and L. Hertzog, “Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on optic nerve head topography and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2302–2305, 2003.
- R. Gürses-Özden, J. M. Liebmann, D. Schuffner, D. F. Buxton, B. D. Soloway, and R. Ritch, “Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness remains unchanged following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 512–516, 2001.
- H. Hirasawa, A. Tomidokoro, M. Araie et al., “Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness determined by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in ophthalmologically normal eyes,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 128, no. 11, pp. 1420–1426, 2010.
- T. Shoji, H. Sato, M. Ishida, M. Takeuchi, and E. Chihara, “Assessment of glaucomatous changes in subjects with high myopia using spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1098–1102, 2011.
- B. Cvenkel and A. Šket Kontestabile, “Correlation between nerve fibre layer thickness measured with spectral domain OCT and visual field in patients with different stages of glaucoma,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 249, no. 4, pp. 575–584, 2011.
- L. M. Sakata, J. DeLeon-Ortega, V. Sakata, and C. A. Girkin, “Optical coherence tomography of the retina and optic nerve—a review,” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 90–99, 2009.
- R. K. Na, S. L. Eun, J. S. Gong et al., “Comparing the ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fibre layer measurements by Fourier domain OCT to detect glaucoma in high myopia,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 1115–1121, 2011.
- O. Tan, V. Chopra, A. T.-H. Lu et al., “Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 12, pp. 2305–14.e1-2, 2009.
- C. A. Curcio and K. A. Allen, “Topography of ganglion cells in human retina,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 300, no. 1, pp. 5–25, 1990.
- J. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Zheng, Q. Liu, C. Zhai, and Y. Wang, “Effect of suction on macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness during femtosecond lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1994–2001, 2014.
- L. M. Zangwill, T. Abunto, C. Bowd, R. Angeles, D. J. Schanzlin, and R. N. Weinreb, “Scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements after LASIK,” Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 200–207, 2005.
- Y.-Y. Tsai and J.-M. Lin, “Effect of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on the retinal nerve fiber layer,” Retina, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 342–345, 2000.
- R. Gürses-Özden, M. E. Pons, C. Barbieri et al., “Scanning laser polarimetry measurements after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 461–464, 2000.
- T. Dada, S. Chaudhary, R. Muralidhar, S. Nair, R. Sihota, and R. Vajpayee, “Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement following laser in situ keratomileusis using scanning laser polarimetry,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 191–194, 2007.
- A. P. Aristeidou, G. Labiris, E. I. Paschalis, N. C. Foudoulakis, S. C. Koukoula, and V. P. Kozobolis, “Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer measurements, after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis, using scanning laser polarimetry (GDX VCC),” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 248, no. 5, pp. 731–736, 2010.
- N. Sharma, P. Sony, A. Gupta, and R. B. Vajpayee, “Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 446–450, 2006.
- M. Hosny, R. M. Zaki, R. A. Ahmed, N. Khalil, and H. M. Mostafa, “Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness following mechanical microkeratome-assisted versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 7, pp. 1919–1922, 2013.
- J.-C. Mwanza, J. D. Oakley, D. L. Budenz, R. T. Chang, O. J. Knight, and W. J. Feuer, “Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: automated detection and thickness reproducibility with spectral domain-optical coherence tomography in glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 8323–8329, 2011.
- N. Nakano, M. Hangai, H. Noma et al., “Macular imaging in highly myopic eyes with and without glaucoma,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 511–e6, 2013.
- V. T. Koh, Y.-C. Tham, C. Y. Cheung et al., “Determinants of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 5853–5859, 2012.
Copyright © 2017 Maja Zivkovic et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.