Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8967803, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8967803
Research Article

Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis Are Prevalent in Women Undergoing Surgery for Endometriosis and May Suggest a Higher Risk of Infertility

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
2Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Correspondence should be addressed to Vered H. Eisenberg; ten.tniqezeb@siederev

Received 29 April 2017; Accepted 10 August 2017; Published 18 September 2017

Academic Editor: Rudy L. De Wilde

Copyright © 2017 Vered H. Eisenberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Vercellini, F. Parazzini, S. Oldani, S. Panazza, T. Bramante, and P. G. Crosignani, “Surgery: Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: a study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics,” Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1160–1162, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Bergholt, L. Eriksen, N. Berendt, M. Jacobsen, and J. B. Hertz, “Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy,” Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2418–2421, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. C. Reid and F. Mukri, “Trends in number of hysterectomies performed in England for menorrhagia: examination of health episode statistics, 1989 to 2002-3,” British Medical Journal, vol. 330, no. 7497, pp. 938-939, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. K. Mehasseb and M. A. Habiba, “Adenomyosis uteri: an update,” The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Struble, S. Reid, and M. A. Bedaiwy, “Adenomyosis: a clinical review of a challenging gynecologic condition,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 164–185, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Kunz, D. Beil, P. Huppert, M. Noe, S. Kissler, and G. Leyendecker, “Adenomyosis in endometriosis—prevalence and impact on fertility: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2309–2316, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Bazot, O. Fiori, and E. Darai, “Adenomyosis in endometriosis—prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1101-1102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Campo, V. Campo, and G. Benagiano, “Adenomyosis and infertility,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Maheshwari, S. Gurunath, F. Fatima, and S. Bhattacharya, “Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 18, no. 4, Article ID dms006, pp. 374–392, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Mathieu D'Argent, C. Coutant, M. Ballester et al., “Results of first in vitro fertilization cycle in women with colorectal endometriosis compared with those with tubal or male factor infertility,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 2441–2443, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Vercellini, D. Consonni, G. Barbara, L. Buggio, M. P. Frattaruolo, and E. Somigliana, “Adenomyosis and reproductive performance after surgery for rectovaginal and colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 704–713, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Dueholm, “Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 569–582, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Kepkep, Y. A. Tuncay, G. Göynümer, and E. Tutal, “Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate?” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 341–345, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Naftalin, W. Hoo, K. Pateman, D. Mavrelos, T. Holland, and D. Jurkovic, “How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3432–3439, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Dueholm, E. Lundorf, E. S. Hansen, J. S. Sorensen, S. Ledertoug, and F. Olesen, “Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 588–594, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Bazot, A. Cortez, E. Darai et al., “Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology,” Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2427–2433, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Reinhold, S. McCarthy, P. M. Bret et al., “Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation,” Radiology, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. M. Meredith, L. Sanchez-Ramos, and A. M. Kaunitz, “Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 107e1–107e6, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. S. Abrao, M. O. da C Gonçalves, J. A. Dias Jr., S. Podgaec, L. P. Chamie, and R. Blasbalg, “Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3092–3097, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Bazot, C. Lafont, R. Rouzier, G. Roseau, I. Thomassin-Naggara, and E. Daraï, “Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1825–1833, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Hudelist, K. Ballard, J. English et al., “Transvaginal sonography vs. clinical examination in the preoperative diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 480–487, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Lazzeri, A. Di Giovanni, C. Exacoustos et al., “Preoperative and postoperative clinical and transvaginal ultrasound findings of adenomyosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1027–1033, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Levy, A. Dehaene, N. Laurent et al., “An update on adenomyosis,” Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 3–25, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Bromley, T. D. Shipp, and B. Benacerraf, “Adenomyosis: sonographic findings and diagnostic accuracy,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 529–534, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Reinhold, M. Atri, A. Mehio, R. Zakarian, A. E. Aldis, and P. M. Bret, “Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography,” Radiology, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 609–614, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Exacoustos, L. Brienza, A. Di Giovanni et al., “Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 471–479, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Exacoustos, L. Manganaro, and E. Zupi, “Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 655–681, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Fedele, S. Bianchi, M. Dorta, F. Zanotti, D. Brioschi, and S. Carinelli, “Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma versus leiomyoma,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 603–606, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Canis, J. G. Donnez, D. S. Guzick et al., “Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 817–821, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Van Den Bosch, M. Dueholm, F. P. G. Leone et al., “Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 284–298, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Brosens, N. M. de Souza, F. G. Barker, T. Paraschos, and R. M. L. Winston, “Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 471–474, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Exacoustos, D. Luciano, B. Corbett et al., “The uterine junctional zone: a 3-dimensional ultrasound study of patients with endometriosis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 248.e1–248.e7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Kissler, S. Zangos, I. Wiegratz et al., “Utero-tubal sperm transport and its impairment in endometriosis and adenomyosis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1101, pp. 38–48, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Vercellini, D. Consonni, D. Dridi, B. Bracco, M. P. Frattaruolo, and E. Somigliana, “Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 964–977, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Galliano, J. Bellver, C. Díaz-García, C. Simón, and A. Pellicer, “Art and uterine pathology: how relevant is the maternal side for implantation?” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 21, no. 1, Article ID dmu047, pp. 13–38, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus