Clinical Study

Assessment of Haemodynamic Response to Nonselective Beta-Blockers in Portal Hypertension by Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population.

Patient characteristic Treatment group value (propranolol versus carvedilol)
Propranolol MRCarvedilolAll patients

Number1111221.00
Age, years (mean ± SD)0.99
Male sex, (%)10 (91)8 (73)18 (82)0.28
Aetiology of liver disease
 Alcoholic liver disease, (%)5 (45)3 (27)8 (36)0.39
 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, (%)3 (27)4 (36)7 (32)0.66
 Viral hepatitis, (%)0 (0)2 (18)2 (9.1)0.15
 Other, (%)3 (27)2 (18)5 (23)0.62
Child-Pugh Score, (%)
 Child-Pugh A7 (64)6 (55)13 (59)0.67
 Child-Pugh B2 (18)3 (27)5 (23)0.62
 Child-Pugh C2 (18)2 (18)4 (18)1.00
Baseline heart rate, bpm78 (69–81)82 (72–94)79 (69–89)0.14
Systolic BP, mm Hg128 (116–146)136 (115–150)136 (115–150)0.99
Splenomegaly, (%)8 (73)8 (73)16 (73)1.00
Thrombocytopaenia, (%)9 (82)10 (91)19 (86)0.55
Final beta blocker dose (mg)160 in 7 patients
80 in 4 patients
12.5 in all
Target beta blocker dose achieved, (%)7 (64)11 (100)18 (82)0.03
Completed study, (%)9 (82)10 (91)19 (86)0.55
Heart rate responders, (%)5 (56)4 (40)9 (47)0.50

rate response in propranolol group was observed in 5 patients; 3 on 80 mg of propranolol MR and 2 on 160 mg of propranolol MR.