Review Article
Diagnostic Value of CK-18, FGF-21, and Related Biomarker Panel in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Major characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Number | Study (year) | Country | Study design | Number of cases | Age, y (SD) | Gender (M/F) | Methods | Biomarkers |
| 1 | Wieckowska et al. [11] (2006) | USA | Cross-sectional | 39 | 50.8 (11.1) | 18/21 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30) | 2 | Yilmaz et al. [12] (2007) | Turkey | Cross-sectional | 83 | 48.9 (9.1) | 45/38 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30 & M65) | 3 | Diab et al. [13] (2008) | USA | Cross-sectional | 86 | 48.0 (11.1) | 38/48 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30) | 4 | Feldstein et al. [14] (2009) | USA | Cross-sectional | 139 | 48.0 (1.9) | 51/88 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30) | 5 | Papatheodridis et al. [15] (2010) | Greece | Cross-sectional | 58 | 48.0 (13.0) | 32/17 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30) | 6 | Musso et al. [16] (2010) | Italy | Cross-sectional | 125 | 46.0 (4.0) | 89/36 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30) | 7 | Malik et al. [17] (2009) | USA | Cross-sectional | 95 | 48.0 (5.3) | 58/37 | ELISA | CK-18-M30 | 8 | Shen et al. [18] (2012) | China | Cross-sectional | 147 | 47.7 (9.7) | 121/99 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30 & M65) | 9 | Joka et al. [19] (2012) | Germany | Cross-sectional | 22 | 45.6 (3.3) | 15/7 | ELISA | CK-18 (M30 & M65) | 10 | Younossi et al. [20] (2008) | USA | Cross-sectional | 69 | 41.6 (10.6) | 23/46 | ELISA | Combined biomarker panel | 11 | Younossi et al. [21] (2011) | USA | Cross-sectional | 79 | 42.3 (10.3) | 18/61 | ELISA | Combined biomarker panel | 12 | Pirvulescu et al. [22] (2012) | Romania | Cross-sectional | 60 | 44.9 (9.4) | 18/42 | ELISA | Combined biomarker panel | 13 | Grigorescu et al. [23] (2012) | Romania | Cross-sectional | 79 | 43.7 (11.1) | 56/23 | ELISA | Combined biomarker panel | 14 | Shen et al. [24] (2012) | China | Cross-sectional | 220 | 48.1 (9.7) | 121/99 | ELISA | Combined biomarker panel | 15 | Yilmaz and Eren [25] (2012) | Turkey | Cross-sectional | 136 | 48.8 (7.5) | 70/66 | ELISA | Combined biomarker panel | 16 | Yang et al. [26] (2015) | China | Cross-sectional | 270 | 30.3 (12.7) | 128/142 | ELISA | Combined biomarker panel | 17 | Yilmaz et al. [27] (2010) | Turkey | Cross-sectional | 159 | 47.0 (8.0) | 71/88 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 18 | Li et al. [28] (2010) | China | Cross-sectional | 348 | 43.5 (11.1) | 212/136 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 19 | Dushay et al. [29] (2010) | Spain | Cross-sectional | 21 | 31 (10.0) | 7/14 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 20 | Dasarathy et al. [30] (2011) | USA | Cross-sectional | 26 | 43.3 (7.0) | 13/13 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 21 | Reinehr et al. [31] (2012) | USA | Cross-sectional | 60 | 12.0 (1.4) | 30/30 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 22 | Li et al. [32] (2013) | China | Cross-sectional | 712 | 51.4 (12.9) | 278/434 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 23 | Shen Y et al. [33] (2013) | China | Cross-sectional | 74 | 63.9 (8.6) | 39/35 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 24 | Giannini et al. [34] (2013) | USA | Cross-sectional | 217 | 15.0 (0.4) | 91/126 | ELISA | FGF-21 | 25 | Alisi et al. [35] (2013) | Italy | Cross-sectional | 107 | 10.5 (4.8) | 41/66 | ELISA | FGF-21 |
|
|
SD, standard deviation. M, male. F, female.
|