BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 1287127 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1287127

Hao-ran Ding, Jing-lin Wang, Hao-zhen Ren, Xiao-lei Shi, "Lipometabolism and Glycometabolism in Liver Diseases", BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 1287127, 7 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1287127

Lipometabolism and Glycometabolism in Liver Diseases

Academic Editor: Shinichi Aishima
Received10 Oct 2018
Accepted03 Dec 2018
Published12 Dec 2018

Abstract

The liver is the main metabolic organ in the body especially in lipometabolism and glycometabolism. Carbohydrates and fats disorders can result in insulin resistance in the liver. Metabolic imbalance can even lead to life-threatening conditions. Therefore, it is essential to maintain the normal metabolic function of the liver. When the liver is in a pathological state, liver metabolism homeostasis is damaged, and metabolic disorders will further aggravate liver disease. Consequently, it is essential to determine the relationship between liver diseases and metabolic disorders. Here we review a lot of evidence that liver diseases are closely related to lipometabolism and glycometabolism. Although the disorder of the liver metabolism is caused by different liver diseases, the break of metabolic balance is determined by changes in the state of the liver. We discuss the relationship between liver disease and metabolic changes, outline the process of how metabolic changes are regulated by liver diseases, and describe the role which metabolic changes play in the process and prognosis of liver disease.

1. Introduction

The liver is the largest organ in the body and mainly regulates carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. The abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and fats due to an imbalance in hepatic metabolism can result in insulin resistance in insulin sensitive tissues such as the liver. An imbalance in hepatic metabolism may result from the disease which causes hepatic dysfunction. Several metabolites of carbohydrates and fats can even lead to life-threatening conditions. As a consequence, it is essential to maintain the normal metabolic function of the liver.

2. Metabolism of Major Substances in the Liver

2.1. Lipometabolism

An important function of the liver is lipid metabolism. Lipid intake, esterification, oxidation, and the secretion of fatty acids take place in hepatocytes. Triglycerides are delivered to the liver for lipid metabolism and absorbed by liver cells, which is regulated by LDL (low density lipoprotein) receptors and LRP (LDL receptor-related proteins) [1, 2]. Excess carbohydrates can be transformed into lipids in the liver under the regulation of transcription factors such as SREBP1, ChREBP, and LXR which is referred to as the de novo fatty acid synthesis pathway [3].

When hepatic lipid metabolism homeostasis is damaged, triglycerides are accumulated pathologically in liver cells due to upregulation of triglyceride synthesis, decreased lipid droplet decomposition, and impaired triglyceride and very LDL (VLDL) secretory function [4]. Dysregulation of hepatic lipid metabolism homeostasis will ultimately result in fatty liver. The mechanism involved in the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, and liver cancer is still unclear. Ekstedt M and Angulo P found that fibrosis contributed to the development of chronic liver disease in patients with NAFLD [5, 6]. Although liver fibrosis is due to excessive activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), the process is regulated by lipid metabolism [7, 8]. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain normal lipid metabolism homeostasis for the healthy biological function of the liver.

2.2. Glycometabolism

The liver also plays a significant role in sugar metabolism, which is responsible for the formation and storage of glucose. Following food consumption, glucose metabolism in the liver results in a rapid transformation from glucose synthesis to glucose storage and is regulated by insulin, a key regulator [9]. Insulin contributes to glucose storage by activating glycogen synthase which mediates the synthesis of hepatic glycogen. When the secretion of insulin is insufficient, the synthesis of hepatic glycogen is inhibited. This is illustrated by hepatic glycogen synthesis in patients with type 1 diabetes and a normal diet, which is only 1/3 of that in healthy individuals [10]. The biological function of insulin is dependent on coordinating intracellular signaling pathways. Insulin can activate IRTK (insulin receptor tyrosine kinase), which mediates the phosphorylation of ATP to stimulate the metabolism of glucose in association with PDK1 and mTORC2. Insulin can also downregulate glycogen related enzymes and inactivate glycogen synthase kinase which reduces the production of glucose in the liver.

2.3. The Relationship between Glucose Metabolism and Lipid Metabolism

Sugar metabolism is closely related to lipid metabolism. Insulin resistance is usually accompanied by liver steatosis. When insulin resistance occurs, lipolysis is suppressed and lipid synthesis is increased due to the effect of hyperinsulinemia. Abnormal lipid metabolism, especially the accumulation of ectopic lipids, is closely associated with insulin resistance. Samuel VT found that the inhibitory effect of insulin on liver gluconeogenesis was significantly reduced [11]. Diacylglycerol is a product of lipolysis, which can activate PKC to impair the insulin signal. Raddatz K found that although the fat content in the liver increased, the level of insulin resistance decreased significantly in high fat fed Prkce (a core gene which promotes lipolysis to upregulate diacylglycerol content) knockout mice [12]. Ectopic lipid accumulation in the liver can activate related pathways which regulate insulin function resulting in reduced glucose uptake and hepatic glycogen synthesis in vivo. The accumulation of ectopic lipid increases the transport of glucose to the liver and stimulates de novo lipid synthesis which can lead to hyperlipidemia. In addition, in a metabolic and inflammatory environment caused by lipid accumulation, macrophages are increased in white adipose tissue which promotes the esterification of fatty acids and induces hyperlipidemia. Macrophages can also regulate lipolysis, which results in the transportation of fatty acids to the liver and the accumulation of acetyl-CoA in the liver. Acetyl-CoA is a strong activator of pyruvate carboxylase, which can promote the transformation of glycerol to glucose known as gluconeogenesis [13].

When the liver is in a pathological state, liver metabolism homeostasis is damaged, and metabolic disorders will further aggravate liver disease. Consequently, it is essential to determine the relationship between liver diseases and metabolic disorders.

3. Major Liver Diseases

3.1. Hepatic Steatosis

Hepatic steatosis is one of the major diseases affecting human health worldwide. The NAFLD morbidity rate is approximately 25% [14]. When liver cell damage, inflammation, and fibrosis occur, simple hepatic steatosis is transformed into NASH which is a high risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [15]. When lipid metabolism is abnormal, the balance of lipid composition in cells is disrupted. Due to the pathological accumulation of lipids, the development of lipotoxicity results in dysfunction of organelles, which leads to cell dysfunction and even death. Signal recognition and transduction in cells depend on normal lipid metabolism. Lipids present in cell membranes and the cytoplasm can be directly modified by cell kinases to regulate cell behavior [16]. Triglycerides are the main components of lipid droplets, and if the content of triglycerides in lipid droplets is high or low, this can lead to lipid metabolism disorders. Papazyan R found that when the synthesis of triglycerides was reduced by depressing diacylglycerol acylase, oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, and cell damage were aggravated despite a reduction in hepatic steatosis [17]. Perilipin-5 regulates the storage of triglycerides in lipid droplets. If the expression of perilipin-5 is downregulated, this leads to pathological lipolysis and lipotoxicity although the lipid droplets are small [18]. Consequently, it is beneficial for health that triglycerides are stored in an inert storage mode to prevent the development of NASH from NAFLD. The study by Raichur S showed an interesting phenomenon, where a significant increase in ceramide content was observed in a mouse model of NASH [19]. Ceramide is an intermediate metabolite of sphingolipid which can be upregulated by high expression of proinflammatory factors. Ceramide can accelerate the progression of hepatic steatosis to NASH due to the promotion of inflammation by interacting with TNF-α. When the expression of ceramide is downregulated, complications such as fatty liver, cell damage, and insulin resistance in the NASH model can be alleviated.

Lipotoxicity not only is harmful to cells under the regulation of inflammatory mechanisms, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and reactive oxygen species (ROS), but also affects the biological functions of organelles. The most important organelles affected are mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum [20]. Studies have shown that increasing the level of autophagy in the liver in the nonalcoholic fatty liver model can eliminate polarization and damaged mitochondria [21]. This process reduces ATP consumption and the production of free radicals which is caused by the reverse function of mitochondrial ATP synthetase. In contrast, if mitochondrial autophagy is suppressed, severe liver mitochondrial damage and hepatic steatosis will develop [22]. Therefore, mitochondrial autophagy plays an important role in the reduction of hepatic steatosis and inhibition of the progression of NAFLD to NASH. In addition to mitochondrial autophagy, liver steatosis can also cause the changes of mitochondrial dynamics. Excessive fat accumulation can directly lead to the mitochondrial damage [23]. Nakagawa H found that endoplasmic reticulum stress plays an important role in the development of NASH from hepatic steatosis. When the level of endoplasmic reticulum stress was improved in mice, obvious NASH characteristics appeared in hepatocytes, such as balloon degeneration, inflammatory infiltration, and bridging “netted” fibrosis. When hepatic steatosis has progressed to NASH, it can quickly develop into a liver adenoma and eventually lead to HCC [24].

In addition to lipotoxicity, “glucose toxicity” caused by glucose metabolism disorders is involved in the pathogenesis of NASH. Excess carbohydrates activate the fat synthesis pathway which is regulated by acetyl-CoA carboxylase, SCD-1, and fatty acid synthase to aggravate hepatic steatosis. Fructose can increase the expression of CD36 and is associated with de novo lipid synthesis-related proteins such as ChREBP to promote lipid synthesis [25]. Excess glucose and fructose can regulate the expression of ChREBP and SREBP1c directly. In addition, fructose can also improve the downstream fat synthesis gene to promote the accumulation of lipids. Softic S confirmed that hepatic steatosis in mice was aggravated following the inhibition of fructose metabolism. The incidence of hepatic steatosis was also significantly increased in humans with fructose metabolism disorders [26].

3.2. Hepatic Fibrosis

Most chronic liver injuries can evolve into liver fibrosis which is closely related to the activation of HSCs. The process by which HSCs are activated involves the transformation of HSCs from the static state in Vitamin A lipid droplets to the facilitated fibrous state [27]. The HSCs in the facilitated fibrous state can transdifferentiate into myofibroblasts and produce superfluous ECM (extracellular matrix) which is responsible for liver fibrosis. In this process, the intracellular vitamin A will be lost. Liver fibrosis is an effective indicator of liver-related complications and specific liver diseases. Liver disease can lead to vitamin A homeostasis impaired and lead to vitamin A deficiency eventually. Lipolysis can stimulate the activation of HSCs which can promote the secretion of extracellular matrix and accelerate the process of liver fibrosis [28]. Hepatic steatosis in the long term may evolve to liver fibrosis. Cholesterol is a confirmed endogenous activator of LXR (liver X receptor) which can not only regulate lipometabolism and glycometabolism but also modulate the activation of HSCs [29]. In addition to lowering cholesterol uptake, LXR prevents the progression of liver fibrosis. Beaven, S. W et al. found that the mice which lack LXRα and LXRβ are easier to develop liver fibrosis [30]. It has been proved that lipid droplet-associated protein RAB18 plays an important role in the metabolism of vitamins and cholesterol [31]. Lipid metabolism disorder can lead to the downregulation of PPAR and/or the dysfunction of PPAR. PPAR can reverse the process of HSCs activation and prevent the development of liver fibrosis by downregulating the expression of fibrogenic cytokines secreted by HSCs. Studies have shown that the inhibition of PPAR can increase the risk of suffering liver fibrosis and the activation of PPAR can reduce liver injury and liver fibrosis [32, 33]. It is strange that the expression of BMP6 (bone morphogenetic protein) is upregulated in NAFLD but not in other liver diseases. In the study in vitro, it is found that BMP6 inhibits the activity of HSCs and reduces the expression of the fibrotic gene [34]. There must be a connection between lipid metabolism and BMP6 activation, but the specific mechanism is not clear. Macrophages play an important role in the progression of liver fibrosis because it has obvious improvement of liver fibrosis after exhaustion of macrophages [35, 36]. During metabolic disorder, CCL2 and MCP-1 can activate fibroblast-related macrophages such as phagocytes, Kupffer cells, and macrophages induced by monocytes which result in upregulated metabolic inflammation [37]. This process of cell recruitment aggravates the chronic inflammatory reaction in the liver. Mononuclear cells can secrete fibrotic factors such as TGF-β and PDGF [38]. These fibrotic factors not only upregulate monocyte-induced macrophages, but also promote the differentiation of HSCs into myofibroblasts. The above process is the main source of extracellular matrix, especially collagen, in liver fibrosis caused by chronic inflammation [39]. The IL-1 and TNF pathways can prolong the survival time of HSCs which is regulated by mononuclear cells [36]. Kazankov K analyzed macrophage markers in more than 300 patients with hepatic steatosis. He found that the level of macrophage activation is closely related to the grade of liver fibrosis and disease [40]. Lipid metabolism also participates in the activation of macrophages [41]. Adipocytokines play multiple roles in the progression from NAFLD to liver cirrhosis. Leptin promotes the liver fibrosis, but adiponectin prevents the progress of liver fibrosis [42]. Leptin can upregulate the expression of the αSMA, Type 1 Collagen, and TGFβ. Hedgehog pathway which is closely associated with liver fibrosis is regulated by lipid [43]. The Hedgehog pathway can activate HSCs to transform it into proliferating myofibroblast. When NAFLD progresses to NASH whose pathological feature is liver fibrosis, the expression of Hedgehog is significantly upregulated [44]. Hedgehog signaling pathway is also involved in lipid synthesis and sugar utilization [45]. Guy CD found that when the Hedgehog signaling pathway is suppressed, the accumulation of muscle fibroblasts in the liver can be reduced [46].

3.3. Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Although the main risk factors for HCC are HBV and HCV infection, HCC induced by virus infection is decreasing annually due to the development of effective hepatitis B vaccines and anti-HCV drugs [47, 48]. Obesity, a high risk factor for HCC, has attracted significant attention [49]. When lipid metabolism is disturbed, the balance is broken between lipid synthesis and lipid decomposition. The decrease of lipoprotein synthesis and lipophagy can result in lipotoxicity which may cause chronic liver injury [50]. Lipotoxicity is one of the important mechanisms for the development of NASH to HCC. Consequently, the metabolic related factors such as type II diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome are becoming the risk factors of HCC. Scientists are paying more and more attention to metabolic disorders and HCC. People with abdominal obesity have a higher risk of HCC [51]. Visceral fat is of great significance in predicting the recurrence of HCC [52]. The lipid accumulation caused by abnormal lipid metabolism may result in the remodeling of adipose tissue. In the reconstituted adipose tissue, the differentiation of the adipocytes is activated and the angiogenesis appears, which provides a favorable microenvironment for the development of HCC. Not only that, abnormal lipid metabolism can lead to the disordered secretory of adipokine characterized by leptin reduction and increased adiponectin. Leptin can not only promote the development of liver fibrosis, but also promote the development of HCC by activating JAK/STAT pathway and ERK pathway. Upregulated leptin can inhibit the apoptosis of tumor tissue through suppressing antiapoptotic pathway mediated by TGFβ [53]. Leptin plays a role in promoting the proliferation of tumor cells. What is more, leptin can also provide a microenvironment for tumor growth. The biological function of adiponectin is opposite to leptin. Adiponectin can inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells through regulating AMPK signaling pathway and mTOR signaling pathway. Jiang CM found that low adiponectin is closely related to the occurrence of HCC [54]. Senescent adipocytes which secret more cytokines can aggravate chronic inflammation associated with obesity. The process above which is called the SASP can promote the development of HCC. When the SASP process is suppressed, the incidence of HCC is significantly reduced [55]. Chronic inflammation caused by liver metabolic diseases, liver fibrosis, the death of parenchymal cells, and lack of monitoring the proliferation of abnormal liver parenchymal cells are the main risk factors for HCC. Park EJ conducted research on the correlation between obesity and liver cancer, which confirmed that there is a relationship between abnormal lipid metabolism and the development of HCC. The authors found that male mice with a high fat diet were more likely to develop HCC. This may be related to the activation of HSCs and hepatocytes, which can secrete TNF and IL-6 to activate STAT3. STAT3 is an important tumor transcription factor, which can promote the occurrence of liver cancer [56]. In addition to the theory of inflammatory induction, some scholars believe that the progression of NASH to HCC is caused by the TNF signal activated by TNFR1. The TNFR1 signal in hepatocytes and hepatoma progenitor cells can be upregulated by IKKβ to activate the NF-κB signaling pathway which mediates cell proliferation. Nakagawa H found that inhibition of the TNFR1 signal not only prevented the progression of NAFLD to NASH, but also decreased the incidence of HCC [24]. With abnormal lipid metabolism, the production of ROS is increased by upregulating β-oxidation and ω-oxidation. Oxidative stress can damage the genome and aggravate the mitochondrial burden. The injured liver cells can also activate the JNK pathway which is related to cell survival and stress. Metabolic disorder of lipids also plays an important role in tumor recurrence [57]. A prospective study found that excessive ROS caused by abnormal lipid metabolism can increase the risk of recurrence after liver cancer surgery [58].

Besides lipid metabolism, the occurrence of HCC is closely related to glucose metabolism. Weng C J and Li C et al. carried out a follow-up analysis of IGF-1 (insulin growth factor 1) and HbA1C (glycosylated hemoglobin A1C) in diabetic patients and found that blood glucose and hyperinsulinemia were significantly related to the incidence of HCC. Effective blood glucose control can reduce the degree of chronic liver disease and reduce the incidence of HCC [59]. Hyperinsulinemia can promote the development of liver fibrosis by activating HSCs and promoting angiogenesis. Continuous hyperinsulinemia can promote the development of liver cancer by modulating IGF signaling axis which can promote the proliferation of hepatocytes and angiogenesis [60]. The upregulated insulin and IGF can bind to the insulin receptor and promote the formation of tumors under the interaction of IGFR. This may be related to the P13K/Akt pathway and MAPK pathway. Increased blood glucose and insulin increase the level of IGF-1 and its bioavailability. Activated IGF-1 can inhibit the receptor-mediated apoptosis pathway in tumor cells and promote their proliferation [61]. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance increase the expression of proinflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-6, which can lead to chronic inflammation. Hyperglycemia can induce the accumulation of ROS. Excess ROS can be combined with DNA which leads to the development of HCC [62, 63].

3.4. Acute Liver Failure

Acute liver failure is characterized by massive liver cell necrosis. Acute liver injury is often accompanied by metabolic disorders, acidosis, and sepsis. These complications can lead to hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, lactic acidosis, and hyperammonemia. Abnormal levels of metabolites can induce coma. Metabolic dysfunction is an important factor in the deterioration of acute liver failure [64]. Abnormality of lipoprotein metabolism is caused by acute liver failure and increases the content of cholesterol on the cell membrane. This process can reduce the deformability of cells. This is the reason that cells are more vulnerable to damage in people with abnormal lipid metabolism. Lysosomal lipase is an important enzyme which can hydrolyze triglycerides and cholesterol. This enzyme is essential to decompose lipid into free cholesterol and free fatty acids. When this enzyme is suppressed, lipid can deposit in the liver and finally form into acute liver failure [65]. The disease which lacks lysosomal lipase is called Wolman disease (lysosomal acid lipase deficiency). Abnormal glycometabolism also induces acute liver failure. When the people are short of hepatic fructose 1-phosphate aldolase, eating fructose can lead to acute liver failure. Acute liver failure can result in OS (oxidative stress), which brings about changes in mitochondrial structural proteins and DNA resulting in ATP depletion and impaired ATP production. Excess accumulation of ROS can induce a shift in JNK proteins in mitochondria, which are responsible for mitochondrial inactivation, aggravation of OS, and liver injury [66]. There is transient lipid accumulation in the liver after major hepatectomy. Therefore, acute liver failure after hepatectomy is often accompanied by lipid metabolism disorders. Ekaterina Kachaylo found that improving liver lipid metabolism can reduce liver failure after hepatectomy by reducing lipid accumulation in the liver [67]. Correction of the metabolic disorder in acute liver failure is the key to improving the prognosis of patients. The timely correction of abnormal biochemical indicators can reduce the impact of metabolic disorders on the body.

4. Conclusions

The liver is an important metabolic organ. Liver abnormalities affect metabolic homeostasis, and metabolites can in turn play a protective or aggravating role in the diseased liver. In view of the complex relationship between the liver and metabolism, there is great potential in the treatment of specific liver diseases with targeted metabolic therapy. This treatment is expected to delay or even cure the disease and has considerable clinical value.

Abbreviations

LDL:Low density lipoprotein
LRP:LDL receptor-related proteins
SREBP1:Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Proteins 1
ChREBP:Carbohydrate response element binding protein
LXR:Liver X receptor
VLDL:Very low density lipoprotein
NAFLD:Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
NASH:Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
HSCs:Hepatic stellate cells
IRTK:Insulin receptor tyrosine kinase
ATP:Adenosine Triphosphate
PDK1:Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1
mTORC2:mTOR Complex 2
PKC:Protein kinase C
HCC:Hepatocellular carcinoma
TNF-α:Tumor necrosis factor-α
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
SCD-1:Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1
CD36:Fatty acid translocase
SREBP1c:Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Proteins 1c
HSCs:Hepatic stellate cells
ECM:Extracellular matrix
RAB18:Ras-related protein Rab-18
PPAR:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
BMP6:Bone morphogenetic protein 6
CCL2:Chemokine CCL2
MCP-1:Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
TGF-β:Transforming growth factor-β
PDGF:Platelet-derived growth factor
IL-1:Interleukin-1
TNF:Tumor necrosis factor
αSMA:α smooth muscle actin
HBV:Hepatitis B virus
HCV:Hepatitis C virus
JAK:Janus kinase 1
STAT:Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription
ERK:Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase
AMPK:Adenosine Monophosphate Activated Protein Kinase
mTOR:Mammalian target of rapamycin
SASP:Senescence-associated secretory phenotype
IL-6:Interleukin-6
TNFR1:Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1
IKKβ:IκB kinase β
NF-κB:Nuclear factor-κB
IGF-1:Insulin growth factor 1
HbA1C:Glycosylated hemoglobin A1C
IGFR:Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor
JNK:c-Jun N-terminal kinase
OS:Oxidative stress.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Hao-ran Ding and Jing-lin Wang have made substantial, direct, and intellectual contributions to the work. At the same time, Hao-zhen Ren and Xiao-lei Shi participated in designing the study, drafting and writing the manuscript, and approving it for submission. Hao-ran Ding and Jing-lin Wang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the technical assistance provided by the staff of the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.

References

  1. A. Rohlmann, M. Gotthardt, R. E. Hammer, and J. Herz, “Inducible inactivation of hepatic LRP gene by Cre-mediated recombination confirms role of LRP in clearance of chylomicron remnants,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 689–695, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. M. Hussain, F. R. Maxfield, J. Más-Oliva, I. Tabas, Z. S. Ji, and T. L. Innerarity, “Clearance of chylomicron remnants by the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  3. Y. Wang, J. Viscarra, S.-J. Kim, and H. S. Sul, “Transcriptional regulation of hepatic lipogenesis,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 678–689, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Kawano and D. E. Cohen, “Mechanisms of hepatic triglyceride accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 434–441, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Ekstedt, H. Hagström, P. Nasr et al., “Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1547–1554, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Angulo, D. E. Kleiner, S. Dam-Larsen et al., “Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 389.e10–397.e10, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Chen, J. Liu, W. Yang, and W. Ling, “Lipopolysaccharide mediates hepatic stellate cell activation by regulating autophagy and retinoic acid signaling,” Autophagy, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1813–1827, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Lu, W. Xu, and S. Zheng, “Nrf2 activation is required for curcumin to induce lipocyte phenotype in hepatic stellate cells,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 95, pp. 1–10, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. F. Petersen, D. Laurent, D. L. Rothman, G. W. Cline, and G. I. Shulman, “Mechanism by which glucose and insulin inhibit net hepatic glycogenolysis in humans,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1203–1209, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J.-H. Hwang, G. Perseghin, D. L. Rothman et al., “Impaired net hepatic glycogen synthesis in insulin-dependent diabetic subjects during mixed meal ingestion: A 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy study,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 783–787, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. T. Samuel, Z.-X. Liu, X. Qu et al., “Mechanism of hepatic insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 31, pp. 32345–32353, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Raddatz, N. Turner, G. Frangioudakis et al., “Time-dependent effects of Prkce deletion on glucose homeostasis and hepatic lipid metabolism on dietary lipid oversupply in mice,” Diabetologia, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1447–1456, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. V. T. Samuel and G. I. Shulman, “The pathogenesis of insulin resistance: integrating signaling pathways and substrate flux,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. K. Satapathy and A. J. Sanyal, “Epidemiology and Natural History of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 221–235, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. E. Rinella, “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 313, no. 22, pp. 2263–2273, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. J. Perry, X. M. Zhang, D. Zhang, Kumashiro N., J. P. Camporez, and G. W. Cline, “Leptin reverses diabetes by suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis,” NAT MED, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. Papazyan, Z. Sun, Y. H. Kim et al., “Physiological Suppression of Lipotoxic Liver Damage by Complementary Actions of HDAC3 and SCAP/SREBP,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 863–874, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Wang, Y. Zhao, X. Gao et al., “Perilipin 5 improves hepatic lipotoxicity by inhibiting lipolysis,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 870–882, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Raichur, S. Wang, P. Chan et al., “CerS2 Haploinsufficiency Inhibits β-Oxidation and Confers Susceptibility to Diet-Induced Steatohepatitis and Insulin Resistance,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 919, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. E. Ertunc and G. S. Hotamisligil, “Lipid signaling and lipotoxicity in metaflammation: indications for metabolic disease pathogenesis and treatment,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 2099–2114, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Wang, X. Liu, J. Nie et al., “ALCAT1 controls mitochondrial etiology of fatty liver diseases, linking defective mitophagy to steatosis,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 486–496, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. A. Williams, H. Ni, Y. Ding, and W. Ding, “Parkin regulates mitophagy and mitochondrial function to protect against alcohol-induced liver injury and steatosis in mice,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 309, no. 5, pp. G324–G340, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. H. Ipsen, J. Lykkesfeldt, and P. Tveden-Nyborg, “Molecular mechanisms of hepatic lipid accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 75, no. 18, pp. 3313–3327, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Nakagawa, A. Umemura, K. Taniguchi et al., “ER Stress Cooperates with Hypernutrition to Trigger TNF-Dependent Spontaneous HCC Development,” Cancer Cell, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 331–343, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. W. Ter Horst and M. J. Serlie, “Fructose consumption, lipogenesis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–20, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Softic, M. K. Gupta, G.-X. Wang et al., “Divergent effects of glucose and fructose on hepatic lipogenesis and insulin signaling,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 127, no. 11, pp. 4059–4074, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. E. Puche, Y. Saiman, and S. L. Friedman, “Hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis,” Comprehensive Physiology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1473–1492, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. L. Friedman, “Hepatic stellate cells: protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 125–172, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Tsuchida and S. L. Friedman, “Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 397–411, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. W. Beaven, K. Wroblewski, J. Wang et al., “Liver X receptor signaling is a determinant of stellate cell activation and susceptibility to fibrotic liver disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 1052–1062, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. O'Mahony, K. Wroblewski, S. M. O'Byrne et al., “Liver X receptors balance lipid stores in hepatic stellate cells through Rab18, a retinoid responsive lipid droplet protein,” Hepatology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 615–626, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. Morán-Salvador, E. Titos, B. Rius et al., “Cell-specific PPARγ deficiency establishes anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrogenic properties for this nuclear receptor in non-parenchymal liver cells,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1045–1053, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. Staels, A. Rubenstrunk, B. Noel et al., “Hepatoprotective effects of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/delta agonist, GFT505, in rodent models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1941–1952, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Arndt, E. Wacker, C. Dorn et al., “Enhanced expression of BMP6 inhibits hepatic fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Gut, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 973–981, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Sunami, F. Leithäuser, S. Gul et al., “Hepatic activation of IKK/NFκB signaling induces liver fibrosis via macrophage-mediated chronic inflammation,” Hepatology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1117–1128, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Pradere, J. Kluwe, S. de Minicis et al., “Hepatic macrophages but not dendritic cells contribute to liver fibrosis by promoting the survival of activated hepatic stellate cells in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1461–1473, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. O. Krenkel and F. Tacke, “Liver macrophages in tissue homeostasis and disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 306–321, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. C. Mossanen, O. Krenkel, C. Ergen et al., “Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2–positive monocytes aggravate the early phase of acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury,” Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1667–1682, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Weiskirchen and F. Tacke, “Liver fibrosis: from pathogenesis to novel therapies,” Digestive Diseases, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 410–422, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Kazankov, F. Barrera, H. J. Møller et al., “The macrophage activation marker sCD163 is associated with morphological disease stages in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Liver International, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1549–1557, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. E. A. Dennis, R. A. Deems, R. Harkewicz et al., “A mouse macrophage lipidome,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 51, pp. 39976–39985, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. N. K. Saxena and F. A. Anania, “Adipocytokines and hepatic fibrosis,” Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 153–161, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Myers, N. Sever, Y. Chong et al., “Hedgehog pathway modulation by multiple lipid binding sites on the smoothened effector of signal response,” Developmental Cell, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 346–357, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. W.-K. Syn, Y. Jung, A. Omenetti et al., “Hedgehog-mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrogenic repair in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. e1478–e1488, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. Teperino, S. Amann, M. Bayer et al., “Hedgehog partial agonism drives warburg-like metabolism in muscle and brown fat,” Cell, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 414–426, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. D. Guy, A. Suzuki, M. F. Abdelmalek, J. L. Burchette, and A. M. Diehl, “Treatment response in the PIVENS trial is associated with decreased hedgehog pathway activity,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 98–107, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. H. B. El-Serag, “Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma,” Gastroenterology, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 1264–1273, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. N. Kimer, E. K. Dahl, L. L. Gluud, and A. Krag, “Antiviral therapy for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials,” BMJ Open, vol. 2, no. 5, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  49. B. Sun and M. Karin, “Obesity, inflammation, and liver cancer”. View at: Google Scholar
  50. “Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Prevention,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology, vol. 1, no. 2, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. Karagozian, Z. Derdák, and G. Baffy, “Obesity-associated mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis,” Metabolism, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 607–617, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G.-H. Lo, “Is visceral fat accumulation really an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after curative treatment in patients with suspected NASH?” Gut, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 278-279, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. Shetty, J. Chen, J. Shin, W. Jogunoori, and L. Mishra, “Pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma development in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Current Hepatology Reports, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. G119–G127, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C.-M. Jiang, C.-W. Pu, Y.-H. Hou, Z. Chen, M. Alanazy, and L. Hebbard, “Non alcoholic steatohepatitis a precursor for hepatocellular carcinoma development,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 44, pp. 16464–16473, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Yoshimoto, L. Tze Mun, A. Koji, K. Hiroaki, S. Seidai, and O. Seiichi, Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome, NATURE, 2013.
  56. G. He, G. Y. Yu, V. Temkin, H. Ogata, C. Kuntzen, and T. Sakurai, Hepatocyte IKKbeta/NF-kappaB inhibits tumor promotion and progression by preventing oxidative stress-driven STAT3 activation, CANCER CELL, 2010.
  57. W.-y. Fei, R.-q. Wu, and S.-f. Zhou, “Optimal consumption choices with anticipation: methods of martingale,” Journal of Mathematics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 137–144, 2001. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  58. Y. Suzuki, K. Imai, K. Takai et al., “Hepatocellular carcinoma patients with increased oxidative stress levels are prone to recurrence after curative treatment: A prospective case series study using the d-ROM test,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 845–852, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. Weng, Y. Hsieh, C. Tsai et al., “Relationship of Insulin-Like Growth Factors System Gene Polymorphisms with the Susceptibility and Pathological Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1808–1815, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Siddique and K. V. Kowdley, “Insulin Resistance and Other Metabolic Risk Factors in the Pathogenesis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Clinics in Liver Disease, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 281–296, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. C. J. Newschaffer, “Premenopausal Levels of Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor I and the Risk of Post-Menopausal Breast Cancer: A Population-Based, Nested Case-Control Study,” Defense Technical Information Center, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. H. Tanaka, N. Fujita, R. Sugimoto et al., “Hepatic oxidative DNA damage is associated with increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 580–586, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. Leahy, “Activation of Oxidative Stress by Acute Glucose Fluctuations Compared With Sustained Chronic Hyperglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes,” Yearbook of Endocrinology, vol. 2007, pp. 47–50, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. W. Bernal, G. Auzinger, A. Dhawan, and J. Wendon, “Acute liver failure,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9736, pp. 190–201, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. Pericleous, C. Kelly, T. Wang, C. Livingstone, and A. Ala, “Wolman's disease and cholesteryl ester storage disorder: the phenotypic spectrum of lysosomal acid lipase deficiency,” The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 670–679, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. Ye, Y. Wang, H. Li et al., “Fibroblast growth factor 21 protects against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity by potentiating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator protein-1α-mediated antioxidant capacity in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 977–989, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. E. Kachaylo, C. Tschuor, N. Calo et al., “PTEN Down-Regulation Promotes β-Oxidation to Fuel Hypertrophic Liver Growth After Hepatectomy in Mice,” Hepatology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 908–921, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Hao-ran Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views4365
Downloads829
Citations

Related articles