Research Article
Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Repeat Cerclage in Women with Prolapsed Membranes
Table 1
Patient characteristics in repeat cerclage (n=26).
| | Variables | Values |
| | Age (years) | 32.5 (± 3.3) | | BMI (kg/m2) | 25.2 (± 4.0) | | Primigravida | 10/26 (38.4%) | | Type of prior cerclage | | | History indicated cerclage (HIC) | 13/26 (50%) | | Ultrasound-indicated cerclage (UIC) | 5/26 (19.2%) | | Physical examination-indicated cerclage (PEIC) | 8/26 (30.8%) | | GA at prior cerclage (weeks) | 15.7 (± 3.1) | | GA at repeat cerclage (weeks) | 21.0 (± 2.3) | | NLR at prior cerclage | 4.0 (± 0.9) | | PLR at prior cerclage | 173.2(± 38.2) | | NLR at repeat cerclage | 8.9 (± 6.6) | | PLR at repeat cerclage | 231.2(± 125.2) | | Bulging membrane at the time of repeat cerclage (cm) | 3.3 (± 1.6) | | GA at delivery (weeks) | 27.6 (± 5.8) | | Latency between repeat cerclage and delivery (days) | 46.5 (± 39.9) | | Birthweight (g) | 1393.0 (± 1037.2) | | Neonatal survival | 18/26 (69.2 %) |
|
|
Note: NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platetlet/lymphocyte ratio; GA, gestational age;
Values are n, mean (± standard deviation) or n/N (%).
|
