Research Article

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk Infants in China

Table 2

Interrater reliability of AIMS scores recorded independently by raters A, B, and C.

GroupRater ARater BRater CInter-rater reliability
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDICC95%CI

0–3 months (n = 23)
Prone2.521.122.521.122.481.280.9810.962–0.991
Supine2.431.082.431.042.351.190.9750.949–0.988
Sitting0.780.800.650.780.700.770.9480.895–0.976
Standing0.780.420.780.420.870.460.9460.891–0.975
Total score6.522.766.392.736.393.070.9820.963–0.992
4–9 months (n = 27)
Prone6.743.216.743.086.592.830.9920.985–0.996
Supine5.891.835.781.915.701.790.9910.982–0.995
Sitting4.223.184.223.204.003.080.9910.982–0.995
Standing1.931.141.931.141.811.110.9200.848–0.961
Total score18.788.6318.678.6518.117.830.9960.992–0.998
0–9 months (n = 50)
Prone4.703.324.723.254.623.100.9950.992–0.997
Supine4.342.244.282.234.202.210.9940.990–0.996
Sitting2.602.962.562.992.462.840.9920.988–0.995
Standing1.421.031.421.031.400.970.9430.909–0.966
Total score13.069.0212.989.0212.688.450.9970.995–0.998

95%CI: 95% confidence interval; AIMS: Alberta Infant Motor Scale; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient; SD: standard deviation.