Research Article

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk Infants in China

Table 3

Interrater reliability of AIMS scores between any two raters.

GroupRaters A and BRaters A and CRaters B and C
ICC95%CIICC95%CIICC95%CI

0–3 months (n = 23)
Prone0.9820.957–0.9920.9760.944–0.9900.9590.904–0.983
Supine0.9790.951–0.9910.9650.918–0.9850.9440.868–0.976
Sitting0.9070.781–0.9610.9230.819–0.9670.9400.858–0.975
Standing1.0001.000–1.0000.8800.717–0.9490.8800.717–0.949
Total score0.9770.947–0.9900.9750.940–0.9890.9670.921–0.986
4–9 months (n = 27)
Prone0.9920.983–0.9960.9840.964–0.9920.9900.977–0.995
Supine0.9930.984–0.9970.9820.960–0.9920.9830.963–0.992
Sitting0.9900.979–0.9960.9870.972–0.9940.9790.955–0.991
Standing1.0001.000–1.0000.8140.592–0.9150.8140.592–0.915
Total score0.9990.997–0.9990.9910.981–0.9960.9920.982–0.996
0–9 months (n = 50)
Prone0.9950.991–0.9970.9900.983–0.9940.9920.985–0.995
Supine0.9950.991–0.9970.9900.982–0.9940.9880.978–0.993
Sitting0.9920.986–0.9950.9890.981–0.9940.9850.974–0.992
Standing1.0001.000–1.0000.8670.766–0.9250.8670.766–0.925
Total score0.9990.997–0.9990.9940.989–0.9970.9940.990–0.997

95%CI: 95% confidence interval; AIMS: Alberta Infant Motor Scale; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient; SD: standard deviation.