BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Uterine Fibroids: From Molecular Oncology to Reproduction

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 2804830 |

Andrea Tinelli, Ioannis Kosmas, Ospan A. Mynbaev, Alessandro Favilli, Grigoris Gimbrizis, Radmila Sparic, Marcello Pellegrino, Antonio Malvasi, "Submucous Fibroids, Fertility, and Possible Correlation to Pseudocapsule Thickness in Reproductive Surgery", BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 2804830, 7 pages, 2018.

Submucous Fibroids, Fertility, and Possible Correlation to Pseudocapsule Thickness in Reproductive Surgery

Academic Editor: Joseph F. Buell
Received24 Sep 2017
Accepted24 Jun 2018
Published03 Sep 2018


Background and Objectives. Fibroids are related to infertility. Fibroid pseudocapsule is a neurovascular bundle surrounding leiomyomas rich of neurofibers involved in myometrial biology. Authors evaluated, by a case-control study, the fibroid pseudocapsule (FP) thickness by ultrasound (US) and the histological measurements, according to uterine location of fibroids. Methods. 137 consecutive patients undergoing hysterectomy for uterine myomas were enrolled and 200 myomas were evaluated. Before surgery, patients underwent an ultrasound (US) investigation to evaluate the number, the size, and the location of fibroids. After surgery, myoma-pseudocapsule-myometrium specimens were measured and evaluated by a single expert pathologist. Both US and histological data were collected and statistically analyzed. Results. Our results confirm the relevant difference of FP thickness, particularly represented under the endometrium for submucous LMs. FPs near the endometrial cavity were considerably thicker than those of both intramural fibroids and subserous fibroids measured by US (P=0.0001) and histology (P=0.0001). A clear cut-off measurement at 2 mm (P=0.0001) was found between endometrial FPs and all other FPs for either US or histology measurements. Conclusion. The thickness of FP is considerably higher near the endometrial cavity when compared to those of both intramural and subserous LMs, suggesting a potential role either in fertility or in myometrial healing.

1. Introduction

Uterine fibroids or leiomyomas (LMs) are the most common worldwide indication for hysterectomy [1, 2]. Although mostly of women with fibroids are asymptomatic, LMs can cause abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, and reproductive dysfunction [1]. It is difficult to assess a correct uterine LMs incidence as it increases with ageing. They may occur in more than 30% of patients of 40-60 years [3]. Nowadays, uterine LMs represent not only a problem for the women health, but also a heavy economic burden. It has been estimated that the American social costs for uterine LMs, in terms of costs of care, adverse obstetric outcomes, and work-hours lost, are higher than that ovarian, breast, and colon cancer [4]. In the last decade, several pharmacological [5] and surgical treatments have been proposed for a conservative management of uterine LMs [6, 7].

In order to preserve fertility, a conservative treatment should be proposed to women wishing pregnancies, especially in those younger patients who want to undergo assisted reproductive techniques (ART). There is a general agreement that submucosal LMs negatively affect fertility, when compared to women without fibroids. A recent review reported that intramural LMs above a certain size (>4 cm), even without cavity distortion, may also negatively influence fertility and the presence of subserosal LMs has little or no effect on fertility [8].

Nevertheless, some studies reported conflicting results and much of the data shows no differences in outcomes no matter the size of fibroids. Vimercati et al. [9] affirmed that patients with fibroids >4 cm required an increased number of cycles to obtain an ongoing pregnancy, compared with the other groups. On the contrary, Oliveira et al. [10] concluded that patients with subserosal or intramural fibroids < 4 cm had IVF-ICSI outcomes (pregnancy, implantation, and abortion rates) similar to those of controls and women with intramural fibroids > 4.0 cm had lower pregnancy rates than patients with intramural fibroids ≤ 4.0 cm of diameter.

Yan et al. [11] showed that women with intramural fibroids with the largest diameter < 2.85 cm or the sum of reported diameters < 2.95 cm had a significantly higher delivery rate than patients with larger fibroids. A significant negative effect on delivery rate was noted when intramural fibroids with the largest diameter greater than 2.85 cm were considered, compared with matched controls without fibroids. Although noncavity-distorting fibroids do not affect IVF/ICSI outcomes, intramural fibroids greater than 2.85 cm in size significantly impair the delivery rate of patients undergoing IVF/ICSI. On the other side, Savarelos et al. [12] reported that women with intracavitary distortion and undergoing myomectomy significantly reduced their midtrimester miscarriage rates in subsequent pregnancies from 21.7 to 0% (P< 0.01). This result have been translated to an increase in the live birth rate from 23.3 to 52.0% (P< 0.05). Conversely, Yarali et al. [13] affirmed that the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were similar on intramural and subserous fibroids (that did not distorted the uterine cavity). Horcajadas et al. [14] concluded their study with no correlation between implantation and miscarriage with leiomyoma number and size, although the focus of the study is in the gene expression and not on a comparative study between the position, size, and number of fibroids.

Trying to understand the correlation between LMs and fertility, some authors deeply studied the LMs anatomical and biological structure, in order to develop even more conservative and effective treatments [15, 16]. From the LMs anatomy studies, the neuroendocrine-biological role of the fibroid pseudocapsule (FP), a sort of neurovascular bundle surrounding LM, on myometrial physiology emerged [17]. Several studies have highlighted a new endocrine function of such structure, which may have a potential role in the uterine healing and fertility, especially after myomectomy [1824]. Recently, a nontumoral origin of FP has been speculated, but rather a protective structure from the healthy myometrial tissue that could enhance regenerative mechanisms [25].

The FP is a well-known anatomical entity, which can be sonographically [17, 25] and histologically evaluated [26]. In a previous preliminary report [27], authors examined the pseudocapsule thickness according to uterine location of LMs, detecting a high correspondence between ultrasound (US) and the histological measurement. Nevertheless, the FP was considerably thicker over the submucous myomas when compared to those of both intramural and subserous LMs, suggesting a potential role in healing mechanism. The limits of such investigation involved a limited number of patients. Therefore, the aim of such prospective case-control study with single surgeon was to validate the results raised in the previous report and to assess the repeatability of the measurement techniques in a large cohort of patients.

2. Material and Methods

From 2009 to 2015, authors conducted a prospective single centre study conducted in Italian affiliated University Hospital, in a cohort of patients affected by fibroids and scheduled for hysterectomy. All selected patients consented to take part in research, as well as be operated. The study design was approved by the IRB. All procedures were in accordance with the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration on human experimentation. All enrolled patients complained symptoms related to fibroids, such as heavy menstrual bleeding and pelvic pain. The surgical treatment was clinically indicated and the patient care was not altered by participation in this study.

A written, informed, and signed consent for hysterectomy was signed from all patients. Cases of endometrial hyperplasia, uterine polyps, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, uterine or cervical cancer, confirmed or suspected primary adnexal pathology, adenomyoma, or adenomyosis were excluded from this study.

Fibroids were excluded from statistical analysis if they had been mapped as intraligamentary and/or in the isthmic-cervical region, as well as pedunculated.

Before surgery, patients underwent an ultrasound investigation in the first 10 days of the menstrual cycle to evaluate the number, the size, and the location of fibroids according to the LMs subclassification system of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), with the following classification: Group 1: FIGO Classes 1&2, Group 2: FIGO Classes 3&4, and Group 3: FIGO Classes 5&6 [25].

Moreover, the pseudocapsule thickness (the white ring surrounding the myoma) was measured for each myomas following the methods described in the previous report [26].

The US examination and measurements were performed by a single US-expert (A.T.). The following US systems, a Logic 7 Pro US system (GE-Kretz, Zipf, Austria) or a Voluson 730 US system (GE-Kretz, Zipf, Austria) equipped with a 3.8 to 5.2 MHz transvaginal transducer, were used. Both machines were settled by the producer Industries with a medium-level quality, by a standard US setting of Doppler and gray scale.

The hysterectomies were performed both in laparoscopic or laparotomic setting at the first ten days of menstrual cycle. After surgery, myoma-pseudocapsule-myometrium specimens were measured and evaluated by a single expert pathologist (M.P.), blinded for patients’ data. Pathologic analysis was carried out by the same methodology described in the previous report [26]. Afterwards both US and histological data were collected and send for statistical analysis to a member of this international research team, then all results were analyzed, and manuscript was drafted by three members of this team.

3. Statistical Analysis

FP measurements have been tested for normal distribution using Q-Q plots. Both LM thicknesses, measured by US and histology, were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA test. P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. By extending the ANOVA method, we used each pair of Student's T test (<0.05, all pairs Tukey-Kramer test (<0.05) comparison with Best Hsus MCB (<0.05) and Dunnett’s (<0.05). Exploratory analysis was performed with partition with three splits, because no prior model existed. Pearson correlation was employed to find whether positive correlation exists between the two measurements, because data are normally distributed (Q-Q plots not seen). Area under the curve was performed with ROC curves. Analyses were conduct with the Statistical Package JMP 9 (SAS) and SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

4. Results

One hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients undergoing hysterectomy for LMs were enrolled in this study. Normal distribution was observed in the tree FIGO classification groups. The total enucleated LMs were 200: 62 fibroids in FIGO Classes 1&2, 73 in FIGO Classes 2&3, and 65 in FIGO Classes 5&6.

FPs near the endometrial cavity were considerably (P=0.0001) thicker than those of both intramural and subserous LMs measured by US ( versus and  mm) and histology ( versus and  mm), respectively.

Significant difference was observed between the three groups, for both measurements, using all tests mentioned above (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).

On exploratory analysis, a clear cut-off measurement at 2 mm (P=0.0001) was found between near the endometrium FPs and all other FPs for either US or histology measurements. Area under the curve was 0.949 for US and 0.953 for histology for endometrial cavity fibroids (Figure 2).

Correlation between ultrasound and histology measurements was near 1, indicating that ultrasound and histology measurements are positively correlated (0.954 P=0.000) (Pearson correlation).

5. Discussion

Authors have found that the FP thickness was significantly different according to LMs uterine position. The FP of the submucous LMs appears considerably thicker in comparison than those of both intramural and subserous LMs. These features of FP depending their localization were observed both in presurgical US and in the histological examinations and US and histological measurements were highly correlated. A major strength of this study compared to the previous one [26] is the large cohort of involved patients.

Submucosal fibroids have a statistically significant negative effect on clinical pregnancy rates as reported by a meta-analysis of 13 studies [22]; the study also showed a lesser extent of intramural fibroids on clinical pregnancy rates. About delivery rates, submucosal and intramural fibroids showed a negative impact. On the contrary, subserosal myomas did not showed any effect on clinical pregnancy rates and delivery rates.

A meta-analysis of Pritts et al. [23] showed that fibroids are generally linked to a statistically significant decrease in fertility, regarding clinical pregnancy and birth rates and, simultaneously, an increase in miscarriage rates. The submucosal fibroids have the greatest negative statistical correlation on clinical pregnancy rates, so intramural fibroids resulted in significantly lower birth rates and higher miscarriage rates.

Pritts et al. [23] concluded that both patients with submucosal and intramural fibroids have poorer reproductive outcomes compared to patients without fibroids.

Thus, submucous and intramural LMs are more involved for sterility and infertility cases due to alteration of uterine cavity and contractility, while subserosal fibroids do not seem to generate any obvious fertility issue.

These surgical conclusions conflicted with studies focusing on endometrial receptivity in uteri with submucosal fibroids, showing surgical removal of intramural fibroids with no improvement in outcomes. Rackow et al. [28] reported that endometrial receptivity markers significantly decrease in submucosal fibroids, while the same is evident for intramural fibroids [29], especially for the HOXA10 gene. After intramural myomectomies a statistically significant increase was observed by Unlu et al. [30] in these receptivity markers, but unfortunately they did not observe such an effect in the submucosal myomectomies. Overall, only these two studies exist in the endometrial receptivity and myomectomy. Although evidence is still minimal, we assume that one factor of improved implantation rates after removal of intramural and submucosal fibroids is the improvement of implantation profile. Although, preservation of pseudocapsule achieves no early postoperative complications and good fertility rates [31], new studies need to be performed in the role of fibroid pseudocapsule preservation and the implantation markers.

From the other side, many other theories have been developed until now for the improvement of fertility rates after submucosal myomectomy. Horne et al. [32] reviewed the theory, as the mechanical distortion of the endometrial cavity, the disruption of the junctional zone within the myometrial layer, the altered vasculature due to the abnormal expression of angiogenic factors, the inflammation mediated changes in the endometrium, and, as lastly new, the alteration of endometrial receptivity factors.

In view of the above surgical evidences, we could correlate the greater thickness of the FP in the submucous and then in the intramural LMs. Among the possible theories which have been proposed in order to explain how fibroids may impair fertility [8], although we do not have a clear explanation of why there is an increase in thickness in LMs in submucous and intramural LMs, we must consider this evidence and further study it.

Our theories formulated on pseudocapsule thickness potential impact in fertility for future investigation consider mechanical reasons and differences in genetic expression components.

The pseudocapsule surrounding fibroids consist of compressed myometrium containing nerves and blood vessels that continue into adjacent myometrium [33]. Uterine stroma might not allow development of intramural pseudocapsule as in fibroids near endometrial cavity. In addition, one of the most frequently observed endometrial histological changes surrounding submucous LMs is glandular atrophy and ulceration, affecting also the proximal and the distal part of the endometrium over LMs [8]. It is possible that the thickest FP of the submucous LMs will be implicated in the endometrial modification that will consistently reduce the female fertility. FP growth of submucous LMs could reduce and adversely affect the overlying endometrium, becoming atrophic. What is not clear is whether increasing of the FP thickness should increase also the amount of normal quota of neuroendocrine fibers [17]. Normally, both protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) and oxytocin demonstrated no significant differences in the density between the FP and adjacent normal myometrium, regardless of the fibroid location in the uterus. The neuroendocrine PGP9.5 immunoreactive nerve fibers may be involved in the pathophysiology of uterine LMs and affect muscle contractility, uterine peristalsis, and muscular healing.

From the other side, pseudocapsule vasculature present with disarray in vascular architecture with absence of vessel parallelism and variable intervascular distances. The different density of vessels per space indicated an abnormal vascular branching of pseudocapsule and some vascular walls without interruption indicated vessel tortuosity. There were vascular spaces, which did not communicate with other vessels (“cul-de-sac” vessels). All previous data present with geometrical characteristics of malignant neoplasm vessels [18]. From the other side, differences in the genetic profile are expressed between fibroids and adjacent endometrium. Angiogenesis promoters’ expression is reduced when compared with myometrium while the precursor of angiogenesis inhibitor has reduced expression relative to endometrium. That explains the reduced microvascular density in fibroids relative to endometrium [34]. Obviously, an extended microarray analysis between different location fibroids, its pseudocapsules, and adjacent endometrium need to be performed. Pseudocapsules at different locations need to be examined as different tissues. Given current data, pseudocapsule angiogenesis is increased, even more than nearby myometrium [35]. From these data this is mandated from myometrium but not the fibroid, while MED12 sequence results between pseudocapsule and fibroid, indicate the nontumor origin of the pseudocapsule [24]. In addition, solitary and multiple tumors should be analyzed in different sets, because multiple fibroids originate from MED-12 associated mechanisms while this is not the case for solitary ones [36].

For the importance of FP in myometrium muscle physiology, in case of submucous LMs, the surgical treatment could be not adequate in FP sparing, to save the LMs neurovascular bundle. Considering that the FP should be preserved during myomectomy procedure, the classical hysteroscopic slicing in the context of myometrium could not ensure a “myometrial sparing” approach and therefore the integrity of its pseudocapsule. Recently the “cold loop” hysteroscopic myomectomy was reported as a safe and effective procedure for the removal of submucous LMs with intramural development. Such technique allows identifying and sparing the FP (Figure 3) and the surrounding healthy myometrium mechanically, cutting the connective bridges of the FP anchoring the LM to the myometrium, without electricity use [6]. In a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of patients who underwent cold loop myomectomy, Mazzon et al. reported a postsurgical synechiae rate of 4.29%, of which 3.94 were light synechiae removed with the tip of hysteroscope during the follow-up hysteroscopy, 2 months after the surgery. The authors reported that preservation of FP and of myometrial integrity was associated with very few surgical complications and with enhanced healing, reducing risk of uterine rupture, and good fertility rates and delivery outcomes [37].

Concerning intramural LMs, studies have already been published that highlight the importance of intracapsular technique to preserve the myometrium integrity during enucleation of LMs, sparing pseudocapsule (Figure 4) [5, 31]. At the light of the study results and of previous report [38], the authors affirmed that the FP should be always preserved, as much as possible, during the myomectomy procedure, to have a better myometrial cicatrization and a better outcome on successive fertility [17, 31].

6. Conclusions

Considering the increasing interest on the LMs and their fertility implications, the FP evaluation could open new perspectives in clinical research and the treatment of uterine myomas, due to its neuroendocrine and biological role on myometrium and on postsurgical myometrial healing. Our results confirm the relevant difference of FP thickness, particularly thickened under the endometrium for submucous LMs. As the submucous LMs are scientifically largely described as cause of sterility and infertility, FP should be more investigated for possible importance of its preservation in order enhance fertility, also in correlation to postmyomectomy healing and avoiding, i.e., intrauterine adhesion. Future studies should be focused on the correlation between the LMs volume and FP thickness, its amount of neurofibers, and its role on medical, surgery, and fertility outcomes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors certify that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this article and they reveal any financial interests or connections, direct or indirect, or other situations that might raise the question of bias in the work reported or the conclusions, implications, or opinions stated, including pertinent commercial or other sources of funding for the individual authors or for the associated departments or organizations, personal relationships, or direct academic competition.


  1. R. Sparic, L. Mirkovic, A. Malvasi, and A. Tinelli, “Epidemiology of uterine myomas: a review,” International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 424–435, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  2. T. F. Baskett, “Hysterectomy: Evolution and trends,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Donnez and M.-M. Dolmans, “Uterine fibroid management: From the present to the future,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 665–686, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. R. Cardozo, A. D. Clark, N. K. Banks, M. B. Henne, B. J. Stegmann, and J. H. Segars, “The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 206, no. 3, pp. e1–e9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Tinelli, B. S. Hurst, G. Hudelist et al., “Laparoscopic myomectomy focusing on the myoma pseudocapsule: Technical and outcome reports,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 427–435, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. I. Mazzon, A. Favilli, M. Grasso, S. Horvath, G. C. Di Renzo, and S. Gerli, “Is cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy a safe and effective technique for the treatment of submucous myomas with intramural development? A series of 1434 surgical procedures,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 792–798, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Tinelli, A. Malvasi, O. A. Mynbaev et al., “The surgical outcome of intracapsular cesarean myomectomy. A match control study,” The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. I. Zepiridis, G. F. Grimbizis, and B. C. Tarlatzis, “Infertility and uterine fibroids,” Best Practice Research Clinical Obstetrics Gynaecology, vol. 34, pp. 66–73, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Vimercati, M. Scioscia, F. Lorusso et al., “Do uterine fibroids affect IVF outcomes?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 686–691, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. G. Oliveira, V. G. Abdelmassih, M. P. Diamond, D. Dozortsev, N. R. Melo, and R. Abdelmassih, “Impact of subserosal and intramural uterine fibroids that do not distort the endometrial cavity on the outcome of in vitro fertilization- intracytoplasmic sperm injection,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 582–587, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Yan, L. Ding, C. Li, Y. Wang, R. Tang, and Z.-J. Chen, “Effect of fibroids not distorting the endometrial cavity on the outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment: A retrospective cohort study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 716–721, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. H. Saravelos, J. Yan, H. Rehmani, and T.-C. Li, “The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3274–3279, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Yarali and O. Bukulmez, “The effect of intramural and subserous uterine fibroids on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in patients having intracytoplasmic sperm injection,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 266, no. 1, pp. 30–33, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. A. Horcajadas, E. Goyri, M. A. Higón et al., “Endometrial receptivity and implantation are not affected by the presence of uterine intramural leiomyomas: A clinical and functional genomics analysis,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 3490–3498, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Tinelli, R. Sparić, S. Kadija et al., “Myomas: Anatomy and related issues,” Minerva Ginecologica, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 261–273, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. Tinelli, A. Malvasi, C. Cavallotti et al., “The management of fibroids based on immunohistochemical studies of their pseudocapsules,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1241–1247, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Tinelli and A. Malvasi, “Uterine fibroid pseudocapsule,” Uterine Myoma, Myomectomy and Minimally Invasive Treatments, pp. 73–93, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Malvasi, A. Tinelli, S. Rahimi et al., “A three-dimensional morphological reconstruction of uterine leiomyoma pseudocapsule vasculature by the Allen-Cahn mathematical model,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 359–363, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Malvasi, A. Tinelli, C. Cavallotti et al., “Distribution of Substance P (SP) and Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) in pseudocapsules of uterine fibroids,” Peptides, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 327–332, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Malvasi, C. Cavallotti, G. Nicolardi et al., “NT, NPY and PGP 9.5 presence in myomeytrium and in fibroid pseudocapsule and their possible impact on muscular physiology,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 177–181, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Malvasi, C. Cavallotti, G. Nicolardi et al., “The opioid neuropeptides in uterine fibroid pseudocapsules: A putative association with cervical integrity in human reproduction,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 982–988, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. V. Delgado, A. T. McManus, and J. P. Chambers, “Exogenous administration of substance P enhances wound healing in a novel skin-injury model,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 230, no. 4, pp. 271–280, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Malvasi, A. Tinelli, C. Cavallotti, S. Bettocchi, G. C. Di Renzo, and M. Stark, “Substance P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the lower uterine segment in first and repeated cesarean sections,” Peptides, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2052–2059, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Di Tommaso, S. Massari, A. Malvasi et al., “Selective genetic analysis of myoma pseudocapsule and potential biological impact on uterine fibroid medical therapy,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Tinelli, B. S. Hurst, L. Mettler et al., “Ultrasound evaluation of uterine healing after laparoscopic intracapsular myomectomy: An observational study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2664–2670, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Tinelli, O. A. Mynbaev, L. Mettler et al., “A combined ultrasound and histologic approach for analysis of uterine fibroid pseudocapsule thickness,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1177–1186, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Somigliana, P. Vercellini, and R. Daguati, “Fibroids and female reproduction: A critical analysis of the evidence,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 465–476, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. B. W. Rackow and H. S. Taylor, “Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 2027–2034, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Makker, M. M. Goel, D. Nigam et al., “Endometrial expression of homeobox genes and cell adhesion molecules in infertile women with intramural fibroids during window of implantation,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 435–444, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Unlu, O. Celik, N. Celik, and B. Otlu, “Expression of endometrial receptivity genes increase after myomectomy of intramural leiomyomas not distorting the endometrial cavity,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Tinelli, O. A. Mynbaev, R. Sparic et al., “Angiogenesis and vascularization of uterine leiomyoma: Clinical value of pseudocapsule containing peptides and neurotransmitters,” Current Protein & Peptide Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 129–139, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. W. Horne and H. O. D. Critchley, “The effect of uterine fibroids on embryo implantation,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 483–489, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Sun, L. Zhu, X. Huang, C. Zhou, and X. Zhang, “Immunohistochemical localization of nerve fibers in the pseudocapsule of fibroids,” European Journal of Histochemistry, vol. 58, no. 2, p. 2249, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Weston, A. C. Trajstman, C. E. Gargett, U. Manuelpillai, B. J. Vollenhoven, and P. A. Rogers, “Fibroids display an anti-angiogenic gene expression profile when compared with adjacent myometrium,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 541–549, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Di Tommaso, S. Massari, A. Malvasi, M. P. Bozzetti, and A. Tinelli, “Gene expression analysis reveals an angiogenic profile in uterine leiomyoma pseudocapsule,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 380–387, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. N. S. Osinovskaya, O. V. Malysheva, N. Y. Shved et al., “Frequency and spectrum of MED12 Exon 2 mutations in multiple versus solitary uterine leiomyomas from Russian patients,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 509–515, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. I. Mazzon, A. Favilli, P. Cocco et al., “Does cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy reduce intrauterine adhesions? A retrospective study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 294–298, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. I. Kosmas, A. Malvasi, O. A. Mynbaev, M. Y. Eliseeva, and A. Tinelli, “Uterine fibroid pseudocapsule thickness differs among fibroid location: a pilot study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 29, 1, pp. M14–M0571, 2014. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Andrea Tinelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.