BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 3054316 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3054316

Quantitative Evaluation of the Relationship between T-Wave-Based Features and Serum Potassium Level in Real-World Clinical Practice

Academic Editor: Dirk Bandorski
Received02 Sep 2018
Accepted25 Nov 2018
Published18 Dec 2018

Abstract

Background. Proper management of hyperkalemia that leads to fatal cardiac arrhythmia has become more important because of the increased prevalence of hyperkalemia-prone diseases. Although T-wave changes in hyperkalemia are well known, their usefulness is debatable. We evaluated how well T-wave-based features of electrocardiograms (ECGs) are correlated with estimated serum potassium levels using ECG data from real-world clinical practice. Methods. We collected ECGs from a local ECG repository (MUSE™) from 1994 to 2017 and extracted the ECG waveforms. Of about 1 million reports, 124,238 were conducted within 5 minutes before or after blood collection for serum potassium estimation. We randomly selected 500 ECGs and two evaluators measured the amplitude (T-amp) and right slope of the T-wave (T-right slope) on five lead waveforms (V3, V4, V5, V6, and II). Linear correlations of T-amp, T-right slope, and their normalized feature (T-norm) with serum potassium levels were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Results. Pearson correlation coefficients for T-wave-based features with serum potassium between the two evaluators were 0.99 for T-amp and 0.97 for T-right slope. The coefficient for the association between T-amp, T-right slope, and T-norm, and serum potassium ranged from -0.22 to 0.02. In the normal ECG subgroup (normal ECG or otherwise normal ECG), there was no correlation between T-wave-based features and serum potassium level. Conclusions. T-wave-based features were not correlated with serum potassium level, and their use in real clinical practice is currently limited.

1. Introduction

Hyperkalemia is an electrolyte derangement that can lead to fatal cardiac arrhythmia. Proper management of hyperkalemia has become more important because of the increased prevalence of hyperkalemia-prone diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease [1]. Hyperkalemia and hypokalemia or fluctuations in potassium levels are associated with an increased risk of mortality and life-threatening arrhythmias [26]. Moreover, morbidity, hospitalization, and death can follow even minor changes in potassium level in patients with renal or cardiac disease [1].

Many of the key drugs used for disease treatment alter serum potassium levels. Medications targeted at the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have been the mainstay of treatment for cardiovascular disease or for the prevention of chronic kidney disease progression. The Eighth Joint National Committee guidelines recommend aldosterone receptor blockers as key drugs for secondary prevention of heart failure because aldosterone antagonists can reduce mortality due to heart failure [7, 8]. However, it is ironic that the use of aldosterone antagonists increases mortality due to hyperkalemia, which emphasizes the importance of proper management of hyperkalemia [9]. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are other medications that cause severe hyperkalemia but are administered without proper electrolyte level monitoring. In addition, other risks are associated with potassium-rich foods, which can often be fatal in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Alterations in electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns are known to be directly associated with serum potassium levels [10, 11]. Mild to moderate hyperkalemia can lead to PR interval prolongation and the development of peak T-waves. Severe hyperkalemia can cause the QRS complex to widen. Flattened or inverted T-waves, a U wave, ST depression, and a wide PR interval are observed in patients with hypokalemia. Because of prolonged ventricular repolarization, a prominent U wave occurs, or a prolonged QT interval can be observed when U waves are superimposed on a T-wave.

Changes in ECG patterns due to an elevated potassium level are clear in the experimental setting. However, many studies have reported that these patterns are not reliable clinically [12]. Some previous studies have reported that the performance of potassium level estimation using ECG information by physicians was poor. The sensitivities of hyperkalemia detection by two physicians were 0.43 and 0.34 [13]; even when subjects had moderate to severe hyperkalemia (potassium level >6.5 mmol/L), the sensitivities were only 0.62 and 0.55. According to another retrospective review, T-wave changes assessed by a cardiologist were also not well correlated with serum potassium level, and most T-wave changes were nonspecific [12].

Based on known T-wave patterns, however, other studies have attempted to determine potassium levels using machine learning [1416]. According to these studies involving patients undergoing hemodialysis, single-lead ECG data (V3, V4, or V5) are as precise as 12-lead ECG data with reported absolute errors of 0.5±0.42 and 0.46±0.39 mmol/L [15, 16], respectively. These studies suggest that ECG patterns, especially the shape of the T-wave, could be helpful in determining serum potassium levels in clinical settings. However, these studies have the limitation that the model that was employed was developed and validated with a limited number of patients (26 patients for the development and 19 for the validation), and the subjects were restricted to patients on hemodialysis.

Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, no study has directly evaluated how well T-wave-based features correlate with serum potassium level in the real clinical practice setting. In the present study, we conducted quantitative evaluation of ECGs captured in real-world clinical practice to determine whether T-wave-based features are useful for estimating serum potassium level in general clinical practice.

2. Methods

The requirement for informed consent was waived and the study was approved by the Ajou University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) (IRB number AJIRB-MED-MDB-17-273). We only used de-identified data and analyzed the information retrospectively.

2.1. Data Source

We used a clinical research database that included patient demographics, diagnoses, drug prescriptions, and laboratory test results extracted from the electronic health records of a tertiary teaching hospital in Korea (Ajou University Hospital) between September 1994 and December 2017 (Figure 1). The database included 134,011,566 prescriptions, 32,956,672 diagnoses, and 278,011,281 laboratory test results from 2,940,379 patients.

The ECG typically consists of alphanumeric values and waveform graphs (Figure 2(a)). Alphanumeric values included demographics, the patient identification number, date of electrocardiography, and ECG parameters (RR, QT intervals, etc.). Waveform graphs are time series data representing changes in electronic signals from the heart over a few seconds. After all data from the ECGs, which were stored in PDF format in the local ECG repository (MUSE™ system), were collected, the part containing the waveform was extracted and transformed to SVG format [17]. Subsequently, we converted the x- and y-coordinates of vector images into an equidistant time series (500 data points per second, 500 Hz) via linear interpolation to retain a data format similar to that obtained from the sensor directly.

Of about 1 million collected ECGs, 124,238 were obtained within 5 minutes (time window) before or after blood collection for serum potassium estimation. Of these, we randomly selected 500 ECGs for manual evaluation.

2.2. Data Preprocessing

A web-based tool was developed to measure amplitude (T-amp; the difference in millivolts (mV) between the peak and the end of the T-wave) and the right slope of the T-wave (T-right slope; the slope at the steepest part of the descending portion of the T wave). This tool helped us evaluate and efficiently manage the measurement results of each ECG signal (Figure 2(b)) quickly. The tool displays a 3-second ECG waveform, allowing the user to measure T-amp and T-right slope. Regarding the 500 selected ECGs, T-amp and T-right slope on the waveforms of five leads (V3, V4, V5, V6, and II) were manually and independently measured by two evaluators using this tool.

Waveforms in the ECGs usually included two or three beats. Evaluators selected the beat of the baseline that was most stable and had less noise. T-amp and T-right slope were measured on selected beats. Measurements of differences between the two evaluators that were greater than mean+2×standard deviation (SD) or less than mean–2×SD were excluded from further analysis (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). The degree of correlation between the two evaluators was determined by Pearson correlation coefficient analysis.

2.3. Feature Extraction

We excluded ECGs, which had discrepancies in their interpretation between the two evaluators in one or more leads. T-amp and T-right slope values measured by the two evaluators were averaged and used as final values of T-amp and T-right slope of corresponding ECGs. According to the following formula, which was used to normalize features for estimating serum potassium level in a study by Zachi et al., [16] two features were normalized and integrated into one feature:

First, we measured or calculated the three features (T-amp, T-right slope, and T-norm) in each lead of the ECGs. Second, the lead that had the most prominent T-wave (the largest T-amp) among V3, V4, and V6, and II, named Pt, was selected and used as the representative feature of each ECG.

2.4. Feature Evaluation and Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance and Post-Hoc Tukey’s test were conducted to evaluate the difference between measured T-amp and T-right slope values between different leads. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

We evaluated the linear correlation between T-wave features and the actual serum potassium level using Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. To exclude the effect of underlying diseases, which can affect cardiac rhythm, we conducted subgroup analysis in which only ECG results showing normal ECG (n=191) or otherwise normal ECG (n=40)—the normal ECG subgroup—was included. The detailed interpretation lists of otherwise normal ECG and the count per interpretation are provided in Table S1.

MS-SQL 2017 (Microsoft Corp.) was used for data management, and R (version 3.2.2, Foundation for Statistical Computing) was used for data preprocessing and statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Datasets for Analysis

T-amp and T-right slope from 500 ECGs were measured by two evaluators. The measurements between two evaluators were well correlated in terms of both T-amp and T-right, as shown in Figures 2(c) and 2(d). After excluding ECGs that were discrepant between the two evaluators, data from 330 ECGs (including 231 ECGs from the normal ECG subgroup) were finally selected. The baseline characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1.


VariableTotalNormal ECG subgroup

No. of patients, n330231
Age (years), mean±SD47.6±17.245.9±15.1
Male sex, n (%)140 (42.4)89 (38.5)
Potassium level (mmol/L), mean±SD4.17±0.394.35±0.59
No. of normal sinus rhythms, n (%)254 (77.0)191 (82.7)
No. of normal ECG, n (%)231 (70.0)231 (100.0)
Amplitude of T-wave (mV), mean±SD
 Lead II0.23±0.110.24±0.10
 Lead V30.43±0.240.42±0.23
 Lead V40.40±0.220.39±0.20
 Lead V50.38±0.190.37±0.17
 Lead V60.32±0.160.32±0.14
Gradient of T-wave (mV/s), mean±SD
 Lead II-3.06±1.51-3.1±1.39
 Lead V3-5.13±3.18-5.02±3.07
 Lead V4-5.02±3.13-4.93±2.88
 Lead V5-4.81±2.78-4.78±2.49
 Lead V6-4.21±2.30-4.24±2.07

SD: standard deviation; no.: number; ECG: electrocardiogram. Normal ECG or otherwise normal ECG.

Absolute values of measured T-amp and T-right slope were highest in lead V3 and lowest in lead II for both the total number of subjects (n=330) and for the normal ECG subgroup (n=231). The values were significantly higher in precordial lead than in lead II in both groups (p<0.001).

3.2. Linear Correlation between T-Wave-Based Features and the Serum Potassium Level

Pearson correlation coefficients of T-amp with the serum potassium level in all the leads indicated a positive correlation but the coefficient values were low and ranged from 0.08 to 0.19 (Table 2). In contrast, T-right slope and T-norm had a negative correlation but their coefficient values were also low (T-right slope: range -0.11 to -0.02; T-norm: range -0.22 to -0.14). Correlation degrees were generally the lowest at lead II and the highest at Pt, the lead that had the most prominent T-wave. However, Pt also showed a poor linear correlation with the serum potassium level (Figures 3(a)3(f)). Lead V3 was mainly selected (53.3%) for Pt, followed by leads V5 (15.8%), V4 (13.9%), V6 (13.6%), and II (0.03%).


GroupFeatureIIV3V4V5V6Pt

TotalT-amp0.080.180.170.170.130.19
T-right slope-0.02-0.12-0.10-0.12-0.07-0.11
T-norm-0.14-0.19-0.21-0.21-0.18-0.22

Normal ECG subgroupT-amp0.050.150.150.150.110.16
T-right slope-0.00-0.13-0.10-0.11-0.07-0.12
T-norm-0.08-0.15-0.16-0.16-0.13-0.17

T-amp: amplitude; T-right slope: right slope of the T-wave; T-norm: normalized feature. Normal ECG or otherwise normal ECG.
3.3. Linear Correlation in Normal ECG Subgroup

After excluding abnormal ECGs (only normal ECGs or otherwise normal ECGs), the results showed the same pattern as those from total number of ECGs selected; similar to the results in the total number of ECGs, the Pearson correlation coefficients of T-amp were positive and those of T-right slope and T-norm were negative in all leads. However, there was no correlation between T-wave-based features and serum potassium level in this subgroup as coefficient values ranged from -0.17 to 0.16 (Figure 3 and Table 2).

4. Discussion

This study directly evaluated the degree of correlation between blood potassium concentration and T-wave-based features of ECGs. Manually reviewed T-wave-based features of ECGs conducted in daily practice did not correlate with serum potassium level. Moreover, in the normal ECG subgroup, we did not detect any correlation.

In this study, the T-amp and T-right slope from the waveforms of five leads (V3, V4, V5, V6, and II) were selected and evaluated. The waveforms of the four leads (V3-V6) were used in previous studies [16] for estimating the serum potassium level. Lead II is most popularly used in patient monitoring. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the possibility of applying the features to a clinical setting where patients are monitored, such as in an intensive care unit.

The pattern of values, which was extracted as features (T-amp and T-right slope from lead II, V3, V4, V5, and V6), showed well-known patterns. It is known that the amplitude of T wave is maximal in lead V3 [18]. In addition, T wave in the precordial leads (<10 mm or <1 mV) is usually greater than that in the limb (<5 mm or 0.5 mV) leads [18]. In our results, only less than 2% in the total patient group (6 in lead II, 5 in lead V3, 5 in lead V4, 1 in lead V5, and 0 in lead V6 among 330 ECGs) and the normal ECG subgroup (2 in lead II, 4 in lead V3, 1 in lead V4, 0 in lead V5, and 0 in lead V6 among 231 normal ECGs) exceeded 0.5 mV in the limb lead or 1 mV in the precordial leads, respectively. Furthermore, the average value of measured T-amp was highest in V3 and that of precordial leads was significantly higher than that of the limb lead (lead II) in one-way analysis of variance and in Post-Hoc Tukey’s test (p<0.001). It could signify that the extracted values are reliable and could be used for further analysis.

Similar to the findings of previous research conducted in clinical settings, T-wave-based features had no clear relationship with serum potassium level. According to a prior study, changes in ECG pattern, which are suggestive of hyperkalemia, were noted in only 46% of patients whose potassium level ranged between 6 and 9.3 mEq/L [19]. Several other case reports also supported the finding that significant ECG changes are not related to markedly elevated potassium levels [20, 21]. In addition, patients we meet in daily practice have diverse confounding factors, such as medications, comorbidities, and demographics. Because these confounding factors might alter ECG data, they make discovering patterns that are clearly associated with serum potassium level more difficult. Because of this, the sensitivities of detecting hyperkalemia by two physicians in an emergency department were very low at 0.43 and 0.34 [13].

In the subgroup analysis of normal ECG or otherwise normal ECG, the results showed the same pattern of no correlation between T-wave features and serum potassium level. We believe that this cannot be due to contamination by abnormal ECGs. Although we selectively applied the serum potassium level determination model to normal ECG, it might be difficult to get reliable performance.

Zachi et al. also attempted to estimate serum potassium level based on T-wave features, and the estimation performance decreased when the developed model was applied to another independent test group [16]. Higher performance was observed when the estimation model was applied to the patients who were used for model development but at different time points. This finding suggests that unique ECG patterns are caused by different characteristics of each patient; therefore, a personalized model rather than one that can be generally applied should be developed.

The deep learning approach could be an alternative model. Deep learning, a machine learning model, has emerged as the most popular design in various applications, including computer vision and natural language processing. In particular, convolutional neural networks can act as feature extractors from data even in the absence of prior knowledge of the domain [22], and the recurrent neural network model identifies temporal dependencies in time series problems [22]. Feature extraction and time dependencies can be effectively captured by combining both models. If the deep learning-based model is used, more diverse and complex features can be extracted from ECG.

Our study has some limitations. First, T-amp and T-right slope were measured manually rather than automatically because there have been issues with determining the end of the T-wave. Because the end of the T-wave transits very slowly from around the signal, locating the end of the T-wave is one of the most challenging issues in the evaluation of the ECG waveform [2325]. By having two independent evaluators perform the measurements and then using only accordant results, we attempted to ensure the reliability of our results. Second, the length of the waveform used in the study was short (about 3 seconds). Our data might be relatively limited and less tolerant of noise or artifacts. Finally, we did not consider other ECG patterns, such as QRS widening or P wave flattening, which can also be observed in hyperkalemia. However, T-wave change is known as the most representative and earliest sign of hyperkalemia.

5. Conclusions

As shown by findings from previous research, our study also showed that T-wave-based features were not correlated with serum potassium levels in real-world clinical practice in the Korean population; even in the normal ECG subgroup, we could not detect any correlation. Therefore, the use of these features in the estimation of serum potassium level in real clinical practice is very limited.

Data Availability

Data of the measurement of T-wave-based features used to support the findings of this study are included in the supplementary information file.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant nos. HI16C0982 and HI17C0970).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Data S1. Values of T-wave-based features and the corresponding serum potassium values.

Supplementary 2. Table S1. The detailed interpretation lists of otherwise normal ECG and the count per interpretation.

References

  1. N. Jain, S. Kotla, B. B. Little et al., “Predictors of hyperkalemia and death in patients with cardiac and renal disease,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1510–1513, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. D. Weiner and C. S. Wingo, “Hyperkalemia: A potential silent killer,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1535–1543, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  3. F. J. Gennari, “Hypokalemia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 7, pp. 451–458, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. P. Kovesdy, “Management of hyperkalaemia in chronic kidney disease,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 653–662, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Pitt and P. Rossignol, “The association between serum potassium and mortality in patients with hypertension: 'a wake-up call',” European Heart Journal, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 113–115, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. L. Krogager, C. Torp-Pedersen, R. N. Mortensen et al., “Short-term mortality risk of serum potassium levels in hypertension: A retrospective analysis of nationwide registry data,” European Heart Journal, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 104–112, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  7. P. A. James, S. Oparil, B. L. Carter et al., “2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8),” JAMA, vol. 311, no. 5, pp. 507–520, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. L, S. PE, B. RW et al., “KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease,” Kidney International Supplements, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. D. N. Juurlink, M. M. Mamdani, D. S. Lee et al., “Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study,” N Engl J Med, vol. 351, no. 6, pp. 543–551, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  10. N. El-Sherif and G. Turitto, “Electrolyte disorders and arrhythmogenesis,” Cardiology Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 233–245, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. M. Laks and S. R. Elek, “The effect of potassium on the electrocardiogram: clinical and transmembrane correlations.,” British Journal of Diseases of the Chest, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 573–586, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. T. Montague, J. R. Ouellette, and G. K. Buller, “Retrospective review of the frequency of ECG changes in hyperkalemia,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 324–330, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. D. Wrenn, C. M. Slovis, and B. S. Slovis, “The ability of physicians to predict hyperkalemia from the ECG,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1229–1232, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. J. Dillon, C. V. Desimone, Y. Sapir et al., “Noninvasive potassium determination using a mathematically processed ECG: Proof of concept for a novel "blood-less, blood test",” Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. Corsi, M. Cortesi, G. Callisesi et al., “Noninvasive quantification of blood potassium concentration from ECG in hemodialysis patients,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Z. I. Attia, C. V. DeSimone, J. J. Dillon et al., “Novel bloodless potassium determination using a signal-processed single-lead ECG,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e002746, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Chung, J. Choi, J. Jang et al., “Construction of an Electrocardiogram Database Including 12 Lead Waveforms,” Health Informatics Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 242, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. Lin, S. G. Teo, and K. K. Poh, “Electrocardiographic T wave abnormalities,” Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 606–610, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. G. Acker, J. P. Johnson, P. M. Palevsky, and A. Greenberg, “Hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients: Causes, adequacy of treatment, and results of an attempt to improve physician compliance with published therapy guidelines,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 158, no. 8, pp. 917–924, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Aslam, E. A. Friedman, and O. Ifudu, “Electrocardiography is unreliable in detecting potentially lethal hyperkalaemia in haemodialysis patients,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation , vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1639–1642, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Martinez-Vea, A. Bardají, C. Garcia, and J. A. Oliver, “Severe hyperkalemia with minimal electrocardiographic manifestations: A report of seven cases,” Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. A. Vila, Y. Gang, J. M. R. Presedo, M. Fernândez-Delgado, S. Barro, and M. Malik, “A new approach for TU complex characterization,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 764–772, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. R. Vázquez-Seisdedos, J. Neto, E. J. Marañón Reyes, A. Klautau, and R. C. Limão de Oliveira, “New approach for T-wave end detection on electrocardiogram: Performance in noisy conditions,” Biomedical Engineering Online, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 77, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. P. V. Madeiro, W. B. Nicolson, P. C. Cortez et al., “New approach for T-wave peak detection and T-wave end location in 12-lead paced ECG signals based on a mathematical model,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1105–1115, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Dukyong Yoon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

840 Views | 269 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder