Review Article

Biatrial versus Isolated Left Atrial Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Risk of bias in observational studies.

Study Selection Comparability Outcome Quality score
Assignment for treatmentRepresentative treatment groupRepresentative reference groupComparable for 1, 2, 3, Comparable for 5, 6, 7, Assessment of outcomeAdequate follow-up

Gualis et al. 2016NoYesYes1, 25, 8YesNo★★★★★
Liu et al., 2015NoYesYes1, 25, 8NoYes★★★★★
Henn et al., 2015NoYesYesNR5, 6YesNo★★★★
Pecha et al., 2014NoYesYes1, 25, 8YesNR★★★★★
Jiang, 2014NoYesYes1, 28YesNo★★★★
Soni et al., 2013NoYesYes1, 28NoNo★★★
Pecha et al., 2014NoYesYes1, 25, 6YesYes★★★★★★
Onorati et al., 2011NoYesYes1, 25, 6, 8YesYes★★★★★★★
Kim et al., 2011NoYesYes1, 27, 8YesNo★★★★★
Breda et al., 2011NoYesYes1, 26, 8NoNo★★★★
Albage et al., 2011NoYesYes1, 27YesNo★★★★
McCarthy et al., 2010NoYesYes1, 28YesYes★★★★★★
Deneke et al., 2009NoYesYes1, 46, 8YesYes★★★★★★
Geuzebroek et al., 2008NoYesYes1, 25NoYes★★★★
Deneke et al., 2007NoYesYes1, 48YesYes★★★★★
Ryan et al., 2004NoYesYesNR5, 6, 7, 8YesNo★★★★★
Guden et al., 2003NoYesYes1, 2, 3NRYesYes★★★★★
Takami et al., 1999NoYesYes1, 2, 35, 7, 8YesYes★★★★★★★

NR: no report; comparability variables: 1 = age; 2 = gender; 3 = body mass index; 4 = type of AF; 5 = Euro score; 6 = preoperative antiarrhythmic drugs; 7 = anatomic complexity (more than one artery and/or vein); 8 = single surgeon.