Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2018, Article ID 4786329, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4786329
Research Article

Variability in Ultrasound Backscatter Induced by Trabecular Microstructure Deterioration in Cancellous Bone

1Department of Electronic Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
2Institute of Acoustics, Tongji University, No. 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
3State Key Laboratory of ASIC and System, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
4Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) of Shanghai, Shanghai 200032, China
5Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Chengcheng Liu; nc.ude.ijgnot@uilgnehcgnehc and Dean Ta; nc.ude.naduf@adt

Received 26 October 2017; Accepted 1 January 2018; Published 29 January 2018

Academic Editor: Weibao Qiu

Copyright © 2018 Xingxing Chou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Vico, V. E. Novikov, J. M. Very, and C. Alexandre, “Bone histomorphometric comparison of rat tibial metaphysis after 7-day tail suspension vs. 7-day spaceflight,” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Grimm, J. Grosse, M. Wehland et al., “The impact of microgravity on bone in humans,” Bone, vol. 87, pp. 44–56, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Khosla and B. L. Riggs, “Pathophysiology of age-related bone loss and osteoporosis,” Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1015–1030, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Y. Lau and X. Guo, “A Review on Current Osteoporosis Research: With Special Focus on Disuse Bone Loss,” Journal of Osteoporosis, vol. 2011, Article ID 293808, 6 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. P. Nagaraja and D. Risin, “The current state of bone loss research: data from spaceflight and microgravity simulators,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 1001–1008, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. D. Sibonga, “Spaceflight-induced bone loss: Is there an Osteoporosis Risk?” Current Osteoporosis Reports, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 92–98, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. K. Hoffmeister, A. P. Holt, and S. C. Kaste, “Effect of the cortex on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of cancellous bone,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 56, no. 19, article no. 006, pp. 6243–6255, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. K. Hoffmeister, D. P. Johnson, J. A. Janeski et al., “Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone in vitro using three different apparent backscatter parameters in the frequency range 0.6-15.0 MHz,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1442–1452, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. H. Chong, B. K. Poh, N. A. Jamil, N. A. Kamaruddin, and P. Deurenberg, “Radial quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Intermethod agreement for bone status assessment in children,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 232876, 7 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D.-A. Ta, G.-H. Zhou, W.-Q. Wang, and J.-G. Yu, “Measurement of Spectral Maximum Shift of Ultrasonic Backscatter Signals in Cancellous Bone,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, pp. 2703–2706, Shanghai, China, January 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Ta, W. Wang, K. Huang, Y. Wang, and L. H. Le, “Analysis of frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient in cancellous bone,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 4083–4090, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Li, D. Liu, K. Xu, D. Ta, L. H. Le, and W. Wang, “Transverse and Oblique Long Bone Fracture Evaluation by Low Order Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Simulation Study,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 3083141, 10 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. K. Hoffmeister, A. R. Wilson, M. J. Gilbert, and M. E. Sellers, “A backscatter difference technique for ultrasonic bone assessment,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 4069–4076, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. C. Liu, D. A. Ta, and W. Q. Wang, “Effect of trabecular bone material properties on ultrasonic backscattering signals,” Chinese Journal of Acoustics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  15. K. A. Wear, “Ultrasonic scattering from cancellous bone: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1432–1441, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Hosokawa, “Numerical analysis of variability in ultrasound propagation properties induced by trabecular microstructure in cancellous bone,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 738–747, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Apostolopoulos and D. Deligianni, “Influence of microarchitecture on cancellous bone ultrasonic backscatter,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Scattering Theory and Biomedical Engineering, pp. 211–217, September 2007. View at Scopus
  18. B. K. Hoffmeister, C. I. Jones III, G. J. Caldwell, and S. C. Kaste, “Ultrasonic characterization of cancellous bone using apparent integrated backscatter,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, no. 11, article no. 002, pp. 2715–2727, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Liu, D. Ta, F. Fujita et al., “The relationship between ultrasonic backscatter and trabecular anisotropic microstructure in cancellous bone,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 115, no. 6, Article ID 064906, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Liu, T. Tang, F. Xu et al., “Signal of Interest Selection Standard for Ultrasonic Backscatter in Cancellous Bone Evaluation,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2714–2721, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Liu, H. Han, D. Ta, and W. Wang, “Effect of selected signals of interest on ultrasonic backscattering measurement in cancellous bones,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1310–1316, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. K. Hoffmeister, J. A. McPherson, M. R. Smathers, P. L. Spinolo, and M. E. Sellers, “Ultrasonic backscatter from cancellous bone: The apparent backscatter transfer function,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 2115–2125, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. A. Wear, “Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter from human trabecular bone: Theory and experiment,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 3659–2664, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. A. Wear, A. P. Stuber, and J. C. Reynolds, “Relationships of ultrasonic backscatter with ultrasonic attenuation, sound speed and bone mineral density in human calcaneus,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1311–1316, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Smolíková, M. P. M. P. Wachowiak, and J. M. J. M. Zurada, “An information-theoretic approach to estimating ultrasound backscatter characteristics.,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 355–370, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Wolff, The Law of Bone Remodelling, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Ramtani, J. M. Garcia, and M. Doblare, “Computer simulation of an adaptive damage-bone remodeling law applied to three unit-bone bars structure,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 259–273, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. M. Frost, “Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 175–188, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Hosokawa, “Effect of porosity distribution in the propagation direction on ultrasound waves through cancellous bone,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1320–1328, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Luo, J. J. Kaufman, A. Chiabrera et al., “Computational methods for ultrasonic bone assessment,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 823–830, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Hosokawa, “Development of a numerical cancellous bone model for finite-difference time-domain simulations of ultrasound propagation,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1219–1233, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. P. Gilbert, P. Guyenne, and J. Li, “Numerical investigation of ultrasonic attenuation through 2D trabecular bone structures reconstructed from CT scans and random realizations,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. Sreenivasan, P. T. Tu, M. Dickinson et al., “Computer modelling integrated with micro-CT and material testing provides additional insight to evaluate bone treatments: Application to a beta-glycan derived whey protein mice model,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 68, pp. 9–20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Litniewski, “Statistics of envelope of high-frequency ultrasonic backscatter from trabecular bone: Simulation study,” Archives of Acoustics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 349–360, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. J. Gibson, “The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 317–328, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Haïat, F. Padilla, F. Peyrin, and P. Laugier, “Variation of ultrasonic parameters with microstructure and material properties of trabecular bone: A 3D model simulation,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 665–674, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Virieux, “SH- wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity- stress finite-difference method.,” Geophysics, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1933–1942, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Chaffaí, F. Peyrin, S. Nuzzo, R. Porcher, G. Berger, and P. Laugier, “Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone using transmission and backscatter measurements: Relationships to density and microstructure,” Bone, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 229–237, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. O. Riekkinen, M. A. Hakulinen, J. Töyräs, and J. S. Jurvelin, “Spatial variation of acoustic properties is related with mechanical properties of trabecular bone,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 52, no. 23, pp. 6961–6968, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y.-Q. Jiang, C.-C. Liu, R.-Y. Li et al., “Analysis of apparent integrated backscatter coefficient and backscattered spectral centroid shift in calcaneus invivo for the ultrasonic evaluation of osteoporosis,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1307–1317, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus