Use of Artificial Neural Network in Determination of Shade, Light Curing Unit, and Composite Parameters’ Effect on Bottom/Top Vickers Hardness Ratio of Composites
Table 6
Multiple comparisons of LCUs.
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Bottom-top ratio
Tukey HSD
(I) LCU
(J) LCU
Mean Difference (I-J)
Std. Error
Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Halogen
Bluephase
-3,6400
2,83935
,576
-11,0451
3,7651
Valo
-11,6836
2,83935
,000
-19,0887
-4,2785
Elipar
-21,4835
2,83935
,000
-28,8887
-14,0784
Bluephase
Halogen
3,6400
2,83935
,576
-3,7651
11,0451
Valo
-8,0437
2,83935
,028
-15,4488
-,6386
Elipar
-17,8436
2,83935
,000
-25,2487
-10,4385
Valo
Halogen
11,6836
2,83935
,000
4,2785
19,0887
Bluephase
8,0437
2,83935
,028
,6386
15,4488
Elipar
-9,7999
2,83935
,004
-17,2050
-2,3948
Elipar
Halogen
21,4835
2,83935
,000
14,0784
28,8887
Bluephase
17,8436
2,83935
,000
10,4385
25,2487
Valo
9,7999
2,83935
,004
2,3948
17,2050
: the mean difference is significant at the ,05 level.
