Research Article
Comparison between Two Radiological Methods for Assessment of Tooth Root Resorption: An In Vitro Study
Table 2
Tooth length with rizalysis.
| Tooth number | Real tooth length | Radiological measurements using traditional endooral X-rays | Radiological measurements using panoramic radiographs | Radiological measurements using digital endooral X-rays | Total | Var.% | Total | Var.% | Total | Var.% | Total |
| 11 | 19.72 | 2.03% | 20.12 | 12.07% | 22.10 | 1.70% | 20.06 | 12 | 18.72 | 3.74% | 19.42 | 18.59% | 22.20 | 0.56% | 18.82 | 13 | 23.88 | 0.42% | 23.98 | 13.15% | 27.02 | 0.06% | 23.90 | 14 | 15.25 | 13.18% | 17.26 | 32.59% | 20.22 | 1.39% | 15.46 | 21 | 19.62 | 2.55% | 20.12 | 18.25% | 23.20 | 2.91% | 20.19 | 22 | 17.38 | 1.73% | 17.68 | 12.08% | 19.48 | 1.06% | 17.56 | 23 | 22.24 | 2.11% | 22.71 | 8.27% | 24.08 | 32.38% | 29.44 | 24 | 15.25 | 4.26% | 15.90 | 23.80% | 18.88 | 1.39% | 15.46 | 25 | 18.22 | 1.43% | 18.48 | 21.41% | 22.12 | 1.02% | 18.41 | 31 | 16.72 | 0.60% | 16.82 | 22.61% | 20.50 | 0.42% | 16.79 | 32 | 17.62 | 0.57% | 17.72 | 16.40% | 20.51 | 0.46% | 17.70 | 33 | 21.40 | 0.93% | 21.60 | 20.19% | 25.72 | 0.47% | 21.50 | 34 | 13.36 | 4.79% | 14.00 | 16.62% | 15.58 | 0.49% | 13.43 | 35 | 15.21 | 1.78% | 15.48 | 17.69% | 17.90 | 0.36% | 15.27 | 41 | 17.54 | 2.05% | 17.90 | 25.43% | 22.00 | 0.57% | 17.64 | 42 | 15.70 | 2.55% | 16.10 | 16.94% | 18.36 | 0.36% | 15.76 | 43 | 23.29 | 0.64% | 23.44 | 14.21% | 26.60 | 0.36% | 23.37 | 44 | 15.50 | 2.84% | 15.94 | 18.45% | 18.36 | 0.40% | 15.56 | 45 | 16.20 | 6.79% | 17.30 | 21.11% | 19.62 | 1.58% | 16.46 |
|
|