Research Article

Comparison between Two Radiological Methods for Assessment of Tooth Root Resorption: An In Vitro Study

Table 2

Tooth length with rizalysis.

Tooth numberReal tooth lengthRadiological measurements using traditional endooral X-raysRadiological measurements using panoramic radiographsRadiological measurements using digital endooral X-rays
TotalVar.%TotalVar.%TotalVar.%Total

1119.722.03%20.1212.07%22.101.70%20.06
1218.723.74%19.4218.59%22.200.56%18.82
1323.880.42%23.9813.15%27.020.06%23.90
1415.2513.18%17.2632.59%20.221.39%15.46
2119.622.55%20.1218.25%23.202.91%20.19
2217.381.73%17.6812.08%19.481.06%17.56
2322.242.11%22.718.27%24.0832.38%29.44
2415.254.26%15.9023.80%18.881.39%15.46
2518.221.43%18.4821.41%22.121.02%18.41
3116.720.60%16.8222.61%20.500.42%16.79
3217.620.57%17.7216.40%20.510.46%17.70
3321.400.93%21.6020.19%25.720.47%21.50
3413.364.79%14.0016.62%15.580.49%13.43
3515.211.78%15.4817.69%17.900.36%15.27
4117.542.05%17.9025.43%22.000.57%17.64
4215.702.55%16.1016.94%18.360.36%15.76
4323.290.64%23.4414.21%26.600.36%23.37
4415.502.84%15.9418.45%18.360.40%15.56
4516.206.79%17.3021.11%19.621.58%16.46