Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 5373846, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5373846
Research Article

Relationship between Isometric Muscle Force and Fractal Dimension of Surface Electromyogram

1Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland
2Criams-Sport Medicine Centre Voghera, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
3NeuroMuscular Function Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
4CeRiSM (Research Centre for Sport, Mountain, and Health), Rovereto, Italy
5University of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Landquart, Switzerland

Correspondence should be addressed to Matteo Beretta-Piccoli; hc.ispus@iloccipattereb.oettam

Received 14 November 2017; Revised 1 February 2018; Accepted 11 February 2018; Published 15 March 2018

Academic Editor: Laura Guidetti

Copyright © 2018 Matteo Beretta-Piccoli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Erim, C. J. De Luca, K. Mineo, and T. Aoki, “Rank-ordered regulation of motor units,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 563–573, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. J. Fuglevand, D. A. Winter, and A. E. Patla, “Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor unit pools,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 2470–2488, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. G. Keenan and F. J. Valero-Cuevas, “Experimentally valid predictions of muscle force and EMG in models of motor-unit function are most sensitive to neural properties,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 1581–1590, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. S. Milner‐Brown and R. B. Stein, “The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force.,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 246, no. 3, pp. 549–569, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Moritani and H. A. DeVries, “Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 263–277, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. V. Basmajian, Muscles Alive, Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 4th edition, 1978.
  7. B. Bigland-Ritchie, “EMG/force relations and fatigue of human voluntary contractions,” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 75–118, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. H. Lawrence and C. J. De Luca, “Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1653–1659, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Zhou and W. Z. Rymer, “Factors governing the form of the relation between muscle force and the EMG: A simulation study,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 2878–2886, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Botter, H. R. Marateb, B. Afsharipour, and R. Merletti, “Solving EMG-force relationship using Particle Swarm Optimization,” in Proceedings of the 2011 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3861–3864, Boston, MA, USA, August 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Al Harrach, V. Carriou, S. Boudaoud, J. Laforet, and F. Marin, “Analysis of the sEMG/force relationship using HD-sEMG technique and data fusion: A simulation study,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 83, pp. 34–47, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. A. Alkner, P. A. Tesch, and H. E. Berg, “Quadriceps EMG/force relationship in knee extension and leg press,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 459–463, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Staudenmann, J. H. van Dieën, D. F. Stegeman, and R. M. Enoka, “Increase in heterogeneity of biceps brachii activation during isometric submaximal fatiguing contractions: A multichannel surface EMG study,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 984–990, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Staudenmann, I. Kingma, A. Daffertshofer, D. F. Stegeman, and J. H. van Dieën, “Heterogeneity of muscle activation in relation to force direction: A multi-channel surface electromyography study on the triceps surae muscle,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 882–895, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Holtermann, K. Roeleveld, and J. S. Karlsson, “Inhomogeneities in muscle activation reveal motor unit recruitment,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 131–137, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Rantalainen, A. Kłodowski, and H. Piitulainen, “Effect of innervation zones in estimating biceps brachii force-EMG relationship during isometric contraction,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Staudenmann, I. Kingma, A. Daffertshofer, D. F. Stegeman, and J. H. Van Dieën, “Improving EMG-based muscle force estimation by using a high-density EMG grid and principal component analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 712–719, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Staudenmann, I. Kingma, D. F. Stegeman, and J. H. Van Dieën, “Towards optimal multi-channel EMG electrode configurations in muscle force estimation: A high density EMG study,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J.-P. Eckmann, S. Oliffson Kamphorst, and D. Ruelle, “Recurrence plots of dynamical systems,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 973–977, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Felici, A. Rosponi, P. Sbriccoli, G. C. Filligoi, L. Fattorini, and M. Marchetti, “Linear and non-linear analysis of surface electromyograms in weightlifters,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 337–342, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. S. Richman and J. R. Moorman, “Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 278, no. 6, pp. H2039–H2049, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Bingham, S. P. Arjunan, B. Jelfs, and D. K. Kumar, “Normalised mutual information of high-density surface electromyography during muscle fatigue,” Entropy, vol. 19, p. 697, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. A. Gitter and M. J. Czerniecki, “Fractal analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 58, no. 1-2, pp. 103–108, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Z. Xu and S. Xiao, “Fractal dimension of surface EMG and its determinants,” in Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 4, pp. 1570–1573, 1997.
  25. C. J. Anmuth, G. Goldberg, and N. H. Mayer, “Fractal dimension of electromyographic signals recorded with surface electrodes during isometric contractions is linearly correlated with muscle activation,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 953-954, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. V. Gupta, S. Suryanarayanan, and N. P. Reddy, “Fractal analysis of surface EMG signals from the biceps,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 185–192, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. Shields, “P32.9 Fractal dimension of the EMG interference pattern: preliminary observations and comparisons with other measures of interference pattern analysis,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 117, p. 159, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Beretta-Piccoli, G. D'Antona, C. Zampella, M. Barbero, R. Clijsen, and C. Cescon, “Test-retest reliability of muscle fiber conduction velocity and fractal dimension of surface EMG during isometric contractions,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 616–630, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Marco, B. Alberto, and T. M. Vieira, “Surface EMG and muscle fatigue: Multi-channel approaches to the study of myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. R27–R60, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Mesin, C. Cescon, M. Gazzoni, R. Merletti, and A. Rainoldi, “A bi-dimensional index for the selective assessment of myoelectric manifestations of peripheral and central muscle fatigue,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 851–863, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. Mesin, D. Dardanello, A. Rainoldi, and G. Boccia, “Motor unit firing rates and synchronisation affect the fractal dimension of simulated surface electromyogram during isometric/isotonic contraction of vastus lateralis muscle,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1530–1533, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Boccia, D. Dardanello, M. Beretta-Piccoli et al., “Muscle fiber conduction velocity and fractal dimension of EMG during fatiguing contraction of young and elderly active men,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 37, no. 1, article no. 162, pp. 162–174, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Beretta-Piccoli, G. D'Antona, M. Barbero et al., “Evaluation of central and peripheral fatigue in the quadriceps using fractal dimension and conduction velocity in young females,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0123921, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. Meduri, M. Beretta-Piccoli, L. Calanni et al., “Inter-Gender sEMG evaluation of central and peripheral fatigue in biceps brachii of young healthy subjects,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 12, Article ID e0168443, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Poosapadi Arjunan and D. K. Kumar, “Computation of fractal features based on the fractal analysis of surface Electromyogram to estimate force of contraction of different muscles,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 210–216, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Troiano, F. Naddeo, E. Sosso, G. Camarota, R. Merletti, and L. Mesin, “Assessment of force and fatigue in isometric contractions of the upper trapezius muscle by surface EMG signal and perceived exertion scale,” Gait & Posture, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. A. Borg, “Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 377–381, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Beretta Piccoli, A. Rainoldi, C. Heitz et al., “Innervation zone locations in 43 superficial muscles: Toward a standardization of electrode positioning,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 413–421, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Farina, D. Zagari, M. Gazzoni, and R. Merletti, “Reproducibility of muscle-fiber conduction velocity estimates using multichannel surface EMG techniques,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 282–291, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Andreassen and L. Arendt-Nielsen, “Muscle fibre conduction velocity in motor units of the human anterior tibial muscle: a new size principle parameter.,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 391, no. 1, pp. 561–571, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. Farina and R. Merletti, “A Novel Approach for Estimating Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity, by Spatial and Temporal Filtering of Surface EMG Signals,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1340–1351, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. P. Weir, “Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM,” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 231–240, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. Rankin and M. Stokes, “Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 187–199, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Bruton, J. H. Conway, and S. T. Holgate, “Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured?” Physiotherapy, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 94–99, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. H. Munro, Statistical Methods for Health Care Research, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 2005.
  46. O. J. Dunn, “Multiple comparisons using rank sums,” Technometrics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. M. Tomczak and E. Tomczak, “The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size,” Trends in Sport Science, vol. 1, pp. 19–25, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  48. A. Rainoldi, J. E. Bullock-Saxton, F. Cavarretta, and N. Hogan, “Repeatability of maximal voluntary force and of surface EMG variables during voluntary isometric contraction of quadriceps muscles in healthy subjects,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 425–438, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. F. A. Arnall, G. A. Koumantakis, J. A. Oldham, and R. G. Cooper, “Between-days reliability of electromyographic measures of paraspinal muscle fatigue at 40, 50 and 60% levels of maximal voluntary contractile force,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 761–771, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. D. Falla, P. Dall'Alba, A. Rainoldi, R. Merletti, and G. Jull, “Repeatability of surface EMG variables in the sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene muscles,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 542–549, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Lee, M.-Y. Jung, and S.-H. Kim, “Reliability of spike and turn variables of surface EMG during isometric voluntary contractions of the biceps brachii muscle,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Rainoldi, G. Galardi, L. Maderna, G. Comi, L. Lo Conte, and R. Merletti, “Repeatability of surface EMG variables during voluntary isometric contractions of the biceps brachii muscle,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 105–119, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Bilodeau, S. Schindler-Ivens, D. M. Williams, R. Chandran, and S. S. Sharma, “EMG frequency content changes with increasing force and during fatigue in the quadriceps femoris muscle of men and women,” Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Gallina, R. Merletti, and M. Gazzoni, “Uneven spatial distribution of surface EMG: What does it mean?” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 887–894, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Farina, R. Merletti, and R. M. Enoka, “The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1486–1495, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. P. J. Blijham, H. J. Ter Laak, H. J. Schelhaas, B. G. M. Van Engelen, D. F. Stegeman, and M. J. Zwarts, “Relation between muscle fiber conduction velocity and fiber size in neuromuscular disorders,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 1837–1841, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. K. G. Keenan, D. Farina, K. S. Maluf, R. Merletti, and R. M. Enoka, “Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 120–131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. C. Stevens and W. S. Cain, “Effort in isometric muscular contractions related to force level and duration,” Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 240–244, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. K. Timmons, S. M. Stevens, and D. M. Pincivero, “The effect of arm abduction angle and contraction intensity on perceived exertion,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. KM. Lagally, RJ. Robertson, KI. Gallagher, FL. Goss, JM. Jakicic, SM. Lephart et al., “Perceived exertion, electromyography, and blood lactate during acute bouts of resistance exercise,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 552–559, 2002. View at Google Scholar