Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2018, Article ID 5429594, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5429594
Research Article

The Fluid Dynamical Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Prosthesis

1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
2Chair of Mechanics and Robotics, University Duisburg-Essen, Campus Duisburg, Lotharstraße 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
3Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel Wendt; ed.nesse-ku@tdnew.leinad

Received 23 August 2017; Revised 22 November 2017; Accepted 28 November 2017; Published 10 January 2018

Academic Editor: Francesco Onorati

Copyright © 2018 Philipp Marx et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Iung, G. Baron, E. G. Butchart et al., “A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease,” European Heart Journal, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 1231–1243, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Vahanian, O. Alfieri, and F. Andreotti, “Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS''),” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 42, pp. S1–S44, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Forcillo and et al., “Morphological and Clinical Findings of Explanted Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Pericardial Valve in the Aortic Position,” J Heart Valve Dis, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 657–662, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  4. H. Guo, C. Lu, H. Huang et al., “Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Pericardial Bioprosthesis in Chinese Patients with Single or Multiple Valve Replacement in Aortic, Mitral, or Tricuspid Positions,” Cardiology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 97–106, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Bourguignon, P. Lhommet, R. El Khoury et al., “Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 49, no. 5, Article ID ezv384, pp. 1462–1468, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. R. Johnston, E. G. Soltesz, N. Vakil et al., “Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1239–1247, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Bourguignon, A.-L. Bouquiaux-Stablo, P. Candolfi et al., “Very long-term outcomes of the carpentier-edwards perimount valve in aortic position,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 831–837, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Totaro, N. Degno, A. Zaidi, A. Youhana, and V. Argano, “Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: A stented valve with stentless performance?” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 1668–1674, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. J. Dalmau, J. M. González-Santos, J. López-Rodríguez, M. Bueno, and A. Arribas, “The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic xenograft: A new design with an improved hemodynamic performance,” Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 263–267, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Minardi, G. Pulignano, D. Del Sindaco et al., “Early Doppler-echocardiography evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards Standard and Carpentier-Edwards Magna aortic prosthetic valve: Comparison of hemodynamic performance,” Cardiovascular Ultrasound, vol. 9, no. 1, article no. 37, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Mizoguchi, M. Sakaki, K. Inoue et al., “Primary echocardiographic results of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna,” Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 155–160, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Wendt, S. Sthle, J. A. Piotrowski et al., “Comparison of flow dynamics of Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic valve prostheses,” Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 97–106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Wendt, “The investigation of systolic and diastolic leaflet kinematics of bioprostheses with a new in-vitro test method,” Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 274–81, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Wendt, S. Stühle, G. Hou et al., “Development and In Vitro Characterization of a New Artificial Flow Channel,” Artificial Organs, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. E59–E64, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. V. Raghav, I. Okafor, M. Quach, L. Dang, S. Marquez, and A. P. Yoganathan, “Long-Term Durability of Carpentier-Edwards Magna Ease Valve: A One Billion Cycle in Vitro Study,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1759–1767, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. S. Bach, H. J. Patel, T. J. Kolias, and M. Deeb, “Randomized comparison of exercise haemodynamics of Freestyle, Magna Ease and Trifecta bioprostheses after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 50, no. 2, Article ID ezv493, pp. 361–367, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. L. Lim, Y. T. Chew, T. C. Chew, and H. T. Low, “Pulsatile flow studies of a porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve in vitro: PIV measurements and shear-induced blood damage,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1417–1427, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Ugur, R. M. Suri, R. C. Daly et al., “Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 1940–1946, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Bäck, T. C. Gasser, J.-B. Michel, and G. Caligiuri, “Biomechanical factors in the biology of aortic wall and aortic valve diseases,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 232–241, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Wasilewski, J. Głowacki, and L. Poloński, “Not at random location of atherosclerotic lesions in thoracic aorta and their prognostic significance in relation to the risk of cardiovascular events,” Polish Journal of Radiology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 38–42, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. A. Nishimura, C. M. Otto, and R. O. Bonow, “2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 129, no. 23, pp. e521–e643, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. R. F. Carey and B. A. Herman, “The effects of a glycerin-based blood analog on the testing of bioprosthetic heart valves,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 22, no. 11-12, pp. 1185–1192, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus