| Study/author | Year | Patient population | Number of patients | Comparison | Results |
| Agarwal et al. [8] | 2017 | Patients with an indication for long-term anticoagulation undergoing PCI | 7,276 | TT versus DT | (1) Less major bleeding with OAC + SAPT (2) Comparable outcomes between OAC + SAPT and TT for MACE, MI, stent thrombosis, CV mortality |
| Liu et al. [46] | 2016 | Patients with indication for OAC and undergoing PCI or medically managed ACS | 22,842 | Network meta-analysis of TT, OAC + C, OAC + A, DAPT | (1) OAC + C had the lowest rate of MACE, CVA, MI, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding |
| Barbieri et al. [47] | 2016 | Patients undergoing PCI that required long-term OAC | 21,716 | TT versus DT | (1) As compared to DT, the use of TT was associated with significant reduction in overall mortality, recurrent MI, and ischemic stroke (2) Patients with TT were found to have a higher incidence of bleeding |
| D’Ascenzo et al. [48] | 2015 | Patients with indication for OAC and undergoing PCI or medically managed ACS | 7,182 | TT versus DAPT, TT versus OAC + C | (1) Major bleeding: DAPT and OAC + C both had less incidence as compared to TT (2) MACE: no benefit of TT over OAC + C or DAPT |
| Gao et al. [49] | 2015 | Patients taking OAC with coronary stent implantation | 9,185 | TT versus OAC + C | (1) Lower incidence of MACE with OAC + C (2) Comparable outcomes between OAC + C and TT for all-cause mortality, MI, ST, ischemic thrombosis, and major and minor bleeding |
|
|