Research Article

MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy

Table 2

Association between mpMRI and tumor characteristics in patients with positive repeat prostate biopsy (n = 75) or in patients with both repeat prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (n = 30).

Gleason Grade Group, GGGClinical or Pathological T-stageTotal
GGG 1GGG 2GGG 3GGG 4GGG 5T1T2T3

Patients with positive repeat prostate biopsy (n = 75)

PI-RADS 1-211
(50.0%)
5
(22.7%)
0
(0.0%)
4
(18.2%)
2
(9.1%)
16
(72.7%)
6
(27.3%)
0
(0.0%)
22
PI-RADS 32
(13.3%)
6
(40.0%)
1
(6.7%)
3
(20.0%)
3
(20.0%)
0
(0.0%)
15
(100.0%)
0
(0.0%)
15
PI-RADS 4-53
(7.9%)
11
(28.9%)
6
(15.8%)
8
(21.1%)
10
(26.3%)
0
(0.0%)
28
(73.7%)
10
(26.3%)
38
Total16
(21.3%)
22
(29.3%)
7
(9.3%)
15
(20.0%)
15
(20.0%)
16
(21.3%)
49
(65.3%)
10
(13.3%)
75

Patients with both repeat prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (n = 30)

PI-RADS 1-24
(30.8%)
2
(15.4%)
4
(30.8%)
1
(7.7%)
2
(15.4%)
-8
(61.5%)
5
(38.5%)
13
PI-RADS 30
(0.0%)
4
(80.0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0.0%)
1
(20.0%)
-3
(60.0%)
2
(40.0%)
5
PI-RADS 4-50
(0.0%)
1
(8.3%)
3
(25.0%)
4
(33.3%)
4
(33.3%)
-6
(50.0%)
6
(50.0%)
12
Total3
(10.0%)
8
(26.7%)
7
(23.3%)
5
(16.7%)
7
(23.3%)
-17
(56.7%)
13
(43.3%)
30

PI-RADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System.