Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography versus Dye Angiography in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis

<table class="fixed-width table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><colgroup><col style="width:8.16em"/><col style="width:11.51em"/><col style="width:2.98em"/></colgroup><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left" rowspan="2">All CNV types</td><td class="align_center">FA versus OCTA</td><td class="align_center">0.88</td></tr><tr><td class="align_center">FA + ICGA versus OCTA</td><td class="align_center">0.91</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Only CNV type I</td><td class="align_center">FA + ICGA versus OCTA</td><td class="align_center">0.84</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td><div>CNV = choroidal neovascularization; FA = fluorescein angiography; OCTA = optical coherence tomography angiography; ICGA = indocyanine green angiography.<br/></div></td></tr></table>

<div>Interrater agreement between the different instruments (Cohen’s Kappa Index).</div>

BioMed Research International

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography versus Dye Angiography in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis 