Review Article

Class III Treatment with Skeletal and Dental Anchorage: A Review of Comparative Effects

Table 1

Quality analysis of the included studies.

Pre-established CharacteristicsScore

1. Adequacy of sample selection description based on age and sex across the groupsFull: 2 points; partial: 1 point
2. Study design for the inclusion of the treated groupProspective: 1 point; retrospective or not declared: 0 points
3. Description of the Class III (full, skeletal, and/or dental parameters; partial, only dental parameters)Full: 2 points; partial: 1 point
4. Distribution of the different maturational stages among the investigated subjectsFull: 2 points; partial: 1 point
5. Adequacy of treatment description based on three criteria: (a) orthodontic appliance; (b) description of TADs and their placement (miniscrews, miniplates); (c) treatment durationFull: 2 points; partial: 1 point
6. Withdrawals declared or derivableNo/yes: 1 point; not declared: 0 points
7. Description of the method error analysisYes: 2 points; no: 0 points
8. Blinding for measurementsYes: 1 point; no: 0 points
9. Adequacy of statistics based on the comparisons of the intragroup changes over time among/between groups (yes, when parametric or nonparametric tests used where appropriate; no, when parametric tests used when nonparametric tests would be more appropriate, multiple comparisons with uncorrected P values, statistical analysis only partially described)Yes: 2 points, no: 1 points
10. Prior estimation of sample size or a posteriori power analysisYes: 1 point, no: 0 points