Modelling of Running Performances: Comparisons of Power-Law, Hyperbolic, Logarithmic, and Exponential Models in Elite Endurance Runners

<div>Individual relationships between running speed and <svg height="10.9562pt" id="M189" style="vertical-align:-3.18152pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -7.77468 17.0822 10.9562" width="17.0822pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M298 36L289 62C276 55 253 45 228 45C202 45 169 60 169 141V397H276C289 405 292 426 282 437H169V574L155 576L90 509V437H45L17 408L21 397H90V107C90 28 125 -12 188 -12C198 -12 213 -8 230 1L298 36Z" id="g121-114"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,3.965,3.132)"><path d="M244 0V30C178 35 170 41 170 107V710C136 697 72 680 18 675V647C83 642 89 639 89 572V107C89 43 80 35 16 30V0H244Z" id="g58-106"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.331,3.132)"><path d="M138 535C169 535 191 560 191 589C191 620 168 644 139 644S85 620 85 589C85 560 110 535 138 535ZM257 0V30C192 35 185 43 185 109V453C142 435 94 422 40 414V386C101 378 104 372 104 311V109C104 41 97 35 33 30V0H257Z" id="g58-103"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.833,3.132)"><path d="M810 0V30C751 35 744 40 744 106V296C744 396 694 451 614 451C583 451 558 438 537 425C512 409 485 391 454 368C434 420 390 451 342 451C309 451 285 439 260 424C228 405 206 387 185 372V453C141 434 90 421 43 413V386C102 378 105 373 105 309V106C105 41 96 35 29 30V0H243V30C194 35 185 41 185 106V335C216 360 256 389 297 389C357 389 384 348 384 275V106C384 41 374 35 312 30V0H530V30C475 35 465 41 465 104V294C465 313 464 324 463 336C502 367 539 389 576 389C637 389 663 346 663 274V109C663 41 653 35 593 30V0H810Z" id="g58-107"></path></g></svg> in the Hopkins model computed with 4 distances (1500-10000 m).</div>

BioMed Research International

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: Modelling of Running Performances: Comparisons of Power-Law, Hyperbolic, Logarithmic, and Exponential Models in Elite Endurance Runners 