Research Article

The Impact of IL-16 3′UTR Polymorphism rs859 on Lung Carcinoma Susceptibility among Chinese Han Individuals

Table 3

Genetic model analyses of IL-16-rs859, CYP24A1-rs4809957, and FBN1-rs1042078with lung cancer risk.

GeneSNPModelGenotypeControlCaseCrude AnalysisAdjusted Analysis
(N = 384)(N = 322)OR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-value

IL-16
(N = 706)
rs859
(call rate 99.86%)
CodominantA/A92 (24.0%)89 (27.7%)1.000.2001.000.058
G/A190 (49.5%)164 (51.1%)0.89 (0.62-1.28)0.82 (0.55-1.22)
G/G102 (26.6%)68 (21.2%)0.69 (0.45-1.05)0.57 (0.36-0.91)
DominantA/A92 (24.0%)89 (27.7%)1.000.2501.000.100
G/A-G/G292 (76.0%)232 (72.3%)0.82 (0.59-1.15)0.73 (0.50-1.06)
RecessiveA/A-G/A282 (73.4%)253 (78.8%)1.000.0951.000.029
G/G102 (26.6%)68 (21.2%)0.74 (0.52-1.06)0.65 (0.44-0.96)
Log-additive---------0.83 (0.67-1.03)0.0860.76 (0.60-0.96)0.019

CYP24A1
(N = 706)
rs4809957
(call rate 100%)
CodominantG/G143 (37.2%)124 (38.5%)1.000.9401.000.560
G/A185 (48.2%)152 (47.2%)0.95 (0.69-1.31)0.89 (0.62-1.27)
A/A56 (14.6%)46 (14.3%)0.95 (0.60-1.50)0.76 (0.46-1.27)
DominantG/G143 (37.2%)124 (38.5%)1.000.7301.000.370
G/A-A/A241 (62.8%)198 (61.5%)0.95 (0.70-1.29)0.86 (0.61-1.20)
RecessiveG/G-G/A328 (85.4%)276 (85.7%)1.000.9101.000.400
A/A56 (14.6%)46 (14.3%)0.98 (0.64-1.49)0.82 (0.51-1.31)
Log-additive---------0.97 (0.78-1.20)0.7600.88 (0.69-1.12)0.280

FBN1
(N = 706)
rs1042078
(call rate 100%)
CodominantA/A117 (30.5%)85 (26.4%)1.000.0651.000.200
A/G185 (48.2%)183 (56.8%)1.36 (0.96-1.92)1.27 (0.86-1.86)
G/G82 (21.4%)54 (16.8%)0.91 (0.58-1.41)0.88 (0.54-1.44)
DominantA/A117 (30.5%)85 (26.4%)1.000.2301.000.450
A/G-G/G267 (69.5%)237 (73.6%)1.22 (0.88-1.70)1.15 (0.80-1.66)
RecessiveA/A-A/G302 (78.7%)268 (83.2%)1.000.1201.000.190
G/G82 (21.4%)54 (16.8%)0.74 (0.51-1.09)0.76 (0.50-1.15)
Log-additive---------0.99 (0.80-1.23)0.9200.97 (0.76-1.23)0.790

SNP: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; OR: Odds Ratio; 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, gender, smoking status, and alcohol drinking status.
Bold italics indicates the statistical significance (P < 0.05).