Research Article

The Impact of IL-16 3′UTR Polymorphism rs859 on Lung Carcinoma Susceptibility among Chinese Han Individuals

Table 6

The relationship between IL-16-rs859, CYP24A1-rs4809957,and FBN1-rs1042078 and lung adenocarcinoma risk.

GeneSNPModelGenotypeControlCaseCrude AnalysisAdjusted Analysis
(N = 384)(N = 150)OR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-value

IL-16
(N = 534)
rs859
(call rate 100%)
CodominantA/A92 (24.0%)39 (26.0%)1.000.1501.000.035
G/A190 (49.5%)83 (55.3%)1.03 (0.65-1.62)0.90 (0.55-1.48)
G/G102 (26.6%)28 (18.7%)0.65 (0.37-1.14)0.49 (0.27-0.90)
DominantA/A92 (24.0%)39 (26.0%)1.000.6201.000.240
G/A-G/G292 (76.0%)111 (74.0%)0.90 (0.58-1.38)0.75 (0.47-1.21)
RecessiveA/A-G/A282 (73.4%)122 (81.3%)1.000.0521.000.010
G/G102 (26.6%)28 (18.7%)0.63 (0.40-1.01)0.53 (0.32-0.87)
Log-additive---------0.82 (0.62-1.07)0.1400.71 (0.53-0.95)0.022

CYP24A1
(N = 534)
rs4809957
(call rate 100%)
CodominantG/G143 (37.2%)64 (42.7%)1.000.2701.000.210
G/A185 (48.2%)71 (47.3%)0.86 (0.57-1.28)0.81 (0.53-1.25)
A/A56 (14.6%)15 (10.0%)0.60 (0.32-1.14)0.55 (0.28-1.09)
DominantG/G143 (37.2%)64 (42.7%)1.000.2501.000.180
G/A-A/A241 (62.8%)86 (57.3%)0.80 (0.54-1.17)0.75 (0.50-1.14)
RecessiveG/G-G/A328 (85.4%)135 (90.0%)1.000.1501.000.130
A/A56 (14.6%)15 (10.0%)0.65 (0.36-1.19)0.62 (0.32-1.17)
Log-additive---------0.80 (0.60-1.06)0.1200.77 (0.56-1.04)0.083

FBN1
(N = 534)
rs1042078
(call rate 100%)
CodominantA/A117 (30.5%)39 (26.0%)1.000.1101.000.150
A/G185 (48.2%)87 (58.0%)1.41 (0.91-2.20)1.28 (0.80-2.05)
G/G82 (21.4%)24 (16.0%)0.88 (0.49-1.57)0.76 (0.41-1.41)
DominantA/A117 (30.5%)39 (26.0%)1.000.3001.000.630
A/G-G/G267 (69.5%)111 (74.0%)1.25 (0.82-1.91)1.12 (0.71-1.76)
RecessiveA/A-A/G302 (78.7%)126 (84.0%)1.000.1601.000.099
G/G82 (21.4%)24 (16.0%)0.70 (0.43-1.16)0.65 (0.38-1.10)
Log-additive---------0.98 (0.75-1.29)0.8900.91 (0.68-1.22)0.530

SNP: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; OR: Odds Ratio; 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, gender, smoking status, and alcohol drinking status.
Bold italics indicates the statistical significance (P < 0.05).