Research Article

The Impact of IL-16 3′UTR Polymorphism rs859 on Lung Carcinoma Susceptibility among Chinese Han Individuals

Table 7

The relationship between IL-16-rs859, CYP24A1-rs4809957,and FBN1-rs1042078 and lung small cell carcinoma risk.

GeneSNPModelGenotypeControlCaseCrude AnalysisAdjusted Analysis
(N = 384)(N = 74)OR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-value

IL-16
(N = 458)
rs859
(call rate 99.78%)
CodominantA/A92 (24.0%)22 (30.1%)1.000.4801.000.110
G/A190 (49.5%)35 (48.0%)0.77 (0.43-1.39)0.58 (0.30-1.11)
G/G102 (26.6%)16 (21.9%)0.66 (0.32-1.32)0.46 (0.21-0.99)
DominantA/A92 (24.0%)22 (30.1%)1.000.2701.000.047
G/A-G/G292 (76.0%)51 (69.9%)0.73 (0.42-1.27)0.53 (0.29-0.98)
RecessiveA/A-G/A282 (73.4%)57 (78.1%)1.000.4001.000.200
G/G102 (26.6%)16 (21.9%)0.78 (0.43-1.41)0.66 (0.35-1.26)
Log-additive---------0.81 (0.57-1.15)0.2300.67 (0.46-0.99)0.044

CYP24A1
(N = 458)
rs4809957
(call rate 100%)
CodominantG/G143 (37.2%)28 (37.8%)1.000.7701.000.710
G/A185 (48.2%)33 (44.6%)0.91 (0.53-1.58)0.88 (0.48-1.59)
A/A56 (14.6%)13 (17.6%)1.19 (0.57-2.45)1.21 (0.55-2.64)
DominantG/G143 (37.2%)28 (37.8%)1.000.9201.000.860
G/A-A/A241 (62.8%)46 (62.2%)0.97 (0.58-1.63)0.95 (0.55-1.66)
RecessiveG/G-G/A328 (85.4%)61 (82.4%)1.000.5201.000.480
A/A56 (14.6%)13 (17.6%)1.25 (0.64-2.42)1.30 (0.64-2.65)
Log-additive---------1.02 (0.69-1.64)0.6901.05 (0.71-1.55)0.800

FBN1
(N = 458)
rs1042078
(call rate 100%)
CodominantA/A117 (30.5%)20 (27.0%)1.000.1501.000.160
A/G185 (48.2%)44 (59.5%)1.39 (0.78-2.48)1.30 (0.70-2.41)
G/G82 (21.4%)10 (13.5%)0.71 (0.32-1.60)0.63 (0.26-1.49)
DominantA/A117 (30.5%)20 (27.0%)1.000.5501.000.780
A/G-G/G267 (69.5%)54 (73.0%)1.18 (0.68-2.07)1.09 (0.60-1.98)
RecessiveA/A-A/G302 (78.7%)64 (86.5%)1.000.1101.000.084
G/G82 (21.4%)10 (13.5%)0.58 (0.28-1.17)0.53 (0.25-1.13)
Log-additive---------0.91 (0.64-1.31)0.6200.85 (0.58-1.26)0.430

SNP: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; OR: Odds Ratio; 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, gender, smoking status, and alcohol drinking status.
Bold italics indicates the statistical significance (P < 0.05).