Research Article

Radiotherapy for Adult Medulloblastoma: Evaluation of Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy, and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and the Results of Helical Tomotherapy Therapy

Table 4

Statistical analysis results of target dose parameters among HT, VMAT, and 3D-CRT.

ParametersCategory
Mean (SD)P value
Overall
P value
P value among groups
HTVMAT3D-CRTHT versus
VMAT
HT versus
3D-CRT
VMAT versus
3D-CRT

Time660.20 (52.17)329.60 (3.51)73.20 (8.41)0.000.000.000.00
99.20 (0.88)99.18 (0.52)99.12 (0.93)0.990.970.870.90
0.97 (1.75)9.57 (8.66)32.09 (27.81)0.030.440.010.06
35.79 (2.86)36.62 (3.11)37.69 (3.58)0.650.690.370.60
32.46 (3.92)32.29 (2.64)31.63 (2.62)0.910.930.680.74
34.77 (2.67)35.04 (2.97)35.51 (2.97)0.920.880.690.80
DHI1.05 (0.02)1.07 (0.02)1.09 (0.02)0.020.150.010.09
CI0.87 (0.03)0.86 (0.02)0.69 (0.03)0.000.570.000.00

Time: beam-on time (second); : % prescription dose delivered to percent volume; : irradiation dose delivered to 1% volume, representing the maximum dose; : irradiation dose delivered to 99% volume, representing the minimum dose; : average irradiation dose.