Ecotoxicological and Interactive Effects of Copper and Chromium on Physiochemical, Ultrastructural, and Molecular Profiling in Brassica napus L.
Table 4
Copper (Cu) and chromium (Cr) accumulation (mg kg−1 FW) in shoots and roots of two Brassica napus cultivars.
Cultivar
Treatment
Total Cu content
Total Cr content
Shoot
Root
Shoot
Root
ZS 758
CK
13.53 ± 1.29
33.35 ± 4.13
0.46 ± 0.08
5.39 ± 0.57
Cu 200 μM
21.38 ± 1.44
214.86 ± 30.05
0.43 ± 0.08
11.57 ± 1.3
Cr 200 μM
14.44 ± 1.29
71.37 ± 5.43
12.91 ± 2.42
202.51 ± 26.78
Cu 200 μM + Cr 200 μM
19.03 ± 0.99
204.62 ± 15.61
26.59 ± 4.83
205.19 ± 38.66
ZD 622
CK
14.57 ± 0.77
25.62 ± 3.12
0.52 ± 0.14
6.67 ± 0.36
Cu 200 μM
18.59 ± 1.63
231.78 ± 26.36
0.72 ± 0.09
16.34 ± 1.24
Cr 200 μM
16.11 ± 0.73
75.50 ± 8.02
15.4 ± 0.99
189.38 ± 19.74
Cu 200 μM + Cr 200 μM
18.89 ± 1.02
294.45 ± 8.86
28.29 ± 1.98
228.45 ± 7.53
Data are the means of three replicates (mean ± SD). Values followed by different letters indicate significant differences followed by Duncan’s multiple range test ( < 0.05) for each cultivar at different metal treatments.
