Evaluating Vitamin D Status in Pre- and Postmenopausal Type 2 Diabetics and Its Association with Glucose Homeostasis
Table 7
Effect of sociodemographic lifestyle and anthropometric indices on the development of vitamin D deficiency among pre- and postmenopausal T2DM women.
Variables
cOR (95% CI)
value
Age adjusted aOR (95% CI)
value
Age
39-40
1
1
41–50
0.533 (0.098–2.895)
0.466
0.477 (0.087–2.607)
0.393
51–60
0.733 (0.108–4.992)
0.751
0.678 (0.099–4.634)
0.692
61–70
0.700 (0.127–3.848)
0.682
0.530 (0.092–3.040)
0.476
Employment status
Employed
1
1
Unemployed
1.573 (0.851–2.905)
0.148
1.612 (0.828–3.138)
0.160
Educational level
Basic
1
1
Illiterate
1.194 (0.105–13.622)
0.105
1.095 (0.094–12.800)
0.943
Secondary
0.812 (0.449–1.469)
0.449
0.840 (0.461–1.531)
0.570
Tertiary
2.387 (0.257–22.173)
0.257
2.236 (0.222–22.529)
0.495
Duration of DM
<5 years
1
1
>5 years
1.824 (0.942–3.531)
0.075
1.842 (0.926–3.664)
0.082
BMI
Nonobese
1
1
Obese
0.763 (0.417–1.397)
0.381
0.749 (0.408–1.376)
0.352
WHR
Nonobese
1
1
Obese
1.375 (0.581–3.253)
0.469
1.419 (0.594–3.392)
0.431
WHtR
Nonobese
1
1
Obese
1.340 (0.728–2.469)
0.347
1.336 (0.723–2.468)
0.355
Binary logistic analysis was performed to determine factor that could predict the development of vitamin D deficiency. CI: confidence interval; cOR: crude odds ratio; aOR: adjusted odds ratio; DM: diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; WHR: waist to hip ratio; WHtR: waist to height ratio.
