Does Psychosocial Work Environment Factors Predict Stress and Mean Arterial Pressure in the Malaysian Industry Workers?

Table 2

Structural model estimates.

H	IV	Path	DV	β	SE	t	p	Results	Remarks
	QD	→	Stress	0.217	0.094	2.307	0.021	Significant	Supported
	ED	→	Stress	0.096	0.073	1.318	0.187	Insignificant	Not supported
	WP	→	Stress	−0.002	0.06	−0.028	0.978	Insignificant	Not supported
	WFC	→	Stress	0.201	0.071	2.848	0.004	Significant	Supported
	RC	→	Stress	−0.102	0.05	−2.04	0.041	Significant	Supported
	JI	→	Stress	0.095	0.044	2.142	0.032	Significant	Supported
	QD	→	MAP	3.714	1.788	2.078	0.038	Significant	Supported
	ED	→	MAP	−1.801	1.392	−1.294	0.196	Insignificant	Not supported
	WP	→	MAP	−1.207	1.132	−1.066	0.286	Insignificant	Not supported
	WFC	→	MAP	−1.262	1.335	−0.946	0.344	Insignificant	Not supported
	RC	→	MAP	−0.662	0.943	−0.702	0.483	Insignificant	Not supported
	JI	→	MAP	0.042	0.835	0.05	0.96	Insignificant	Not supported

Note. WFC = Work-family conflict; RC = role clarity; WP = work pace; JI = job insecurity; ST = stress; QD = quantitative demands; ED = emotional demands; H = hypotheses; IV = independent variable; DV = dependent variable.