Review Article

Extracorporeal Life Support: The Next Step in Moderate to Severe ARDS—A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

Table 1

Clinical trials of extracorporeal life support.

Clinical trialStudy designLung protective ventilation in the ECLS groupLung protective ventilation in the control groupRisk of biasOutcome

Randomized clinical trialsZapol et al. [17]90 pts with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with IMV vs. IMV with VA-ECMONoNoLowNo improvement with ECMO use, >90% overall mortality
Morris et al. [32]40 pts with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with IRV IMV vs. IMV with VV-ECCO2RNoNoLowNo significant difference in mortality, 67% mortality in the ECCO2R group
Peek et al. CESAR trial [10]180 pts with ARDS treated with IMV vs. IMV with VV-ECMOYesYesLowSignificantly reduced mortality (37% vs. 53% in the controls) and disability in the ECMO group
Bein et al. Xtravent trial [18]79 pts with ARDS treated with ultraprotective lung ventilation by ECCO2R use vs. conventional IMVYesYesLowFavours ECCO2R vs. conventional IMV. More ventilator-free days in pts with P/F ratio <150
Combes et al. EOLIA trial [9]249 pts with severe ARDS treated with IMV vs. IMV with VV-ECMOYesYesLowNo significant difference in 60-day mortality between the 2 groups

Observational clinical trialsLewandowski et al. [16]Cohort prospective observational study: 73 severe ARDS pts treated with ECMO vs. 49 pts treated with IMVNAYesHighECMO was not associated with a lower mortality rate
Mols et al. [15]Cohort prospective observational study: 245 severe ARDS pts, of which 62 treated with ECMOYesYesHighECMO was associated with a lower mortality rate
Beiderlinden et al. [14]Cohort prospective observational study: 150 severe ARDS pts, of which 32 pts treated with ECMO vs. 118 treated with IMVYesN/AHighMortality in ECMO pts tended to be higher than that in pts with conservative treatment
Noah et al. [11]Cohort prospective observational study: 75 matched pairs of pts with ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1), treated with VV-ECMO vs. no ECMO therapyYesN/ALowECMO use was associated with lower mortality compared with matched non-ECMO-referred patients
ANZ ECMO Influenza Investigators [29]Retrospective observational study: influenza A (H1N1) ARDS pts, of which 61 were treated with ECMO vs. 133 without ECMON/AN/AHighECMO use was associated with higher mortality compared to conservative treatment
Roch et al. [13]Prospective observational study: 18 influenza A (H1N1) ARDS pts, of which 9 were treated with ECMO vs. no ECMO therapyYesYesHighECMO may be an effective salvage treatment in ARDS pts
Patroniti et al. [30]Retrospective observational study: 153 influenza A (H1N1) ARDS pts, of which 60 were treated with ECMO vs. no ECMO therapyN/AN/AHighECMO may be an effective salvage treatment in ARDS pts
Pham et al. [12]Prospective observational matched case-control study: pts with ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1), treated with VV-ECMO vs. no ECMO therapyYesYesLowECMO use was associated with no significant difference in mortality compared with matched non-ECMO-referred patients
Tsai et al. [28]Retrospective observational matched case-control study: pts with ARDS, treated with ECMO vs. no ECMO therapyN/AYesHighECMO use was associated with lower mortality risk
Kanji et al. [27]Retrospective observational cohort matched and unmatched study: pts with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure, treated with ECMO vs. no ECMO therapyN/AN/AHighECMO use was associated with lower mortality risk but longer ICU and hospital length of stay
Combes et al. SUPERNOVA trial [33]Prospective single-arm, phase 2 study: 78 of 95 pts received ultraprotective ventilationYesNo control groupECCO2R use minimized respiratory acidosis. Relatively high levels of adverse events

Upcoming clinical trialREST clinical trial (NCT02654327)RCT: 1120 pts with acute respiratory failure, with PaO2/FiO2 <150 mmHgIMV vs. IMV plus ECCO2R

RCT: randomized controlled trial; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; VA: venoarterial; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IRV: inverse ratio ventilation; VV: venovenous; ECCO2R: extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal; VT: tidal volume; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; N/A: not applicable; pts: patients; P/F ratio: PaO2/FiO2 ratio.