Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study

<div>Linear regression model revealed the KEA,<i> K</i>max<i>, K</i>1, and<i> K</i>2 decreased after CXL in model y = 0.9622 -0.02408 x (P&lt;0.05), y = 0.9982 -0.003469 x(P&lt;0.05), y = 0.9977 + -0.001347 x(P&lt;0.05), y = 0.9992 + -0.001779 x(P&lt;0.05) (y represents KEA,<i> K</i>max<i>, K</i>1 or<i> K</i>2; x represents time (month)).</div>

BioMed Research International

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study 

Figure 2 | Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study 