Effectiveness of Combined General Rehabilitation Gymnastics and Muscle Energy Techniques in Older Women with Chronic Low Back Pain

Table 5

Effect of general rehabilitation gymnastics on spondylometric parameters of the spine in women with chronic low back pain, analysis of variance.

Variable	df1	df2	F	p	Partial eta-squared	%
CAF	1	39	13.55	0.001	0.26	25.79
CPF	1	39	10.82	0.001	0.22	21.72
CRF	1	39	0.03	0.87	0.00	0.07
CLF	1	39	0.17	0.69	0.00	0.42
CRR	1	39	7.16	0.01	0.16	15.52
CLR	1	39	12.29	0.001	0.24	23.96
ThAF	1	39	4.24	0.05	0.10	9.80
ThPF	1	39	18.17	0.001	0.32	31.78
ThRF	1	39	17.18	0.001	0.31	30.58
ThLF	1	39	27.62	0.001	0.41	41.46
ThRR	1	39	46.13	0.001	0.54	54.19
ThLR	1	39	6.39	0.02	0.14	14.08
LAF	1	39	6.24	0.02	0.14	13.79
LPF	1	39	40.05	0.001	0.51	50.66
LRF	1	39	8.32	0.01	0.18	17.58
LLF	1	39	7.34	0.01	0.16	15.84
LRR	1	39	5.56	0.02	0.12	12.47
LLR	1	39	6.06	0.02	0.13	13.46

CAF: Cervical Anterior Flexion, CPF: Cervical Posterior Flexion, CRF: Cervical Right Flexion, CLF: Cervical Left Flexion, CRR: Cervical Right Rotation, CLR: Cervical Left Rotation, ThAF: Thoracic Anterior Flexion, ThPF: Thoracic Posterior Flexion, ThRF: Thoracic Right Flexion, ThLF - Thoracic Left Flexion, ThRR: Thoracic Right Rotation, ThLR: Thoracic Left Rotation, LAF: Lumbar Anterior Flexion, LPF: Lumbar Posterior Flexion, LRF: Lumbar Right Flexion, LLF: Lumbar Left Flexion, LRR: Lumbar Right Rotation, LLR: Lumbar Left Rotation, df: degrees of freedom, F: value of the Snedecor F-test, p: probability of a type I error, : statistically significant differences at α≤ 0.05, and : statistically significant differences at α≤0.01.