An Economic Analysis of the Systematic Use of Mapping Systems during Catheter Ablation Procedures: Single Center Experience

Table 3

VSL values, expressed as millions $(2014-USD), in different countries and United States Agencies, and corresponding Cost Reduction, expressed in $(2014-USD), Cost Effectiveness, expressed as Yes or No, Low and High Cost Effectiveness, both expressed as Yes or No, for SVT CA and AF CA, adopting VSL method.

OECD [18]	VSL-values in millions $(2014-USD)	SVT CA Cost Reduction $(2014-USD)	SVT CA Cost Effectiveness	SVT CA Low Cost Effectiveness	SVT CA High Cost Effectiveness	AF CA Cost Reduction $(2014-USD)	AF CA Cost Effectiveness	AF CA Low Cost Effectiveness	AF CA High Cost Effectiveness
OCED countries	3.5	369	No	No	No	3201	Yes	Yes	Yes
OCED EU-27	4.3	443	No	No	No	3842	Yes	Yes	Yes
United States Agencies [16]	VSL-values in millions $(2014-USD)	SVT CA Cost Reduction $(2014-USD)	SVT CA Cost Effectiveness	SVT CA Low Cost Effectiveness	SVT CA High Cost Effectiveness	AF CA Cost Reduction $(2014-USD)	AF CA Cost Effectiveness	AF CA Low Cost Effectiveness	AF CA High Cost Effectiveness
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)	8.7	918	No	No	No	7958	Yes	Yes	Yes
Department of Transportation (DOT)	9.3	981	No	No	No	8507	Yes	Yes	Yes
Department of Homeland and Security (DHS)	8.6	907	No	No	No	7866	Yes	Yes	Yes
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)	8.6	907	No	No	No	7866	Yes	Yes	Yes
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)	9.0	949	No	No	No	8232	Yes	Yes	Yes
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (min value)	1.3	137	No	No	No	1189	Yes	Yes	Yes
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (max value)	13.2	1393	No	No	No	12074	Yes	Yes	Yes