Review Article

Current Trends in the Evaluation of Osteochondral Lesion Treatments: Histology, Histomorphometry, and Biomechanics in Preclinical Models

Table 1

Data extraction of papers involving small-medium animal models.

Experimental modelAnatomical site (defect dimension) and experimental timeOsteochondral treatmentHistological, histomorphometric, and biomechanical methodsMain outcomesAuthor

Rodent model
Fifty-five rats (6 weeks old)Cartilage defect (2 mm Ø and 1 mm depth) in the patellar groove for 1 and 2 monthsBilayered collagen scaffold with or without hESC-MSC(i) ICRS score
(ii) Paraffin embedding
(iii) H&E and Safranin O stainings
(iv) Indentation test on fresh explants submerged in PBS: Young’s equilibrium modulus
Similar trends between the histomorphometric score and biomechanical analysisZhang et al. [10]

Nine male athymic nude rats (11 weeks old)Critical-size defects in the trochlear groove (1.4 mm Ø and 1 mm depth) for 2 monthsMicromasses of hPDCs with or without TGF-β1(i) Paraffin embedding
(ii) Alcian Blue staining (iii) IHC: Col I, Col II, nuclei, and lubricin
(iv) MicroCT: BV/TV, Tb.Th., Tb.Sp., and Tb.N.
MicroCT showed heterogeneous regeneration across the defectsMendes et al. [11]

Fifty male Wistar rat (4 months old)Defects in the trochlear groove (1.5 mm Ø and 1.5 mm depth) for 2 monthsMeHA hydrogel seeded with MSCs or chondrogenically primed MSCs cultivated either free loading or dynamically compressed(i) Paraffin embedding
(ii) Wakitani score
(iii) Safranin O staining
(iv) IHC: Col II
Dynamic compression and chondrogenic priming synergistically improved regenerative properties of MSCsLin et al. [12]

Lapine model
Twelve young adult NZW rabbitsDefects in the weight-bearing areas of femoral condyles (4 mm of chondral defect followed by a 2 mm hole in the centre of the 4 mm defect) for 3 monthsADM alone (rabADM) or in association with IPFP-MSCs (cells + rabADM)(i) Paraffin embedding HC: Col I and II
(ii) Quantification of the total area of cartilage repair by 2D analysis
Significant differences in type II collagen stainingYe et al. [13]

Ten NZW male rabbits (5 months old)Defects in the medial femoral condyles (4 mm Ø and 4 mm depth) for 40 daysCollagen scaffold alone or seeded with rabbit BMC; half of the animals stimulated by PEMFs(i) Niederauer score
(ii) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) Safranin-O/fast green staining
(iv) Modified O’Driscoll score quantification of new cartilaginous tissue over and under the tidemark
Significant effects in Niederauer and O’Driscoll scores and in percentage of cartilageVeronesi et al. [14]

Twelve female skeletally mature NZW rabbitsDefects in the central medial femoral condyles (3.5 mm Ø and 2 mm depth) for 1.5 monthsBilayered collagen type I/III scaffold seeded with either culture-expanded allogenic chondrocytes (ACI-CHDR) or synovium-derived stem cells (ACI-SMSC)(i) ICRS subscore and OARSI score
(ii) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) H&E and Safranin O staining
(iv) IHC: Col II, X (Remmele–Stegner score)
(v) Indentation test on fresh samples: cartilage thickness, instant modulus, and shear modulus
Similar trends among instantaneous and shear modulus and OARSI scoreSchmal et al. [15]

Sixteen male NZW rabbits (34 weeks old)Defects in the patellar groove (3 mm Ø and 2–2.5 mm depth) for 3 months3-dimensional constructs fabricated using Col II hydrogel alone (Col II) or associated with auricular chondrocytes (AU-Col II)(i) Modified ICRS score
(ii) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) H&E, Masson’s trichrome, and Alcian Blue stainings
Significance in histological scores and defect healingWong et al. [16]

Ten male NZW rabbits (10 months old)Full-thickness cartilage defects in the patellar groove (4 mm in Ø and 3 mm in depth) for 3 weeksAutologous BMSCs seeded on type I collagen scaffold in association or not with LLLT(i) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(ii) H&E staining
(iii) Quantification of new cartilage formation, new bone formation%, measure of inflammation
No significant difference in new cartilage formation and inflammation; significance in new bone formationFekrazad et al. [17]

48 NZW rabbits (6–8 months old)Defects in the trochlear groove (4 mm Ø and 3 mm depth) for 3 and 9 monthsRegenerated silk fibroin scaffold alone (SF) or seeded with autologous chondrocytes (SFC); fibrin glue containing autologous chondrocytes (FGC)(i) Wakitani score
(ii) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) Modified O’Driscoll, Keeley and Salter score
(iv) H&E, Alcian Blue and Masson’s trichrome stainings
(v) IHC: Col II
(vi) Indentation test on fresh samples: ultimate compressive strength (UCS) and compressive Young’s modulus
Significant differences in histological scores but not in biomechanical dataKazemnejad et al. [18]

Twenty-eight female skeletally mature NZW rabbitsDefects in the medial femoral condyle (4 mm Ø and 5 mm depth) for 13 weeksAutologous BMP‐2-activated muscle tissue directly implanted into OC lesions(i) Paraffin embedding
(ii) Extended O’Driscoll score
(iii) Safranin O/fast green stainings
(iv) IHC: Col I and II
(v) Quantification of bone area within the subchondral defect
(v) Indentation test on fresh samples: stiffness
Similar trends between the bone area quantification and biomechanicsBetz et al. [19]

Forty-one skeletally mature NZW rabbitsFull-thickness defects in the femoral groove (5 mm Ø and 6 mm depth) for 1, 2, and 6 monthsCombined material comprising a scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct (TEC) derived from synovial mesenchymal stem cells and hydroxyapatite (HA) artificial bone (TEC-HA)
Control group: HA artificial bone
(i) Paraffin embedding
(ii) O’Driscoll score
(iii) H&E and Toluidine Blue staining
(iv) Microindentation test (at 6 months): stiffness
Significance in the histological score but not in biomechanicsShimomura et al. [20]

Nine skeletally mature male NZW rabbitsDefects in the medial femoral condyles (2.7 mm Ø and 4.0 mm depth) for 6.5 months(i) Poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citrate) (POC) with 60 weight % hydroxyapatite nanocrystals (POC-HA)
(ii) Poly-L-lactide (PLL)
(i) Paraffin embedding (longitudinal cut)
(ii) Niederauer score
(iii) Masson–Goldner trichrome staining
(iv) Quantification of total area and range of depth of tissue ingrowth, active osteoid surface area/total trabecular bone surface area, total osteoid surface area/total trabecular bone surface area, and trabecular bone surface area/total tissue area
(v) Measurement of fibrous capsule widths
No significant differences in all histomorphometric evaluationsChung et al. [21]

Seven male and female NZW rabbits (13 or 32 months old)Defects in the trochlear groove (1.5 mm Ø and 2 mm depth drill holes) for 70 days(i) 10 kDa chitosan/blood implant with fluorescent chitosan tracer
(ii) 40 kDa chitosan/blood implant with fluorescent chitosan tracer
(i) Modified O’Driscoll score
(ii) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) SafO staining
(iv) IHC: Col I and II
(v) Quantification of total chondral repair tissue area, (including bone overgrowth); percentage SafO, Col-1- or Col-2-positive-stained tissue (excluding bone overgrowth)
(vi) MicroCT on fresh samples: Residual hole depth and residual hole area below the surface
Significant differences in bone morphometry and O’Driscoll scoresGuzmán-Morales et al. [22]

Five male and female NZW rabbits (30-months old)Defects in the trochlea (microdrill hole defects, 1.4 mm Ø, and 2 mm depth) for 1 and 21 days150, 40, and 10 kDa chitosan solutions, mixed with autologous rabbit whole blood and clotted with tissue factor(i) MicroCT on fresh samples: residual hole depth and residual hole area below the surface
(ii) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) SafO staining
(iv) IHC: Col I and II
(v) Quantification of GAG, col I or col II (%); distribution of repair tissues in treated defects and volume density of neutrophils and stromal cells
(vi) TRAP quantification
Significant differences in microCT, GAG, col II, and col I quantifications and volume density of neutrophilsLafantaisie-Favreau et al. [23]

Twenty NZW rabbits (18 weeks old)Defects in the weight-bearing area of medial femoral condyles (3 mm Ø and 3 mm depth) for 2 weeks and 1, 2, and 4 monthsAllogeneic scaffold-free bioengineered chondrocyte pellet (BCP)(i) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(ii) Modified O’Driscoll score
(iii) H&E, Safranin O/fast green staining
(iv) IHC: Col I and II, type I and type II
(v) PCNA stainings
(vi) Quantification of % area filled in defect, cartilage thickness, and bone area
Significant differences in the score and cartilage thicknessCheuk et al. [24]

Forty NZW rabbits (12–15 months old)Defects in the weight-bearing area of medial femoral condyles (2 mm Ø with 1–1,5 mm depth) for 2 and 4 monthsOsteochondral defect (acute osteoarticular injury)(i) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(ii)Manking score
(iii) Safranin O/fast green staining
(iv) Sagittal-plane laxity measurement (at 8 and 16 weeks)
(v) Contact stress test on 7 fresh cadaver knees
Significance in the histological scoreVaseenon et al. [25]

Fourty-two adult male NZW rabbitsDefects in the patellar groove (4 mm Ø and 3.5–4 mm depth) for 1.5 and 3 monthsBilayered microporous scaffold with collagen and electrospun poly-L-lactic acid nanofibers (COL-nanofiber) and bilayer COL scaffold, seeded with BMSCs(i) ICRS score
(ii) Paraffin embedding
(iii) H&E and Safranin O/fast green staining
(iv) Indentation test (at 12 weeks): Young’s moduli on fresh samples placed in PBS at room temperature before testing.
(v) microCT: subchondral bone
Similar trend between histological scoring system and biomechanical testZhang et al. [26]

Nine female NZW rabbits (6 months old)Defects in the medial femoral condyle (4 mm Ø and 4 mm depth) for 3 months(i) 70/30 poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT) scaffold
(ii) 55/45 PEOT/PBT
(i) Histological scoring system (O’Driscoll score) on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (Technovit) embedded samples (thionine staining) (midsagittal cut)Significance in the histological scoring systemJansen et al. [27]

Forty-eight NZW rabbits (7 months old)Defects in the patellar groove (5 mm Ø and 10 mm depth) for 2 weeks and 1, 2, and 4 monthsOC defects treated with low-level He-Ne laser therapy (LLLT) 3 times a week(i) Paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(ii) H&E, Toluidine Blue staining
(iii) Pineda score
Significant acceleration of healing at 4 and 6 weeksBayat et al. [28]

20 adult male NZW rabbitsDefects in the femoral epiphysis (6 mm Ø and 8 mm depth) for 2 monthsMineralized HA-alginate scaffold compared to a commercially available collagen-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold(i) Niederauer score
(ii) PMMA embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) Stevenel Blue/van Gieson pichrofucsin staining
(iv) Quantification of MAR and BFR
(v) MicroCT on fresh samples: defect BV/TV; defect Tb.Th.; defect Tb.N.; defect Tb.Sp.; peri-implant BV/TV; peri-implant Tb.Th., Tb.N., and Tb.Sp.
Significance in microCT evaluations and not in dynamic morphometric analysesFilardo et al. [29]

Sixty skeletally immature male NZW rabbits (3 months old)Full-thickness defects in the trochlear groove (4 mm Ø and 4 mm depth) for 2 and 9 monthsAutogenous periosteal grafts under the influence of (i) group a— active intermittent motion (AIM), euthanized at 8 weeks; group B— continuous passive motion (CPM), euthanized at 8 weeks; group C—AIM, euthanized at 36 weeks; (ii) Group D—CPM, euthanized at 36 weeks(i) Indentation test on fresh samples: elastic stiffness
(ii) paraffin embedding (sagittal cut)
(iii) O’Driscoll score
(iv) H&E, Masson trichrome, and Alcian Blue staining
(v) Quantification of thickness and area of the regenerated tissue; thickness of the normal cartilage surrounding the defect
Significance in thickness of regenerated tissue and in elastic stiffnessMartin-Hernandez et al. [30]

Forty-two male NZW rabbits (7 months old)Full-thickness defects in the patellar groove (5 mm Ø and 10 mm depth) for 2 and 1, 2, and 4 monthsOC defects treated with low-level He-Ne laser therapy (LLLT) 3 times a week(i) Indentation test on previously frozen samples: instantaneous stiffness, maximum force, equilibrium load, and energy absorptionSignificance only in the energy absorptionJavadieh et al. [31]

Twenty mature female NZW rabbitsDefects in the medial femoral condyle (2.5 Ø and 3 mm depth) for 1, 2, and 3 monthsOC defects treated with low-dose irradiation(i) Paraffin embedding
(ii) O’Driscoll score
(iii) H&E and Safranin O staining
(iv) Indentation test on previously frozen samples: cartilage stiffness
No statistical significance was seen in any parameterÖncan et al. [32]

Thirty-four male NZW rabbitsFull-thickness defects in the medial and lateral femoral condyles (3 mm Ø and 3 mm in depth) for 6 and 12 weeksPoly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) with or without fibrin as cells carrier: (i) PLGA/Fibrin/BMSCs (PFC group)
(ii) PLGA/BMSCs (PC group)
(i) ICRS score
(ii) Paraffin embedding
(iii) H&E; Alcian Blue; Safranin O staining
(iv) IHC: Col II
(v) Cartilage-specific gene expression
(vi) Quantification of sGAG
(v) Compression test (at 12 weeks)
Similar significant trends in histological score, GAG content and biomechanical strengthRahman et al. [33]

Thirty-five skeletally mature NZW rabbits (24 weeks old)Full-thickness defects in the patellar groove (5 mm Ø and 6 mm depth) for 1, 2, and 6 months(i) Combined material: bTCP-based hybrid implant coupled with a scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct (TEC) derived from synovial mesenchymal stem cells (TEC/bTCP)
(ii) Scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct (TEC) derived from synovial mesenchymal stem cells and hydroxyapatite (HA) artificial bone (TEC/HA)
(i) Histological grading system (resurfacing:0–2) for gross examination
(ii) Paraffin embedding
(iii) Modified O’Driscoll score
(iv) H&E and Toluidine Blue staining
(v) Microindentation test: tissue stiffness
Similar trends among cellular morphology, total histological score, and biomechanicsShimomura et al. [34]

Five NZW rabbits (5–6 months old)Defects in the trochlear groove (3 mm Ø and 2 mm depth) for 3 and 6 monthsCell carrier prepared from articular cartilage slices, designated cartilage extracellular matrix- (ECM-) derived particles (CEDPs) seeded with rabbit ACs or ASCs(i) ICRS score
(ii) Paraffin embedding
(iii) H&E, Toluidine Blue and sirius red staining
(iv) OARSI score
(v) IHC: Col I and II
(vi) Nanoindentation tests on fresh samples (6 months): hardness, contact stiffness and reduced modulus
(vii) MRI: cartilage regeneration
(viii) microCT: Tb.Th. and BV/TV
Same significant trend in histological, microCT, and biomechanical evaluationsYin et al. [35]

Eighteen NZW rabbits (15 weeks old)Defects in the medial and lateral femoral condyles (3 mm Ø and 3 mm depth) for 2, 4, and 6 monthsExpandable gelatin scaffold seeded with rabbit chondrocytes (C + S group) compared to OC defects treated with allogenic chondrocyte injection (positive control), scaffold alone (S) and empty defect(i) O’Driscoll score
(ii) Paraffin embedding
(iii) H&E, Alcian Blue stainings
(iv) Quantification of integration, apposition, and disintegration of regenerated tissue
(v) IHC: Col I, II, and X and S-100
(vi) Compression test on fresh samples
Similar trend among the macroscopic score, histomorphometry, and compressive strength at each time pointWang et al. [36]

Twenty-seven NZW rabbits (3 months old)Full-thickness defects in the trochlea (4 mm Ø and 4 mm depth) for 6, 12, or 24 weeksOriented bovine cartilage ECM-derived scaffold using thermal-induced phase separation (TIPS) technology and seeded with rabbit BMSCs: (i) cell-oriented scaffold construct; (ii) cell-random scaffold composite(i) Paraffin embedding
(ii) H&E, Toluidine Blue, and Safranin O staining
(iii) Modified O’Driscoll score
(iv) microCT
(v) Unconfined compression test (UCC) on fresh samples: Young’s modulus
(v) Quantification of total DNA level, total GAG, and collagen content
Similar trends among histomorphological score, DNA, GAG, and collagen content and biomechanicsJia et al. [37]

Fifty-two Japanese white rabbits (6 months old)Defects in the trochlea (4.3 mm Ø and 7 mm depth) for 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeksHydroxyapatite- (Hap-) coated double-network (DN) hydrogel (HAp/DN gel)(i) MMA embedding (sagittal cut)
(ii) Villanueva bone staining
(iii) IHC: procollagen 1A1
(iv) Pushout test
(v) MicroCT: Bonding area and tissue density
Similar trend between microCT and biomechanicsWada et al. [38]

Five female Japanese white rabbits (6 months old)Defects in the trochlea (4.7 mm Ø and 7 mm depth) for 1 month(i) Collagen fibril-based tough hydrogels based on the double network (DN) concept using swim bladder collagen (SBC) extracted from Bester sturgeon fish (SBC/PDMAAm)
(ii) Hydroxyapatite- (Hap-) coated gel (HAp/c-SBC(ge-1)/PDMAAm)
(i) Pushout and compression test on fresh samplesSignificant differences in biomechanical performanceMredha et al. [39]

Forty-eight adult male NZW rabbitsDefects in the medial femoral condyles (4 mm Ø and 5 mm depth) for 1, 2, and 4 monthsPorous tantalum (PT) loaded with BMP-7 (MPT group)(i) SEM analysis
(ii) MMA embedding (longitudinal cut)
(iii) Toluidine Blue staining
(iv) MicroCT (at 16 weeks): bone intertrabecular space (trabecular spacing, Tb. Sp); bone density; Tb.Th.; Tb.N.; BV/TV;
(v) Launch test
Similar trend among histological grading system, micro CT, and biomechanicsWang et al. [40]

Thirty-six skeletal mature NZW rabbits (5-6 months old)Defects in the central medial femoral condyle (4 mm Ø and 5 mm depth) for 4 monthsBilayered PLGA/PLGA-Hap composite scaffold preseeded with BMSCs(i) Paraffin embedding (longitudinal cut)
(ii) H&E, Toluidine Blue, and Safranin O stainings
(iii) IHC: Col II
(iv) MicroCT on fresh samples
(v) AFM test of Young’s modulus and surface roughness
(vi) Western blot: p-smad 1, p-smad 2, and Col I and II
Significant differences in protein expression but not in all other parametersXiangyu et al. [41]

Forty-two NZW rabbits (6–12 months old)Defects in the trochlea (5 mm Ø and 5 mm depth) for 6 months(i) Osteochondral allografts (OCA) stored in Tsmu
(ii) OCA after vitrification
(i) Paraffin embedding
(ii) Mankin score
(iii) H&E, Safranin O/fast green staining
(iv) Quantification of chondrocyte viability (fluorescein diacetate and ethidium bromide staining), proteoglycan (PG) type II collagen
(v) Compression test on fresh samples: Young’s modulus
Similar trends among gross score, chondrocyte viability, PG content, type II collagen, and Young’s modulusCao et al. [42]

Ø = diameter; IHC = immunohistochemistry; Col = collagen; hPDCs = human periosteum-derived progenitor cells; TGF-β1: transforming growth factor β1; BV/TV = bone volume/trabecular volume; Tb.Th. = trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp. = trabecular separation; Tb.N. = trabecular number; microCT = microcomputed tomography; hESC-MSC = human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells: PBS = phosphate-buffered saline; MeHA = methacrylated hyaluronic acid; NZW = New Zealand white; ADM =  acellular dermal matrix; IPFP = infrapatellar fat pad; H&E = hematoxilyn and eosin; BMC = bone marrow concentrate; HA = hydroxyapatite; PEMFs = pulsed electromagnetic field; BMP‐2 = bone morphogenic protein-2; OC = osteochondral, BMSCs = bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; LLLT = low-level laser therapy; mar = mineral apposition rate; BFR = bone formation rate; AFM = atomic force microscope; sGAG =  sulphated glycosaminoglycan; bTCP = beta-tricalcium phosphate; ACs = articular chondrocytes; ASCs = adipose-derived stem cells; Tsmu = Taishan Medical University solution.