Research Article

Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy

Table 2

Results of the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test (the t-Student test was also used for associated variables, marked in the tables with an asterisk), which show significant differences (bold field) between individual values of parameters that determine root conduction in the pre- and postoperative evaluations.

Spinal root level (N=27)Lat. Min. FFreq. FFCTRxMEP latencyRxMEP amplitudeRxCTM-wave amplitude

C5 (recording from DPnrnrna0.07860.0044nr0.2333

C6 (recording from BB)nrnrna0.00350.5521nr0.6343

C7 (recording from TB)nrnrna0.14370.1882nr0.2149

C8 (recording from TB)0.69380.61640.52470.26650.03350.33050.7032

C8 (recording from ADM)0.00980.14240.03060.66560.55640.11830.2577

F min. APB: minimum F-wave latency after stimulation of motor fibres, Freq. F: frequency of F-waves after stimulation of nerve motor fibres, FCT: F-wave conduction time, RxMEP: root motor evoked potentials, RxCT: root conduction time, DP: deltoid posterior, BB: biceps brachii, TB: triceps brachii, APB: abductor pollicis brevis, ADM: abductor digiti minimi, nr: nonrecorded, and na: nonanalyzed.