BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 4798906 | 7 pages |

Prevalence and Genotyping of Echinococcus Species from Livestock in Kajiado County, Kenya

Academic Editor: Wen-Jun Li
Received22 Mar 2019
Revised04 Jun 2019
Accepted23 Jun 2019
Published07 Jul 2019


Cystic Echinococcosis (CE) is a widespread neglected zoonotic disease and is caused by the larval stage of the dog tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. CE is more frequent in livestock-rearing areas and where people live a nomadic or seminomadic lifestyle such as in Kajiado County, Kenya. There is limited data on CE disease situation in the county of Maasailand; the present study, therefore, reports on the prevalence of CE in cattle, sheep, and goats and their relative importance in CE transmission in Kajiado County. In total, 1,486 livestock (388 cattle, 625 sheep, and 473 goats) slaughtered in two abattoirs were examined for the presence of hydatid cysts in various organs. Cyst isolates were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) of the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 gene (nad1). The overall prevalence of CE was 14.8% (220/1486), while prevalence per livestock species was 15.2% (72/473) in goats, 14.9% (93/625) in sheep, and 14.2% (55/388) in cattle. Out of the 421 cysts isolated, 389 cysts were successfully characterized to be either E. granulosus sensu stricto (s. s.), 356/389 (91.5%), E. canadensis (G6/7), 26/389 (6.7%), or E. ortleppi, 7/389 (1.8%). This record confirms predominance of E. granulosus s. s. in Maasailand and other parts of Kenya, while the importance of E. ortleppi and E. canadensis (G6/7) to the general CE burden in Maasailand might be higher than previously thought. More so, a higher infection pressure for humans by E. granulosus s. s. based on its abundance could be speculated. The study sheds significant light on CE situation in livestock in the nomadic/seminomadic society of the Maasai in Kajiado County and provides good bases to investigate human CE in the area.

1. Introduction

Cystic Echinococcosis is caused by the larval stage of the dog tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s. l.) and is currently recognized by World Health Organization (WHO) as a neglected tropical disease [1]. CE is a common zoonotic disease of great public health significance globally due to its associated economic losses [2]. Approximately US$ 3 billion are lost annually on treatment of CE in humans and losses incurred due to the condemnation of infected organs in livestock [3]. Dogs and to a lesser extent other canids and felids are the primary definitive hosts of Echinococcus species, with herbivores acting as the intermediate hosts and the humans as aberrant intermediate hosts. The outcome of the infection in livestock and human is cyst development in the liver, lungs, or other organs [4]. E. granulosus s. l. consists of at least five species, namely, E. granulosus sensu stricto (s. s.), E. equinus, E. ortleppi, E. canadensis (G6–G10), and E. felidis [5, 6].

East Africa and Kenya, in particular, have long been known to be of the world’s largest foci of CE in humans [79]. Previous data from Kenya have centered their focus on CE situations in Turkana and Maasailand [8]. Data from other endemic areas are available but only sparingly. Previous CE studies in Kenya, thus far, indicate the presence of all five E. granulosus s. l. and the recently discovered Gomo genotype [1015]. To appreciate the CE situation in the whole of Kenya, epidemiological data from all endemic localities including Kajiado County is required. The only available data from this area is nearly three decades old and did not report Echinococcus spp. in livestock [16]. Furthermore, the recent study examined livestock originating mainly from Bissil area (Kajiado South) [10]. Therefore, this study focused on the two main slaughterhouses receiving livestock from the wider scope of the Kajiado County. We report here the prevalence of CE in cattle, sheep, and goats and the Echinococcus spp. causing CE in Kajiado County. Findings from the study will improve our knowledge of CE in this county and establish the relative contribution of each livestock species in the distribution and transmission of CE.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hydatid Cysts Collection from Cattle, Sheep, and Goats

Majority of the livestock examined for CE came from Kajiado County. The county is divided into five subcounties: Kajiado Central, Kajiado North, Kajiado East, Kajiado West, and Kajiado South. Sampling was done in two major abattoirs in Kajiado West Subcounty, namely, Kiserian and Keekonyokie, during slaughter days from December 2016 to February 2017 (Figure 1). A total of 1486 carcasses of livestock were inspected for the presence of hydatid cysts in all organs (lungs, liver, heart, spleen, as well as the kidneys) of the pleural and abdominal cavities. Visual inspection, palpation, and incision were done for all of the organs for the presence and cyst distribution. The lesions were carefully excised from all infected organs. Individual cysts were identified as those that had a continuous cyst wall while multiple cysts had a visibly separate cyst wall even for the calcified cysts. The isolated cysts were packed in clean polythene bags placed in cooler boxes and transported to the parasitology laboratory of the Kenya Medical Research Institute, for examination and further analysis. Cysts were dissected using a sterile scalpel blade and each cyst material was fixed and preserved in 70% Ethanol in individual tubes. The contents of the cysts were examined microscopically for the presence of protoscoleces (PS). Cysts were classified as fertile (with protoscoleces) sterile (fluid-filled without protoscoleces), degenerated (collapsed cyst walls with caseated protoscoleces and soft cheesy debris without calcification), and calcified (hard solid appearance of the ectocyst). All the cysts from the same organ were examined individually to confirm mixed infections.

2.2. DNA Extraction

DNA was obtained from cyst material and protoscoleces by lysing in 0.02 M NaOH at 99°C for 10 minutes. In a few instances where the above process failed to yield adequate DNA, genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit® (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The germinal layers or cyst walls were cut into small pieces and lysed in ATL lysis buffer (180 μl) and proteinase K (20 μl), and DNA was subsequently extracted using the manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted DNA was eluted in 50 μL of elution buffer.

2.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction and Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)

Two nested PCR assays targeting part or the entire NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 gene (nad1) were used for genotyping of cyst materials. The first nested PCR (entire nad1 gene) was performed as described by Hüttner and Nakao [17]. The cyst materials negative using the first PCR assay were genotyped using a second nested PCR as described by Mulinge and Magambo [18], which amplifies part of the nad1 gene (545-552 bp). In both PCR assays, the reaction mixture contained 2 μl of the DNA, 1 × DreamTaq Green Buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 100 mM KCl, 0.5 % (v/v) Nonidet P40, 0.5 % (v/v) Tween 20) (Thermo Scientific), 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.25 μM of forward and reverse primers, 2 mM MgCl2, and 0.625 units of DreamTaq Green DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific) in 25 μl final volume. The PCR cycling conditions were 5 min. for initial denaturation at 94°C, 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 60 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Positive PCR products were genotyped by RFLP to the specific Echinococcus species. To this end, 10 μl of the nested PCR products was digested using 0.5 μl (5 U) of HphI restriction enzyme, 1 × Buffer, and 7.5 μl of nuclease-free water and incubated at 37°C overnight [18, 19]. Positive controls for E. granulosus s. s., E. ortleppi, E. canadensis (G6/7), and E. felidis were resolved alongside the test samples for both methods.

2.4. Ethical Approval

Institutional approval was granted by the Institute of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases (ITROMID) at the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT). The study protocol received ethical clearance from the Department of Veterinary Services, Kajiado County, and by KEMRI’s Scientific Ethics Review Unit (SERU) (P00048/3395) and Animal Care and Use Committee.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence, Cysts Location, Load, and Conditions

A total of 1486 livestock at slaughter were screened during the survey. The general prevalence of CE in the current study area was 14.80% (220/1486): more common in goats 15.22% (72/473) than in sheep 14.88% (93/625) and in cattle 14.18% (55/388) (Table 1). In all the infected livestock, liver and lungs were the only organs harbouring cysts, and the liver was the most infected organ (p = 0.013). Across infected livestock, 421 cysts were isolated: 260 (61.76%) were from the liver and 161 (38.24%) from the lungs (Table 1). Though CE infection in goat was the highest, infections with more than one cyst were higher in cattle and sheep than in goat (Table 2). Majority of cysts of cattle origin were sterile (41.9%), while most of the calcified cysts were found in sheep (48.5%) and goats (52.2%) (Tables 3 and 4). On average, sheep had the greatest number of fertile cysts at 40.5%, 25.9% in cattle and 18.3% in goats (Tables 3 and 4).

LivestockPrevalence (%)Liver Lungs Both organs

Cattle (n=388)55 (14.18)251614
Goats (n=473)72 (15.22)45216
Sheep (n=625)93 (14.88)67188

Cysts n (%)
Livestock12345 or More

Cattle (55)26 (47.3)14 (25.5)2 (3.6)8 (14.5)5 (9.1)
Goat (72)51 (70.8)10 (13.9)6 (8.3)3 (4.2)2 (2.8)
Sheep (93)64 (68.8)17 (18.3)5 (5.4)1 (1.1)6 (6.5)

n = number of cysts.

Condition of cysts
LivestockFertileSterileDegeneratedCalcifiedTotalFertility rate


Condition of cysts (n (%) and Echinococcus spp.

Cattle37 (25.9%) (37 E. granulosus s. s.)60 (41.9%) (52 E. granulosus s. s., 3 E. ortleppi, 5 NC)20 (14%) (19 E. granulosus s. s., 1 E. canadensis (G6/7))26 (18.2%) (23 E. granulosus s. s., 1 E. ortleppi, 1 E. canadensis (G6/7),1 NC)
Goat21 (18.3%) (21 E. granulosus s. s.)3 (2.6%) (3 E. granulosus s. s.)31 (26.9%) (27 E. granulosus s. s., 4 E. canadensis (G6/7))60 (52.2%) (33 E. granulosus s. s., 2 E. ortleppi, 13 E. canadensis (G6/7), 12 NC)
Sheep66 (40.5%) (65 E. granulosus s. s.,1 E. canadensis (G6/7))5 (3.1%) (5 E. granulosus s. s.)13 (7.9%) (11 E. granulosus s. s.,1 E. canadensis (G6/7), 1 NC)79 (48.5%) (60 E. granulosus s. s., 1 E. ortleppi, 5 E. canadensis (G6/7), 13 NC)

n = number of cysts
NC = Not characterised
3.2. Genotyping

From a total of 421 cysts that were subjected to nested PCR-RFLP, 389 cysts were successfully genotyped and included 137/143 (95.8%) from cattle, 103/115 (89.57%) from goats, and 149/163 (91.4%) from sheep. A total of 32/421 cysts failed to amplify, thus, 6, 12, and 14 from cattle, goats, and sheep, respectively, and therefore were not characterized (Table 4). Three species of Echinococcus were identified and included E. granulosus s. s. 356 (91.5%), E. canadensis (G6/7) 26 (6.7%), and E. ortleppi 7 (1.8%). E. canadensis (G6/7) infection was higher in goats 17 (16.5%) than in cattle 2 (1.5%) and sheep 7 (4.7%). All the fertile cysts in cattle (25.9%), 18.3% in goats, and 40.5% in sheep except one belonged to E. granulosus s. s taxon. The other fertile cyst from sheep was E. canadensis (G6/7). All the remaining cysts identified as E. canadensis (G6/7) (25) and E. ortleppi (7) were not fertile (Table 4).

In addition to single infections, this study reports several cases of mixed infections. There were three cases of mixed infections in cattle and there was one case of all three Echinococcus spp. (E. granulosus s. s., E. ortleppi, and E. canadensis (G6/7) as well as two instances of E. granulosus s. s. and E. ortleppi and E. ortleppi and E. canadensis (G6/7). In goats, there were three cases of mixed infections, all with E. granulosus s. s. and E. canadensis (G6/7), and, in sheep, only one case of E. granulosus s. s. and E. canadensis (G6/7) mixed infection was observed (Table 5).

Livestock n (%)
Echinococcus spp.CattleGoatSheep

E. granulosus s. s.51 (92.7)50 (73.5)79 (90.8)
E. ortleppi1 (1.8)2 (2.9)1 (1.1)
E. canadensis (G6/7)0 (0)13 (19.1)6 (6.9)
E. granulosus s. s./E. ortleppi 1 (1.8)0 (0)0 (0)
E. granulosus s. s./E. canadensis (G6/7)0 (0)3 (4.4)1 (1.1)
E. ortleppi/E. canadensis (G6/7)1 (1.8)0 (0)0 (0)
E. granulosus s. s./E. ortleppi/E. canadensis (G6/7)1 (1.8)0 (0)0 (0)

n = number of cattle, goats, and sheep.

4. Discussion

This study reports the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) and Echinococcus spp. in cattle, goats, and sheep in Kajiado County, Kenya. The prevalence reported is within the range known of Maasailand from older accounts, such as in the works of Macpherson [16] (8.9%, 8.1%, and 7.1% in cattle, sheep, and goat, respectively) and Addy et al. [19] (25.8 % in cattle, 16.5 % in sheep, and 10.8% in goats). It confirms the persistence of CE in nomadic society. High livestock stocking intensity, conducive environmental conditions, and movement of livestock [20, 21] may have influenced the infection pressure and the persistence of the cestode in livestock intermediate hosts in Maasailand.

The liver was the most affected organ just as was known before from Maasailand [19]. The predilection site of E. granulosus s. l. is not fully understood and some studies [16, 20, 22] indicated the lungs to be the most affected. Cysts in the liver or the lungs could be either fertile containing protoscoleces/daughter cysts or nonfertile. The nonfertile cysts can further be divided into calcified, degenerated, or sterile. These nonfertile cysts are noninfectious and, therefore, have no epidemiological significance in CE transmission to definitive hosts. In this study majority of the cysts from livestock were nonfertile, and a recent survey reported 80% of cysts from sheep in Turkana being calcified (Zeyhle unpublished data). This observation is not clearly understood, because regular deworming of ruminants is less likely to have a significant effect on the calcification of cysts. Previous studies have shown that long-term treatment with high doses of anthelmintic drugs is required to arrest cyst development [23, 24]. Sheep in which most fertile cysts were isolated in the present study would be more important in the transmission and maintenance of CE in Maasailand. The cysts fertility rates reported indicate the need for control measures such as health education, regular deworming of dogs, dog population control, good slaughter hygiene, and proper disposal of slaughter offal to avert transmission.

Majority of the cysts in this study were E. granulosus s. s. which confirms its predominance observed almost a decade ago in Maasailand [10] and in Kenya at large [11, 13, 15, 25, 26]. The high fertility rates of E. granulosus s. s. cysts in sheep indicate that they are important intermediate host of this taxon in this area. Sheep are also the most common home-slaughtered livestock species in Maasailand and that may enhance transmission of E. granulosus s. s. However, both cattle and goats may also play a role in transmission of E. granulosus s. s. based on the fertility rate in this study. Although goats are considered important intermediate host of E. canadensis (G6/7) in absence of camels, none of the cysts belonging to this taxon were fertile in this study [10, 27]. Isolation of E. ortleppi from all three livestock species reveals a wider host range of the parasite, aspect that is less understood. Generally, E. ortleppi is a rare species even in cattle who are the principal intermediate hosts, possibly due to the fact that cattle are rarely slaughtered at home, and therefore dogs have less access to slaughter offal from cattle [10]. However, in a recent development, due to poor disposal of condemned viscera in poorly managed slaughter facilities in urban centres, dogs have readily access to slaughter offal and this might be a reason for the increased cases of E. ortleppi in our study [18]. Elsewhere in Brazil home slaughter of cattle is believed to be a factor that facilitates the recent rise of E. ortleppi prevalence in Brazil [28].

5. Conclusion

Cystic echinococcosis continues to persist in Maasailand with E. granulosus s. s. being the dominant species. The high fertility rate of cysts in sheep and its regular home-slaughter make it the most important intermediate host in the transmission of CE in Kajiado County of Kenya. Echinococcus ortleppi (G5) and E. canadensis (G6/7) may be important CE agents in Maasailand more than previously thought.

Data Availability

The prevalence and genotyping data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.


The proceedings from this study were presented in the Kenya Veterinary Association 53rd Annual Scientific Conference and World Veterinary Day Celebrations and the abstract was published in the Conference’s Book of Abstract.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors acknowledge the meat inspectors in the abattoirs for their assistance during the sampling and data collection. This work has been published with the approval of the Director, Kenya Medical Research Institute. The authors also sincerely thank Dr. Francis Addy, University for Development Studies, Ghana, for proofreading this paper. This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KE282-7/1, -8/1, -9/1, RO3753-1/1, -2/1, -3/1] through “Cystic Echinococcosis in sub-Saharan Africa Research Initiative (CESSARi).”


  1. WHO, Sustaining the Drive to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases: Second WHO Report on Neglected Diseases, World Health Organization, 2013.
  2. C. M. Budke, P. Deplazes, and P. R. Torgerson, “Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 296–303, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. WHO, Echinococcosis. Fact Sheet No. 377, World Health Organisation, 2015.
  4. R. C. Thompson, “Biology and systematics of echinococcus,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 95, pp. 65–109, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Nakao, A. Lavikainen, T. Yanagida, and A. Ito, “Phylogenetic systematics of the genus Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae),” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 43, no. 12-13, pp. 1017–1029, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Nakao, T. Yanagida, S. Konyaev et al., “Mitochondrial phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae) with emphasis on relationships among Echinococcus canadensis genotypes,” Parasitology, vol. 140, no. 13, pp. 1625–1636, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. N. L. Macpherson, A. Spoerry, E. Zeyhle, T. Romig, and M. Gorfe, “Pastoralists and hydatid disease: an ultrasound scanning prevalence survey in east africa,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 243–247, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Romig, R. Omer, E. Zeyhle et al., “Echinococcosis in sub-Saharan Africa: emerging complexity,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Macpherson, E. Zeyhle, T. Romig, P. Rees, and J. Were, “Portable ultrasound scanner versus serology in screening for hydatid cysts in a nomadic population,” The Lancet, vol. 330, no. 8553, pp. 259–261, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. Addy, A. Alakonya, N. Wamae et al., “Prevalence and diversity of cystic echinococcosis in livestock in Maasailand, Kenya,” Parasitology Research, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 2289–2294, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Mbaya, J. Magambo, S. Njenga et al., “Echinococcus spp. in central Kenya: a different story,” Parasitology Research, vol. 113, no. 10, pp. 3789–3794, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. O. Odongo, C. M. Tiampati, E. Mulinge et al., “Prevalence and genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus in sheep in Narok County, Kenya,” Parasitology Research, vol. 117, no. 7, pp. 2065–2073, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Dinkel, E. M. Njoroge, A. Zimmermann et al., “A PCR system for detection of species and genotypes of the Echinococcus granulosus-complex, with reference to the epidemiological situation in eastern Africa,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 645–653, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Kagendo, J. Magambo, E. Agola et al., “A survey for Echinococcus spp. of carnivores in six wildlife conservation areas in Kenya,” Parasitology International, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 604–611, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. M. Wachira, J. Bowles, E. Zeyhle, and D. P. McManus, “Molecular examination of the sympatry and distribution of sheep and camel strains of Echinococcus granulosus in Kenya,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 473–479, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  16. C. N. Macpherson, “Epidemiology of hydatid disease in Kenya: a study of the domestic intermediate hosts in Masailand,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 209–217, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Hüttner, M. Nakao, T. Wassermann et al., “Genetic characterization and phylogenetic position of Echinococcus felidis Ortlepp, 1937 (Cestoda: Taeniidae) from the African lion,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 861–868, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. Mulinge, J. Magambo, D. Odongo et al., “Molecular characterization of Echinococcus species in dogs from four regions of Kenya,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 255, pp. 49–57, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Hüttner, L. Siefert, U. Mackenstedt, and T. Romig, “A survey of echinococcus species in wild carnivores and livestock in East Africa,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1269–1276, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. Kebede, Z. Gebre-Egziabher, G. Tilahun, and A. Wossene, “Prevalence and financial effects of hydatidosis in cattle slaughtered in birre-sheleko and dangila abattoirs, Northwestern Ethiopia,” Zoonoses and Public Health, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. N. Kebede, A. Mitiku, and G. Tilahun, “Hydatidosis of slaughtered animals in Bahir Dar Abattoir, North-western Ethiopia,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Njoroge, P. Mbithi, J. Gathuma et al., “A study of cystic echinococcosis in slaughter animals in three selected areas of northern Turkana, Kenya,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. M. Schantz, H. Bossche, and J. Eckert, “Chemotherapy for larval echinococcosis in animals and humans: Report of a workshop,” Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 5–26, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. A. Gemmell, S. N. Parmeter, R. J. Sutton, and N. Khan, “Effect of mebendazole against echinococcus granulosus and taenia hydatigena cysts in naturally infected sheep and relevance to larval tapeworm infections in man,” Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Casulli, E. Zeyhle, E. Brunetti et al., “Molecular evidence of the camel strain (G6 genotype) of Echinococcus granulosus in humans from Turkana, Kenya,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Mutwiri, J. Magambo, E. Zeyhle et al., “Molecular characterisation of echinococcus granulosus species/strains in human infections from Turkana, Kenya,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 235–240, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Soriano, N. Pierangeli, L. Pianciola et al., “Molecular characterization of Echinococcus isolates indicates goats as reservoir for Echinococcus canadensis G6 genotype in Neuquén, Patagonia Argentina,” Parasitology International, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 626–628, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. Romig, P. Deplazes, D. Jenkins et al., “Ecology and life cycle patterns of Echinococcus species,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 95, pp. 213–314, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Lucy Nungari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

686 Views | 261 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.