Research Article

Preliminary Study on the Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TL on Cecal Bacterial Community Structure of Broiler Chickens

Table 3

Differences in the abundance of nine bacterial genera among the control, antibiotic, and probiotic groups, as determined on day 14 (n = 7).

TaxaRelative abundance value
GeneraCPAP vs. CA vs. CP vs. A
(Mean% ± SD)(Mean% ± SD)(Mean% ± SD)

Faecalibacterium8.3 ± 0.02415.25 ± 0.03914.57 ± 0.039n.s.n.s.n.s.
Oscillospira2.94 ± 0.0023.79 ± 0.0034.09 ± 0.005n.s.
Butyricicoccus1.88 ± 0.0052.29 ± 0.0021.75 ± 0.003n.s.n.s.n.s.
Anaeroplasma0.60 ± 0.0011.13 ± 0.0001.30 ± 0.001n.s.
Ruminococcus1.45 ± 0.0021.37 ± 0.0021.48 ± 0.002n.s.n.s.n.s.
Bacteroides3.92 ± 0.0080.32 ± 0.0030.31 ± 0.001n.s.
Lactobacillus0.68 ± 0.0010.55 ± 0.0021.08 ± 0.002n.s.n.s.n.s.
Clostridium1.07 ± 0.0021.09 ± 0.0020.96 ± 0.001n.s.n.s.n.s.
Bilophila1.34 ± 0.0030.020 ± 0.0000.0015 ± 0.000n.s.

n.s. means not significant (); significant (). C = control group; A = chlortetracycline group; P = Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TL group.