BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 6361320 | 7 pages |

A Comparative Analysis of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Lean and Obese Humans

Academic Editor: Koichiro Wada
Received12 Mar 2019
Revised01 May 2019
Accepted28 May 2019
Published12 Jun 2019


Obesity is intrinsically linked with the gut microbiome, and studies have identified several obesity-associated microbes. The microbe-microbe interactions can alter the composition of the microbial community and influence host health by producing secondary metabolites (SMs). However, the contribution of these SMs in the prevention and treatment of obesity has been largely ignored. We identified several SM-encoding biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) from the metagenomic data of lean and obese individuals and found significant association between some BGCs, including those that produce hitherto unknown SM, and obesity. In addition, the mean abundance of BGCs was positively correlated with obesity, consistent with the lower taxonomic diversity in the gut microbiota of obese individuals. By comparing the BGCs of known SM between obese and nonobese samples, we found that menaquinone produced by Enterobacter cloacae showed the highest correlation with BMI, in agreement with a recent study on human adipose tissue composition. Furthermore, an obesity-related nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) was negatively associated with Bacteroidetes, indicating that the SMs produced by intestinal microbes in obese individuals can change the microbiome structure. This is the first systemic study of the association between gut microbiome BGCs and obesity and provides new insights into the causes of obesity.

1. Introduction

Recent studies show that gut microbes play an important role in the pathogenesis of obesity [1, 2]. Diet-induced alteration of the gut microbiota alleviated obesity in children [3, 4], and several intestinal microbes (e.g., Actinobacteria) have been significantly associated with obesity [5]. Occasionally, an obesity-associated microbe detected in one study cannot be validated in other studies. For example, some studies report an increased Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio in obese patients [6, 7], whereas others found no association between the above phyla and obesity [8, 9].

Microbial interactions can alter the composition of the community by producing secondary metabolites (SMs). SMs are organic compounds that are produced by bacteria and fungi that can mediate microbial competition and interaction and therefore influence the composition of the gut microbiota. The biosynthesis of SMs is controlled by enzymes encoded by biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). Genomic mining of gut microbiota BGCs has helped identify numerous bioactive SMs with antimicrobial potential [10, 11]. Most microbial BGCs that have been identified so far contain genes encoding core biosynthetic enzymes such as polyketide synthase (PKS) and nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS). More than 3000 small molecule BGCs were identified in the NIH Human Microbiome Project [12], of which lactocillin showed similar structure to some clinically tested antibiotics, and the in vivo expression was validated by the metatranscriptome sequencing analysis. These small molecules not only inhibit the growth of competing bacteria but also alter the composition of the gut microbiome. In addition, microbial SMs have also been implicated in human physiology, although their precise role in obesity is unclear.

In our previous study, we used a systematic approach to detect putative BGCs enriched in Parkinson’s disease from raw metagenomic data, of which many originated from microbes that were not abundant in the corresponding patients [13]. In this study, we analyzed the differences in the BGCs of nonobese and obese individuals using human fecal metagenomic data, in order to identify obesity-associated BGCs. Our findings illustrate the widespread distribution of SM-encoding BGCs in the human microbiome and provide new insights into the causes of obesity.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Collection and Construction of Human-Related BGC Protein Database

A total of 10,042 genomes were identified from the IMG-ABC website (Version 4.560) using “Homo sapiens” as the host name, and 246,188 human-related BGCs and 2,640,191 protein sequences were extracted from these genomes [14]. The gut metagenomic data was extracted from the European Bioinformatics Institute-Sequence Read Archive database using the accession number ERP003612, which initially was used to analyze the correlation between the colonic microbiota and metabolic disorders in a Danish cohort of 123 nonobese and 169 obese individuals [15]. In the quality control step, we only kept the first 70bp of the reads for each sample, and samples with read length less than 70bp were discarded. The remaining 278 samples were analyzed further.

2.2. Identification of Putative BGCs

To determine the abundance of each putative BGC per sample, the metagenomic reads were first aligned against the protein sequence database of the human-related BGCs using the DIAMOND tool with an E-value of 1e-05 [16], and the top hit proteins per read were subsequently analyzed. To avoid contamination of the nonbiosynthesis genes, a list of biosynthesis and nonbiosynthesis related Pfam domains was, respectively, extracted from AntiSMASH [17] and a recent study [12]. A database was constructed using these Pfam domains and queried against the top hit proteins, and the biosynthesis genes were validated using the hmmscan program in the HMMER package with an E-value of 0.01. Finally, the abundance scores of the biosynthesis genes of each BGC per sample were calculated, and the BGCs with at least 50% biosynthesis genes that were detected in more than 10 samples with a frequency of reads ≥ 10 were selected for the following analysis [13].

2.3. Detection of Known SM-Encoding BGCs

A database of 13460 protein sequences extracted from all SM-encoding BGCs was constructed, and the trimmed metagenomic reads from ERP003612 were aligned against this database using the DIAMOND tool with an E-value of 1e-05 [16]. The putative BGCs encoding known SMs were detected the same way as the human-related BGCs. For each known secondary metabolite BGC, we compared their abundance with the body mass index (BMI).

2.4. Normalization and Comparison

The abundance of these putative BGCs and known SM-encoding BGCs was further assessed across different samples. Each BGC was normalized as = 06 / , where is the sum of reads aligned to all biosynthetic genes in a particular BGC and is the total number of reads in the metagenomic data. A BGC absent in a specific sample was assigned a value of 0.01. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between BMI and the BGCs, and the p-values were corrected by the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

2.5. NRPS Analysis

NRPS is a class of peptide SMs produced by bacteria and fungi and has been successfully used as antibiotics [18]. AntiSMASH 4.0 was used to predict the domain information and core chemical structure of putative NRPS [17], NRPSsp was used to find the subunit of NRPS [19], and NaPDoS was used to define the class of condensation domain [20]. In order to determine the potential effect of NRPS on the obesity-related (positively or inversely) microbes, we evaluated the distribution of NRPS using the taxonomic profile of the ERP003612 data and the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) data [8, 21]. The taxonomic profiling of metagenomic reads was performed using metaphlan2 [22].

3. Results

3.1. Overview of BGCs in the Gut Microbiome of Obese Subjects

The IMG-ABC is the largest freely accessible database of predicted and experimental BGCs that includes more than one million reads isolated from both genomes and metagenomes. After mapping the BGC reads from the obesity-related metagenomics extracted from the IMG-ABC database with the DIAMOND tool, we calculated the abundance of these BGCs by normalizing the aligned metagenomic reads from at least 10 samples with frequency of reads ≥ 10. A total of 4,640 BGCs, corresponding to ~2% of the total human-related BGCs, were finally selected, of which 2183 were detected in at least 80% of the samples (Figure 1). Most BGCs are species specific, mirroring the individual-specific taxonomic profiles of the gut microbiome [23].

Interestingly, there was a significant positive correlation between the mean abundance of BGCs and the BMI of corresponding subjects (Figure 2(a)). The gut microbiota of obese individuals exhibited reduced taxonomic diversity compared to that of lean individuals [5]. It seems that obesity-associated SMs play a role in inhibiting the growth of competing species and reduce the diversity of the gut microbiota of obese individuals.

Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation of some of the detected BGCs with BMI. The most significantly correlated BGCs are shown in Table 1, and most of them are located in metagenomic data (Genome ID with prefix “70000”), indicating that they originate from microbial species that have not been identified so far [24]. For the unknown species-derived BGCs, we defined the putative host organism by the best hit genome using NCBI-BLAST [13], and, not surprisingly, most of them belonged to obese-related genera like Akkermansia, Ruminococcus, Bacteroides, and Prevotella [4, 7, 25]. However, the association between the BGCs and BMI did not do that between the host and obesity. For example, Bacteroides and Prevotella were positively associated with BMI (Table 1), but these two genera are usually negatively associated with obesity [26]. Furthermore, many species listed in Table 1 have not been linked with obesity, e.g., Gastranaerophilaceae MH_37 (Figure 2(b)).

Genome IDBGC IDBest hit genomeP-valueRho

2522572068160477684Gastranaerophilaceae MH_372.50E-06-0.28
7000000081161367537Gastranaerophilaceae Zag_14.19E-05-0.24
7000000111161369749Lachnospiraceae bacterium sp. 8_1_57FAA1.51E-040.23
646206266160358802Bacteroides sp. 2_2_41.65E-040.22
7000000093161368122Lachnoclostridium fimetarium DSM 91791.94E-04-0.22
7000000063161366183Alloprevotella tannerae ATCC 512592.03E-040.22
7000000036161364337Proteiniborus ethanoligenes DSM 216502.24E-04-0.22
7000000308161383461Bacteroides dorei CL03T12C012.44E-040.22
641380427160336495Clostridium leptum DSM 7532.77E-040.22
7000000532161400499Ruminiclostridium cellobioparum termitidis CT11123.95E-04-0.21
7000000716161411607Prevotella melaninogenica ATCC 258454.81E-040.21
7000000532161400549Clostridium cellulovorans 743B, ATCC 352965.37E-04-0.21
7000000172161373025Clostridium sp. DSM 84315.66E-04-0.21
7000000187161374310Ruminococcaceae bacterium AP75.67E-04-0.21
7000000666161408821Prevotella melaninogenica ATCC 258456.76E-040.20
7000000171161372603Anaerotruncus rubiinfantis MT157.48E-04-0.20
7000000332161385164Ruminococcus bromii L2-638.60E-040.20
7000000579161403195Barnesiella intestinihominis YIT 118608.77E-040.20
7000000100161368698Bacteroides vulgatus NLAE-zl-G2028.78E-040.20
7000000333161385387Clostridium sp. Marseille-P2998.85E-04-0.20
7000000213161376660Bacteroides vulgatus mpk9.34E-040.20
7000000417161390983Akkermansia muciniphila ATCC BAA-8359.37E-04-0.20
7000000549161401581Barnesiella intestinihominis YIT 118609.43E-040.20
2548876788160755921Bacteroides faecis MAJ279.75E-040.20
7000000624161405348Gastranaerophilaceae Zag_19.92E-04-0.20

3.2. Obese Individuals Have Characteristic BGCs with Known SM

We also determined the correlation between obesity and BGCs encoding known SMs using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis (Table 2). Menaquinone produced by Enterobacter cloacae showed the strongest correlation to BMI (Figure 2(c)). This is consistent with the high concentration of menaquinone detected in the adipose tissues of obese adults [27]. In addition, Enterobacter cloacae B29 isolated from the gut of morbidly obese individuals induced obesity in germfree mice [28], and reduction in Enterobacteriaceae and other bacteria could decrease fecal levels of menaquinone [29]. Taken together, our approach can identify obesity-associated BGCs and SMs.

Genome IDBGC IDGenome descriptionSMP-valueRho

651717061160625038Enterobacter cloacaeMenaquinone0.0050.17
651716797160624794Escherichia coliYersiniabactin0.0450.12
2582581495160962548Azospirillum brasilense CdL-Rhamnose0.0520.12
2582581623160962746Burkholderia glumae Toxoflavin0.1060.10
651716745160624742Escherichia coliLipopolysaccharide0.1490.09
2582581704160962493Pasteurella multocida CHEBI:593930.1770.08
651717167160625143Lactobacillus plantarum L-Citrulline0.194-0.08
651717142160625119Streptomyces chattanoogensisPimaricin0.2290.07
651716887160624883Salmonella enterica GDP-mannose0.2390.07
2563366797160938787Escherichia coli KTE111Enterochelin0.4720.04
651716864160624860Escherichia coliLipopolysaccharide0.5870.03
651716612160624612Escherichia coliLipopolysaccharide0.6390.03
2582581365160962702Klebsiella pneumoniae Lipopolysaccharide0.655-0.03
2563366674160938831Aneurinibacillus migulanus GRAMICIDIN0.9810.00

3.3. A NRPS Found Increased with BMI

We also detected an NRPS-encoding BGC (Cluster ID: 160336495) that was significantly correlated with BMI (Figure 2(d)). The best match genome of this NRPS is Clostridium leptum DSM 753, which is associated with both obesity and weight loss [30]. The structure of this NRPS was analyzed by antiSMASH (Figure 3), and its putative substrate was identified as phenylalanine by NRPSsp. Finally, both condensation domains of this NRPS were recognized as being of the LCL class by NapDoS.

We compared the NRPS with each phylum in the ERP003612 data and found that the Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Chlorobi were negatively associated with the abundance of this NRPS (Table 3). To further determine the potential role of this NRPS on gut microbiome of obese individuals, we calculated its abundance in HMP data and correlated it with each phylum per sample (Table 4). The phyla Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia were negatively associated with the abundance of this NRPS.


Candidatus Saccharibacteria0.0130.0240.15


Candidatus Saccharibacteria1.85E-054.81E-050.16

4. Discussion

We identified several obesity-associated BGCs by comparing the metagenomics data of obese and lean individuals. In agreement with previous studies [31], the BGCs were highly host specific, with only half of them detected in at least 80% of the individuals. In addition, most of these BGCs encode for unknown secondary metabolites, thereby indicating a potential source for antimicrobials. Studies have largely focused on the effects of externally administered drugs on the human body [32], and those of endogenously produced antibiotics are virtually unknown. We found that obesity, measured in terms high BMI, was associated with increased BGC abundance, indicating lower complexity of the gut microbiome due to the inhibitory function of encoded SMs. This is consistent with a previous study which identified decreased microbial complexity of the gut as one of the factors promoting obesity [5]. This could be due to obesity-associated SMs that kill the competing bacteria and reduce diversity. In addition, an obesity associated NRPS identified in this study was negatively correlated with Bacteroidetes, an obesity-associated bacterial phylum, in both ERP003612 data and HMP data [4].

Comparison of the BGCs with known SMs between obese and nonobese individuals showed the strongest correlation of menaquinone with high BMI. In addition, many obesity-associated BGCs encoded for SMs hitherto unrelated to obesity, indicating potential biomarkers for obesity. Several BGCs are associated with mobile genetic elements like transposons that are involved in horizontal gene transfer [33] and can account for their spread across multiple genomes. This could explain the correlation of these BGCs with even the bacteria not associated with obesity. For example, the role of Bacteroidetes in obesity has been largely ambiguous [4], whereas we found an inversely association of some BGCs from this phylum with BMI. It is possible that only some species of Bacteroidetes are associated with obesity, while the rest have gained BGCs encoding for SMs that inhibit the obesity-associated species. In addition, the Clostridium genus of the phylum Firmicutes has been positively associated with obesity [34], especially the pathogenic C. difficile [35]. However, some species like C. bolteae [7] are more abundant in lean individuals. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is another obesity-related member of family Clostridiaceae and can decrease adipose tissue inflammation and improve hepatic health [36].

To summarize, we identified obesity-related BGCs from metagenomics data and provided novel insights into gut microbial SMs as potential markers for obesity.

5. Conclusions

We identified 4640 BGCs in the human gut microbiota, which provides novel insights into the role of the intestinal microbial community in obesity.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant numbers 61601332 and , the Special Project on Blue Granary Science and Technology Innovation under the National Key R&D Program [Grant number 2018YFD0901501], the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant number LQ16F010009], and the Special Science and Technology Innovation Project for Seeds and Seedlings of Wenzhou City [Grant number ].


  1. O. A. Baothman, M. A. Zamzami, I. Taher, J. Abubaker, and M. Abu-Farha, “The role of Gut Microbiota in the development of obesity and Diabetes,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 108, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. E. Ley, P. J. Turnbaugh, S. Klein, and J. I. Gordon, “Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7122, pp. 1022-1023, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Zhang, A. Yin, H. Li et al., “Dietary modulation of gut microbiota contributes to alleviation of both genetic and simple obesity in children,” EBioMedicine, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 968–984, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. O. Castaner, A. Goday, Y.-M. Park et al., “The gut microbiome profile in obesity: a systematic review,” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2018, Article ID 4095789, 9 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. J. Turnbaugh, M. Hamady, T. Yatsunenko et al., “A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7228, pp. 480–484, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Qin, R. Li, J. Raes et al., “A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 59–65, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Kasai, K. Sugimoto, I. Moritani et al., “Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between obese and non-obese individuals in a Japanese population, as analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and next-generation sequencing,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 100, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  8. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium, “Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome,” Nature, vol. 486, pp. 207–214, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Arumugam, J. Raes, E. Pelletier et al., “Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome,” Nature, vol. 473, no. 7346, pp. 174–180, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. R. Wilson, L. Zha, and E. P. Balskus, “Natural product discovery from the human microbiome,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 21, pp. 8546–8552, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Wang, Z. Zheng, H. Zou, N. Li, and M. Wu, “Characterization of the secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in archaea,” Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 78, pp. 165–169, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. S. Donia, P. Cimermancic, C. J. Schulze et al., “A systematic analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters in the human microbiome reveals a common family of antibiotics,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 1402–1414, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Wang, N. Li, H. Zou, and M. Wu, “Gut microbiome-based secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters detection in Parkinson’s disease,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 696, pp. 93–98, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Hadjithomas, I.-M. A. Chen, K. Chu et al., “IMG-ABC: New features for bacterial secondary metabolism analysis and targeted biosynthetic gene cluster discovery in thousands of microbial genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. D560–D565, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. Le Chatelier, T. Nielsen, J. Qin et al., “Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers,” Nature, vol. 500, no. 7464, pp. 541–546, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Buchfink, C. Xie, and D. H. Huson, “Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND,” Nature Methods, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 59-60, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Blin, T. Wolf, M. G. Chevrette et al., “AntiSMASH 4.0 - improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. W36–W41, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Winn, J. K. Fyans, Y. Zhuo, and J. Micklefield, “Recent advances in engineering nonribosomal peptide assembly lines,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 317–347, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Prieto, C. García-estrada, D. Lorenzana, and J. F. Martín, “NRPSSP: Non-ribosomal peptide synthase substrate predictor,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 426-427, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. Ziemert, S. Podell, K. Penn, J. H. Badger, E. Allen, and P. R. Jensen, “The natural product domain seeker NaPDoS: A phylogeny based bioinformatic tool to classify secondary metabolite gene diversity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, article no. e34064, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  21. B. A. Methe, K. E. Nelson, and M. Pop, “A framework for human microbiome research,” Nature, vol. 486, no. 7402, pp. 215–221, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. T. Truong, E. A. Franzosa, T. L. Tickle et al., “MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling,” Nature Methods, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 902-903, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. E. A. Franzosa, K. Huang, J. F. Meadow et al., “Identifying personal microbiomes using metagenomic codes,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 22, pp. E2930–E2938, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Almeida, A. L. Mitchell, M. Boland et al., “A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota,” Nature, vol. 8, article no. 1027, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. Derrien, C. Belzer, and W. M. de Vos, “Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions,” in Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 106, pp. 171–181, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. Furet, L. Kong, J. Tap et al., “Differential adaptation of human gut microbiota to bariatric surgery-induced weight loss: links with metabolic and low-grade inflammation markers,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 3049–3057, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. K. Shea, S. L. Booth, C. M. Gundberg et al., “Adulthood obesity is positively associated with adipose tissue concentrations of vitamin K and inversely associated with circulating indicators of vitamin K status in men and women,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 1029–1034, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. Fei and L. Zhao, “An opportunistic pathogen isolated from the gut of an obese human causes obesity in germfree mice,” The ISME Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 880–884, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. P. Karl, X. Fu, X. Wang et al., “Fecal menaquinone profiles of overweight adults are associated with gut microbiota composition during a gut microbiota-targeted dietary intervention,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 84–93, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. K. Chakraborti, “New-found link between microbiota and obesity,” World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 110, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. J. Faith, J. L. Guruge, M. Charbonneau et al., “The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota,” Science, vol. 341, no. 6141, Article ID 1237439, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Maier, M. Pruteanu, M. Kuhn et al., “Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria,” Nature, vol. 555, no. 7698, pp. 623–628, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Mei, K. Xu, L. Yang, Z. Yuan, J. Mahillon, and X. Hu, “The genetic diversity of cereulide biosynthesis gene cluster indicates a composite transposon Tnces in emetic Bacillus weihenstephanensis,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 149, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  34. D. Samul, P. Worsztynowicz, K. Leja, and W. Grajek, “Beneficial and harmful roles of bacteria from the Clostridium genus,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 515–521, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. Leung, B. Burke, D. Ford et al., “Possible association between obesity and Clostridium difficile infection,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1791–1796, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. Munukka, A. Rintala, R. Toivonen et al., “Faecalibacterium prausnitzii treatment improves hepatic health and reduces adipose tissue inflammation in high-fat fed mice,” The ISME Journal, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1667–1679, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Shengqin Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

922 Views | 384 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.