BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7805467 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7805467

Chemical Composition and Acaricidal Activity of the Essential Oils of Some Plant Species of Lamiaceae and Myrtaceae against the Vector of Tropical Bovine Theileriosis: Hyalomma scupense (syn. Hyalomma detritum)

Academic Editor: Gail B. Mahady
Received14 Nov 2018
Revised08 Jan 2019
Accepted29 Jan 2019
Published07 Feb 2019

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the acaricidal properties of six essential oils. They were extracted from some plant species (Lamiaceae and Myrtaceae) using the technique of hydrodistillation with the Clevenger apparatus. The chemical compositions of the essential oils under study were determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometer (GC-MS). An Adult Immersion Test (AIT) and a Larval Immersion Test (LIT) were used to evaluate the acaricidal activity of these essential oils against the adults and larvae of Hyalomma scupense. GC-MS analysis showed the major constituents of each essential oil: 25.49% of α-thujone (lavender); 46.82% of carvacrol (oregano); 78.78% of carvacrol (thyme); 40.27% of 1,8-cineole (blue gum); 17.45% of p-cymene (river red gum); and 26.96% of 1,8-cineole (rosemary). The biotests on the essential oils revealed that they inhibit the reproduction of H. scupense engorged females at a rate of 100 % with doses of 0.781 μl/ml of rosemary, 1.562 μl/ml of thyme, 3.125 μl/ml of lavender and oregano, and 6.250 μl/ml of blue gum and river red gum. After a treatment that lasted for 24 hours, essential oils showed a larvicidal activity with respective values of lethal concentrations (LC): LC50, LC90, and LC95 (0.058, 0.358, and 0.600 μl/ml for thyme; 0.108, 0.495, and 0.761 μl/ml for rosemary; 0.131, 0.982, and 1.740 μl/ml for oregano; 0.155, 2.387, and 5.183 μl/ml for blue gum; 0.207, 1.653, and 2.978 μl/ml for river red gum; and 0.253, 2.212, and 4.092 μl/ml for lavender). This is the first report on the acaricidal activity of these essential oils against H. scupense. The results obtained showed that the essential oils with chemotype carvacrol, 1,8-cineole, α-thujone, and p-cymene are highly acaricidal, and they can be used for ticks control. However, further studies on their toxicity in nontarget organisms are required.

1. Introduction

Ticks and the diseases they transmit have long been recognized as one of the major constraints of livestock development in various countries. Ticks feeding on domestic animals can result in various adverse effects including anemia, paralysis, toxicosis, decreased quality of the leather, and transmission of many diseases of diverse etiology. The causative agent of these diseases can be a virus, rickettsia, bacterium, or protozoan [1]. Therefore, the damage directly caused by ticks (and induced pathology) is a serious animal health problem that can significantly reduce overall livestock productivity.

In Algeria, cattle herds cost a heavy price if infected with piroplasmosis, a major tick transmitted disease of livestock in the country [2]. Another tick-borne disease, tropical bovine theileriosis transmitted by Hyalomma scupense (syn. Hyalomma detritum), is also present in this area. This species has been the most frequently recorded from several surveys conducted in Algeria [3, 4]. Many approaches have been used for tick management such as biological control using pathogens or predators, pheromone-assisted control, herbal pour-on or dip preparations including green manufactured nanoparticles [5], and vaccination [6]. Acaricides and repellents are still regarded as the easiest method for control but applications involve several drawbacks like cost, toxicity, waiting times, and acaricide resistance [7]. In Algeria, the most widely used means to control cattle ticks are conventional acaricides. Despite of the absence of studies on the chemoresistance of marketed acaricides, Algerian veterinary practitioners have observed resistance to these compounds in recent years. Therefore, it is prudent that effective compounds be discovered and evaluated for their acaricidal potential. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of various essential oils (EO) against H. scupense obtained from six aromatic plant species: Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh (river red gum), Eucalyptus globulus Labill (blue gum), Lavandula stoechas L. (lavender), Origanum floribundum Munby (oregano), Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary), and Thymus capitatus L. (thyme).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

During April through July 2015, leaves and flowering tops were collected from their natural habitats from Wilaya of Guelma: lavender, Ain Safra region of Djebel Maouna, latitude: 36.403237, longitude: 7.387801; oregano, Djebel Haouara region, latitude: 36.544436, longitude: 7.523108; thyme, Ouled Chiha region of Hammam Ouled Ali, latitude: 36.588422, longitude: 7.467377; and blue gum and river red gum, Djebel Beni Salah area, latitude: 36.476148, longitude: 7.854270. Leaves and flowering tops of rosemary were harvested on April 2015 from the Wilaya of Tebessa in Ouenza region (Gora Range) latitude: 35.917372, longitude: 8.127908.

2.2. Essential Oils Extraction and Analyses

Extraction of EO from plant parts was carried out by hydrodistillation for three hours using a Clevenger-type hydrodistillation apparatus. GC-MS analysis of the oils was performed on an HP-MS HP Model 6980 inert MSD (Agilent Technologies, USA), with HP-5MS column (30 × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film thickness). Temperature of the injector was maintained at 280°C. Oven temperature was maintained at 60°C for 1 min and then increased to 280°C at 5°C/min and remained constant at this temperature for 8 min. Flow rate of the helium carrier was 1 ml/min and split mode 1/100 was used. Identification of components in the EO was accomplished by comparison of their Kovats index and GC mass fragmentation with those of Wiley Mass Spectral data (Agilent Technologies 7th edition, Inc.) and NIST 05 MS library data. Each analysis was executed in duplicate.

2.3. Ticks Collection

Engorged females of H. scupense, with an average weight of 0.50 g, were collected from naturally infested cattle. Ticks were washed with 2% sodium hypochlorite solution and were then rinsed with distilled water before being dried with paper towels [8]. Engorged females used for Adult Immersion Test (AIT) and larvae for Larval Immersion Test (LIT) were tested on the same day of collection.

2.4. Bioassays
2.4.1. Adult Immersion Test (AIT)

Essential oils concentrations used in Adult Immersion Tests (AIT) were prepared in series diluted in Tween 80 at 2% ranging from 12.5 to 0.097μl/ml. Engorged females were each immersed in a concentration for 5 minutes and were then removed and dried with paper towels. Ticks were individually incubated at 27°C and 90% relative humidity with a 12:12 light: dark photoperiod until the end of oviposition [9]. Eggs of each female were weighed and transferred to tubes that were covered with Tissue-Non-Tissue (TNT) fabric (Inotis: LICIAL®, spunlace nonwovens, Algeria) and fastened by elastic bands. Each bioassay was repeated three times. A similar group of ticks as untreated controls was prepared in parallel by the immersion of ticks in 2% Tween 80. The oviposition rates were assessed after the end of oviposition. Reproductive efficiency and reproduction inhibition were calculated using the following equations [10]:where OR is the oviposition rate, IFW is the initial female weight, EW is the egg weight, E is egg eclosion, RE is the reproductive efficiency, and RI is reproduction inhibition.

2.4.2. Larval Immersion Test (LIT)

Larval immersion bioassays utilized the syringe test technique [9] to evaluate the larvicidal activity of the EO. Approximately 200 eggs (0.01 g) were transferred to a 2.5 ml open-end syringe whose plunger was withdrawn to the line of 2 ml. The syringe was then sealed with a TNT fabric and incubated at 27°C with 90% RH in darkness. Bioassays started 14 days after eclosion.

Essential oils were serially diluted in 2% Tween 80 to obtain ten concentrations ranging from 12.5 μl/ml to 0.024 μl/ml. Larvae were exposed to 2 ml of a concentration per syringe replicated twice. Larvae were exposed to each concentration for 5 min. Mortality in one syringe was recorded at 24 h, while larval mortality in the second syringe was recorded at 6 days. Each bioassay was repeated three times. After removing the TNT parts and emptying the syringes contents, the number of the living and dead larvae was counted in both syringes incubated at 24 h and 6 days. Control groups were handled similarly and were exposed to 2% Tween 80 solution only.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The results of mean oviposition rate, egg eclosion rate, reproduction efficiency, and reproduction inhibition for adult ticks (H. scupense) were subjected to nonparametric tests using the Kruskal Wallis test [11]. Estimated LC50, 90, and 95 of larvae of each EO were determined at 24 h and 6 days. Lethal concentration data were transformed according to Finney’s probit analysis method [12]. The Tukey test was used to identify differences between mean values of the LC50, LC90, and LC95 which were obtained at 24 h and after 6 days for each EO. All these statistical analyses were performed using the Social Science Statistics Software (SPSS) for Windows, version 20.0. [13] (IBM Corp. released 2011 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.)

3. Results

According to the results of GC-MS chromatographic analysis (Table 1), the major components of river red gum EO are p-cymene, (+) spathulenol, (E, E) –farnesol, α-pinene, cuminic aldehyde, 1-phellandrene, sabinene, carvacrol, and p-cymen-7-ol. For blue gum EO, 1,8-cineole, α-pinene, viridiflorol, camphene, d-pinocarvone, and (+) - aromadendrene are the major components. The major constituents of lavender EO were α-thujone, camphor, camphene, D-fenchyl alcohol, l-bornyl acetate, terminalol L, dl -limonene, α-pinene, and linalool L. The main chemical components of oregano EO were carvacrol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene followed by β-myrcene, o-cymene, thymol, trans-caryophyllene, α-pinene, and α-terpinene. Essential oil of rosemary contained 1,8-cineole and l-camphor as major components; other recorded compounds were α-pinene, borneol L, camphene, α-terpineol, β-pinene, trans-caryophyllene, l-bornyl acetate, β-myrcene, and γ-terpinene. In addition to the major components of thyme EO (carvacrol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene), other compounds from fractionation included transcaryophyllene, m-thymol, β-myrcene, and α-terpinene.


No.CompoundsKI Area (%)
EC EG LS OF RO TC

1Tricyclene921--0.66-0.15-
2α-thujene928---0.51-0.33
3α-pinene9414.4114.231.751,9312.060.71
4camphene953-4.607.310.396.39-
5sabinene9772.43-----
5β-pinene978-0.350.080.223.61-
6β-myrcene9920.76--3.572.231.24
7α-phellandrene9984.04----0.22
8Δ,3-carene1004-----1.01
9α-terpinene1015--0.101.37-1.15
10p-cymene101817.45--18.35-6.62
11o-cymene1026---3.53--
12dl-limonene1030--2.13---
13β-ocimene10400.14--0.07--
14d-pinocarvone1042-4.31----
151,8-cineole1046-40.27--26.90-
16(E)-ocimene10540.08-----
17α-terpinolene10630.760.46--0.57-
18γ-terpinene10650.840.250.1011.321.373.96
19trans-sabinene hydrate1070----0.03-
20α-terpinolene1088---0.32--
21α-thujone1099--25.49---
22linalool L11020.64-1.430.500.41-
23d-fenchyl alcohol1139--6.85---
24l-camphor1152--20.06-19.00-
25pinocarvone1165--0.18---
26borneol L1168--3.99-11.76-
274-terpinenol1178-0.390.83--0.54
28p-cymene-8-ol1182--0.94---
29α-terpineol1190----5.77-
30myrtenal1193--0.68---
31myrtenol1195-0.280.56---
32verbenone1205--0.88---
33fenchyl acetate1210--0.97---
34trans-(+)-carveol12120.160.51----
35β-citronellol1217--0,36-0.09-
36isobornyl formate1233--0,13---
37pulegone1237----0.26-
38cuminic aldehyde12404.29-----
39l-carvone1241--0.51---
40carvacrol methyl ether1244-0.300.96-0.09-
41citrol1255-0.11----
42piperitone12580.57-----
43l-bornyl acetate1285-0.085.51-3.00-
44thymol1286---2.040.102.14
45p-cymen-7-ol12911.56-----
46carvacrol12991.59--46.820.3678.78
47piperitenone1339---1.180.16-
48γ-pyronene13450.92-----
49α-cubebene1351--0.09---
50eugenol1359----0.05-
51(+)-cyclosativene1362--0.25---
52copaene13750.050.050.15-0.14-
53carvacryl acetate1391-----0.80
54methyl eugenol1398----0.14-
55calarene1409-0.19----
56α-humulene1413-0.17--0.41-
57transcaryophyllene1418--0.112.002.302.27
58(+)-aromadendrene14400.212.53--0.02-
59β-patchoulene1441----0.04-
60β-elemene14450.17-----
61caryophyllene1454-0.16-0.21-0.09
62aromadendrene14671.86-----
63α-gurjunene14750.060.31----
64trans-β-farnesene14790.69-----
65γ-gurjunene1481-0.31----
66α-curcumen1482---0.15--
67germacrene-D14850.07-0.11---
68ledene1489-0.95-0.15--
69α-guaiene1491-0.04----
70β-selinene14930.240.04--0.02-
71eremophilene1502-0.41----
72α-muurolene1504----0.03-
73δ-guaiene1505-1.37----
74bicyclogermacrene15051.28-----
75β-bisabolene1506--0.030.410.03-
76α-amorphene15110.050.04-0.060.19-
77γ-cadinene1513-0.16----
78Δ-cadinene15240.200.090.53-0.16-
79β-sesquiphellandrene1525---1.34--
80zingiberene1526------
81cadina-1,4-diene1532--0.13---
82ledol15600.66-----
83(-)-allospathulenol15760.89-----
84spathulenol158113.45-----
85caryophyllene oxide1582--0.480.540.49-
86viridiflorol1587-8.141.89---
87caryophyllenol-I1641--0.34-0.36-
88t-muurolol16411.03-----
89torreyol1643--0.22---
90isospathulenol16441.57-----
91cadalin1652--0.15---
92(Z,Z)-farnesal17200.72-----
93trans-farnesol17225.37-----
94farnesal17381.08-----
95farnesyl acetate 318250.43-----

Identification of components based on GC-MS Wiley 7.0 version library and National Institute and Technology 05 MS (NIST) library data. KI: Kovats Indices on HP-5MS capillary column. River red gum. Blue gum. Lavender. Oregano. Rosemary. Thyme.

Thyme EO completely inhibited tick oviposition at 100% at a concentration of 1.562 μl/ml whereas the other EO induced this same effect at greater concentrations ranging from 3.125 to 6.25 μl/ml (Table 2). At the same concentration (1.562 μl/ml), thyme EO completely inhibited reproduction of H. scupense. This concentration is significantly lower than what was recorded with the other EO (3.125 - 6.25 μl/ml). The eclosion rates of the eggs in all treatments were significantly different as compared to controls (p < 0.05). Note that thyme and rosemary EO are more inhibitors of eclosion than other EO such as those of river red gum and blue gum. At 24 hours, thyme EO proved to be the most larvicidal, whereas the least larvicidal was blue gum EO. On the 6th day, the most and the least larvicidal EO remained the same as those obtained in 24 h (Table 3, Figures 16). We observed no mortality in control groups in LIT and AIT.


Essential oil (μl/ml)OR (%)E (%)RE (%)RI (%)

EC
0.09731.37 ± 7.12 g65.99 ± 0.03 fe28.41 ± 3.79 hg54.71 ± 3.84 g
0.19538.54 ± 0.56 hg62.86 ± 5.74 e24.24 ± 6.28 gfe61,37 ± 7.09 hg
0.39042.84 ± 3.89 i61.86 ± 1.18 e22.19 ± 2.18 f64.64 ± 5.26 ih
0.78152.02 ± 4.42 j59.42 ± 3.87 dc17.89 ± 2.19 e71.49 ± 4.52 jih
1.56264.56 ± 9.11 k54.69 ± 7.88 c12.16 ± 1.82 d80.62 ± 1.86 k
3.12581.22 ± 0.59 l8.52 ± 2.69 b1.00 ± 0.10 b98.40 ± 0.36 m
6.2594.49 ± 1.19 m0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n
12.50100.00 n0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n

EG
0.0972.69 ± 0.47 b99.53 ± 0.14 j64.71 ± 6.17 nml3.15 ± 1.48 a
0.1954.85 ± 0.28 c99.38 ± 0.04 j63.19 ± 6.92 ml5.43 ± 2.63 ba
0.3905.93 ± 1.58 c98.64 ± 0.17 ih62.00 ± 4.69 l7.21 ± 1.92 cb
0.78119.20 ± 3.61 d98.57 ± 0.18 ih53.22 ± 2.55 kj20.35 ± 6.77 d
1.56221.76 ± 5.91 ed97.84 ± 1.88 h51.15 ± 6.09 ji23.45 ± 8.02 ed
3.12536.86 ± 0.53 hg8.04 ± 2.69 b3.39 ± 1.18 c94.92 ± 2.09 l
6.2543.02 ± 3.06 i0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n
12.50100.00 n0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n

LS
0.0971.53 ± 0.09 a99.44 ± 0.09 e65.43 ± 0.08 l2.08 ± 0.12 a
0.1953.09 ± 1.59 a99.11 ± 0.54 e64.18 ± 0.49 k3.95 ± 0.74 b
0.3903.23 ± 0.91 a95.51 ± 1.48 d61.76 ± 1.35 j7.57 ± 2.02 c
0.78133.36 ± 6.21 ecd94.21 ± 2.83 d41.95 ± 1.78 f37.21 ± 2.66 gi
1.56260.01 ± 6.53 g93.40 ± 3.32 d24.96 ± 1.25 d62.65 ± 1.87 igfh
3.12599.88 ± 0.01 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
6.250100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
12.50100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l

OF
0.09710.90 ± 2.46 bc91.80 ± 2.48 d54.66 ± 2.09 i18.21 ± 3.13 d
0.19521.15 ± 9.18 cd90.58 ± 4.58 d47.73 ± 3.41 g28.58 ± 5.11 fi
0.39041.53 ± 0.57 f89.68 ± 1.13 d35.04 ± 0.62 e47.57 ± 0.93 hi
0.78145.48 ± 3.66 f70.37 ± 7.33 c25.64 ± 3.78 d61.64 ± 5.65 i
1.56247.98 ± 4.57 f4.31 ± 0.99 b1.50 ± 0.49 b97.76 ± 0.73 k
3.125100 ± 0.00 i0.98 ± 0.01 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
6.250100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
12.50100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l

RO
0.0970.36 ± 0.08 a97.33 ± 1.18 h64.80 ± 6.45 nml3.02 ± 0.17 a
0.19521.25 ± 2.64 ed96.90 ± 0.59 h50.99 ± 2.09 ji23.70 ± 2.94 ed
0.39023.75 ± 2.00 fe93.13 ± 2.91 g47.45 ± 3.56 i28.99 ± 1.06 fe
0.78131.79 ± 3.48 g95.55 ± 1.01 g43.55 ± 1.63 i34,82 ± 1.59 g
1.56295.72 ± 1.91 m0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n
3.125100.00 n0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n
6.25100.00 n0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n
12.50100.00 n0.00 a0.00 a100.00 n

TC
0.0979.04 ± 2.33 b99.77 ± 0.02 e60.65 ± 0.02 j9.24 ± 0.03 c
0.19521.42 ± 1.09 c99.57 ± 0.11 e52.28 ± 0.08 hi21.76 ± 0.12 e
0.39027.45 ± 5.07 de98.47 ± 0.87 e47.74 ± 0.60 g28.55 ± 0.89 fi
0.78167.79 ± 0.82 h98.23 ± 0.66 e21.14 ± 0.20 c68.36 ± 0.30 j
1.562100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
3.125100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
6.25100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
12.50100 ± 0.00 i0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a100 ± 0.00 l
Control-100 ± 0.00 f66.82 ± 0.00 m-

Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different by the Kruskal Wallis test (p ≥ 0.05).

Essential oilLC50 (μl/ml)LC90 (μl/ml)LC95 (μl/ml)
(μl/ml)24 h6j24 h6j24 h6j

EC0.207 a0.003 a1.653 b0.066 a2.978 b0.151 a
EG0.155 a0.081 c2.387 b0.705 a5.183 c1.301 b
LS0.253c0.039b2.212c0.324c4.092c0.587c
OF0.131b0.030b0.982b0.176b1.740 b0.290b
RO0.108 a0.017 b0.495 a0.073 a0.761 a0.110 a
TC0.058a0.016a0.358a0.058a0.600a0.083a

Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p ≥ 0.05).

4. Discussion

In general, most of the major components of the EO tested in our study (carvacrol, 1,8-cineole, α-thujone, borneol L, α-pinene, p-cymene, and α-terpinene) have been identified as major acaricidal agents around the world [1420]. Acaricide and insecticidal properties of other Thymus species have been noted by several authors [21, 22]. Many other studies on the acaricidal properties of EO extracted from other Origanum species have been carried out by Ramzi et al. [23], Koc et al. [24], Cetin et al. [15], and Coskun et al. [16]. Moreover, the larvicidal activity of α-pinene (from river red gum) has also been documented against Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus [25], and Anopheles stephensi [26]. In our study, 1,8-cineole from rosemary and blue gum EO exhibited excellent acaricidal activity against H. scupense. Indeed, according to Pirali-Kheirabadi et al. [27], this EO showed an ovicidal, larvicidal, and adulticidal activity against Rhipicephalus annulatus. Furthermore, Martinez-Velazquez et al. [28] asserted that the EO of rosemary plant is lethal to another tick species (Rhipicephalus microplus). We found significant acaricidal activity of α-thujone in lavender EO on the reproductivity of adults as well as larvicidal action against H. scupense.

As far as the present study is concerned, we have noticed that each EO we evaluated for acaricidal activity was composed of a combination of 14 to 37 chemical compounds. This may indicate that associations between constituent compounds should be studied mainly in terms of possible additive, synergistic, or even probable antagonistic properties.

5. Conclusion

We found excellent acaricidal activity of several EO constituents that were evaluated against H. scupense in this study. Our results indicate that these compounds may provide real alternatives to the current conventional acaricidal products, especially against resistant tick populations. However, further investigations are warranted including toxicological studies on nontarget species regarding the usefulness of these components for tick control.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Disclosure

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding from agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are gratefully acknowledging the assistance of Dr. Khaladi Omar and Dr. Bousbiaa Aissam.

References

  1. F. Jongejan and G. Uilenberg, “The global importance of ticks,” Parasitology, vol. 129, supplement 1, pp. S3–S14, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Ziam and H. Benaouf, “Prevalence of blood parasites in cattle from wilayates of Annaba and El Tarf east Algeria,” Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis, vol. 81, no. 1-4, pp. 27–30, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. Boulkaboul, “Parasitisme des tiques (Ixodidae) des bovins à Tiaret, Algérie,” Revue D’Élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux, vol. 56, no. 3-4, pp. 157–162, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. C. Benchikh Elfegoun, M. Gharbi, S. Djebir, and K. Kohil, “Dynamique d’activité saisonnière des tiques ixodidés parasites des bovins dans deux étages bioclimatiques du nord-est algérien,” Revue D’élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 117–122, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  5. B. Banumathi, B. Vaseeharan, P. Rajasekar et al., “Exploitation of chemical, herbal and nanoformulated acaricides to control the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus ) microplus – A review,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 244, pp. 102–110, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. Labarta, M. Rodríguez, M. Penichet, R. Lleonart, L. L. Luaces, and J. De La Fuente, “Simulation of control strategies for the cattle tick Boophilus microplus employing vaccination with a recombinant Bm86 antigen preparation,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 131–160, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Benelli, A. Caselli, and A. Canale, “Nanoparticles for mosquito control: Challenges and constraints,” Journal of King Saud University - Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 424–435, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. W. Banks, J. H. Oliver Jr., C. E. Hopla, and E. M. Dotson, “Laboratory life cycle of ixodes woodi (Acari: Ixodidae),” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 177–179, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Sindhu, N. N. Jonsson, and Z. Iqbal, “Syringe test (modified larval immersion test): A new bioassay for testing acaricidal activity of plant extracts against Rhipicephalus microplus,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 188, no. 3-4, pp. 362–367, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. Stendel, “The relevance of different test methods for the evaluation of tick controlling substances,” Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 147–152, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1984.
  12. D. J. Finney, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 3rd edition, 1971.
  13. A. C. Elliott and W. A. Wooduard, IBM SPSS by example. A pratical guide to statistical data analysis, Sage publication, Inc., Singapore, 2nd edition, 2016.
  14. T. Hüe, L. Cauquil, J. B. Fokou, P. M. Dongmo, I. Bakarnga-Via, and C. Menut, “Acaricidal activity of five essential oils of Ocimum species on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus larvae,” Parasitology Research, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Cetin, J. E. Cilek, L. Aydin, and A. Yanikoglu, “Acaricidal effects of the essential oil of Origanum minutiflorum (Lamiaceae) against Rhipicephalus turanicus (Acari: Ixodidae),” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 160, no. 3-4, pp. 359–361, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Coskun, O. Girisgin, M. Kürkcüoglu et al., “Acaricidal efficacy of Origanum onites L. essential oil against Rhipicephalus turanicus (Ixodidae),” Parasitology Research, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 259–261, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Mkolo and S. Magano, “Repellent effects of the essential oil of Lavendula angustifolia against adults of Hyalomma marginatum rufipes,” Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, vol. 78, pp. 149–152, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  18. T. G. T. Jaenson, S. Garboui, and K. Pålsson, “Repellency of oils of lemon eucalyptus, geranium, and lavender and the mosquito repellent MyggA natural to Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) in the laboratory and field,” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 731–736, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. M. D. O. Cruz, L. M. Costa-Junior, J. A. O. Pinto et al., “Acaricidal activity of Lippia gracilis essential oil and its major constituents on the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 195, no. 1-2, pp. 198–202, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Cetin, J. Cilek, E. Oz, L. Aydin, O. Deveci, and A. Yanikoglu, “Acaricidal activity of Satureja thymbra L. essential oil and its major components, carvacrol and γ-terpinene against adult Hyalomma marginatum (Acari: Ixodidae),” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 170, no. 3-4, pp. 287–290, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. M. Salama, E. E. Taher, and M. M. El-Bahy, “Molluscicidal and mosquitocidal activities of the essential oils of thymus capitatus Hoff. ET link. and marrubium vulgare L,” Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 281–286, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Pavela, “Larvicidal effects of various Euro-Asiatic plants against Culex quinquefasciatus Say larvae (Diptera: Culicidae),” Parasitology Research, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 555–559, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Ramzi, M. R. Ismaili, M. Aberchane, and S. Zaanoun, “Chemical characterization and acaricidal activity of Thymus satureioides C. & B. and Origanum elongatum E. & M. (Lamiaceae) essential oils against Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman (Acari: Varroidae),” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 108, pp. 201–207, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. Koc, E. Oz, I. Cinbilgel, L. Aydin, and H. Cetin, “Acaricidal activity of Origanum bilgeri P.H. Davis (Lamiaceae) essential oil and its major component, carvacrol against adults Rhipicephalus turanicus (Acari: Ixodidae),” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 193, no. 1-3, pp. 316–319, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S.-S. Cheng, J.-Y. Liu, C.-G. Huang, Y.-R. Hsui, W.-J. Chen, and S.-T. Chang, “Insecticidal activities of leaf essential oils from Cinnamomum osmophloeum against three mosquito species,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 457–464, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. M. Medhi, S. Reza, K. Mahnaz et al., “Phytochemistry and larvicidal activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis against malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 841–845, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Pirali-Kheirabadi, M. Razzaghi-Abyaneh, and A. Halajian, “Acaricidal effect of Pelargonium roseum and Eucalyptus globulus essential oils against adult stage of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus in vitro,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 162, no. 3-4, pp. 346–349, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Martinez-Velazquez, R. Rosario-Cruz, G. Castillo-Herrera, J. M. Flores-Fernandez, A. H. Alvarez, and E. Lugo-Cervantes, “Acaricidal Effect of Essential Oils From Lippia graveolens (Lamiales: Verbenaceae), Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiales: Lamiaceae), and Allium sativum (Liliales: Liliaceae) Against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae),” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 822–827, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Somia Djebir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1153 Views | 479 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.