Review Article
Application of Compressive Sensing to Ultrasound Images: A Review
Table 3
CS reconstruction algorithm based on compression ratio.
| S/N | Reference | Method | PSNR | SSIM |
| 1 | [41] | Orthogonal matching pursuit for CS Compressive sampling matching pursuit | Algorithm | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% | OMP | 24.13 | 24.33 | 24.40 | 25.10 | | | | | CoSaMP | 26.44 | 26.48 | 26.48 | 26.75 |
| 2 | [42] | ADMM compressive deconvolution GGD | ADMM | 24.77 | 25.28 | 26.03 | 26.82 | | | | |
| 3 | [43] | Compressive sampling image deconvolution AM-based algorithm for compressive blind deconvolution | | 21.48 | 22.59 | 23.12 | 24.39 | | | | |
| 4 | [44] | CSBD SDMM TRF and PSF | CD_true | 25.29 | 27.07 | 28.57 | 29.29 | 61.07 | 73.91 | 78.14 | 80.10 | CD | 22.72 | 22.49 | 22.33 | 22.32 | 45.76 | 49.66 | 50.51 | 52.04 | CSBD | 25.01 | 26.87 | 27.31 | 28.55 | 58.36 | 73.22 | 77.35 | 80.03 |
| 5 | [45] | Compressive deconvolution based on ADMM Lp-norm minimization | Dataset | B-PSNR | Image 1 proposed | 28.97 | 40.65 | 47.28 | 52.33 | 22.40 | 43.74 | 65.06 | 72.52 | Image 1 sequential | 49.25 | 40.98 | 31.90 | 22.34 | 20.75 | 36.82 | 55.72 | 70.93 | Image 2 proposed | 73.75 | 66.98 | 52.38 | 52.12 | 26.23 | 52.80 | 59.06 | 60.25 | Image 2 sequential | 36.46 | 29.60 | 25.90 | 23.87 | 18.32 | 28.02 | 40.89 | 39.89 |
|
|