Research Article

Integrating Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing: A Simple and Rapid Approach to Reduce the Turnaround Time in the Management of Blood Cultures

Table 1

Identification performance of rapid bacterial identification (rID) versus the standard bacterial identification method (sID).

Organism ID by the current standard methodN (%) identified in Vitek MS (rID)
Concordance level
nSpeciesGenusNo. Id

Overall524459 (87.3)466 (88.6)58 (11)
Gram-negative bacteria246235 (96)235 (96)11 (4)
K. pneumoniae10096 (96)96 (96)4 (4)
E. coli6766 (99)66 (99)1 (4)
K. oxytoca1513 (87)13 (87)2 (13)
E. cloacae66 (100)6 (100)0
P. mirabilis55 (100)5 (100)0
E. hormaechei44 (100)4 (100)0
S. marcescens33 (100)3 (100)0
C. koseri21 (50)1 (50)1 (50)
M. morganii11 (100)1 (100)0
P. aeruginosa2222 (100)22 (100)0
A. baumannii1413 (93)13 (93)1 (7)
B. cepacia43 (75)3 (75)1 (25)
S. maltophilia33 (100)3 (100)0
Gram-positive bacteria
Staphylococci278224 (81)231 (83)47 (17)
S. aureus7372 (99)72 (99)1 (1)
Coagulase-negative staphylococci205153 (75)160 (78)45 (22)

Concordance rate for species level and genus level and nonreliable identification by Vitek MS system.