BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 8134651 |

Mehmood Jan, Gulmeena Shah, Sadaf Masood, Kamran Iqbal Shinwari, Rashida Hameed, E. S. Rha, Muhammad Jamil, "Bacillus Cereus Enhanced Phytoremediation Ability of Rice Seedlings under Cadmium Toxicity", BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 8134651, 12 pages, 2019.

Bacillus Cereus Enhanced Phytoremediation Ability of Rice Seedlings under Cadmium Toxicity

Academic Editor: Atanas Atanassov
Received17 Dec 2018
Revised10 Mar 2019
Accepted25 Mar 2019
Published24 Jul 2019


Cadmium (Cd+2) is a highly toxic metal, which significantly alters different biochemical and metabolic processes in plants. Massive amounts of Cd+2 is being released into the environment by different anthropogenic activities. In the present study, plant growth promoting activities of bacterial strain Bacillus cereus was evaluated under Cd+2 stress in two rice cultivars Basmati-385 and Shaheen Basmati. Cd+2 stress significantly decreased plant growth and biomass production in both cultivars. However, with the inoculation of B. cereus under Cd+2 treatments, reduced Cd+2 uptake and increased antioxidant enzymes activities in rice cultivars lead to enhanced plant growth, biomass production, photosynthetic pigments, micronutrients, and lowered electrolytes leakage. This study suggests that B. cereus has the ability to alleviating Cd toxicity and increased phytoremediation efficiency of rice seedling under Cd stress.

1. Introduction

Cadmium being a toxic pollutant has become a widespread problem in agricultural soils [13]. Atmospheric deposition is considered as the main source of cadmium accumulation in the soil; besides this, several anthropogenic activities like industrial waste, irrigation by wastewater, sludge usage and disposition of solid waste are the common sources of Cd introduction into the environment [4]. Cadmium alters many processes in plants like photosynthesis, respiration, plant–water relationship, and mineral nutrition and also interference with the electron-transport chain in growing plants ultimately leading to cause a reduction in crop productivity [57]. In addition, Cd+2 is classified as a human carcinogen, which may cause cardiovascular disease, skeletal damage, and cancer in the lungs, prostate, and kidneys [810]. Therefore, research is needed to avoid Cd+2 bioaccumulations in plants and which subsequent entry into the food chain. It is particularly important to reduce Cd+2 accumulation in rice grain because rice is a vital cereal crop being utilized as a necessary food source for more than half of the world’s population particularly in Asian countries [1113]. Rice accumulates a higher amount of Cd+2 in the grain as compared with other cereals like barley and wheat [14]. To reduce Cd-induced toxicity and uptake, different approaches have been used including priming of seeds with phytohormones/chemicals like salicylic acid, glutathione, brassinosteroids (BRs) phytochelatins (PCs), polyamines (PAs), nitric oxide, abscisic acid, and jasmonic acid [1518].

However, biopriming techniques have been widely to prevent the toxic effect of pollutant like heavy metals on plant growth and development. Many studies reported that biopriming of seeds with plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) or application of PGPB on seedling could enhance plant growth by lowering the uptake of toxic metals in the medium [13, 19, 20]. PGPBs contain 1-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase efficiently accelerate plant growth by decreasing plant ethylene levels under different stress conditions, such as heavy metals, drought, salinity, and flooding [21]. Bacterial strains also produce bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPSs) which could bind cations and decrease the contents of cations (like Cd) available for the plant uptake. In this way, increasing the population density of EPS-producing bacteria in the root zone could reduce the uptake of cations content, which leads to enhanced plant growth under stress conditions [22]. A wide range of bacterial species which include Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Arthrobacter, Azotobacter, Enterobacter, Azospirillum, Serratia klebsiella, and Alcaligin could be used for this purpose [23].

Many Bacillus species have been used for phytoremediation and also as a protectant from toxic effects of heavy metals. For enhancement of plant growth, these species are directly involved in increased uptake of nitrogen, synthesis of phytohormones, solubilization of minerals such as phosphorus, and secretion of siderophores that chelate iron and make it available to the plant root [24]. Until now there are few reports on isolation and characterization of Cd tolerant and plant growth promoting bacterial strains. However, reports related to the effect of PGPR on plant growth and physiological and biochemical aspects under the Cd stress are also rare. Keeping this in view, in the present study, bacterial strain Bacillus cereus has been used to investigate its growth promoting effects under the Cd+2stress, yet Bacillus cereus has been not reported as a cadmium remediater. Therefore, the objectives of the designed study were (i) to examine the role of Bacillus cereus as a plant growth regulator and (ii) to investigate the physiological and metabolic changes induced by Bacillus cereus in rice seedling under Cd stress.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain Isolation and Characterization

Cadmium resistant strain used in this study was isolated from waste water of tannery industry Peshawar, Pakistan. The bacterial isolation was carried out on the same day through the pore plate method [25] and the isolated bacteria were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence. Briefly, DNA was isolated from the bacteria as described by [26] with minor modification. A 20 mL PCR mix was prepared containing 2μL DNA, 2μL 10X PCR reaction buffer, 1μL dNTPs (2.5 mM) 1μL forward primer (7F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTCAG-3′) 1μL reverse primer 492R (5′ - GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′) of 10mM and 0.1 μL rTaq (Takara Japan). The amplification was performed as initial denaturation for 5 mins at 95°C and followed by continuous 32 cycles of denaturation for the 30s, annealing for 30s at 56°C and extension for 72°C for 90s and finally extension at 72°C for 7 mins. The PCR product was then sequenced and was compared with the known nucleotides sequences in the Gene Bank database using BlastN ( The sequencing resemblance of our isolated bacteria was 99% with Bacillus cereus. On the basis of resemblance with a specific group of bacteria, we conclude our bacterial isolate as a Bacillus cereus (Supplementary Figure 1) [27].

2.2. Colony Formulating Unit (CFU)

Bacterial strain was subcultured on nutrient media and was incubated for 24h at 37°C in a shaker (Wise Cube, WIS-20R) to obtain a culture density of 108 CFU mL−1colony [13]. CFU was calculated by using the following formula:

2.3. Pot Experiment

Pot experiments were conducted to assess the effects of Cd+2 on the growth and physiology of rice. Seeds of Oryza sativa cultivars cv. Basmati 385 (B-385) and S. Basmati (S-Basmati) were collected from the National Agriculture Research Center Islamabad (NARC). The healthy and uniform seeds were surface sterilized using 3.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 minutes. The sterilized seeds were placed in a 9 cm-diameter Petri dish layered with Whatman No. 1 filter paper and 10 mL distilled water was added. The Petri dishes were sealed with Parafilm and placed inside a growth chamber for germination. After germination, seven-day-old seedlings were shifted to autoclaved sand in plastic pots (1kg sand per pot) and were grown for two weeks. All pots were placed in a greenhouse with average 29 ± 1°C and 24 ± 1°C temperature for day and night, respectively, with average humidity 70% throughout the experiment. The experiment was laid out in complete randomized design (CRD) with eight treatments. According to the experimental design, 10mL bacterial suspension (108 CFU) was applied to each pot, whereas a CdCl2 solution of different concentration, i.e., 100, 200, and 400μM with and without bacterial suspension, was applied to each pot of 21-day-old seedlings [28].

2.4. Morphological Parameters

After 7 days of treatment, plants were harvested and were separated into shoots and roots. Root length, shoot length, and the fresh weight of plants were measured immediately after harvesting; for dry biomass, plants were placed in an oven at 80°C for 2 days.

2.5. Cell Membrane Stability

Cell membrane stability was calculated by using the method of Beltrano et al. [29]. Leaves were cut into small fine 1cm dices in a 20 mL test tube containing distilled water and incubated at 10°C for 24hrs. The electric-conductivity (C1) was measured and then samples were autoclaved for 15 minutes; the electroconductivity (C2) was measured after autoclaving by using conductivity meter (BMS EC Meter EC-4001). Cell membrane stability was calculated by using the formula,where C refers to electroconductivity one and two.

2.6. Photosynthetic Pigment

Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were measured by using the method of Lichtenthaler et al. [30]. In 5mL methanol, 25mg dried plant material along with MgO was homogenized for 2hr using an orbital shaker. The suspension was centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 25°C, and 3mL supernatant was transferred to the cuvette and absorbance was measured at three different wavelengths: 666nm, 653nm, and 470nm using spectrophotometer (UV-VIS). Various chlorophyll pigments were determined by the following formulae:

2.7. Micronutrients

According to Awan [31], 50mg dry material was added in 2mL sulfuric acid and 1mL of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the mixture was boiled until one oily droplet was left. After cooling, 20 mL of distilled water was added and filtered by using Whatman filter paper. Ion contents (Na+, Ca+2, and K+) in the solution were calculated by using flame photometer (jenway pf7f).

2.8. Cadmium Content Determination

The methodology of Garraud et al. [32] was used for cadmium determination. Dry material 100mg was digested with sulfuric acid and nitric acid mixture and was diluted with 20mL deionized distilled water and filtered by using Whatman filter paper. Cd content in the solution was measured by using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (Perkin ELMER, An Analyst 4000).

2.9. Proline Determination

Proline content was determined according to Bates et al. [33]. Fresh plant leaves 100mg were homogenized with 5mL of 3% sulfosalicylic acid and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 30 minutes. The supernatant of 1mL was mixed with 1mL acid ninhydrin (1.25 g ninhydrin in 30mL glacial acetic acid and 20 mL of 6 M phosphoric acid) and 1mL glacial acetic acid. The mixture was incubated for 1 hour at 100°C. The 2mL toluene was added in a mixture and was kept at room temperature until two layers became separated. The top aqueous layer was measured spectrophotometrically at an absorbance of 520nm. Proline content was determined from the standard curve and calculated by the given formula:

2.10. Total Soluble Sugar

Total soluble sugar contents were determined by the phenol-sulphuric acid method of Dey et al. [34] with slight modifications. Fresh plant material (50mg) was grounded in 3mL prewarmed 90% ethanol and incubated at 80°C for 60 min. The supernatant was transferred and the same procedure was repeated. Both supernatants were combined and added to 1:10.5% phenol, 5mL H2SO4, and 3mL distilled water under constant shaking conditions and incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 485nm using glucose as a standard.

2.11. Antioxidant Analysis

For antioxidant activity, 500mg fresh plant material was crushed in 10mL precooled phosphate buffer (NaH2PO4.2H2O 0.6663g∖L, Na2HPO4.2H2O 16.385g∖L) with precooled motor and pestle. After complete homogenization, the mixture was centrifuged at 20000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C as described by Vasconcelos et al. [35]. For peroxidase analysis, the 3mL reaction was prepared by adding 0.1mL 1.5% guaiacol, 0.1mL enzyme extract, and 2.7mL potassium phosphate buffer (PBS) and 0.1mL of 0.4% H2O2; after 2 to 3 mins the absorbance was noted at 470nm as mentioned by Kumar et al. [36]. Catalase activity was measured by the protocol mentioned by Vasconcelos et al. [35] in a 3 mL reaction mixture that contained 100uL 30mM H2O2, 100uL enzyme extract, and 2.8mL of 25mM potassium phosphate buffer and absorbance was determined at 240nm.

Data Analysis. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 19. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to check the significance of the different Cd doses and B. cereus treatment. Duncan’s multiple range test was used for multiple mean comparisons. Origin 8.5 was used to plot graphs [37].

3. Results

3.1. Strain Characterization

Isolated bacterial strain was identified taxonomically by 16S rRNA gene sequence method. Results revealed that bacterial strain showed 99% similarity with Bacillus genera strain B. cereus 115526 by comparing with those 16S rRNA gene sequences available in the Gene Bank nucleotide sequence database (Supplementary Figure 1).

3.2. Seedling Vigour

Ten plants were used from three replicates to measure seedling vigour. Results showed that with the inoculation of B. cereus the root/shoot length and fresh and dry weights increased in both cultivars under normal as well as under stress conditions (Figure 1), while root/shoot lengths and biomass were decreased with increasing cadmium levels in both rice cultivars (B-385 and S. Basmati) but more significant decrease was noted in S. Basmati as compared to B-385.The higher root/ shoot length (17/38cm) was noted with B. cereus treated seedling of B-385 in control which was significantly decreased to 5/20 cm at 400μM Cd+2level. Similarly, S. Basmati reduced 6.25/20.5cm root/shoot length under 400μM stress conditions. Fresh and dry root/shoot biomasses of both cultivars were significantly increased with B. cereus treated seedling under control and Cd+2 stress conditions, whereas the maximum decrease in seedlings biomass was observed at 400uM in both rice cultivars (Table 1).

CultivarPrimingTreatmentsLengthFresh WeightDry Weight

Basmati-385ControlControl32.5 ± 0.88310.5 ± 0.6730.7616 ± 0.010.2302 ± 0.1150.192 ± 0.0050.024 ± 0.007
100 µM27.5 ± 0.988.25 ± 0.2370.695 ± 0.0170.1719 ± 0.0250.161 ± 00.021 ± 0.003
200 µM23 ± 0.7847 ± 0.0230.6121 ± 0.0050.1445 ± 0.0750.142 ± 0.0040.019 ± 0.005
400 µM20.5 ± 0.935 ± 0.10.5278 ± 0.010.1197 ± 0.1050.114 ± 00.013 ± 0.006
B. CereusControl38 ± 0.93717 ± 0.8831.05 ± 0.010.304 ± 0.0550.224 ± 0.0050.032 ± 0.008
100 µM33.5 ± 0.9412.5 ± 0.3450.84 ± 0.0250.22 ± 0.0450.198 ± 0.0090.028 ± 0.001
200 µM28 ± 1.0211.5 ± 0.230.695 ± 0.0050.1924 ± 0.030.179 ± 0.0030.025 ± 0.006
400 µM26.5 ± 0.93811 ± 0.170.6232 ± 0.0350.1743 ± 0.040.134 ± 0.0080.02 ± 0.004

Shaheen BasmatiControlControl29.5 ± 0.7512.5 ± 0.3730.7011 ± 0.1750.2366 ± 0.030.161 ± 0.0090.034 ± 0.003
100 µM26.5 ± 0.5189.75 ± 0.1980.5263 ± 0.10.202 ± 0.0550.141 ± 0.0040.029 ± 0.007
200 µM25 ± 0.8938.25 ± 0.3030.4447 ± 0.030.179 ± 0.0450.127 ± 00.024 ± 0.001
400 µM20.5 ± 0.5766.25 ± 0.0290.3194 ± 0.030.1371 ± 0.0250.107 ± 0.0010.02 ± 0.008
B. CereusControl34.4 ± 0.34516 ± 0.380.991 ± 0.0250.295 ± 0.0450.235 ± 0.0090.038 ± 0.001
100 µM32.5 ± 1.1914 ± 0.0840.991 ± 0.0250.279 ± 0.1050.176 ± 0.0010.031 ± 0.001
200 µM30.65 ± 0.73c9.85 ± 0.0570.791 ± 0.030.212 ± 0.0150.147 ± 0.0080.027 ± 0.001
400 µM27.75 ± 0.9788.95 ± 0.3030.55 ± 0.030.2 ± 0.0150.119 ± 0.0090.023 ± 0.007

Each value represents the mean of three replications of each treatment. The same letters within a column indicate that there was no significant difference at a 95% probability level (p < 0.05).
3.3. Electrolyte Leakage (EL)

Electrolyte leakage was determined for the membrane permeability. Higher values of EL were recorded under 400μM in both rice cultivars as compared to their controls, while the B. cereus treatment significantly reduced the EL values under Cd+2 stress in both genotypes. At 400μM stress, the highest EL was observed (28.52 μS/cm2) in B-385 and S. Basmati (27.48 μS/cm2) which was significantly reduced to 25.96 and 22.38μS/cm2 by B. cereus treatment, respectively (Figure 2).

3.4. Photosynthetic Pigment

Regarding the chlorophyll contents, the higher level of Cd+2 stress reduced chlorophyll “a” “b” and total carotenoids contents in both rice genotypes significantly. In control, the chlorophyll “a”, “b” and total carotenoids contents were 4.14, 5.38, and 395.77μg/g, which were significantly reduced to 2.64, 4.69, and 279.97μg/g at 400μM in B-385. Seedling treatment with B. cereus showed promontory results under stress conditions. Similarly, S. Basmati reduced chlorophyll “a”, “b” and total carotenoids 1.85, 2.7, and 3.6 folds under 400 μMCd+2 stress.

3.5. Micronutrients

Micronutrients (Na+2, Ca+2 and K+) were determined in both rice cultivars under control and stress conditions (Figures 4(a), 4(b), and 4(c)). Results showed that S. Basmati has significantly higher Na+2, Ca+2 ion contents as compared to B-385 under control condition. The micronutrients leakage was gradually declined with increasing Cd+2 content from 100μM to 400μM. The highest observed values of Na+2, Ca+2, and K+ were 15.65, 15, and 40 ppm in B-385 while 28, 18.5, and 38.5 ppm in the control of B. cereus treated seedlings in S. Basmati which were significantly reduced at 400μM to 41, 40, and 52.5% and 44.6, 54, and 55%, respectively, while B. cereus treated seedlings increased the Na+2, Ca+2, and K+ content under stress condition in both rice cultivars.

3.6. Cd+2 Content

Cd+2 treatment plants remarkably increased the accumulation of metal in the leaves of both rice genotypes but the higher accumulation was noted in the S. Basmati seedlings (Figure 5). Results showed that Cd+2 contents were 10.5 and 29 folds more augmented in B-385 and S. Basmati under 400μM treated seedlings as compared to control, while the seedling treated with 400μM Cd+2 and B. cereus treatment reduced Cd+2 accumulation to 8.5 and 27.4 as compared to alone 400μM Cd+2 stress. Seedlings treated with B. cereus showed alleviating results under stress conditions.

3.7. Proline Contents and Total Soluble Sugar (TSS)

The alone B. cereus application resulted in a nonsignificant reduction of proline content and significantly reduced the total soluble sugar (TSS) content in both rice cultivars under control conditions. On the other hand, the seedling treated with different concentrations of Cd+2 significantly increased the proline and TSS in B-385 and S. Basmati. Results showed that higher proline contents were observed in B-385 (17.4 μmol/g) and S. Basmati (16.6 μmol/g) at 400μM which was 66 and 69% higher as compared to their respective controls. While the seedling treated with 400μM and B. cereus reduced to 12.66 and 13.55 μmol/g in B-385 and S. Basmati respectively (Figure 6). A similar trend was also noted for TSS, at 400μM 2.6 and the 1.43-fold increase was noted, which was significantly reduced to 1.6 and 0.9 folds in B-385 and S. Basmati with B. cereus application, respectively (Figure 7).

3.8. Peroxidase Content

Figure 8(a) shows the effect of Cd+2 treatment and B. cereus application on POD contents under control and stress conditions in both rice cultivars. Results showed that with increasing heavy metal concentration the POD contents were also increased while the B. cereus applications reduced the POD content in both rice cultivars. A higher value of POD was 233.5 (U min−1g−1FW-) in B-385 while 168.12 (U min−1g−1FW-) in S. Basmati which was significantly reduced to 170.7 and 133.8 (U min−1g−1FW-) with B. cereus under 400 μMCd+2 stress.

3.9. Catalase Activity

Catalase activity was also observed for both rice cultivars under stress conditions and results showed that CAT activity was enhanced with increasing cadmium concentration in the pots. The highest activity was observed at 400uM in both cultivars as compared to their respective control and B. cereus application. B. cereus treated seedlings showed the highest values at 400μM as 1.3 -U min−1g−1FW- in B-385 and 1.2 -U min−1g−1FW- in S. Basmati which was comparatively lower than seedling untreated with B. cereusat400 μMCd+2 stress (Figure 8(b)).

4. Discussion

Environmental pollution by heavy metals is a serious issue in most countries around the globe, which is caused by natural processes and anthropogenic activities. Among these metals, cadmium has become a serious threat due to its increasing amount in agricultural soil by several outdoor or indoor irrigation factors [38]. In agriculture soils, cadmium phytotoxicity is caused by Cd-induced oxidative stress that affects nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids, thereby causing growth inhibition or even cell death [39]. Various techniques such as adsorption, oxidation, reduction, precipitation, ion-exchange, and coagulation-flocculation have been employed for cleaning Cd-contaminated sites. However, all these practices remove the heavy metals from the soil by transforming one phase to another, which make them expensive and energy intensive [40]. Microbe assisted phytoremediation is considered as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly biotechnological approach for the remediation of heavy metals like Cd. Additionally, PGPB poses an attractive way to reduce pesticides, chemical fertilizer, and supplements inputs in agrosystem [41]. In the current study, we isolated and investigated the effect of B. cereus as a heavy metal remediator to alleviate the toxic effects of Cd+2 on rice biomass, cell membrane stability, metabolites, and antioxidants. Previously it was reported by Egidi et al. [42] that B. cereus can be used as a toxic metals remediator. Similarly, it was observed that inoculation of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) are supposed to be highly efficient remediation method mainly for salinity [43] and heavy metals [44] without any harmful effects on soil and plant.

Cd uptake analysis (Figure 5) of the present study revealed that the accumulation of Cd increased in the roots and shoots of rice cultivars by dose-dependent manner. The application of B. cereus significantly decreased the uptake of metal as compared to control plants. This reduction in Cd uptake may be due to a chelating compound produced by a bacterial strain that decoys cadmium and protects the plant [45]. Khan et al. [46] also showed that wheat, maize, and all other cereals inoculated with chromium tolerant bacterial isolates lowered chromium uptake in roots and other parts of plants. The study of Jamil et al. [47] reported that Bacillus licheniformis (NCCP- 59) are capable to restrict Ni uptake in Oryza sativa L. The results of metal uptake are correlated with plant biomass reduction, as we noted that root and shoot length and biomass decreased with increasing cadmium concentration in both rice cultivars B-385 and S. Basmati (Table 1). The reduction in plant biomass might be due to cadmium that stops elongation of root/shoot fresh and dry biomasses by inhibiting cell signalling mechanism. According to Srivastava et al. [48], in soybean at 2mM cadmium stress, root and shoot length inhibited as compared to control. However, seedling treatment with B. cereus alleviated the drastic effects of Cd-induced toxicity on plants as shown in Table 1. Our results are in line with the findings of Luo [20], who reported that seedling inoculated with endophytic bacterium LRE07 was capable of resisting the toxic effect of heavy metal isolated from hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Similarly, Shirinzadeh et al. [49] also demonstrated that treatment with rhizobacteria significantly enhanced dry mass than control in barely. Similar to our findings Barassi et al. [45] reported that priming seeds with Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 not only enhanced seed germination but also stimulated plant growth and subset to the aerial part in lettuce when exposed to sodium chloride 80 mol m−3.

Photosynthetic pigments are essential for plant survival as they act as an important component in light-harvesting complex of photo system II (PSII). Different Cadmium concentrations significantly affected chlorophyll “a” “b” and carotenoids contents by reducing pigments in green tissues (Figures 3(a)3(c)). The decrease of photosynthetic pigment might be due to heavy metal toxicity that results in replacing magnesium ion and damaging chloroplast [45]. According to Xue et al. [50] cadmium interferes with chloroplast and photosynthetic pigments and decreases the efficiency of the carbon assimilation pathway and disturbs Chl protein complexes and Chl content [45], which results in a reduction of photosynthetic rate. Similar findings are also reported by Vijayarengan et al. [51] in rice photosynthetic pigment reduced during cadmium stress condition. However, rice plants inoculated with B. cereus showed maintenance of photosynthetic pigments under Cd stress (Figures 3(a)3(c)). When rice plants are exposed to excessive levels of heavy metals, like Cd, in the growth medium, one immediate consequence involves increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the tissues. The ROS affects cell membrane properties by causing oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, DNA, pigments, and other essential cellular molecules and can lead to a series of destructive processes [6]. Our results demonstrated that by under higher application of Cd, cell rupturing become higher in both rice cultivars (B-385 and S. Basmati) that affect osmotic regulation in the cell (Figure 2). It could be due to cadmium toxicity that disturbs the electrolytes regulation and cell membrane stringency caused leakage of electrolytes. Study of Zeid et al. [24] provide evidence that electrolyte leakage was more in alfalfa plant due to higher uptake of metals. B. cereus treated seedling showed effective results and lowered the electrolyte leakage with increasing cadmium content up to 400 μM (Figure 2).

To cope with overproduced ROS due to the Cd uptake, plant employed ROS scavenging system consists of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. It has been demonstrated by many researchers that antioxidants play a key role in regulating the physiological redox status and also in scavenging reactive oxygen species [48, 52]. The stimulation of antioxidants enzymes like catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) acts as an essential detoxification mechanism in plants under heavy metal stresses [44]. Cadmium toxicity increases peroxidase and catalase content with increasing stress treatments in both rice cultivars (B-385 and S.B). However, B. cereus inoculation has significantly lowered POD and CAT activity under high cadmium concentration, which suggests that inoculation of B. cereus reduces oxidative stress in plants and have maintained the redox balance in stressed plants (Figure 8). Previously, Kang et al. [53] also observed that enzyme activity was lowered in paddy plants when inoculated with Pseudomonas, pseudoalcaligenes, and Bacillus pumilus in comparison to control under a saline stress condition [54].

Nonenzymatic antioxidants such as total soluble sugars, free amino acids, proline, glutathione, phenolic compounds, and ascorbic acid in plants are known to be involved in the internal detoxification of metal induce toxicity [55, 56]. Lower proline accumulation in control and higher in the stressed plant is a common phenomenon as investigated by different authors [57]. Similarly, our result suggested that proline and total soluble content increased with increasing metal toxicity, while inoculation of B. cereus lowered the proline and total soluble content in stressed plants (Figures 6 and 7). The lower accumulation of proline contents may be due to less accumulation of Cd, electrolyte leakage and less accumulation of ROS in the shoots. Similarly, Vardharajula [58] also showed that inoculation of Bacillus sp. reduces proline and total soluble content in wheat and maize as compared to untreated plants under drought stress.

In plants, mineral nutrition, ionic balance, and acquisition are strongly affected by the cadmium presence in nutrient media. Micronutrients content considerably decreased with increasing Cd uptake in both cultivars (Figure 4). This may be due to the reason that cadmium blocked the ion channel by binding to micronutrient or causes osmotic effects due to extreme absorption in the root/leaf at a lethal level [59]. Several studies reported that cadmium decreases nutrient uptake and grain yield [4951]. Previously, Shinwari et al. [60] demonstrated that the presence of Cr significant decrease micronutrients uptake and their distribution in rice plants. From our present results, it could be assumed that PGPB helped to maintain micronutrients in equilibrium and help the plant to overcome the competitiveness of Cd+2 ions [47].

5. Conclusion

Plant associated bacteria (PGRB) can play a beneficial role in plant growth. Nevertheless, some of these bacteria can also provide resistant to the plants against abiotic stress like heavy metal (Cd) which is not investigated in depth. Based on our knowledge, B. cereus can be used as plant growth promoting bacteria at the seedling stage to promote plants under high cadmium toxicity. From current studies, it can be concluded that studied bacterial stain has the capability to reduce the cadmium toxicity and enhance plant growth or it can be used in contaminated soil to overcome Cd toxicity.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest in this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Mehmood Jan is the main contributor of the article; 80 % work is done by this author; Gulmeena Shah contributed in the experimental work and manuscript writing; Sadaf Masood helped in experimental work; Kamran Iqbal Shinwari helped in experimental work; Rashida Hameed helped in experimental work; E. S. Rha helped in correction of the revised manuscript and Muhammad Jamil conceived the research idea and supervised the research work. Mehmood Jan and Gulmeena Shah contributed equally to this work.


We would like to thank Muhammad Hafeez Ullah Khan, Ijaz Malook, Muhammad Naeem, Mehvish Riaz Khattak, and Khatija Neyar for making efforts in the current work. The current study was partially supported by the higher education commission through Grant no. 20-4372.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of B. cereus as a metal (Cd) remediator based on the nucleotide sequences. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. B. Steffens, “The role of ethylene and ROS in salinity, heavy metal, and flooding responses in rice,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 5, p. 685, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. M. Gallego, L. B. Pena, R. A. Barcia et al., “Unravelling cadmium toxicity and tolerance in plants: insight into regulatory mechanisms,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 83, pp. 33–46, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Du, X.-F. Hu, X.-H. Wu, Y. Shu, Y. Jiang, and X.-J. Yan, “Affects of mining activities on Cd pollution to the paddy soils and rice grain in Hunan province, Central South China,” Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 185, no. 12, pp. 9843–9856, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. Shi, S. Tao, B. Pan et al., “Contamination of rivers in Tianjin, China by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 97–111, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. S. Shah, F. Mohammad, M. Shafi et al., “Effects of cadmium and salinity on growth and photosynthesis parameters of Brassica species,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 333–340, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. A. Anjum, M. Tanveer, S. Hussain et al., “Cadmium toxicity in Maize (Zea mays L.): consequences on antioxidative systems, reactive oxygen species and cadmium accumulation,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 17022–17030, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. A. Anjum, M. Tanveer, S. Hussain et al., “Morpho‐physiological growth and yield responses of two contrasting maize cultivars to cadmium exposure,” Clean - Soil, Air, Water, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Ke, X.-Y. Cheng, N. Zhang et al., “Cadmium contamination of rice from various polluted areas of China and its potential risks to human health,” Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 187, no. 7, article 408, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Liu, Y. Ding, F. Wang, Y. Ye, and C. Zhu, “Role of salicylic acid in resistance to cadmium stress in plants,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 719–731, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Aziz, M. T. Rafiq, T. Li et al., “Uptake of cadmium by rice grown on contaminated soils and its bioavailability/toxicity in human cell lines (Caco-2/HL-7702),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 13, pp. 3599–3608, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. Kosolsaksakul, J. G. Farmer, I. W. Oliver, and M. C. Graham, “Geochemical associations and availability of cadmium (Cd) in a paddy field system, northwestern Thailand,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 187, pp. 153–161, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Sasaki and B. Burr, “International rice genome sequencing project: the effort to completely sequence the rice genome,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 138–141, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Shah, M. Jan, M. Afreen et al., “Halophilic bacteria mediated phytoremediation of salt-affected soils cultivated with rice,” Journal of Geochemical Exploration, vol. 174, pp. 59–65, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Tsukahara, T. Ezaki, J. Moriguchi et al., “Rice as the most influential source of cadmium intake among general Japanese population,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 305, no. 1-3, pp. 41–51, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. M. Nadeem, Z. A. Zahir, M. Naveed, M. Arshad, and S. M. Shahzad, “Variation in growth and ion uptake of maize due to inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under salt stress,” Soil Environ, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 78–84, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  16. W. Xu, Y. Li, J. He et al., “Cd uptake in rice cultivars treated with organic acids and EDTA,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 441–447, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Farooq, H. N. Asghar, M. Y. Khan, M. Saleem, and Z. A. Zahir, “Auxin-mediated growth of rice in cadmium-contaminated soil,” Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 272–276, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. Wu, C. Zhang, J. Yan, Q. Yue, and Y. Ge, “Effects of sulfur supply and hydrogen peroxide pretreatment on the responses by rice under cadmium stress,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 299–306, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. H. U. Khan, J. Z. K. Khattak, M. Jamil et al., “Bacillus safensis with plant-derived smoke stimulates rice growth under saline conditions,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 24, no. 30, pp. 23850–23863, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Luo, Y. Wan, X. Xiao et al., “Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacterium LRE07 from cadmium hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and its potential for remediation,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1637–1644, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Han and K. Lee, “Physiological responses of soybean-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum with PGPR in saline soil conditions,” Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 216–221, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  22. B. Saharan and V. Nehra, “Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review,” Life Sciences and Medicine Research, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 30, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. Fu, Q. Zhou, J. Liu et al., “High levels of heavy metals in rice from a typical E-waste recycling area in southeast China and its potential risk to human health,” Chemosphere, vol. 71, pp. 1269–1275, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  24. I. Zeid, S. Ghazi, and D. Nabawy, “Alleviation of Co and Cr toxic effects on alfalfa,” International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 984–993, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. Islam, T. Yasmeen, Q. Ali et al., “Influence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as PGPR on oxidative stress tolerance in wheat under Zn stress,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 285–293, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Chèneby, S. Perrez, C. Devroe et al., “Denitrifying bacteria in bulk and maize-rhizospheric soil: diversity and N2O-reducing abilities,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 469–474, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3402, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. B. Bal, L. Nayak, S. Das, and T. K. Adhya, “Isolation of ACC deaminase producing PGPR from rice rhizosphere and evaluating their plant growth promoting activity under salt stress,” Plant and Soil, vol. 366, no. 1-2, pp. 93–105, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Beltrano and M. G. Ronco, “Improved tolerance of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability,” Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. K. Lichtenthaler and A. R. Wellburn, Determinations of Total Carotenoids and Chlorophylls a and b of Leaf Extracts in Different Solvents, Portland Press Limited, 1983. View at: Publisher Site
  31. J. Awan and S. U. Rehman, Food analysis manual, Unitech Communications, 2005.
  32. H. Garraud, M. Robert, C. R. Quetel, J. Szpunar, and O. F. X. Donard, “Focused microwave-assisted digestion of biological reference materials for the determination of trace metals by ICP-MS,” Atomic Spectroscopy, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 183–185, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  33. L. S. Bates, R. P. Waldren, and I. D. Teare, “Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies,” Plant and Soil, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 205–207, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Dey, “Oligosaccharides,” in Methods in Plant Biochemistry, pp. 189–218, Elsevier, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. C. F. de Vasconcelos, X. Zhang, E. H. Ervin, and J. D. C. Kiehl, “Enzymatic antioxidant responses to biostimulants in maize and soybean subjected to drought,” Scientia Agricola, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 395–402, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. B. Kumar and P. A. Khan, “Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in excised ragi (Eleusine corocana cv PR 202) leaves during senescence,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology (IJEB), vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 412–416, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. Gelman, “Analysis of variance—why it is more important than ever,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–53, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  38. S. A. Anjum, M. Tanveer, S. Hussain et al., “Osmoregulation and antioxidant production in maize under combined cadmium and arsenic stress,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 11864–11875, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. Loix, M. Huybrechts, J. Vangronsveld, M. Gielen, E. Keunen, and A. Cuypers, “Reciprocal interactions between cadmium-induced cell wall responses and oxidative stress in plants,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, p. 1867, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. M. Willey, L. Sherwood, and C. J. Woolverton, Prescott, Harley, and Klein's Microbiology, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008.
  41. S. V. Kuriakose and M. N. V. Prasad, “Cadmium stress affects seed germination and seedling growth in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench by changing the activities of hydrolyzing enzymes,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 143–156, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. Egidi, J. L. Wood, E. Mathews, E. Fox, W. Liu, and A. E. Franks, “Draft genome sequence of Bacillus cereus LCR12, a plant growth–promoting rhizobacterium isolated from a heavy metal–contaminated environment,” Genome Announcements, vol. 4, no. 5, Article ID e01041-16, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  43. B. Lugtenberg and F. Kamilova, “Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 63, pp. 541–556, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. B. R. Glick, Z. Cheng, J. Czarny, and J. Duan, “Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria,” New Perspectives and Approaches in Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Research, pp. 329–339, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  45. C. A. Barassi, G. Ayrault, C. M. Creus, R. J. Sueldo, and M. T. Sobrero, “Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Schmfger, Phytochelatins: complexation of metals and metalloids, studies on the phytochelatin synthase [Ph.D. thesis], Munich University of Technology (TUM), Munich, Germany, 2001.
  47. M. Jamil, S. Zeb, M. Anees et al., “Role of bacillus licheniformis in phytoremediation of nickel contaminated soil cultivated with rice,” International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 554–571, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. Srivastava, R. Khan, and N. Manzoor, “Responses of cadmium exposures on growth, physio-biochemical characteristics and the antioxidative defence system of soybean (Glycine max L.),” International Journal of Botany, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 305–309, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. Shirinzadeh, H. Soleimanzadeh, and Z. Shirinzadeh, “Effect of seed priming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on agronomic traits and yield of barley cultivars,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 727–731, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  50. Z.-C. Xue, H.-Y. Gao, and L.-T. Zhang, “Effects of cadmium on growth, photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content in leaves of soybean seedlings,” Biologia Plantarum, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 587–590, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. Vijayarengan, “Changes in growth and biochemical constituents in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under cadmium stress,” International Journal of Botany and Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 27–33, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  52. U.-H. Cho and N.-H. Seo, “Oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to cadmium is due to hydrogen peroxide accumulation,” Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Y. Khan, H. N. Asghar, M. U. Jamshaid, M. J. Akhtar, and Z. A. Zahir, “Effect of microbial inoculation on wheat growth and phytostabilization of chromium contaminated soil,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 45, no. S1, pp. 27–34, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  54. R. Wang, F. Gao, B.-Q. Guo, J.-C. Huang, L. Wang, and Y.-J. Zhou, “Short-term chromium-stress-induced alterations in the maize leaf proteome,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 11125–11144, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. F. Islam, B. Ali, J. Wang et al., “Combined herbicide and saline stress differentially modulates hormonal regulation and antioxidant defense system in Oryza sativa cultivars,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 107, pp. 82–95, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. F. Islam, T. Yasmeen, M. S. Arif et al., “Plant growth promoting bacteria confer salt tolerance in Vigna radiata by up-regulating antioxidant defense and biological soil fertility,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. F. Islam, T. Yasmeen, M. S. Arif et al., “Combined ability of chromium (Cr) tolerant plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) and salicylic acid (SA) in attenuation of chromium stress in maize plants,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 108, pp. 456–467, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Vardharajula, S. Z. Ali, M. Grover, G. Reddy, and V. Bandi, “Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting bacillus spp.: effect on growth,osmol ytes,and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress,” Journal of Plant Interactions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. F. Zeng, B. Qiu, S. Ali, and G. Zhang, “Genotypic differences in nutrient uptake and accumulation in rice under chromium stress,” Journal of Plant Nutrition, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 518–528, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. K. I. Shinwari et al., “Seed priming with salicylic acid induces tolerance against chromium (VI) toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.),” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 47, pp. 161–170, 2015. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Mehmood Jan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.