Motor Improvement in Adolescents Affected by Ataxia Secondary to Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Study

Peri, Elisabetta; Panzeri, Daniele; Beretta, Elena; Reni, Gianluigi; Strazzer, Sandra; Biffi, Emilia

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8967138

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 8967138 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8967138

Motor Improvement in Adolescents Affected by Ataxia Secondary to Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Study

Elisabetta Peri,¹Daniele Panzeri,¹Elena Beretta,¹Gianluigi Reni,¹Sandra Strazzer,¹and Emilia Biffi¹

Academic Editor: Mario U. Manto

Received23 Apr 2019

Revised01 Aug 2019

Accepted10 Aug 2019

Published26 Nov 2019

Abstract

Aim. To assess changes in locomotion and balance in adolescents affected by ataxia secondary to acquired brain injury after a rehabilitation treatment with physiotherapy and the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL), an immersive virtual reality platform. Methods. 11 ataxic adolescents (16(5) years old, 4.7(6.7) years from injury) underwent 20 45-minute sessions with GRAIL plus 20 45-minute sessions of physiotherapy in one month. Patients were assessed before and after rehabilitation with functional scales and three-dimensional multiple-step gait analysis. Results. Results showed significant improvements in ataxia score assessed by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, in dimension D and E of Gross Motor Function Measure, in walking endurance and in balance abilities. Moreover, the training fostered significant changes at hip, knee, and ankle joints, and the decrease of gait variability, toward healthy references. Interpretation. In spite of the pilot nature of the study, data suggest that training with immersive virtual reality and physiotherapy is a promising approach for ataxic gait rehabilitation, even in chronic conditions.

1. Introduction

Ataxia is a neurological sign resulting in cognitive and motor deficits that have a significant impact on quality of daily life. The locomotion ability is impaired by decreased balance due to loss of coordination, dysmetria, tremors, and hypotonia [1]. Cerebellar ataxia is a form of ataxia that originates from a deficit located in the cerebellum [2]. Its etiology is either genetic or it is a consequence of an acquired brain injury (ABI). In the latter case, it can be due to a focal lesion as a result of hemorrhagic events, traumatic brain injury or brain tumor, often located in the posterior cranial fossa. Ataxia in children and adolescents usually entails a relevant social and economic burden, since it involves young subjects that may need assistance and restorative treatments to be paid by the community throughout all life.

Cerebellar ataxic gait shows some common clinical signs: a generalized irregular gait pattern, reduced gait speed and cadence, shorter step and stride length, reduced swing phase, increase of the step width[3], augmented stance phase and double limb support time [4], increased variability in timing [1, 5], knee hyperextension, reduced power at the ankle joint, loss of smoothness during the gait, and decomposition of multijoint movements into a series of single-joint movements [6]. These signs can increase the exposure to fall risk, reduce the endurance during the walk and, in more severe cases, require the use of orthosis, limiting a complete access to peer activities.

Therefore, the recovery of locomotion is commonly considered one of the primary goals in rehabilitation of ataxic patients.

Previous studies described motor recovery [7] and reported successful outcome in patients with degenerative ataxia [8–11], while only few low-level evidence publications tackle the rehabilitation of patients with ataxia secondary to ABI [7].

Two main rehabilitative approaches are usually considered [12], named as restorative and compensatory strategy. The former aims at restoring the functional ability through the recovery of the neuro-musculoskeletal system, while the latter consists of a series of strategies that the patient has to learn to get access to a determinate function.

The choice is guided by the distance from the injury: a very early intervention exploits the plasticity mechanisms and the subject has a better chance to regain functions working with a restorative approach, trying to re-learn the more correct patterns. In contrast, when the distance from the injury increases and the residual potential relearning declines, the compensatory approach is usually preferred.

In the last years, the advent of advanced technologies in rehabilitation and, specifically, of Virtual Reality (VR)-based devices, has unfolded new possibilities in the world of rehabilitation [13–16]. VR is a promising strategy that incorporates many principles recognized as crucial for motor relearning, such as high intensity, repetitive and goal-oriented tasks, enhanced synchronized sensorial cues and active participation [17–19]. Furthermore, the combination of biofeedback has already shown to be effective [20]. The virtual environment is suitable for a tailor-made work too, as it can be adapted to the individual needs of each patient.

Platforms integrating immersive VR (IVR) with an instrumented treadmill and a motion capture system combine assessment and rehabilitation purposes. Instrumented treadmills are able to acquire gait data recording many consecutive steps, differently to traditional gait analysis devices. This allows to evaluate the step variability, which is particularly relevant in the ataxic population [21], who exhibits an increased variability in terms of step length, excursion, and timing of hip, knee, and ankle joints [5].

VR training with these kinds of platforms has been previously studied on children affected by Cerebral Palsy (CP) [22] and with ABI [23].

Since there are no studies about the rehabilitation of ataxic children and adolescents by means of similar platforms, the aim of this work is to investigate the potential of the use of IVR, biofeedback, and treadmill walking combined with physiotherapy, in this population and to highlight the advantages given by the assessment of the multistep gait analysis in ataxic subjects.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Patients affected by ABI who exhibited ataxia secondary to trauma, brain tumor, stroke, encephalitis, anoxia, or arteriovenous malformation were recruited at the Scientific Institute Medea. The inclusion criteria were: signs of ataxia, identified by clinical assessment; age between 7 and 30; mild to moderate gross motor ability–level I–III of Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) [24, 25]; compliance and ability to understand and execute test instructions. The exclusion criteria were: severe muscle spasticity, a diagnosis of severe learning disability or behavioral problems, and visual difficultiesthat would impact on function and participation.

The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Scientific Institute Medea and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients or their parents subscribed a written informed consent.

2.2. Gait Real-Time Analysis Interactive Lab

Medea is equipped with an IVR system, the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL) by Motekforce Link (the Netherlands). This device integrates IVR with an instrumented treadmill and a motion capture system, that can be used for rehabilitation and assessment purposes. It includes a semicircular screen where the virtual reality environment is projected and a dual-belt treadmill, which integrates two force platforms and is synchronized with the projected environment. To assure a safe use, a harness and two lateral handrails are used (Figure 1(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

As a rehabilitative tool, the GRAIL provides biofeedback based on kinematic or kinetic gait features, allowing to train left and right body side thanks to the split-belt treadmill, and to coach balance and coordination control.

As assessment tool, the GRAIL is equipped with 10 optoelectronic cameras and three video cameras that, together with the two force platforms, can be used to acquire spatial, temporal, kinematic, and kinetic parameters of many consecutive steps in real time. These data can also be exploited as visual feedback to the operator and patient during the training.

2.3. Study Design and Intervention

Patients underwent 20 45-minute sessions of training with GRAIL plus 20 45-minute sessions of physiotherapy within one month. The therapeutic scheme was customized over the patients’ need, tailoring the setting and the difficulty of proposed exergames on patients’ skills, and it was oriented to the recovery of balance ability and of a correct locomotion pattern.

The balance training encompassed left-right shifting of body weight, monopodalic support, or balance maintenance while receiving external swinging stimuli (Figure 1(b)).

The gait training included gradually increasing difficulty exercises, from the control of the center of mass during walking without the upper limb support to more challenging tasks, like multitasking activities during walking, external perturbations (i.e., changes of treadmill slope, single belt sliding, medio-lateral belt sways) and locomotion with decreased step width (i.e., one belt only activated). The kinetics and kinematics of target districts were projected in real time as feedback and overlaid to healthy reference values (Figure 1(c)).

Concerning physiotherapy, exercises were aimed at reinforcing the activities trained with VR, focusing on monopodalic balance training, walking on narrow path, walking on irregular path, get up and down the stairs, jump and run.

2.4. Outcome Measures

Patients’ performance was evaluated before (T0) and after (T1) rehabilitation by means of functional scales and three-dimensional gait analysis.

The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a scale developed to quantify the severity of the ataxia from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (severe ataxia). It includes motor tasks (that investigate the most common deficits, like imbalance, tremors, dysmetria, and rhythmic movements) and speech [26].

The gross motor ability of patients was assessed by means of Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88): it ranges from 0 (severe deficit) to 100 and is composed of 88 items divided into 5 sections: A–lying and rolling; B–sitting; C–crawling and kneeling; D–standing; E–walking, running, and jumping [27].

The six-minute walking test (6MWT) evaluated walking endurance [28], measuring the distance covered over six minutes of self-paced walking along a standardized path.

The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) assesses patients’ fall risk and was used to evaluate patient’s balance ability [29]. BBS is composed of 14 items scored with a five-point scale (0–4) according to functional level. The total score ranges from 0 (high fall risks) to 56 (low fall risks).

The 3D gait analysis (GA) was acquired on the GRAIL. Subjects were asked to walk wearing socks for an adaptation period of six minutes on the instrumented treadmill at a fixed velocity, customized over the patient’s ability. Then, about 20 steps were acquired. During this assessment no biofeedback was provided with the GRAIL.

At the end of the treatment, qualitative improvements of each patient in terms of activities and participation were collected by patients and their families.

2.5. Data Analysis

Concerning GA data, the Gait Offline Analysis Tool was used to load the .mox file, to filter data (2^nd order Butterworth filter, cut off frequency at 6 Hz), to exclude strides with misplaced feet (e.g., foot on both belts or on the opposite belt) and to export the kinematics and kinetics traces in a .csv file. The gait parameters were then computed with an ad-hoc MATLAB (The MathWorks®) software that, for each step, extracted gait features at hip, knee, and ankle levels for left and right side. Since ataxia is not characterized by laterality, the mean value between the right and left parameters was considered.

The gait parameters computed were: the stance period, computed as the percentage ratio between the stance phase (from the initial contact of foot and the toe off of the same limb) and the gait cycle, the step length, the step width, and the gait speed as spatio-temporal parameters; the peak flexion power for the ankle, knee, and hip joints for kinetic evaluations; the peak of flexion and extension for the three joints in the sagittal plane; the range of motion (ROM) of hip abduction/adduction, and the ROM of pelvis in the three planes (tilt, obliquity and rotation).

To evaluate the variability of gait, for each parameter the coefficient of variation (CV) was computed as the percentage ratio between the SD and the mean of the steps of each i-th subject [30], as in Equation (1).

The coefficient of variation is not appropriate for negative datasets or with values around zero [31]. For parameters that assumed values , the SD has been reported.

The normality of the data was checked with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Since not all the measures were normal, nonparametric statistical analysis was carried out; medians and interquartile ranges are reported.

A within-group comparison was performed by means of the Wilcoxon test.

To help the interpretation of GA, patients outcomes were compared with those obtained by a healthy control group of 16 subjects (mean (SD) age of 10.0 (1.3) years, 15 males). These data were included in a previous study on autism [32]. The between-group comparison of GA outcomes was performed with Mann–Whitney U-test.

The analysis was carried out with IBM SPSS Statistics v15 and the significance level was set at 5%.

3. Results

According to the inclusion criteria, 11 subjects (age from 9 to 27) were recruited for the study. Demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Accidentally, only patients with GMFCS level of II agreed to participate.

Table 2 shows the results in terms of functional scales.

The signs of ataxia significantly diminished across the training, with a reduction of 20% of the SARA. GMFM-88, and its subscales, 6MWT and balance ability showed significant improvements after the treatment.

Table 3 summarizes results obtained in terms of GA.

A significant variation of step length, gait speed, maximal ankle power, maximal degree of knee flexion, and ROM of hip during abduction was obtained over time. Furthermore, the significant differences observed with respect to the healthy control group in terms of step length, gait speed, maximal ankle power, maximal knee extension and ROM of pelvic rotation disappeared after treatment.

Finally, the CV of step length, gait speed, maximal ankle power, and ROM of pelvic obliquity and rotation significantly reduced after therapy. This was supported by an overall trend of reduction of CV in almost all the parameters.

All the data were collected for the whole group.

Concerning qualitative changes of each patient in terms of activities and participation, improvements for 9 patients out of 11 were observed. Specifically, three patients had significant improvement in terms of safety during activities in standing and walking; three patients, that had reported difficulties in dual task activities such as walking and speaking before the treatment, enhanced their ability to fix a trajectory and keep balance while interacting with other people; one patient was able to go out alone, using public transports after the treatment; two patients showed pain decrease due to the improvement of their gait pattern.

4. Discussion

Children and adolescents with ataxia exhibit coordinative limitations, which often affect their locomotion and balance. In recent years, more and more attention has been devoted to training that exploit the potential of VR in rehabilitative context, but up to now only few studies described improvements on children with ABI treated with VR [23, 33], and, to our knowledge, none specifically on ataxic patients.

This manuscript aims at investigating the feasibility and effectiveness of a rehabilitation program that exploits IVR, biofeedback, and treadmill walking coupled to physiotherapy for the recovery of locomotion and balance in adolescents affected by ataxia secondary to ABI.

The study showed that the training was feasible and well tolerated by patients. No subject withdrew from the study, and patients and their families gave positive feedbacks in terms of engagement and functional recovery.

Our findings support that 20 sessions of treadmill training augmented by IVR together with 20 sessions of physiotherapy are effective for a significant improvement of balance and locomotion functions in ataxic adolescents. The ataxia level was significantly diminished, the gross motor ability was significantly improved in terms of standing and walking, and the balance and the walking endurance improved as well.

In terms of GA, subjects showed at T0 reduced gait speed, shorter step length and swing phase, diminished maximal ankle power, reduced knee flexion, and a generalized increase in step variability, with respect to their healthy pairs. These gait features well match with the typical clinical signs of cerebellar ataxic gait [3–6].

Data obtained after the proposed treatment showed improvements towards the pattern of typically developing subjects in terms of step length, gait speed, kinetic of the movement at ankle, and kinematic of knee, hip and pelvic joints. Evidence of reduction of the variability among steps was also obtained, suggesting the achievement of a more regular gait pattern. Furthermore, a reduction of step width, even if not significant, was observed and the two patients that were affected by knee hyperextension showed improvements after the combination of IVR and physiotherapy treatment.

Comparison among our results and what was previously reported is limited by the paucity and low-level of evidence reported on ataxia [7]. Previous case-studies have shown some improvements induced by treadmill training or virtual exergames on ataxic adults. Three case reports evaluated five adult ataxic patients (three secondary to traumatic brain injury and two secondary to tumor resection) who underwent trunk exercises and treadmill training with body weight support (15 and 30 sessions). The participants obtained some improvements in terms of BBS and gait [34–36]. Differently, no evidence of improvements induced by a four-week training with VR exergames on five ataxic adults have been reported in terms of balance ability and gait parameters, although SARA highlighted progresses [37].

The effectiveness of IVR treadmill training plus physiotherapy on ataxic adolescents has never been investigated. However, its performance in young patients with ABI has been previously studied [23], with comparable improvements in terms of gross motor abilities (GMFM-D improved of 6.6% in ABI and of 5.4% in ataxic patients; GMFM-E improved of 11.5% in ABI and of 4.4% in ataxic patients), but smaller ones in terms of 6MWT (improvements of 60.0% in ABI and of 9.6% in ataxic subjects). However the different mean value at baseline (277 m vs 500 m in the current work) may have limited the improvements due to ceiling effect (95% of confidence interval in age-matched healthy population is 651–742 m [38]).

Modifications induced by training based on IVR and physiotherapy look effective in modifying both the locomotion pattern as a whole and the control of the local districts in ataxic patients. Indeed, the present work supports that the treatment induces a modification of the gait kinematics. With respect to other technologically-advanced tools, such as robot-assisted gait training applied in the context of ABI rehabilitation, the effects obtained combining physiotherapy with IVR treadmill training seems to be particularly promising at ankle and knee levels. Indeed, a previous study on 23 children with ABI showed improvements induced by 20 sessions of robot-assisted gait training in terms of gross motor abilities, walking endurance and gait kinematics at hip level, while no changes were observed for more distal districts [39].

One of the strengths of the present work is that we exploited the GRAIL technology to quantitatively analyze the variability of the locomotion, which is a crucial aspect of ataxic patients. Their high gait irregularity prevents from obtaining reliable results by using standard gait analysis, during which the user usually selects one or few steps that should represent the gait pattern of a single patient. Due to the specificity of ataxia, it is mandatory to use a multistep approach to quantify ataxic locomotion. Our results, based on the multistep gait analysis available through GRAIL, give encouraging evidence of reduction of step variability, toward the pattern of healthy individuals.

A limit of this work is that, although GMFCS has been used in the past for the description of patients with ABI [25], we are not aware of any systematic validation in children with this pathology. Furthermore, the increased effectiveness of a combined IVR treadmill training plus physiotherapy with respect to traditional approaches has to be deepened in the future by means of randomized controlled trials. The generalizability of the results of the present work is currently limited by the little sample size, the heterogeneity of patients in terms of age, and the absence of a control group.

However, it is noteworthy that the population analyzed had a median (interquartile) distance from trauma of 4.7 (6.7) years. As studied by Kuper and colleagues, the spontaneous recovery of balance ability in children after cerebellar tumor resection is relevant over the first three months post-surgery and continues over the first year post surgery [40]. The recovery of the remaining motor ability shown in the present work may thus be ascribed to the rehabilitation treatment.

5. Conclusion

To conclude, the present study shows the first evidence of the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality treadmill training together with standard physiotherapy on ataxic adolescents. The intervention proposed was customized on patients’ need; it was ecological and highly motivating. Forty sessions of such training produced significant improvements in locomotion pattern, balance, and reduction of gait variability, towards healthy references. Finally, although specific goals in terms of activity and participation were not defined, the proposed protocol improved patients’ participation to social life, as reported both by patients and their parents.

What This Paper Adds(i)Assessment of preliminary effectiveness of IVR devices in the ataxic patient rehabilitation.(ii)Modifiability of locomotion and balance of ataxic adolescents, even in chronic condition.(iii)Reliable evaluation of gait pattern and step variability in ataxic population.

Abbreviations

VR:	Virtual reality
GMFCS:	Gross motor function classification system
GRAIL:	Gait real-time analysis interactive lab
SARA:	Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
GMFM-88:	Gross motor function measure-88 items
6MWT:	Six minute walking test
BBS:	Berg balance scale
GA:	Gait analysis
ROM:	Range of motion
CV:	Coefficient of variation
AVM:	Arteriovenous malformation
TBI:	Traumatic brain injury
SD:	Standard deviations.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

The research protocol was approved by the central ethical committee of Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

The participants give their consent for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Bi.E., Be.E., G.R., and S.S. substantially contributed to conception and design of the study. P.E. analyzed data. P.E., P.D., and Bi.E. interpreted results. P.E., P.D. were the major contributors in writing the manuscript. P.D. was the major responsible of data acquisition. All authors critically read and approved the final manuscript. Elisabetta Peri and Daniele Panzeri equally contributing authors.

Funding

This study was supported by Italian Ministry of Health with the following projects: Ricerca Corrente 2016–RACE project to GR, and Ricerca Corrente 2017/2018/2019–VARA project to GR.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Alessandro Crippa and Silvia Busti for their help in collecting data of the healthy control group. Authors also thank the physiotherapists that performed functional evaluations and patients and their families.

References

W. Ilg, H. Golla, P. Thier, and M. A. Giese, “Specific influences of cerebellar dysfunctions on gait,” Brain, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 786–798, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-C. Diener and J. Dichgans, “Pathophysiology of cerebellar ataxia,” Movement Disorders, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95–109, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hoogkamer, S. M. Bruijn, S. Sunaert, S. P. Swinnen, F. Van Calenbergh, and J. Duysens, “Toward new sensitive measures to evaluate gait stability in focal cerebellar lesion patients,” Gait & Posture, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 592–596, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Buckley, C. Mazzà, and A. McNeill, “A systematic review of the gait characteristics associated with cerebellar ataxia,” Gait & Posture, vol. 60, pp. 154–163, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Moon, J. Sung, R. An, M. E. Hernandez, and J. J. Sosnoff, “Gait variability in people with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Human Movement Science, vol. 47, pp. 197–208, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Morton and A. J. Bastian, “Mechanisms of cerebellar gait ataxia,” The cerebellum, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Marquer, G. Barbieri, and D. Pérennou, “The assessment and treatment of postural disorders in cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review,” Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 67–78, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Miyai, M. Ito, N. Hattori et al., “Cerebellar ataxia rehabilitation trial in degenerative Cerebellar diseases,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 515–522, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ilg, M. Synofzik, D. Brötz, S. Burkard, M. A. Giese, and L. Schöls, “Intensive coordinative training improves motor performance in degenerative cerebellar disease,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 22, pp. 1823–1830, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ilg, D. Brötz, S. Burkard, M. A. Giese, L. Schöls, and M. Synofzik, “Long-term effects of coordinative training in degenerative cerebellar disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 2239–2246, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Armutlu, R. Karabudak, and G. Nurlu, “Physiotherapy approaches in the treatment of ataxic multiple sclerosis: a pilot study,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 203–211, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Marsden and C. Harris, “Cerebellar ataxia: pathophysiology and rehabilitation,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 195–216, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ilg, C. Schatton, J. Schicks, M. A. Giese, L. Schöls, and M. Synofzik, “Video game-based coordinative training improves ataxia in children with degenerative ataxia,” Neurology, vol. 79, no. 20, pp. 2056–2060, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Holden, “Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 187–211, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cho, W. Hwang, S. Hwang, and Y. Chung, “Treadmill training with virtual reality improves gait, balance, and muscle strength in children with cerebral palsy,” The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 238, no. 3, pp. 213–218, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Hamed and M. S. Abd-elwahab, “Pedometer-based gait training in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled study,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Krakauer, “Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation,” Current opinion in Neurology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Lyons, “Cultivating engagement and enjoyment in exergames using feedback, challenge, and rewards,” Games for Health Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Huang, S. L. Wolf, and J. He, “Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation,” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 3, Article ID 11, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
A. T. C. Booth, A. I. Buizer, J. Harlaar, F. Steenbrink, and M. M. van der Krogt, “Immediate effects of immersive biofeedback on gait in children with cerebral palsy,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 598–605, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ilg and D. Timmann, “Gait ataxia-specific cerebellar influences and their rehabilitation,” Movement Disorders, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1566–1575, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gagliardi, A. C. Turconi, E. Biffi et al., “Immersive virtual reality to improve walking abilities in cerebral palsy: a pilot study,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1376–1384, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Biffi, E. Beretta, A. Cesareo et al., “An immersive virtual reality platform to enhance walking ability of children with acquired brain injuries,” Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 56, no. 02, pp. 119–126, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Palisano, P. Rosenbaum, S. Walter, D. Russell, E. Wood, and B. Galuppi, “Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy,” Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 214–223, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jackman, I. Novak, and N. Lannin, “Effectiveness of functional hand splinting and the cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP) approach in children with cerebral palsy and brain injury: two randomized controlled trial protocols,” BMC Neurology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 144, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Hartley, B. Pizer, S. Lane et al., “Inter-rater reliability and validity of two ataxia rating scales in children with brain tumours,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 693–697, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Linder-Lucht, V. Othmer, M. Walther et al., “Gross motor function measure-traumatic brain injury study group. validation of the gross motor function measure for use in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries,” Pediatrics, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. e880–e886, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Andersson, L. Asztalos, and E. Mattsson, “Six-minute walk test in adults with cerebral palsy. A study of reliability,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 488–495, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-M. Gan, L.-C. Tung, Y.-H. Tang, and C.-H. Wang, “Psychometric properties of functional balance assessment in children with cerebral palsy,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 745–753, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Brown, “Coefficient of variation,” in: Applied Multivariate Statistics in Geohydrology and Related Sciences, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Sachs, Applied Statistics : A Handbook of Techniques, Springer, New York, 1984.
E. Biffi, C. Costantini, S. B. Ceccarelli et al., “Gait pattern and motor performance during discrete gait perturbation in children with autism spectrum disorders,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Biffi, E. Beretta, E. Diella et al., “Gait rehabilitation with a high tech platform based on virtual reality conveys improvements in walking ability of children suffering from acquired brain injury,” in 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 7406–7409, IEEE, Milan, Italy, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Freund and D. M. Stetts, “Use of trunk stabilization and locomotor training in an adult with cerebellar ataxia: a single system design,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 447–458, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Gill-Body, R. A. Popat, S. W. Parker, and D. E. Krebs, “Rehabilitation of balance in two patients with cerebellar dysfunction,” Physical Therapy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 534–552, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Teixeira, V. R. Cavalcanti Furtado, S. R. de Mello, and E. Figueiredo, “Treadmill training for ataxic patients: a single-subject experimental design,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 234–241, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R.-Y. Wang, F.-Y. Huang, B.-W. Soong, S.-F. Huang, and Y.-R. Yang, “A randomized controlled pilot trial of game-based training in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 7816, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Geiger, A. Strasak, B. Treml et al., “Six-minute walk test in children and adolescents,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 395–399.e2, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Beretta, M. Romei, E. Molteni, P. Avantaggiato, and S. Strazzer, “Combined robotic-aided gait training and physical therapy improve functional abilities and hip kinematics during gait in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury,” Brain Injury, vol. 29, no. 7-8, pp. 955–962, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Küper, K. Döring, C. Spangenberg et al., “Location and restoration of function after cerebellar tumor removal—a longitudinal study of children and adolescents,” The Cerebellum, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elisabetta Peri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3051

Downloads

1962

Citations