BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 9596810 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9596810

Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals from Smoked Corbicula fluminea Collected on Roadside Vendors at Kelantan, Malaysia

Academic Editor: Francesco Dondero
Received11 May 2019
Revised27 Aug 2019
Accepted06 Sep 2019
Published30 Sep 2019

Abstract

Corbicula fluminea serves as traditional food to the local people in Kelantan, Malaysia. Concerns regarding river contamination, smoking method, and associated adverse effects on public health had been increasing. Hence, this study aims to measure the level of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn) and assess human health risk in C. fluminea consumption at Kelantan. Heavy-metal analysis was done using flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry, while human health risk was assessed using provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), target hazard quotient (THQ), and hazard index (HI). The estimated weekly intake (EWI) for all metals was found within PTWI, while THQ for Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn was 0.12, 0.06, 0.04, 0.41, and 0.03, respectively. The HI was calculated at 0.61 which is less than 1, considered as the safe consumption level. Therefore, C. fluminea consumption in this study was found safe from the health risk of noncarcinogenic effect over a lifetime.

1. Introduction

Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) is known as “Etak” at Kelantan, Malaysia. The local people consume C. fluminea since a very long time ago, especially smoked C. fluminea as their favourite. Smoked C. fluminea is broadly sold at morning market, night market, and in the street stalls. This food generates income for local Kelantanese. In average, C. fluminea sellers can generate up to 600 USD/month [1]. Different countries have different ways to cook C. fluminea. This can be shown in the Philippines where C. fluminea is consumed raw-pickled or cooked in soup [2]. In Kelantan, the local people consume C. fluminea in many cooking methods, including the smoke method, sun-drying method, and frying method [1]. Among these cooking methods, the smoke method is the most popular method. The local people consume the smoked C. fluminea while they are watching television, studying, and chatting with friends.

Corbicula fluminea is distributed in most of the freshwater river in Malaysia, such as Perak River, Pahang River, Golok River, and Pergau River. This clam is mostly found in sand and gravel sediments. C. fluminea obtains the food in water column and sediment via inherent filter feeding and pedal feeding ability, respectively [3]. They mainly feed on suspended matter, phytoplankton, bacterioplankton, zooplankton, diatoms, green algae, and protozoans [4, 5]. With this feeding ability, C. fluminea is important in ecosystem balance by contributing in benthic/pelagic biogeochemical coupling and enhanced oxygen penetration into the sediment [6, 7]. C. fluminea is also used as a bioindicator of the heavy metals and microplastic in freshwater river [8, 9].

In Kelantan, high demand for C. fluminea is contributed by a better understanding of nutrition content on seafood consumption. C. fluminea is well known for its high nutritional values of protein, omega-3 fatty acid, and pharmaceutical values including lowering cholesterol accumulation, increasing antioxidant, and anticancer and antitumor activities [1013]. Despite the ecological importance and economic benefits, the heavy metals potentially accumulate in C. fluminea soft tissue [5]. The river pollution and popular smoking method are suspected to contaminate C. fluminea. One of the most common heavy metals bioaccumulation in human body is through the food chain and regular consumption of contaminated food [14]. The relationship between the heavy metals concentrations in this clam and associated health risk assessment in Kelantan is yet to e reported. The local people lack information about the safety of C. fluminea consumption. Hence, this research aims to determine the selected heavy-metal (cadmium, copper, manganese, lead, and zinc) level in C. fluminea soft tissue that is sold in the streets and assess the human health risk. These selected heavy metals and their effects on human health are of great concern based on the previous studies [5, 1517]. The health risk assessment is carried out on the ready-to-eat C. fluminea sold along the roadside. The provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), target hazard quotient (THQ), and hazard index (HI) were used to evaluate the health risk.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The samples were collected at Pasir Mas and Tumpat, Kelantan (6.0495938 N, 102.1693547 E and 6.1467273 N, 102.218605 E), for six months duration. Six stalls of C. fluminea were selected due to their availability throughout the year (Figure 1). The primary source of C. fluminea used in these stalls is from Perak River which is located close to oil palm plantations, durian farms, and urban area. Around 1 kg smoked C. fluminea was collected from each seller for the heavy-metal analysis. Each sample was labelled with the date, time, collection site, and weather. The samples were preserved at 4°C by storing in an ice box during their transportation to the laboratory [18]. The samples were stored in a freezer at −20°C before analysis.

2.2. Sample Analysis

The soft tissues of C. fluminea were obtained using a blade and oven dried (60°C, 72 hours) to constant weight. After that, the samples were ground into homogenous samples using a mill machine (Panasonic®MX-900M). The samples were preserved in amber jars and stored in a desiccator before acid digestion. The digestion process was carried out by following the standard method by PerkinElmer Corporation [19].

Approximately 5 g of dried samples was placed in the 250 mL beaker in which 5 mL of 95% sulfuric acid (Merck) and 5 mL of 65% nitric acid (Merck) were added. The samples were covered immediately with watch glass. After the reaction between sample and acid was completed, the mixtures were heated at 60°C for 30 minutes using hot plates (IKA® C-MAG HS 7). The samples were allowed to cool, and 20 mL of 65% nitric acid was added. The temperature was increased slowly to 150°C for two hours. Then, the solutions were allowed to cool, and 1 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide (Merck) was added until the colour became clear. Samples were diluted to 50 ml with deionized water. The solutions were then filtered by filter paper (Whatman® No. 41 filter circles, 125 mm) and syringe filter (Minisart® nylon syringe filter, 25 mm).

The samples analysis was analysed by using the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer PinAACLE 900F and measured in triplicates. The accuracy and validity of the applied protocol were evaluated using the Standard Reference Materials (SRM 2976, National Institute of Standards and Technology) due to its suitability in the mussel sample and matrix. Recovery rates were found to be between 99.98%–110.08% for the selected metals.

2.3. Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)

All data obtained were converted into wet weight (ww) using a conversion factor of 0.19. The conversion factor is based on the moisture analysis carried out in the food laboratory, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan by our research assistant, Siti Nor Aini Md Nasir, on 28 October 2018.(a)Maximum permissible limit (MPL) of the heavy metals for the consumers set by the European Union [20] and FAO compilation of the legal limits by FAO [21].(b)The estimated daily intakes (EDIs) of the consumers in order to evaluate the adverse health effects:The JECFA uses the term estimated daily intake (EDI) and provisional tolerable daily intake (PTDI) for contaminants as heavy metals that can accumulate in the human body [22]. Estimated daily intake (EDI) (μg/kg body weight) of heavy metals from C. fluminea consumption was obtained using the following equation (1) [23, 24]:where EDI is estimated daily intake and Cmetal (mg/kg ww) is an average weighted heavy metal content in C. fluminea. Ingestion rate (IR) (gram/day person) is the daily mussel consumption. BW is the average body weight. The average IR is determined by interviewing the local people using a simple questionnaire. The average IR of C. fluminea for Malaysian adults is 75 g/day person which is similar to the literature [2]. The average body weight for Malaysians was 62.65 kg [25].To obtain estimated weekly intake (EWI), the EDI will be multiplied by a factor of 7 corresponding to 7 days. However, based on questionnaires and interviews, the local people consume C. fluminea with a frequency of three days per week. Hence, EWI was obtained using the following equation:The EWIthis study is compared to the JECFA provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI).(c)Target hazard quotient has been recognised as a useful parameter for evaluation of risk associated with the consumption of metal contaminated food. To assess the noncarcinogenic risk due to heavy metal exposure in C. fluminea soft tissue, the target hazard quotient (THQ) was computed using the following equation [26]:where EFr is exposure frequency (156 days per year for the average consumer, according to the local interview); ED is exposure duration (70 years) equivalent to the average human lifespan; IR is the ingestion rate (75 grams per person per day); MC is the metal concentration in C. fluminea soft tissue (in mg/kg, ww); RfD is the oral reference dose (Cd is 1 mg/kg wt/day, Cu 40 mg/kg wt/day, Zn 300 mg/kg wt/day, and Mn 140 mg/kg wt/day) [27]. The reference dose (RfD) is an estimate of the daily intake of contaminant during a lifetime that would not cause adverse health effects to the human [28]; BW is the average body weight (62.65 kg); AT is the averaging time for noncarcinogens (i.e., 30 years or 10,950 days).With the refusal to set the reference dose of Pb by EPA [29], the THQ for Pb was calculated by using the following equation [30]:where CPb is the Pb concentration in C. fluminea (mg/kg ww). MPL: maximum permissible limit. In this study, the MPL of Pb for bivalve is 1.50 mg/kg ww [20].THQ < 1 indicates no obvious risk. A THQ >1 shows that the level of exposure is higher than the oral reference dose (ORD), which assumes that a daily exposure at this level is likely to cause harmful health effects during the lifetime in a human population [31]. Following EPA guidelines, we assumed that the ingested dose was equal to the absorbed contaminant dose.(d)The hazard index (HI) calculated from THQ is the total of the hazard quotients [23, 32]:If HI less than 1, there is no obvious risk.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The metal concentrations for six sellers were averaged to obtain the mean. Microsoft Excel was used to tabulate all the data throughout the experiment and generate the hazard index graph. SPSS 23 for Windows was used to run the statistical analysis including the mean, standard error, and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. The statistical significance was significant when .

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Heavy-Metal Concentration in C. fluminea and Human Health Risk Assessment

The mean concentration of Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn (mg/kg ww) in C. fluminea from the roadside stalls, which are consumed by local people, is tabulated in Table 1. The values in each month are the mean from six stalls. Metal concentration in C. fluminea exhibited an order of Zn > Mn > Cu > Pb > Cd.


MonthCdCuMnPbZn
Mean ± SEMean ± SEMean ± SEMean ± SEMean ± SE

February0.24 ± 0.02a3.68 ± 0.22a7.62 ± 3.09a0.45 ± 0.21a9.06 ± 2.19a
March0.21 ± 0.01a3.26 ± 0.18a12.18 ± 1.44a0.44 ± 0.02ab15.03 ± 0.63ab
April0.23 ± 0.01a8.97 ± 1.22b6.91 ± 0.94a0.86 ± 0.04b29.82 ± 1.89c
May0.20 ± 0.01a4.94 ± 0.64a8.16 ± 1.49a0.49 ± 0.05ab18.31 ± 2.08b
June0.24 ± 0.02a4.23 ± 0.43a12.52 ± 2.83a0.88 ± 0.06b16.67 ± 1.45b
July0.26 ± 0.01a5.12 ± 0.15a14.11 ± 1.70a0.57 ± 0.35ab16.06 ± 1.55ab
Average0.23 ± 0.015.03 ± 0.4710.25 ± 1.920.62 ± 0.1217.49 ± 1.63

Letters show significant differences among the months at . The data were presented as mean ± standard error.

In this study, dietary exposure to heavy metals through consumption of C. fluminea in the studied areas was evaluated using estimated daily intake (EDI) by considering the average concentration of the heavy metals and the respective consumption rate for adults. Then, the estimated weekly intake (EWI) was calculated and compared with PTWI. Table 2 shows the values of EDI, EWI, PTWI, and EWI :PTWI ratio.


C. fluminea (mg/kg ww)EDI (μg/kg/day)ADIa (μg/kg/day)EWIb (μg/kg/week)PTWI (μg/kg/week)EWI : PTWI ratio (%)

Cd0.230.2810.847c12.00
Cu5.036.0235018.063500c0.52
Mn10.2512.2714036.81980d3.76
Pb0.620.743.572.2225c8.88
Zn17.4720.91100062.737000c0.90

aAccepted daily intake which was calculated from PTWI; bestimated weekly intake with a frequency of three times consumption per week; cPTWI set by FAO/WHO [33]; dreference dose of Mn established by USEPA [34].
3.2. Cadmium

Cd detected in C. fluminea ranged from 0.17 to 0.34 mg/kg ww and has a mean of 0.23 ± 0.01 mg/kg ww. No significant difference was found between Cd levels in each month with . The Cd level is within the permissible limit set by the European Union of 1.0 mg/kg ww [20]. In EWI measurement, the local people consuming C. fluminea would intake 0.84 μg/kg/week or 0.05 mg/62.65 kg person/week (0.84 × 62.65/1000) of the Cd. The EWI : PTWI ratio of the Cd was 12.00%. This showed that the intake is within the safe level.

The current result is found to be higher than that in the study by Zhelyazkov et al. [35] who reported the EWI of Cd for the marine mollusc (Mytilus galloprovincialis) was 0.002 mg/70 kg person/week (0.0032 × 70 × 7/1000). Besides, Yunus et al. [36] study the metal level in the cockles (Anadara granosa) from Kuala Selangor, Malaysia. They reported 5.96 μg/70 kg/daily or 0.04 mg/70 kg person/week (5.96 × 7/1000) of Cd intake with cockle consumption which is also lower than the EWI value of Cd in the current study. Sharif et al. [37] study on consumption of shellfish clam (Metretrix spp.), scallop (Amusium pleuronectes), and conch (Strombus canarium) at Kudat, Sabah. They reported that if the local people consume these shellfish every day, the EWI values of Cd for Metretrix spp., Amusium pleuronectes, and Strombus canarium were 0.01 mg/62.65 kg person/week (0.03 × 7 × 62.65/1000), 0.69 mg/62.65 kg person/week (1.58 × 7 × 62.65/1000), and 0.009 mg/62.65 kg person/week (0.02 × 7 × 62.65/1000), respectively.

EWI of Cd (0.05 mg/62.65 kg person/week) in the current study is higher than that of previous studies, except the scallop (Amusium pleuronectes). High EWI of Cd in C. fluminea is due to high ingestion rate and high Cd concentration in C. fluminea. Cd is mainly used in industries includes electroplating, alloy production, pigments, and battery production [38]. This is in agreement in the current study where metal industries, automobile workshops, and laptop shops can be found near to Perak River. The Cd in discharged wastewater is easily deposited into river, transferred to aquatic life, and eventually accumulated in human body through the food chain [39]. As a filter feeding organism, C. fluminea is reported susceptible to heavy-metal exposure in river and possess high metal level [5].

Cadmium is a nonessential element for human and detrimental to our health even when ingested in small quantities. Food is the primary source of Cd exposure, besides cigarette smoking [40, 41]. Continuous Cd consumption leads to respiratory system damage, lung cancer, Parkinson’s and Wilson’s diseases, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women [42, 43]. In Japan, consumption of Cd-contaminated rice causes osteomalacia (bone disease) and kidney malfunction to the local people [44]. Cd-poisoning patients need to be treated with gastrointestinal tract irrigation, supportive care, and chemical decontamination with chelating agents and nanoparticle-based antidotes [45].

3.3. Copper

The Cu detected in C. fluminea ranged from 2.64 to 12.61 mg/kg ww and has a mean of 5.03 ± 0.47 mg/kg ww. There is no significant difference between the Cu level in every month with , except in April with . The Cu level is within the permissible limit of 20 to 70 mg/kg ww set by FAO compilation of the legal limits [21]. In EWI measurement, the C. fluminea consumer would intake 18.06 μg/kg/week or around 1.13 mg/62.65 kg person/week (18.06 × 62.65/1000) of the copper. The EWI : PTWI ratio of the Cu was 0.52%. This showed that the intake is within the safe level. The result obtained is higher than the previous study carried out by Olmedo et al. [46] who reported 0.82 mg/60 kg person/week (0.117 × 7) of Cu intake through fish and shellfish consumption in Andalusia (Southern Spain). Bat et al. [47] study the heavy metals in Mytillus galloprovincialis from the Turkish Black Sea coasts and found that EWI of Cu was in the range of 0.24 to 0.88 mg/70 kg person/week (0.0035 × 70 to 0.0126 × 70) with EWI :PTWI ratio 0.1% to 0.36%.

By comparing the data with the mussel in the previous studies, it is notable that the Cu level in the current study was higher than that of those studies. It is believed that using copper-based pesticide in paddy fields in Perak River and discharge of municipal sewage increase the Cu concentration in the soil [48, 49]. The contaminant leached into the river and the sediment eventually accumulated in C. fluminea soft tissue [50]. This is supported by Patrick et al. [6] who reported C. fluminea soft tissue had significantly greater Cu concentrations compared to river and sediment.

Copper is an essential trace element for living organisms which allows the critical enzyme to function properly and assists enzyme in transferring energy into the cells in humans [51]. The shellfish is an excellent source of Cu for human needs [46]. However, higher copper uptake than needed is a double-edged sword that causes adverse effects [52]. The effects include headache, vomiting, liver and kidney damage, and Wilson’s disease [53].

3.4. Manganese

The Mn level in C. fluminea ranged from 3.63 to 26.16 mg/kg ww and has a mean of 10.25 ± 1.92 mg/kg ww. No significant difference was found between Mn level in each month with . There is no permissible limit for manganese. In EWI measurement, the C. fluminea consumers would intake 36.81 μg/kg/week or around 2.31 mg/62.65 kg person/week (36.81 × 62.65/1000) of the manganese. The EWI : PTWI ratio of the Mn was 3.76%. This showed that Mn intake is within the safe level. The current result is found to be higher than that of the study by Olmedo et al. [46], who reported 0.35 mg/60 kg person/week (0.05 × 7) of Mn intake through fish and shellfish consumption in Andalusia. The current result is also found to be slightly higher than that of the study by Bat et al. [47] who reported that EWI of the Mn in M. galloprovincialis was in the range of 1.37 to 2.21 mg/70 kg person/week (0.0196 × 70 to 0.0315 × 70).

High Mn contamination in C. fluminea is associated with accumulation from the sediment and river. This is supported by Hulten et al. [54] who reported that sediment is the main source of Mn, specifically on the surface of the sediment particles. Moreover, wastewater discharged from the metal industry flows into the river, lowering its pH and facilitating the sediment dissolution into the river [55]. Hence, concentrated Mn in river and sediment contributes to high Mn level in C. fluminea.

Manganese is an essential element for living organisms. Tiny amounts of Mn are required to form healthy bones, regulate the blood sugar level, maintain the metabolism, promote the digestion, and boost the vitamin absorption [56]. Overconsumption of manganese from food sources is rare [57]. When Mn uptake exceeded the required amount, it has negative impacts on the human body including weakness, muscle pain, less facial expression, and clumsy movement of the limbs and neurological damage [58, 59].

3.5. Lead

Pb detected in C. fluminea ranged from 0.17 to 0.34 mg/kg ww and has a mean of 0.62 ± 0.12 mg/kg ww. The Pb detection in April and June is significantly different than that in other months with . The Pb level is within the permissible limit set by the European Union of 1.5 mg/kg ww [20]. In EWI measurement, the local people consuming C. fluminea would intake 2.22 μg/kg/week or around 0.14 mg/62.65 kg person/week (2.22 × 62.65/1000) of the lead. The EWI :PTWI ratio of Pb was 8.88%. This showed that the intake rate of Pb is within the safe level.

The current finding is compared with that of the previous studies. Zhelyazkov et al. [35] reported that the EWI of Pb for the Mytilus galloprovincialis was 0.001 mg/70 kg person/week (0.0028 × 70 × 7/1000). Besides, Sharif et al. [37] reported that the EWI of Pb for Metretrix spp., Amusium pleuronectes, and Strombus canarium were 0.04 mg/62.65 kg person/week (0.10 × 7 × 62.65/1000), 0.11 mg/62.65 kg person/week (0.25 × 7 × 62.65/1000), and 0.08 mg/62.65 kg person/week (0.19 × 7 × 62.65/1000), respectively. Bat et al. [47] reported that the EWI of Pb in M. galloprovincialis from the Turkish Black Sea coasts was in the range of 0.03 to 0.15 mg/70 kg person/week (0.00042 × 70 to 0.00217 × 70) with the highest EWI : PTWI ratio of 1.68 to 8.68%. In the current study, the Pb intake in weekly measurement is found to be higher than that of most of these previous studies. However, the current result is in line with a similar study by De la Cruz et al. [2] who also studied the human health risk in C. fluminea consumption in Philippines. They reported that EWI for average consumers was within 0.76 to 1.2 μg/kg/day or 0.15 to 0.23 mg/65 kg person/week (0.76 × 65 × 3/1000 to 1.2 × 65 × 3/1000) assuming three times consumption per week as indicated in their result.

High Pb contamination in C. fluminea is due to fact that their habitat was within the vicinity of oil palm plantation that used pesticides and herbicides [60]. In Nigeria, Osobamiro and Adewuyi [61] reported that Pb concentration in oil palm plantation soil ranged from 15.5 to 33.1 mg/kg which is significantly higher than that of arable soil. The Pb-contaminated soils leached into the river and accumulated in the soft tissue of C. fluminea [62]. Besides, the smoking process of C. fluminea using firewood was also reported to increase Pb contamination in soft tissue of C. fluminea [63].

In the top 20 most poisonous heavy metals, Pb is the second element after As. Pb has no biological function in human body, and it is highly harmful to human health even in the smallest amount [64, 65]. There are many types of Pb exposures, but inhalation and ingestion through contaminated food is found to be the most common route [66]. Excessive Pb uptake causes intellectual damage to children such as cognitive and behavioural problems [67, 68]. This is because the brain development and central nervous system of children are susceptible to damage [69]. Long-term exposure to Pb-contaminated food caused the metal to be deposited into bone, leading to kidney and liver disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and reproductive system defect [64, 70].

3.6. Zinc

The Zn concentrations in C. fluminea were found in the range of 2.47 to 33.76 mg/kg ww with a mean of 17.49 ± 1.63 mg/kg ww. The Zn level in April is significantly higher than those in other months with . The Zn level is within the permissible limit in FAO compilation of the legal limits of 40–150 mg/kg ww [20]. This indicated that the Zn is in the safe level to consume. In EWI measurement, the C. fluminea consumers would intake 62.73 μg/kg/week or around 3.93 mg/62.65 kg person/week (62.73 × 62.65/1000) of the zinc. The EWI : PTWI ratio of the Zn was 0.90%. The Zn intake is within the safe level. This result is in agreement with that of Olmedo et al.’s [46] study which found 3.25 mg/60 kg person/week (0.464 × 7) of Zn intake through fish and shellfish consumption in Andalusia (Southern Spain). The current result is lower than that in [47] which reported that the EWI of the Pb in M. galloprovincialis ranged from 3.92 to 13.23 mg/70 kg person/week (0.056 × 70 to 0.189 × 70) with the EWI : PTWI ratio of 0.86 to 2.70%.

The Zn in C. fluminea is believed to be due to phosphate rock fertilizer that is used for oil palm growth. Zn in the topsoil leached into the river [71]. Besides, Zn as a famous anticorrosive agent is widely used as antifouling paint for commercial boats [72, 73]. The leaching of boat paint coupling with accidental spill of oils or fuel increases the Zn contamination that accumulates in C. fluminea [74].

Zn is considered as an essential trace element for living organisms which is relatively less toxic compared to other metals. It assists in metabolism, enzyme catalytic activity, and immune system functioning and possesses antioxidant properties [75]. Oyster is reported as a source of Zn, followed by meat and mussel [76]. Excess Zn uptake damages the brain, respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, and prostate gland [77]. Besides, high Zn intake disrupts homeostasis for other essential elements and suppresses the Cu and Fe absorption [78].

Figure 2 shows the THQ values of the heavy metals and their hazard index (HI) for the consumption of the C. fluminea. The target hazard quotient (THQ) values of Cd, Cu, Zn, Pb, and Mn were 0.12, 0.06, 0.04, 0.41, and 0.03, respectively. The results of the THQ showed the following order of level: Pb > Cd > Cr > Cu > Zn > Mn. As presented in THQ, there exists no hazard. The HI index is found to be 0.61, which is less than 1. This suggests a relative absence of human health risk associated with intake of heavy metal via consumption of soft tissue alone. However, health risks to the consumers depend on the amounts of estimated weekly intake of heavy metal. In this study, we do not take into account the heavy-metal intake via other sources that probably contributes to higher THQ and HI. Hence, the present results need more attention in view of the fact that metals enter into the human body through other sources, primarily through other foodstuff.

The results in current study can be used as a guideline to consume C. fluminea safely. Nevertheless, as reported in the literature, the heavy metals in surrounding sediment and river water from anthropogenic activities correlate with heavy metal levels in C. fluminea [79, 80]. Although the level of heavy metal in C. fluminea is within the permissible limit, potential dangers emerging in the future depends upon industrial wastewaters and domestic activities. Given the vital level of C. fluminea to the local people, the routine biomonitoring of the clam for consumption should be done to ensure continuous food safety. The authority must ensure that domestic sewage and industrial effluents are treated before discharge into the rivers [81].

4. Conclusion

The mean concentrations of metals found in C. fluminea were 0.23 ± 0.01, 5.03 ± 0.47, 10.25 ± 1.92, 0.62 ± 0.12, and 17.49 ± 1.63 mg/kg ww for Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn, respectively. All EWI values were found to be less than the JECFA provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) value for studied heavy metals. Thus, there is no potential health risk for people who consume C. fluminea in Kelantan. The present study showed that the consumption of C. fluminea from Pasir Mas and Tumpat, Kelantan, at the rate of 75 g/day/person with the frequency of three times per week most probably does not pose a health hazard of cancer to the local population.

Data Availability

The data of the heavy metals used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Additional Points

Human health risk as a result of heavy metals intake due to C. fluminea consumption was evaluated. All metal concentrations in C. fluminea were within the permissible limits. Smoked C. fluminea in Kelantan is safe for human health with the current consumption rate.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia, for its support for both facility and instruments. This study was supported by the Transdisciplinary Research Grant Scheme under Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education (funding code: R/TRGS/A08.00/00244A/005/2016/000389).

Supplementary Materials

Graphical overview starting from C. fluminea selling to the consumption safety. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. E. R. Aweng and A. A. Kutty, Etak, Lokan Air Tawar, Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 2018.
  2. C. P. P. De la Cruz, N. M. De Vera, L. Lapie, M. N. Catalma, and R. V. Bunal, “Bioaccumulation and health risks assessment of lead (Pb) in freshwater Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea, Müller) from Laguna de Bay, Philippines,” Pollution Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 366–372, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. C. Hakenkamp, S. G. Ribblett, M. A. Palmer, C. M. Swan, J. W. Reid, and M. R. Goodison, “The impact of an introduced bivalve (Corbicula fluminea) on the benthos of a sandy stream,” Freshwater Biology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 491–501, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Arapov, D. Ezgeta-Balić, M. Peharda, and Ž. N. Gladan, “Bivalve feeding—how and what they eat?” Ribarstvo, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 105–116, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. Kong, X. Hang, L. Wang, H. Yin, and Y. Zhang, “Accumulation and risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments and zoobenthos (Bellamya aeruginosa and Corbicula fluminea) from Lake Taihu,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 203–214, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Patrick, M. Waters, and S. Golladay, “The distribution and ecological role of Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) in a large and shallow reservoir,” BioInvasions Records, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Zhang, Q. Shen, H. Hu, S. Shao, and C. Fan, “Impacts of corbicula fluminea on oxygen uptake and nutrient fluxes across the sediment–water interface,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 220, no. 1–4, pp. 399–411, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Su, H. Cai, P. Kolandhasamy, C. Wu, C. M. Rochman, and H. Shi, “Using the Asian clam as an indicator of microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 234, pp. 347–355, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. Waykar and G. Deshmukh, “Evaluation of bivalves as bioindicators of metal pollution in freshwater,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 48–53, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Liao, S. Chen, X. Ye et al., “Antioxidant and anti-tumor activity of a polysaccharide from freshwater clam, Corbicula fluminea,” Food & Function, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 539–548, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. Liao, J. Zhong, R. Zhang et al., “Protein-bound polysaccharide from Corbicula fluminea inhibits cell growth in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 12, Article ID e0167889, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H.-T. Yao, P.-F. Lee, C.-K. Lii, Y.-T. Liu, and S.-H. Chen, “Freshwater clam extract reduces liver injury by lowering cholesterol accumulation, improving dysregulated cholesterol synthesis and alleviating inflammation in high-fat, high-cholesterol and cholic acid diet-induced steatohepatitis in mice,” Food & Function, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 4876–4887, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Pi, G.-p. Wang, Z.-j. Lv et al., “Analysis and evaluation of the nutritional components in the soft part of Corbicula fluminea in Datong Lake,” Journal of Hydroecology, vol. 5, p. 15, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. E. Gall, R. S. Boyd, and N. Rajakaruna, “Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: a review,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 187, no. 4, p. 201, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Sarkar, M. M. Alam, N. Parvin et al., “Assessment of heavy metals contamination and human health risk in shrimp collected from different farms and rivers at Khulna-Satkhira region, Bangladesh,” Toxicology Reports, vol. 3, pp. 346–350, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. N. S. El-shenawy, N. Loutfy, M. F. Soliman, M. M. Tadros, and A. A. A. El-Azeez, “Metals bioaccumulation in two edible bivalves and health risk assessment,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 188, no. 3, p. 139, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. K. Yap, F. B. Edward Thomas, W. H. Cheng et al., “Distribution of heavy metals in edible bivalve Donax faba collected from Pasir Panjang: a health risk assessment,” Frontiers Drug Chemistry Clinical Research, vol. 2, pp. 1–5, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Zeiner, I. Rezic, and I. Steffan, “Analytical methods for the determination of heavy metals in the textile industry,” Kemija U Industriji, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 587–595, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  19. Perkin Elmer Corporation, Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA, 1996.
  20. European Union, “No. 1881/2006 of the European parliament and the council 693 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in 694 foodstuffs,” Official Journal of the European Communities, pp. 5–24, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  21. C. E. Nauen, Compilation of Legal Limits for Hazardous Substances in Fish and Fishery Products, vol. 764, FAO Fisheries Circular (FAO), Rome, Italy, 1983.
  22. JECFA, Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants: Sixty-Ninth Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  23. J. Li, Z. Y. Huang, Y. Hu, and H. Yang, “Potential risk assessment of heavy metals by consuming shellfish collected from Xiamen, China,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2937–2947, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. U. Saher and N. Kanwal, “Assessment of some heavy metal accumulation and nutritional quality of shellfish with reference to human health and cancer risk assessment: a seafood safety approach,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 5189–5201, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Azmi, R. Junidah, A. S. Mariam et al., “Body mass index (BMI) of adults: findings of the Malaysian adult nutrition survey (MANS),” Malaysian Journal of Nutrition, vol. 15, no. 2, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  26. USEPA, USEPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) Summary Table: November 2011, USEPA, Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  27. USEPA, Human Health Risk Assessment. Regional Screening Level (RSL)—Summary Table, USEPA, Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
  28. USEPA, Reference Dose (RfD): Description and Use in Health Risk Assessments, USEPA, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  29. USEPA, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) on Lead and Compounds (Inorganic), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  30. M. Jović and S. Stanković, “Human exposure to trace metals and possible public health risks via consumption of mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis from the Adriatic coastal area,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 70, pp. 241–251, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. Liang, W. Gong, B. Li, J. Zuo, L. Pan, and X. Liu, “Analysis of heavy metals in foodstuffs and an assessment of the health risks to the general public via consumption in Beijing, China,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 6, p. 909, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Javed and N. Usmani, “Accumulation of heavy metals and human health risk assessment via the consumption of freshwater fish Mastacembelus armatus inhabiting, thermal power plant effluent loaded canal,” SpringerPlus, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 776, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. FAO/WHO, Summary of Evaluations Performed by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committe on Food Addictive (JEFCA). First through Sixtyfirst Meetings, ILSI Press International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  34. USEPA, Manganese Compound, USEPA, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  35. G. Zhelyazkov, T. Yankovska-Stefanova, E. Mineva et al., “Risk assessment of some heavy metals in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and veined rapa whelks (Rapana venosa) for human health,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 128, pp. 197–201, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. M. Yunus, Z. Hamzah, N. A. N. Ariffin, and M. B. Muslim, “Cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, ferrum and zinc levels in the cockles (Anadara granosa) from Kuala Selangor, Malaysia,” Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 514–521, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  37. R. Sharif, E. Chong, and C. K. Meng, “Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in shellfish from Kudat, Sabah,” Malaysian Journal of Nutrition, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 301–305, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  38. P. B. Tchounwou, C. G. Yedjou, A. K. Patlolla, and D. J. Sutton, “Heavy metal toxicity and the environment,” Experientia Supplementum, vol. 101, pp. 133–164, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. International Cadmium Association, Level of Cadmium in the Environment, International Cadmium Association, Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
  40. R. Chunhabundit, “Cadmium exposure and potential health risk from foods in contaminated area, Thailand,” Toxicological Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Cejchanová, K. Wranová, V. Spevácková et al., “Human bio-monitoring study-toxic elements in blood of women,” Central European Journal of Public Health, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 139, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Ganguly, B. Levänen, L. Palmberg, A. Åkesson, and A. Lindén, “Cadmium in tobacco smokers: a neglected link to lung disease?” European Respiratory Review, vol. 27, no. 147, Article ID 170122, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. Itoh, M. Iwasaki, N. Sawada et al., “Dietary cadmium intake and breast cancer risk in Japanese women: a case-control study,” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. A. Wuana and F. E. Okieimen, “Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation,” ISRN Ecology, vol. 2011, Article ID 402647, 20 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. R. Rahimzadeh, M. R. Rahimzadeh, S. Kazemi, and A.-A. Moghadamnia, “Cadmium toxicity and treatment: an update,” Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 135–145, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  46. P. Olmedo, A. F. Hernández, A. Pla, P. Femia, A. Navas-Acien, and F. Gil, “Determination of essential elements (copper, manganese, selenium and zinc) in fish and shellfish samples. Risk and nutritional assessment and mercury-selenium balance,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 62, pp. 299–307, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. L. Bat, E. Arici, and A. Öztekin, “Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in the Black Sea: evaluating mussels,” Current World Environment, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 15, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. T. M. Chiroma, B. I. Abdulkarim, and H. M. Kefas, “The impact of pesticide application on heavy metal (Cd, Pb and Cu) levels in spinach,” Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies, vol. 11, pp. 117–122, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  49. F. M. Fishel, Pesticide Toxicity Profile: Copper-Based Pesticides, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2005.
  50. S. Giri, A. K. Singh, and M. K. Mahato, “Metal contamination of agricultural soils in the copper mining areas of Singhbhum shear zone in India,” Journal of Earth System Science, vol. 126, no. 4, p. 49, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. L. Prashanth, K. Kattapagari, R. Chitturi, V. Baddam, and L. Prasad, “A review on role of essential trace elements in health and disease,” Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–85, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  52. E. Tvrda, R. Peer, S. C. Sikka, and A. Agarwal, “Iron and copper in male reproduction: a double-edged sword,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Mahurpawar, “Effects of heavy metals on human health,” International Journal of Research—Granthaalayah, vol. 3, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  54. V. M. Hulten, J.-C. Dutay, R. Middag et al., “Manganese in the world ocean: a first global model,” Biogeosciences Discussions, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1–38, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. V. N. T. Ha, S. Takizawa, K. Oguma, and N. Van Phuoc, “Sources and leaching of manganese and iron in the saigon river basin, Vietnam,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 2231–2237, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. A. Jose, “Eleven impressive health benefits of manganese,” 2018, https://www.naturalfoodseries.com/11-benefits-manganese/. View at: Google Scholar
  57. D. S. Avila, R. L. Puntel, and M. Aschner, “Manganese in health and disease,” in Interrelations between Essential Metal Ions and Human Diseases, pp. 199–227, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  58. World Health Organization, Manganese in Drinking-Water: Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  59. T. R. Guilarte and K. K. Gonzales, “Manganese-Induced parkinsonism is not idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: environmental and genetic evidence,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 204–212, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. Hossen, S. Hamdan, and M. Rahman, “Review on the risk assessment of heavy metals in Malaysian clams,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2015, Article ID 905497, 7 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. T. Osobamiro and G. O. Adewuyi, “Levels of heavy metals in the soil: effects of season, agronomic practice and soil geology,” Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 109–117, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. T.-L. Pham, “Accumulation, depuration and risk assessment of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) in clam Corbicula fluminea (OF Müller, 1774) under laboratory conditions,” Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 1–11, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  63. A. O. Igwegbe, C. A. Negbenebor, E. C. Chibuzo, M. H. Badau, and G. I. Agbara, “Effects of season and fish smoking on heavy metal contents of selected fish species from three locations in Borno State of Nigeria,” Asian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1010–1019, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. A. Assi, M. N. M. Hezmee, A. W. Haron, M. Y. Sabri, and M. A. Rajion, “The detrimental effects of lead on human and animal health,” Veterinary World, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 660–671, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. Jaishankar, T. Tseten, N. Anbalagan, B. B. Mathew, and K. N. Beeregowda, “Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals,” Interdisciplinary Toxicology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 60–72, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Jan, M. Azam, K. Siddiqui, A. Ali, I. Choi, and Q. Haq, “Heavy metals and human health: mechanistic insight into toxicity and counter defense system of antioxidants,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 29592–29630, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. R. L. Canfield, T. A. Jusko, and K. Kordas, “Environmental lead exposure and children’s cognitive function,” The Italian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 293–300, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  68. A. P. Sanders, B. Claus Henn, and R. O. Wright, “Perinatal and childhood exposure to cadmium, manganese, and metal mixtures and effects on cognition and behavior: a review of recent literature,” Current Environmental Health Reports, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 284–294, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. World Health Organization, Lead Poisoning and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
  70. L. H. Mason, J. P. Harp, and D. Y. Han, “Pb neurotoxicity: neuropsychological effects of lead toxicity,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 840547, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. Aini, C. Fauziah, and A. Samsuri, “Cadmium and zinc concentrations in soils and oil palm tissues as affected by long-term application of phosphate rock fertilizers,” Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 586–603, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. E. Ytreberg, J. Karlsson, and B. Eklund, “Comparison of toxicity and release rates of Cu and Zn from anti-fouling paints leached in natural and artificial brackish seawater,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 408, no. 12, pp. 2459–2466, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. A. Bighiu, A.-K. Eriksson-Wiklund, and B. Eklund, “Biofouling of leisure boats as a source of metal pollution,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 997–1006, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. D. Mustafa, H. Juahir, K. Yunus et al., “Oil spill related heavy metal: a review,” Malaysia Journal of Analytical Sciences, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1348–1360, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  75. P. T. Bhattacharya, S. R. Misra, and M. Hussain, “Nutritional aspects of essential trace elements in oral health and disease: an extensive review,” Scientifica, vol. 12, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  76. N. Bilandžić, M. Sedak, M. Đokić et al., “Determination of zinc concentrations in foods of animal origin, fish and shellfish from Croatia and assessment of their contribution to dietary intake,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 61–66, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. L. M. Plum, L. Rink, and H. Haase, “The essential toxin: impact of zinc on human health,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1342–1365, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. J. Osredkar and N. Sustar, “Copper and zinc, biological role and significance of copper/zinc imbalance,” Journal of Clinical Toxicology, vol. s3, pp. 2161–0495, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. E. R. Aweng and M. Mohamed, “Water quality and shellfish related gastrointestinal disease cases in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia,” Journal of Bioentrepreneurship, vol. 1, pp. 9–13, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  80. J. M. Salman, A. R. Hughes, and A. M. Almamoori, “Seasonal variations of heavy metals in water and two species of molluscs in Al Hilla River, Iraq,” International Journal of Geology, Earth & Environmental Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 16–24, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  81. M. Hussain, T. Saputra, E. Szabo, and B. Nelan, “An overview of seafood supply, food safety and regulation in New South Wales, Australia,” Foods, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 52, 2017. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Koh Han Dee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

894 Views | 501 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.