BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 2379280 |

Zhengqing Zhu, Lei Zhong, Ronghang Li, Yuzhe Liu, Xiangrun Chen, Zhaoyan Li, Lanfeng Huang, "Study of Osteoarthritis-Related Hub Genes Based on Bioinformatics Analysis", BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 2379280, 10 pages, 2020.

Study of Osteoarthritis-Related Hub Genes Based on Bioinformatics Analysis

Academic Editor: Betti Giusti
Received24 Apr 2020
Revised02 Jul 2020
Accepted17 Jul 2020
Published06 Aug 2020


Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of morbidity and disability worldwide. However, the pathogenesis of OA is unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted to characterize the pathogenesis and implicated genes of OA. The gene expression profiles of GSE82107 and GSE55235 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Altogether, 173 differentially expressed genes including 68 upregulated genes and 105 downregulated genes in patients with OA were selected based on the criteria of and an adjusted value < 0.05. Protein-protein interaction network analysis showed that FN1, COL1A1, IGF1, SPP1, TIMP1, BGN, COL5A1, MMP13, CLU, and SDC1 are the top ten genes most closely related to OA. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction showed that the expression levels of COL1A1, COL5A1, TIMP1, MMP13, and SDC1 were significantly increased in OA. This study provides clues for the molecular mechanism and specific biomarkers of OA.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common orthopedic disease that occurs in middle-aged and elderly people [1, 2]. OA is characterized by joint degeneration, with the main clinical manifestations being pain, swelling, and limited movement of the involved joints. Its etiology is related to joint injury, joint or limb dysplasia, age, obesity, and genetic factors. OA is among the greatest causes of morbidity and disability worldwide [3]. According to the estimation, it is estimated that approximately 31 million people in the United States are affected [4]. Local or systemic inflammation is considered to play a key role in the progress of OA, particularly in the early stage of disease [5]. Although abnormal gene expression in OA synovial cells has been widely reported in human and animal studies, altered gene expression and regulation in OA synovial cells remain unclear [6].

In recent years, a lot of research had been conducted to explore the molecular characteristics of OA. High-throughput microarray methods have attracted attention and are widely used in fields such as medical oncology ranging from diagnosis to treatment and prediction of the pathogenesis and prognosis of patients and for identifying drug targets [79]. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression in OA progression has recently been reported, and bioinformatics and microarray technologies have been extensively conducted to screen gene signaling pathways of OA [10, 11], providing strong theoretical support for the diagnosis as well as the treatment of OA [12, 13]. The roles of some differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in OA were studied by bioinformatics analysis and microscopy, enabling studies of the complex process of OA occurrence and development [14]. However, microarray methods are limited by the small number of samples collected, measurement errors, and inadequate information collection. The integrative analysis of multiple factors in OA remains challenging, and the exact pathogenesis of this condition remains unclear.

Despite these limitations, microarray systems are still efficient tools for detecting gene expression, identifying biomarkers, and evaluating epigenetic variation [15]. Network modeling of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is a new technology for studying diseases and identifying disease-related gene targets [16]. To further explore DEGs and their molecular biological roles in OA, we have downloaded raw microarray data (GSE82107, GSE55235) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). DEGs between osteoarthritis synovium and normal controls were screened out by a bioinformatics method. A PPI network was built to enrich the protein domain of genes in the PPI network module and screen for hub genes related to OA. Significant DEGs between patients with OA and normal subjects may play an important part in OA development and progression. Additionally, the understanding of the underlying molecular mechanism of the pathogenesis of OA may be improved by using this method, revealing new therapeutic approaches for the epigenetic regulation of OA. In this research, we intended to explore the pathogenesis of OA through gene expression analysis to identify new potential biomarkers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microarray Data Source

The GEO dataset is a public functional genomics data repository that stores public gene expression datasets and platform records [17]. The gene expression profiles of GSE82107 and GSE55235 were downloaded from the GEO database. The GSE82107 dataset was obtained by using the GPL570 platform (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array, Santa Clara, CA, USA); the microarray data of GSE82107 contained 20 synovium samples from patients with OA and 17 knee synovium samples from normal subjects [18]. The GSE55235 dataset was based on the GPL96 platform (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array), and the microarray data of GSE55235 contained 10 OA patients synovium and 10 normal knee synovium [19].

2.2. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes

Raw data were corrected using the RMA method before analyzing DEGs in OA, and we used a limma package in R software to screen for DEGs between the synovium of patients with OA and normal knee synovium [20]. DEGs were screened according to and an adjusted value < 0.05. Common DEGs in the GSE82107 and GSE55235 datasets were screened with FunRich software [21].

2.3. GO and Pathway Enrichment Analysis

To better understand the pathways and signal transduction processes involving DEGs in disease processes, the online DAVID bioinformatics database was used for GO and KEGG pathway analysis, and a gene and were considered to indicate significant results [22]. The GO database is the world’s largest source of information on gene function, with enrichment analysis including the molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC), and categories of biological processes (BP). [23].

2.4. PPI Network Construction

The STRING database is used to integrate all publicly available sources of PPI information and is also used to calculate predictions based on PPI analysis [24]. We utilized the STRING database to structure a PPI network of DEGs. An interaction was selected as a significant threshold. We led the raw data in Cytoscape software and used the cytoHubba plugin to build a subnetwork of PPIs and screened hub genes [25].

2.5. Case and Control Groups

Our research was approved by the ethics committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University (Ethics number 2018-292). Ten patients with OA and ten patients with meniscus tears were included in this study, and all patients signed informed consent. We collected OA synovial tissue from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty at the Jilin University Second Hospital, and normal synovial tissue was collected from patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery at the Jilin University Second Hospital.

2.6. Validation of Gene Expression

Real-time PCR was worked to validate the top ten hub genes, and total RNA was extracted from osteoarthritic and control synovial tissues by utilizing TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) followed by reverse transcription into cDNA. The mRNA expression levels were further assessed by quantitative reverse transcription- (qRT-) PCR using the QuantStudio™ 7 Flex real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). These primers were designed with primer premier 6.0 software (Table 1). All samples were standardized to GAPDH expression; also, the experiment was repeated three times. The relative abundance of genes was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method, and data were analyzed with GraphPad software (GraphPad, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The value < 0.05 was considered significant. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between key genes.

GeneForward primerReverse primer


3. Results

3.1. Identification of DEGs in OA

We evaluated 10 patients with OA and 10 healthy control patients. After gene expression data processing and normalizing, we utilized the limma package in R software to screen for DEGs in each GEO dataset. The GSE5235 and GSE82107 datasets were standardized, and the results are shown in Figures 1 and 2. By using and adjusted value < 0.05 as thresholds, we determined 553 upregulated genes and 972 downregulated genes in GSE55235 and also 2811 upregulated genes and 639 downregulated genes in GSE82107. Based on overlapping results in the Venn diagrams (Figure 3), 173 genes were identified; 68 genes were upregulated, and the other 105 genes were downregulated.

3.2. GO and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analyses

We conducted enrichment analysis to assess the biological processes and pathways within OA (an interaction was selected as a significance). The GO enrichment analysis results were divided into three functional categories, including MF, CC, and BP. For BP, the DEGs were enriched in cell adhesion, immune response, and osteoblast differentiation (Table 2). In the CC group, the DEGs were majorly enriched in the extracellular space, extracellular matrix, and extracellular exosome. In the MF group, DEGs were majorly enriched in the collagen binding, integrin binding, and extracellular matrix structural constituent (Figure 4). We used the DAVID online database to perform DEG pathway enrichment analysis. KEGG analysis showed that DEGs play a role in regulating synovial inflammation in OA through various pathways including the AMPK signaling pathway, osteoclast differentiation, insulin signaling pathway, autophagy, ECM-receptor interaction, and HIF-1 signaling pathway (Figure 5, Table 3).

ExpressionCategoryTermDescriptionGene count value

Cell adhesion
Extracellular matrix organization
Positive regulation of T cell activation
Osteoblast differentiation
Extracellular space
Extracellular matrix
Extracellular exosome
Extracellular region
Proteinaceous extracellular matrix
Collagen binding
Integrin binding
Extracellular matrix structural constituent
Peptidase activator activity
RNA polymerase II regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding

ExpressionTermDescriptionGene count value

DEGshsa04512ECM-receptor interaction60.001503576
hsa04066HIF-1 signaling pathway50.013969316
hsa04510Focal adhesion70.01467336
hsa04152AMPK signaling pathway50.031444563
hsa04380Osteoclast differentiation50.038325066
hsa04910Insulin signaling pathway50.045003644
hsa05202Transcriptional misregulation in cancer50.079165687
hsa01212Fatty acid metabolism30.079189222

3.3. Identification of Hub Genes

To further examine the hub genes involved in the development of OA, we used the STRING database to evaluate the interaction between genes. We built a PPI network by using Cytoscape software and some data from the STRING database. To further analyze protein interactions, we evaluated the betweenness centrality and degree using the plugin cytoHubba in Cytoscape software (Figure 6). Hub genes with betweenness centrality and degree indicate that these genes play a key role in this network. The 10 hub genes showing significant interactions were FN1, COL1A1, IGF1, SPP1, TIMP1, BGN, COL5A1, MMP13, CLU, and SDC1 (Figure 7).

3.4. Validation of Hub Genes

To check the data analysis results, qRT-PCR was used to detect the expression level of the first 10 hub genes in the OA synovium of the knee joint and normal control groups. Statistical analysis proved that ADIPOQ, IL6, and CXCR1 were obviously raised in the synovium of OA samples () (Figure 8). All validations are consistent with the results of this research.

4. Discussion

OA is a complex disease caused by genetic and environmental factors. This condition affects more than 40% of 70 year olds and is the main cause of loss of body movement and pain [26]. OA is characterized by several factors, including the loss of articular cartilage, hyperosteogeny, and synovitis. The combined effects of mechanical and biochemical factors are implicated in OA development. The rate of OA increases with age and mechanical wear on the joints. However, the exact pathogenesis of OA is unclear, and there are no effective treatment methods; joint replacement surgery is the last resort for treating OA [27].

Gene chip and high-throughput sequencing technologies can be used for detecting the gene expression, microRNA, long noncoding RNA, and DNA methylation to explore genetic alterations in disease [28]. Microarray techniques have also been widely used to predict potential target genes for OA [7, 29]. To decrease the number of false-positive results, we performed functional enrichment and network analysis of the DEGs. A total of 173 genes were identified, with 68 genes upregulated and 105 genes downregulated.

Using the KEGG signal pathway analysis method to analyze the enrichment of DEGs. Based on the string online database, a PPI network is built by using the software of Cytoscape, and 10 most closely related genes were screened out by the degree analysis method of the cytoHubba plugin. The following genes were highly expressed: FN1, COL1A1, IGF1, SPP1, TIMP1, BGN, COL5A1, MMP13, CLU, and SDC1. To validate these findings, the qRT-PCR results confirmed that the expression levels of COL1A1, COL5A1, TIMP1, MMP13, and SDC1 were obviously increased in OA samples ().

The main organic component of bone is collagen type I, which consists of one pro-alpha2 (I) chain encoded by the collagen type I alpha 2 chain gene (COL1A2) and two pro-alpha1 (I) chains encoded by two the collagen type I alpha 1 chain genes (COL1A1) [30]. COL1A1 is one of several collagens showing rich differences in RNA and protein levels. Collagens are the major structural components of the cartilage. Collagen imbalance plays an important pathogenic role in OA [31, 32]. Type I collagen is the most abundant collagen in scar tissue and is the final product of tissue healing. A recent study showed that COL1A1 was upregulated in the synovium of patients with advanced OA as well as in the synovium of OA-induced mice and human fibroblasts stimulated by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) [33]. According to previous studies, collagen type I is rare in normal chondrocytes but is highly expressed in OA cartilage, especially in the late stage of OA [34]. The collagen type I alpha 5 chain gene (COL5A1) encodes the α1 chain of type V collagen and is small fibrous collagen found in ligaments, tendons, and other tissues [35]. Type V collagen, encoded by COL5A1, is a type I collagen present in tissues containing type I collagen and may play an important role in regulating the assembly of heteromorphic fibers composed of type I as well as type V collagen [36, 37]. Because these genes were found to be upregulated in OA patients, collagen may play a key role in the pathogenesis of OA.

It has been established that the aging of chondrocytes in elderly patients promotes the development of OA [38]. In this case, aging and pathological cells still survive but show changes in the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression profile. MMPs are known to be involved in cartilage destruction and inflammation in the joint [39]. MMPs belong to a protease family called metzincin superfamily, which contains 23 core members and more than 30 extended members [40]. These enzymes participated in all kinds of physiological and pathological processes in life activities, such as morphogenesis, tissue repair, wound healing, and postinjury remodeling, as well as the progression of OA, chronic tissue ulcers, cancer, and arthritis [41]. MMP13 is a member of the MMP family. Due to its high expression in human OA cartilage and the ability to degrade type II collagen fibers, MMP13 is supposed to the main collagenase involved in the growth of OA [4244]. In the past two decades, studies have shown that MMP13 is significant in the degradation of cartilage aggregation proteins and is closely related to the senescence of chondrocytes in the pathogenesis of OA [45, 46]. Therefore, MMP13 is considered a promising target for OA therapy [47]. The tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) proteins forms a family of natural inhibitors of MMPs. This family consists of four members: TIMP 1, TIMP 2, TIMP3, and TIMP 4 [48, 49]. Because of the strong binding affinity between TIMP1 and MMP13, TIMP1 is a functional regulator of MMP13-related chondrocyte aging and cartilage matrix changes. Therefore, the improvement of TIMP1 activity is considered to be an effective way to treat OA [50].

Syndecan 1 (SDC1) protein is a transmembrane (type I) heparin sulfate proteoglycan, which is a member of the syndecan proteoglycan family [51]. SDC1 protein has several molecular roles in proliferation, migration, and cell-matrix interactions through its extracellular matrix protein receptor. In the early stage of cartilage degeneration in OA, the expression of SDC1 in the articular cartilage was upregulated, indicating that SDC1 participates in the repair of cartilage fibrils [51, 52].

In conclusion, the PPI network and data analyses are effective ways for screening OA target proteins and corresponding gene targets, which can further reveal the pathological and biological mechanisms of OA. In the present study, based on qRT-PCR results, COL1A1, COL5A1, TIMP1, MMP13, and SDC1 may be gene diagnostic markers and drug targets of OA. Even though we validated several hub genes and pathways, the small sample size is one limitation of this study. Further large-scale experimental studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors were involved in the study and approved the final version of the manuscript.


This work was supported by the Health Special Project of Jilin Province (Grant Number 201817294302), the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (Grant Number 20200201327JC), the Education Department of Jilin Province (Grant Number 3D518Q243429), and the Training Program of Outstanding Doctoral Student by Norman Bethune Health Science Center of Jilin University (Grant Number 470110000646). We thank Dr. Zhaoyan Li for the assistance with the samples.


  1. R. Higgs, “Concentrated efforts to detect early OA,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 6, no. 11, p. 616, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. G. Hoy, E. Smith, M. Cross et al., “The global burden of musculoskeletal conditions for 2010: an overview of methods,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 982–989, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. L. Parkinson, D. L. Waters, and L. Franck, “Systematic review of the impact of osteoarthritis on health outcomes for comorbid disease in older people,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1751–1770, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Park, A. Mendy, and E. R. Vieira, “Various types of arthritis in the United States: prevalence and age-related trends from 1999 to 2014,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 256–258, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. H. Robinson, C. M. Lepus, Q. Wang et al., “Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 580–592, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Zhang, K. Lygrissea, and J. Wanga, “Role of microRNA in osteoarthritis,” Journal of Arthritis, vol. 6, no. 2, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. Li, Q. Wang, G. Chen et al., “Integration of gene expression profile data to screen and verify hub genes involved in osteoarthritis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 9482726, 10 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Z. Li, L. Zhong, Z. Du et al., “Network analyses of differentially expressed genes in osteoarthritis to identify hub genes,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 8340573, 9 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Nannini, M. A. Pantaleo, A. Maleddu, A. Astolfi, S. Formica, and G. Biasco, “Gene expression profiling in colorectal cancer using microarray technologies: results and perspectives,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 201–209, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. The Gene Ontology Consortium, “Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. D1, pp. D331–D338, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. Q. Liu, “Analysis of differentially expressed genes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis by integrated microarray analysis,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 120, no. 8, pp. 12653–12664, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Kanehisa, M. Furumichi, M. Tanabe, Y. Sato, and K. Morishima, “KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. D1, pp. D353–D361, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. C. Li, D. L. Bai, Y. Xu et al., “Identification of differentially expressed genes in synovial tissue of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis in patients,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 4533–4544, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. C. Hochberg, L. Yerges-Armstrong, M. Yau, and B. D. Mitchell, “Genetic epidemiology of osteoarthritis: recent developments and future directions,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 192–197, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Liu, H. Li, L. Sun, Z. Wang, C. Xing, and Y. Yuan, “Aberrantly methylated-differentially expressed genes and pathways in colorectal cancer,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 75, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Liu, S. Patel, R. Nibbe et al., “Systems biology analyses of gene expression and genome wide association study data in obstructive sleep apnea,” Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 14–25, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Barrett, S. E. Wilhite, P. Ledoux et al., “NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--update,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, Database issue, pp. D991–D995, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. G. A. Broeren, M. de Vries, M. B. Bennink et al., “Functional tissue analysis reveals successful cryopreservation of human osteoarthritic synovium,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 11, article e0167076, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Woetzel, R. Huber, P. Kupfer et al., “Identification of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients by transcriptome-based rule set generation,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 16, no. 2, p. R84, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. E. Ritchie, B. Phipson, D. Wu et al., “Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 7, article e47, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Pathan, S. Keerthikumar, C. S. Ang et al., “FunRich: an open access standalone functional enrichment and interaction network analysis tool,” Proteomics, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 2597–2601, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. W. Huang, B. T. Sherman, Q. Tan et al., “The DAVID Gene Functional Classification Tool: a novel biological module-centric algorithm to functionally analyze large gene lists,” Genome Biology, vol. 8, no. 9, article R183, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake et al., “Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Szklarczyk, A. L. Gable, D. Lyon et al., “STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 47, no. D1, pp. D607–D613, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. H. Chin, S. H. Chen, H. H. Wu, C. W. Ho, M. T. Ko, and C. Y. Lin, “cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 8, article S11, Supplement 4, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Vos, A. D. Flaxman, M. Naghavi et al., “Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9859, pp. 2163–2196, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. A. Dieppe and L. S. Lohmander, “Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis,” Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9463, pp. 965–973, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Z. Dong, J. Wang, T. Zhan, and S. Xu, “Identification of prognostic risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma using bioinformatics analysis,” Oncotargets and Therapy, vol. Volume 11, pp. 4327–4337, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. Fang, P. Wang, L. Xia et al., “Aberrantly hydroxymethylated differentially expressed genes and the associated protein pathways in osteoarthritis,” PeerJ, vol. 7, article e6425, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. Zhang, C. Chen, Y. Cui et al., “lnc-SAMD14-4 can regulate expression of the COL1A1 and COL1A2 in human chondrocytes,” PeerJ, vol. 7, article e7491, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. V. Tchetina, “Developmental mechanisms in articular cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis,” Arthritis, vol. 2011, Article ID 683970, 16 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. B. Xia, di Chen, J. Zhang, S. Hu, H. Jin, and P. Tong, “Osteoarthritis pathogenesis: a review of molecular mechanisms,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 495–505, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. F. G. Remst, A. B. Blom, E. L. Vitters et al., “Gene expression analysis of murine and human osteoarthritis synovium reveals elevation of transforming growth factor β-responsive genes in osteoarthritis-related fibrosis,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 647–656, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Miosge, M. Hartmann, C. Maelicke, and R. Herken, “Expression of collagen type I and type II in consecutive stages of human osteoarthritis,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 229–236, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. E. Birk, “Type V collagen: heterotypic type I/V collagen interactions in the regulation of fibril assembly,” Micron : the international research and review journal for microscopy, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 223–237, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Colombi, C. Dordoni, M. Venturini et al., “Spectrum of mucocutaneous, ocular and facial features and delineation of novel presentations in 62 classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome patients,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 624–631, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Willard, S. Mannion, C. J. Saunders, M. Collins, and A. V. September, “The interaction of polymorphisms in extracellular matrix genes and underlying miRNA motifs that modulate susceptibility to anterior cruciate ligament rupture,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. S. Price, J. G. Waters, C. Darrah et al., “The role of chondrocyte senescence in osteoarthritis,” Aging Cell, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. B. J. Rose and D. L. Kooyman, “A tale of two joints: the role of matrix metalloproteases in cartilage biology,” Disease Markers, vol. 2016, Article ID 4895050, 7 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. Nagase, R. Visse, and G. Murphy, “Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 562–573, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. G. Murphy and H. Nagase, “Progress in matrix metalloproteinase research,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 290–308, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. G. Mitchell, H. A. Magna, L. M. Reeves et al., “Cloning, expression, and type II collagenolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinase-13 from human osteoarthritic cartilage,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 761–768, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Tsezou, “Osteoarthritis year in review 2014: genetics and genomics,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2017–2024, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. Yamamoto, H. Okano, W. Miyagawa et al., “MMP-13 is constitutively produced in human chondrocytes and co-endocytosed with ADAMTS-5 and TIMP-3 by the endocytic receptor LRP1,” Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology, vol. 56, pp. 57–73, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. B. Forsyth, A. Cole, G. Murphy, J. L. Bienias, H. J. Im, and R. F. Loeser, “Increased matrix metalloproteinase-13 production with aging by human articular chondrocytes in response to catabolic stimuli,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1118–1124, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Inada, Y. Wang, M. H. Byrne et al., “Critical roles for collagenase-3 (Mmp13) in development of growth plate cartilage and in endochondral ossification,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 49, pp. 17192–17197, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. N. G. Li, Y. P. Tang, and J. A. Duan, “New selective inhibitors of MMP-13 for inflammatory diseases: a patent evaluation (W02012151158),” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 669–675, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. Brew and H. Nagase, “The tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): an ancient family with structural and functional diversity,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1803, no. 1, pp. 55–71, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. W. Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Luo, Y. Zhan, and B. Zhong, “Design, cyclization, and optimization of MMP13-TIMP1 interaction-derived self-inhibitory peptides against chondrocyte senescence in osteoarthritis,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 121, pp. 921–929, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. V. Knäuper, S. Cowell, B. Smith et al., “The role of the C-terminal domain of human collagenase-3 (MMP-13) in the activation of procollagenase-3, substrate specificity, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase interaction,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 12, pp. 7608–7616, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. E. Barre, F. Redini, K. Boumediene, C. Vielpeau, and J. P. Pujol, “Semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of syndecan-1 and -4 messages in cartilage and cultured chondrocytes from osteoarthritic joints,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 34–43, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Salminen-Mankonen, A. M. Säämänen, M. Jalkanen, E. Vuorio, and L. Pirilä, “Syndecan-1 expression is upregulated in degenerating articular cartilage in a transgenic mouse model for osteoarthritis,” Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 469–474, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Zhengqing Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.