Research Article

Effect of Lifestyle Changes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Revascularization

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participant with or without revascularization.

VariablesRevas. (N = 1583)No revas. (N = 15516) value

Age, y, mean ± SD58.1 ± 10.457.4 ± 10.40.023
Male, n (%)1259 (79.5)12201 (78.6)0.406
Unstable angina, n (%)1028 (64.9)10228 (65.9)<0.001
Prior myocardial infarction, n (%)570 (36.0)4755 (30.7)<0.001
Family history of CHD, n (%)88 (5.6)611 (3.9)0.002
Hypertension, n (%)911 (57.6)7636 (49.2)<0.001
Dyslipidemia, n (%)574 (36.3)4905 (31.6)<0.001
Diabetes, n (%)349 (22.1)2821 (18.2)<0.001
LVEF < 40%, n (%)683 (43.2)8516 (54.9)<0.001
Reference vessel diameter, mm, mean ± SD3.1 ± 0.63.2 ± 1.9<0.001
Lesion length, mm, mean ± SD26.1 ± 15.725.4 ± 14.60.078
Diameter stenosis, %, mean ± SD89.7 ± 7.788.4 ± 8.0<0.001
Calcification, n (%)72 (4.6)534 (3.4)0.023
Total occlusion, n (%)469 (29.6)3231 (20.8)<0.001
Transradial access, n (%)1140 (72.0)12495 (80.5)<0.001
TIMI classification, n (%)<0.001
 0421 (26.6)3232 (20.8)
 175 (4.7)648 (4.2)
 2202 (12.8)1945 (12.5)
 3885 (55.9)9691 (62.5)