Effect of Lifestyle Changes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Revascularization

Table 3

Hazard ration (95% CI) of revascularization according to combined and individual ideal CVH metrics.

	Univariable analysis	Multivariable analysis
Combined ideal CVH metrics
1 unit change (each 1-number increment in ICVHMs)	0.95 (0.93, 0.98)	0.96 (0.93, 0.98)
1 tertile change ( for trend)	0.90 (0.85, 0.96) <0.001	0.91 (0.85, 0.97) 0.003
Average vs. Inadequate	0.88 (0.79, 0.99)	0.89 (0.79, 0.99)
Optimal vs. Inadequate	0.81 (0.72, 0.92)	0.83 (0.73, 0.94)
Individual component of ideal CVH metrics—Physical activity
1 unit change	0.92 (0.85, 0.99)	0.92 (0.85, 0.99)
for trend	0.038	0.037
Individual component of ideal CVH metrics—blood pressure
1 unit change	0.89 (0.82, 0.96)	0.90 (0.84, 0.97)
for trend	0.002	0.008
Individual component of ideal CVH metrics—blood cholesterol
1 unit change	0.88 (0.82, 0.95)	0.89 (0.83, 0.96)
for trend	0.001	0.004
Individual component of ideal CVH metrics—blood glucose
1 unit change	0.79 (0.72, 0.86)	0.79 (0.72, 0.86)
for trend	<0.001	<0.001
Individual component of ideal CVH metrics—ideal BMI
1 unit change	0.95 (0.89, 1.02)	0.94 (0.88, 1.01)
for trend	0.192	0.110
Individual component of ideal CVH metrics—healthy diet
1 unit change	0.98 (0.90, 1.06)	1.01 (0.92, 1.10)
for trend	0.586	0.885
Individual component of ideal CVH metrics—ideal smoking status
1 unit change	1.05 (0.98, 1.11)	1.05 (0.98, 1.12)
for trend	0.153	0.150