|
Strategies | Materials | Engineered approaches | Pros | Cons |
|
Natural scaffold-based | Alginate Chitosan Collagen Fibrin Hyaluronic acid Laminin | Fibrous meshes Hydrogels Porous scaffolds Sponges | Biocompatible Intrinsic bioactive signaling cues Facilitated controlled release of growth factors Can be configured in different forms Can be chemically modified | In vivo rapid degradation Do not generate uniform cell alignment and supported disorganized repair of large muscle defects Limited mechanical stiffness |
Synthetic scaffold-based | Poly (glycolic acid) Poly (lactic acid) Poly-ε-caprolactone Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Polydimethylsiloxane Polyurethane Copolymers (e.g., PLLA/PLGA) | Fibers Fibrous meshes Micro-/nanopattered substrates Microspheres Porous sponge-like scaffolds | Possess precisely tuned mechanical and structural properties Flexible in chemical and physical modification Reproducibility in preparation, modification, and chemical properties Readily fabricated into a variety of geometries Availability of various processing technologies allowing the fabrication of tissue shape and size-specific scaffolds with control on mechanical, structural, and physicochemical properties | Low bioactivity Need functionalization to improve cell attachment or regenerative outcomes Possible foreign body response |
Decellularized scaffolds | Small intestine submucosa Urinary bladder Muscle-derived | As it is Hydrogels Minced tissue (for muscle) | Retain ECM architecture and complexity, including vasculature and biofactors Angiogenic, promotes vascularization Significantly improve functional outcomes | Decellularization process can significantly damage ECM structure and protein/growth factor content Incomplete decellularization can induce an inflammatory response |
Cell-based | Mesenchymal stem cells Mesoangioblasts Myoblasts Pericytes Satellite cells | Systemic injections Seeded/loaded/injected on scaffolds/hydrogels Encapsulated in microspheres | Promote muscle regenerative capability Can form new muscle fibers | Low cell viability Poor cell migration and engraftment Need of immunosuppressive therapy Inefficient methods of delivery High costs for cell expansion and manipulation |
Molecular signaling based | FGF HGF IGF-1 PEDF SDF-1a TGF-β1 VEGF Antisense specific nucleotides (e.g., nusinersen) | Systemic injections Incorporated in scaffolds/hydrogels | Activate and/or recruit host stem cells Enhance myogenesis Promote angiogenesis Functional recovery with revascularization | Short factor half-life Difficulty in controlled release |
|