Review Article

Likelihood of Accomplishing an In-Patient Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in a One-Step Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 3

Quality score results.

SeriesModified GRADE scoreWide explanations on surgical techniquesClearly reporting on feasibilityCharacteristics of patients disclosedMissing myoma' diameter as meanSample sizeTotal

Classical slicing in series with less than 50% of G2Arcaini [26]31111−16
De Blok [40]2−111115
Fernandez [84]21−11115
Hart [47]3−111116
Makris [63]31111−16
Mavrelos, 2010, Placebo [66]4−1111−15
Mavrelos, GnRh [66]4−1111−15

Techniques for treating the deep portion (including “cold loop”) of the myomas in series with less than 50% of G2Di Spiezio Srado [41]31111−16
Hallez [44]2111−116
Imbesi [48]31111−16
Ioannis [49]31111−16
Litta [58]2111117
Mazzon [17]211−1115
Vercellini [10]3111117
Zayed [83]31111−16

Classical slicing in series with more or equal to 50% of G2Ahdad-Yata [25]21111−15
Hamidouche [46]21111−15
Ludwin, Group 2 [61]31111−16

Techniques for treating the deep portion of the myomas (including “cold loop”) in series with more than or equal to 50% of G2Bernard [28]21111−15
Favilli, GnRh group [42]41111−17
Favilli, Controls [42]41111−17
Leone [54]3111−116
Ludwin, Group 1 [61]31111−16
Wang [78]21111−15

Quality score results for studies judged of good quality (quality score more than 4). None of the good quality series falls among the ones in which estimating the rare event has been needed. In the study of Leone et al. [54], the main myoma diameter was reported as median. Hallez et al. [44] provided intervals for diameters of myoma.