Mechanism by which TRAF6 Participates in the Immune Regulation of Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer

Wang, Jingjing; Wu, Xinjie; Jiang, Mengyu; Tai, Guixiang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4607197

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 4607197 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4607197

Mechanism by which TRAF6 Participates in the Immune Regulation of Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer

Jingjing Wang,¹Xinjie Wu,¹Mengyu Jiang,¹and Guixiang Tai¹

Academic Editor: Vineet K. Singh

Received04 Jun 2020

Revised06 Nov 2020

Accepted17 Nov 2020

Published26 Nov 2020

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a signal transduction molecule shared by the interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R)/Toll-like receptor (TLR) family and the TNFR superfamily. TRAF6 has a unique TRAF domain and RING finger domain that mediate intracellular signaling events. In the immune system, TRAF6-mediated signaling has been shown to be critical for the development, homeostasis, and activation of a variety of immune cells, including B cells, T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. Although the pathogenesis and etiology of autoimmune diseases and cancer are not fully understood, it is worth noting that existing studies have shown that TRAF6 is involved in the pathogenesis and development of a variety of these diseases. Herein, we reviewed the role of TRAF6 in certain immune cells, as well as the function and potential effect of TRAF6 in autoimmune diseases and cancer. Our review indicates that TRAF6 may be a novel target for autoimmune diseases and cancer.

1. Introduction

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TNFR) family. TRAF6 is considered to be the only signal transduction-related ligase of the TNFR superfamily and the interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R)/Toll-like receptor (TLR) superfamily within the TNFR family [1, 2]. TRAF6 can activate multiple signaling pathways, such as NF-κB [3]. TRAF6 also plays indispensable roles in regulating innate and adaptive immunity, embryonic development, tissue homoeostasis, and bone metabolism. TRAF6-deficient mice display various developmental abnormalities during embryogenesis, including osteopetrosis [4], failure of neural tube closure [5], defective formation of skin appendices [6], defects in the lymphoid compartment, and absence of mature thymic epithelial cells [7]. One hundred percent of TRAF6-deficient mice experience death within 15 days after birth. In mammals, TRAF6 is abundantly expressed in the brain, lungs, liver, skeletal muscle, and kidney, and it is also found in the heart, spleen, and testes. In the immune system, TRAF6 has been shown to be critical for the development, homeostasis, and activation of various immune cells, including T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages [8].

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are a series of complex chronic inflammatory diseases characterized by the immune response to self-antigen, and cause damage to tissues [9]. Over 100 ADs that affect 5-10% of the world’s population [10] have been identified, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), type 1 diabetes (T1D), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), multiple sclerosis (MS), and primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). So far, the cause of ADs is still unclear. Studies have shown that abnormal immune responses in ADs may be caused by the interaction between genetic and environmental factors [11]. Although the understanding of the etiological mechanisms of autoimmune diseases are constantly evolving and progress in treatment is being made [12–14], the long-term prognosis is unsatisfactory for most patients. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new individualized therapeutic targets for clinical use. The role of TRAF6 in immune cells has been extensively studied over the last two decades [15]. Current researches indicate that TRAF6 could be involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of autoimmune diseases, including RA, SLE, LN, and MS. In addition to autoimmune diseases, accumulating evidence indicates that TRAF6 is associated with the progression of various types of tumors, including breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and lung cancer. This review summarizes the functional roles of TRAF6 in regulating immunocytes and in the pathogenesis of ADs and cancer as well as the possibility of TRAF6 as a potential promising target for future AD and cancer treatment.

2. Structure of TRAF6 and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System

The TRAF family includes seven members from TRAF1 to TRAF7 (Figure 1). TRAF proteins contain several domains: a zinc finger, a coiled-coil (TRAF-N), TRAF-C, and a RING. The main feature of the TRAF family proteins (except for TRAF1) is the RING homology domain at the N terminus [16], which constitutes the core of E3 ubiquitin ligase activity [17]. The TRAF domain, another feature of the TRAF family (except for TRAF7) at the C terminus, is subdivided into two distinct subdomains: the TRAF-N domain, which is a coiled-coil domain, and the TRAF-C domain, which is composed of seven to eight antiparallel β-strand folds. This domain is responsible for protein-protein interactions, including TRAF oligomerization as well as interactions with upstream regulators and downstream effectors [18, 19].

TRAF6 is composed of 522 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 60,000 Da. TRAF6 is the only TRAF family member that participates in the signal transduction of both the TNFR superfamily and the IL-1R/TLR superfamily and could regulate adaptive immunity, innate immunity, and bone homeostasis [1]. TRAF6 has the least homology with a prototypical TRAF domain sequence. TRAF2, TRAF3, and TRAF5 bind to the membrane distal domain at the cytoplasmic tail of CD40 and RANK, while TRAF6 interacts with the membrane proximal domain [20]. The differences in the degrees of the directions of the bound peptides have shown that there were marked structural differences between receptor recognition by TRAF6 compared to the other TRAFs [21]. For example, the TRAF-C domain of TRAF6 can interact with RANK and c-Src. As a result, this interaction promotes the activation of c-Src for tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Cbl and Cbl-b, but the phosphorylation is dependent on the TRAF-N domain of TRAF6 [22]. Scavenger receptor A (SRA) inhibits TRAF6 dimerization and ubiquitination by directly interacting with the TRAF-C domain of TRAF6, thereby inhibiting the activation of the TLR4-induced transcription factor NF-κB, causing inflammatory gene expression to be downregulated [23].

It has been demonstrated that the ubiquitin-proteasome system consists of 3 primary enzymes: a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) [25]. TRAF6 has been confirmed to function as an E3 ubiquitin ligase. TRAF6 is responsible for the interaction with specific substrates, which then act in concert with E1, E2, and ubiquitin to place ubiquitin chains on the substrate (Figure 2). Two main types of ubiquitination have been discovered to regulate intracellular signal transduction [26]. The classic ubiquitination process uses Lys48- (K48-) linked polyubiquitin, which could produce the protein targeted by 26S proteasome for degradation [27]. TRAF6 and the Ubc13-Uev1a E2 complex generate K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, which recruit proteins through their selective binding of a ubiquitin-binding domain (UBD) as a novel posttranslational modification without causing proteasomal degradation [28].

Figure 2

The ubiquitination of TRAF6. Based on the data by Dainichi et al. [28]. Firstly, the E1 enzyme forms a thiol ester bond with a ubiquitin. Next, the activated ubiquitin is transferred to E2. Then, TRAF6 (the E3 enzyme) functions as a scaffold for the binding of both E2 and the target molecule, facilitating the transfer of ubiquitin from E2 to the target protein. Finally, TRAF6 mediates the addition of lysine-linked polyubiquitin chains to the substrates, commonly via K48-linked polyubiquitination or K63-linked polyubiquitination. The K48-linked polyubiquitin causes proteasomal degradation. The K63-linked polyubiquitin recruiting protein is used for further posttranslational modifications.

3. TRAF6 Signaling Mechanism

TRAF6, an unconventional E3 ubiquitin ligase, binds to ubiquitin via a thioester bond in a catalytic reaction and transmits ubiquitin to the relative substrate, thereby participating in a series of signal transductions in immune cells and nonimmune cells. The general signaling roles played by TRAF6 in immune cells are summarized here, but some of them are dependent on context or type-specific cells. In addition to the TLR/IL-1 family and the TNFR superfamily, TRAF6 is also involved in the signaling pathways of IL-17R and TCR (Figure 3). TRAF6 is widely expressed in various immune cells, but most immune cells limit TRAF6 activity by selectively expressing receptors for activating it.

Figure 3

Overall depiction of the TRAF6-mediated signaling pathways. TRAF6 has been identified as a downstream adaptor of multiple receptor families with immunoregulatory functions, including members of the TNFR superfamily, the TLR family, IL-17R, and TCR. These receptors activate TRAF6 by binding directly to TRAF6 or by linking to an intermediate protein. TRAF6 catalyzes the K-63 polyubiquitination of TAK1 by means of Ubc13 and Uev1a. TAK1 forms a complex with TAB1 and TAB2 or TAB3, which phosphorylates and fully activates TAK1. Subsequently, IκB can be phosphorylated and degraded by the activation of the IKK complex, activating NF-κB. However, it can also activate the MAPK pathway, including the ERK pathway, the JNK pathway, and the p38 pathway. In addition, TRAF6 may also directly activate the PI3K and IRF pathways. In this process, TRAF6 conjugates K63-linked polyubiquitin chains (Ub K63) (e.g., IKKβ, TAK1, IRAK, and TRAF6) and K48-linked polyubiquitin chains (Ub K48) (e.g., IκB) to transduce the signal.

TRAF6 interacts directly with some receptors through a binding motif, and links to other receptors through an intermediate protein. It also interacts directly with TNFR superfamily members, primarily RANK and CD40, via the TRAF6 binding motif. The CD40 cytoplasmic tail is associated with the activation of TRAF6 [29]. The binding of RANKL to RANK induces the ternarization of RANK and the recruitment of the adaptor protein TRAF6 through the three TRAF6 binding sites in its C-terminal cytoplasmic tail as described previously [30], thereby initiating the downstream signaling cascade. In other cases, TRAF6 is linked to the receptor via intermediate proteins. The IL-17R family activates TRAF6 via Act1 [31]. TCR activates TRAF6 via CARMA1, Bcl10, and MALT1 [32]. Additionally, some TLR family members (e.g., TLR3/4) are linked by TRIF, recruit TRAF3, and activate TRAF6. Other TLR family members and some IL-1R superfamily members (e.g., TLR1/2/4/5/6, TLR7/8/9, and IL-1/18/33R) initiate MyD88 recruitment, bind to and activate IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 or 4 (IRAK), and thereby activate TRAF6 [33–36].

Upon activation, TRAF6 can complex with the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc13 and its variant Uev1a, conjugating K63-linked polyubiquitin chains to transduce the signal and attach K63-linked ubiquitin chains to lysine residues on various target proteins, including inhibitory kappa B kinase (IKKγ, also known as NEMO), TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), IRAK1, and TRAF6 itself [37, 38]. TAK1 and TAK1-binding proteins TAB1 and TAB2/3 form the TAB1/TAK1/TAB2/3 complex that activates the IKKα/IKKβ/IKKγ complex and phosphorylates IκB, which lead to the degradation of IκB and the activation of the transcription factor NF-κB [39, 40]. Simultaneously, TRAF6 can also activate downstream interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF7) via the TLR7/8/9-MyD88 pathway [41]. In addition, TAK1 can also lead to the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, including the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway, the extracellular regulated protein kinase (ERK) pathway, the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, and the p38 pathway [42]. These MAPK pathways are involved in the activation of transcription factor AP-1. Moreover, RANK and CD40 could activate protein kinase B (Akt) in a variety of cell types via TRAF6. RANK or CD40 forms a complex with the Cbl family of scaffolding proteins and TRAF6, depending on the Src kinase activity. Additionally, Cbl brings phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) to the receptor complex and activates Akt [43, 44].

4. Regulatory Effects of TRAF6 on Various Immune Cells

TRAF6 is widely expressed in a variety of immune cells, including T cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and macrophages [8]. Herein, we summarize the immune-related regulatory role of TRAF6 in these cells, and the recent evidence, which amply confirmed the mechanism.

4.1. T Cells

To study the specific role of TRAF6 in T cells, TRAF6-ΔT mice (with the TRAF6 deletion specific to T cells) were established by crossing floxed TRAF6 mice with CD4-Cre transgenic mice [45]. The TRAF6-ΔT mice show splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy, with a significant decrease in the percentage of CD8⁺ T cells but an increase in the number of CD4⁺ T cells. The T cell-specific deletion of TRAF6 results in multiorgan inflammatory diseases accompanied by mononuclear cell infiltration, including in the intestine, liver, lungs, and kidneys. Abnormal Th2 cytokine production, such as IL-4 and IL-10, can also be observed in the infiltrated organs. In addition, compared with wild-type T cells, TRAF6-deficient T cells exhibit hyperactivation of the PI3K-Akt pathway, which becomes resistant to suppression by CD4⁺CD25⁺ Treg cells. The extensive role of TRAF6 in T cells has been gradually recognized with the subset-specific mechanism summarized as follows.

4.1.1. CD4⁺ T Cells

After an initial stimulation by an antigen, naive CD4⁺ T cells may differentiate into different T helper (Th) lineages, including Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, Th22, and Tregs and perform different functions. The direction of differentiations is regulated by various factors such as the nature of the antigen and the hormones and cytokines in the local environment. Various types of cytokines and the balance among cytokines play an important regulatory role in the differentiation of Th cells. A variety of evidence has shown that TRAF6 plays an essential role in the differentiation of CD4⁺ T cells. NLRC3, a non-inflammasome-forming member of the NLR (nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich-repeat-containing) innate immune receptor family, mediates TRAF6-dependent CD4⁺ T cell signaling and metabolism. NLRC3 limits IFN-γ and TNF expression in CD4⁺ T cells, as well as the proliferation of Th1 and Th17 cells, by reducing TRAF6 ubiquitination to interfere with NF-κB signaling [46]. OX40 (also known as tumor necrosis factor receptor super family 4, Tnfrsf4) acts as a potent inducer of Th9 cells in a TRAF6-dependent manner. OX40 ligation together with TGF-β and IL-4 convert up to 80% of CD4⁺ T cells into Th9 cells. A mechanism analysis revealed that the OX40 linkage activates TRAF6 and mediates the activation of NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK). NIK activation results in the processing of p100 to generate the p52 subunit which, together with RelB, forms the transcriptionally active p52-RelB complex. This noncanonical NF-κB pathway is critical for OX40-induced Th9 differentiation [47]. It is well known that the synergy of TGF-β and IL-6 is required for the generation of Th17 cells, and IL-2 is a known inhibitor of Th17 differentiation. CD4+ T cells lacking TRAF6 showed a specific increase in Th17 differentiation, which is caused by the increased TGF-β-induced Smad2/3 activation and TGF-β-dependent IL-2 downregulation. Notably, TRAF6-deficient T cells could produce normal amounts of Foxp3-expressing cells under the conditions of the iTreg differentiation that provided exogenous IL-2 [48]. Additionally, TRAF6-deficient mice showed severe defects in Treg development in the thymus [49]. In Tregs, TRAF6 maintains Foxp3 and suppresses the pathogenic-Th2 type conversion of Tregs. In lymphopenic or inflammatory conditions, TRAF6-/- Tregs tend to lose Foxp3 with these cells transformed into Th2-like IL-4-producing cells. As a result, Treg-specific TRAF6-deficient mice develop various diseases such as allergic skin diseases, arthritis, and lymphadenopathy [50].

4.1.2. CD8⁺ T Cells

CD8⁺ T cells are central players in controlling pathogen infections and cancer. The T cell-specific deletion of TRAF6 shows the unique role of TRAF6 in the differentiation and metabolism of CD8⁺ T cells. TRAF6-deficient CD8⁺ T cells show altered fatty acid metabolism, and consequently, the CD8⁺ T cells have a defective ability to generate long-lived memory cells, which could be restored by the use of the antidiabetic drug metformin [51]. Although naïve TRAF6-ΔT CD8⁺ T cells show normal survival when transferred into normal T cell pools, recent studies have shown that naïve TRAF6-ΔT CD8⁺ T cells show defective lymphopenia-induced proliferation (LIP) [52]. Specifically, IL-18 potentiates LIP in vivo and synergizes with high doses of IL-7 to induce LIP-like proliferation in vitro. IL-7 and IL-18 act synergistically to upregulate the expression of the IL-18 receptor (IL-18R) genes, thereby enhancing IL-18 activity. In this case, IL-18R signaling increases the TRAF6-dependent activation of PI3K/Akt activation and makes naïve CD8⁺ T cells sensitive to noncognate self-peptide ligands. Consequently, the TRAF6-mediated pathway is required for both in vivo LIP and in vitro IL-7/IL-18-mediated synergy. This evidence suggests that there are multiple TRAF6-dependent signaling pathways in T cells. Different pathways may play different roles in T cell proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, and homeostasis.

4.2. B Cells

Some studies have shown that TRAF6 is involved in B cell development, maturation, homeostasis, and function. By blocking the binding of CD40 to TRAF6 in B cells, it has been found that the binding of TRAF6 to CD40 was able to induce IL-6 and antibody secretion. TRAF6 mediates its secretion of CD40-stimulated antibodies mainly through its effect on IL-6 production by B cells. The combination of TRAF6 and CD40 upregulates B7-1, but other surface molecules do not. Surprisingly, the activation of NF-κB and c-Jun kinase in CD40-mediated B cells was not affected by the disruption of CD40-TRAF6 binding [53]. Subsequently, it has been discovered that the consensus binding sites of TRAF2 and TRAF3 account for the majority of signaling via CD40, but the TRAF6 binding site appears to be redundant in the activation of the p38 and NF-κB signaling pathways [54]. However, the generation of high-affinity antibodies and long-lived bone marrow plasma cells require the recruitment of TRAF6 to the CD40 cytoplasmic domain [55]. TRAF6 resides not only in the cellular cytoplasm but also in the nucleus of normal and malignant B lymphocytes. Nuclear TRAF6 is modified by small ubiquitin-related modifier-1, then interacts with histone deacetylase 1, and eventually represses c-Myb-mediated transactivation. Therefore, nuclear TRAF6, as a negative regulator, may maintain cellular signal homeostasis by inhibiting transcriptional regulators [56]. B cell-specific TRAF6-deficient mice showed a significant reduction in the number of mature B cells in the bone marrow and spleen. Furthermore, the TRAF6-deficient B cell progenitors are unable to produce CD5⁺ B-1 cells. B cell-specific TRAF6-deficient mice are severely impaired in both T cell-dependent antigenic responses and T cell-independent antigenic responses, possibly due to the complete absence of CD5⁺ B-1 cells in the peritoneal cavity. This indicates that TRAF6 is required for CD5⁺ B-1 cell development and the maintenance of a mature B cell bank [57].

Activation of NF-κB by latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) of the Epstein-Barr virus is critical for the survival of Epstein-Barr virus-infected B lymphocytes. LMP1 is also involved in the progression of autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus. By detecting the LMP1-induced levels of NF-κB activation in a variety of gene-specific knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts, it was found that LMP1 activation of NF-κB can be independent of TRAF2 and TRAF5, but is dependent on TRAF6 or IRAK1 [58]. Further research indicates that two regions of the cytoplasmic carboxyl tails of LMP1, the C-terminal-activating regions 1 and 2 (CTAR1 and CTAR2), are responsible for NF-κB activation. LMP1 activates NF-κB mainly through the classical CTAR2/TRAF6/TAK1/IKKβ pathway, in addition to the noncanonical CTAR1/TRAF3/NIK/IKKα pathway [59]. Using TRAF6-deficient B cells, it was determined that TRAF6 is required for LMP1-mediated B cell activation and associated with the CTAR1 subdomain of LMP. LMP1, as a constitutively active functional mimetic of CD40, mediates TRAF6-dependent signaling that requires the TRAF6 receptor binding domain, but the CD40-mediated signaling pathway does not require the presence of this domain [60]. Similarly, in a B cell-specific TRAF6-deficient mouse model, TRAF6 is an important mediator of LMP1 B cell function in vivo. LMP1 is more dependent on TRAF6 than CD40 to promote the B cell effector function [61]. In short, it would be beneficial to target TRAF6 to disrupt downstream LMP1 signaling. Since LMP1 does not have a canonical TRAF6 binding site, it is also possible to disrupt the association of TRAF6 and LMP1 while maintaining its binding to CD40.

4.3. Dendritic Cells

DCs, as a kind of antigen-presenting cell (APC), could activate the innate and adaptive immune responses after infection occurs and maintain immune tolerance. TRAF6 not only plays a key role in DC maturation, including the expression of the surface markers, secretion of cytokines, and the ability to stimulate naïve T cells, but is also essential for the development of DC subsets.

4.3.1. TRAF6 Contributes to the Maturation of DCs

TRAF6-deficient DCs can directly exhibit the role of TRAF6 to some extent. TLR ligands or CD40L induces the upregulation of surface molecules such as MHC class II and B7.2 on wild-type DCs in vitro, and upregulation is severely impaired in TRAF6-deficient DCs. Similarly, the administration of LPS or the anti-CD40 antibody in vivo induces DC maturation in wild-type mice but not in TRAF6 knockout mice [62]. These results imply that TRAF6 is required for DC maturation in response to microbial components, such as LPS or CD40L, both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, while wild-type DCs activated by various TLR ligands or CD40L produce a substantial amount of the inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-12, DCs generated from TRAF6 knockout mice exhibit a severe cytokine production defect [62]. Therefore, CD40L and TLR ligands stimulate cytokine production from DCs in a TRAF6-dependent manner (Figure 4).

Figure 4

The role of TRAF6 in dendritic cells. TRAF6 is a key regulator of TLR, CD40, and RANK, which regulates DC maturation and interaction with T cells. TRAF6 regulates DC maturation by upregulating the expression of B7 and MHC molecules and secreting the cytokines IL-12 and IL-6. The activated DCs interact with T cells, causing CD4⁺ T cells to polarize to Th1. DCs in TRAF6-deficient mice are unable to upregulate MHC and B7.2 and secrete IL-12 in response to stimulation with CD40L or various TLR ligands. Moreover, the ability of TRAF6-deficient DCs to activate antigen-specific CD4⁺ T cells to become IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells is insufficient. However, they have no effect on the development of Th2 cells. In addition, TRAF6 directs DCs to maintain intestinal and lung immune tolerance by balancing the induction of Tregs and Th2 cellular immunity.

Another hallmark of DC maturation is their ability to stimulate T cell activation. Restimulated T cells primed in vivo with LPS-treated wild-type splenic DCs show remarkably increased IFN-γ production compared to that of T cells primed with untreated wild-type splenic DCs. In contrast, restimulated T cells primed with either LPS-treated or untreated TRAF6-/- splenic DCs exhibit a low amount of IFN-γ production [62]. These results indicate that the splenic DCs in TRAF6-ΔDC mice exhibit deficiencies in driving acute Th1 immunity. Furthermore, TRAF6-/- DCs do not prevent TLR from inducing Th2 cell development, but MyD88-/- DCs suppress Th2 development. This suggests that the TLR-initiated signaling that is critical for the generation of the negative signal for Th2 cell development occurs via an MyD88-dependent, TRAF6-independent pathway [63] (Figure 4). Similarly, an analysis of small intestinal lamina propria tissue gene expression from TRAF6 -ΔDC and littermate control mice older than 8 weeks revealed that the Th1 cell-associated factor IL-12 and IFN-γ decrease significantly, while the Th2 cell-associated factors IL-13, IL-5, and IL-4 increase significantly [64] (Figure 4). Furthermore, TRAF6-ΔDC mice specifically exhibit Th2-related inflammation and fibrosis in the small intestine. This disease phenotype is associated with Treg homeostasis. This disease can be ameliorated by broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, which initially indicates that TRAF6-ΔDC associated inflammation is triggered by the intestinal commensal microbiota. Notably, MyD88-ΔDC mice have no similar performance in the small intestine, suggesting that upstream of the disease is TLR independent. As with the intestine, the absence of TRAF6 expression by DCs led to the spontaneous generation of the Th2-associated immune responses in the lungs [65]. The relative mRNA levels of the Th1-associated cytokine IL-12β were reduced in TRAF6-∆DC lungs compared to control lungs, and the mRNA level of profibrogenic factor Igf-1 and the Th2-associated cytokines IL-13 and IL-5 also significantly increased in TRAF6-∆DC lungs. TRAF6-dependent signaling is essential to establish and/or maintain immune tolerance in the lungs and small intestine to prevent spontaneous Th2-associated hypersensitivity.

The TRAF6 signaling pathway is not the only pathway associated with DC maturation. Cytokine LIGHT is a type II transmembrane protein belonging to the TNF family that plays a role in inducing the maturation of dendritic cells. Interestingly, LIGHT-mediated DC maturation does not require TRAF6, since the knockdown of TRAF6 does not affect the LIGHT-induced upregulation of CD86 expression [66]. Therefore, other TRAF6-independent signaling pathways still exist in the maturation of DCs.

4.3.2. TRAF6 Is Essential for the Development of DC Subsets

For nearly two decades, TRAF6 has been shown to be essential for the development of multiple tissues and organs. Depending on the differential expression of the CD4⁺CD8α molecules, namely CD4⁺CD8α^-, CD4^-CD8α⁺, or CD4^-CD8α^- [67], DCs in the mouse spleen can be assigned to one of three distinct subgroups. Among the three DC subpopulations, CD4⁺ DCs predominate in the wild-type spleen, while the CD4⁺ DC population is almost completely absent in the TRAF6 knockout spleen. This phenotype is similar to knockout mice lacking the NF-κB subunit RelB, which is located downstream of TRAF6 activation, suggesting that the TRAF6-RelB signaling pathway may control the development of the CD4⁺ DC subpopulation in the spleen [62]. DCs in the adult thymus are mostly CD8α⁺CD11b⁻, but CD8α⁻CD11b⁺ DCs were abundantly present in the fetal thymus and they possessed antigen-presenting activity. Thymic CD11b⁺ DCs are dramatically reduced in TRAF6-deficient fetal thymus compared with the wild type. These results indicate that TRAF6 activation is required for the development of CD11b⁺ DCs in the fetal thymus [68].

4.4. Macrophages

Macrophages have been confirmed to participate in tissue development and inflammation in response to pathogenics, cancer, and organ transplantation. Accumulating evidence has identified the role of TRAF6 in macrophages in recent years on a large scale. For example, Mason et al. report that, compared to the wild-type, TRAF6-deficient mice fail to produce IL-12 when stimulated by the Toxoplasmagondii antigen (STAg). TRAF6-deficient macrophages are also unable to secrete IL-12 in response to STAg. Therefore, TRAF6-dependent activation is required for the production of IL-12 in macrophages in response to STAg [69]. Mannose-terminated lip arabinose (Man-LAMs) from M. tuberculosis inhibits LPS-induced IL-12 production in murine RAW264.7 macrophages by inhibiting IRAK-TRAF6 interaction, IκB-α phosphorylation, and the nuclear translocation of c-Rel and p50 [70]. Similarly, HLA-B-associated transcript 3 (BAT3), which is also known as Scythe or Bag6, inhibits the homooligomerization of TRAF6 as well as the interaction between TRAF6 and TAK1, thereby functioning as the negative regulator of LPS-induced macrophage activation. The inhibited TRAF6-mediated signaling by BAT3 may be related to the direct binding of BAT3 to TRAF6 and the subsequent blocked interaction with downstream signaling molecules, or it may be due to the presence of a third-factor-mediated BAT3-dependent inhibition of TRAF6 [71]. In addition, major vault protein (MVP), a major component of nuclear ribonucleoproteins, acts as an inhibitor of NF-κB signaling in macrophages. The worsening metabolic disorders caused by MVP deficiency are accompanied by an increase in macrophage infiltration and an increase in the inflammatory response in the microenvironment. In vitro studies have shown that MVP interacts with TRAF6, preventing its recruitment to IRAK1 and subsequent oligomerization and ubiquitination. The overexpression of MVP inhibits the activity of TRAF6 and macrophage inflammation [72].

The fact that Ubc13 is depleted in STAT3-deficient macrophages explains why STAT3 could inhibit the production of proinflammatory cytokines mediated by NF-κB signaling in innate immune cells. Specifically, STAT3 inhibits Ubc13 expression by direct transcriptional repression, thereby inhibiting TRAF6 K63-linked ubiquitination, NF-κB signaling, and RANKL- and LPS-responsive gene expression [73]. The abnormal cleavage of retinoic acid X receptor-alpha (RXRα) in tumor cells and tissues produces a truncated RXRα (tRXRα) with a tumorigenic effect, mainly due to its expression in bone marrow cells leading to IL-6 induction and STAT3 activation. Studies have revealed the broad interaction of tRXRα with TRAF6 in the cytoplasm of macrophages, leading to ubiquitination of TRAF6 and subsequent activation of the NF-κB inflammatory pathway [74]. STAT1 is also directly recruited into the TLR signaling pathway through interaction with TRAF6, leading to the activation of STAT1 residue 727 (S727) via phosphorylation, which mediates specific proinflammatory cytokine responses following TLR stimulation. Notably, compared to wild-type macrophages, macrophages produced by mice that replaced the S727 residue with alanine (STAT1 S727A mice) show a significant reduction in TNF-α protein production, but no decrease in IL-6 or the RANTES protein [75]. These studies demonstrate an increased incidence of crosstalk between the TLR/IL-1 and JAK/STAT signaling pathways, suggesting that differential activation of STAT family members may contribute to the TLR proinflammatory responses following pathogen challenge.

5. The Role of TRAF6 in Autoimmune Diseases

5.1. Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the expansion of synoviocytes and inflammatory immune cells that affects approximately 1-2% of the world’s population [76]. Although the etiology of RA is unclear, it is considered to occur in the presence of genetic predispositions and environmental factors [77, 78]. In recent years, the role of TRAF6 has been recognized in the pathogenesis of RA.

The increased expression of TRAF6 in RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA-FLS) is significantly associated with the severity of synovitis and the number of infiltrating inflammatory cells. Compared with osteoarthritis, multiple molecules involved in TLR signaling are upregulated in the FLS cells of RA patients, including TRAF6 [79]. The role of TRAF6 in RA-FLS contributes to the development of RA (Figure 5(a)). Infection with Gram-negative bacteria has been considered to be an initiator of rheumatoid arthritis. In RA-FLS, LPS regulates NF-κB and AP-1 activation by inducing the formation of the TLR4/MyD88/TRAF6/c-Src complex, leading to the induced high expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and immune cell infiltration of the synovium [80]. The expression levels of the NOD2 gene and protein were found to be significantly increased in RA-FLS. When the NOD2 gene expression was inhibited, the levels of TRAF6, IKK, and NF-κB were also decreased [81]. In IL-1β-stimulated human RA-FLS, the TRAF6 expression remained unchanged, but the K63-linked autoubiquitination of TRAF6 increased. When inhibiting the K63-mediated autoubiquitination, the binding of TRAF6 and TAK1 is inhibited, which abrogates IL-1β-induced IL-6 and IL-8 synthesis in RA-FLS. The autoubiquitination, but not expression, of TRAF6 is critical in IL-1β-induced RA signaling mechanisms [82]. Th17 cytokines, particularly IL-17, induce the upregulation of RANKL and osteoclast differentiation mediated by the Act1/TRAF6/NF-κB and AP-1 pathways [83]. Blocking the IL-17 and RANKL axis may be a potential new therapeutic target for bone destruction in RA. Additionally, neddylation, a process similar to ubiquitination, is critical in various ADs. In FLSs, TRAF6 neddylation might mediate RA responses by regulating NF-κB activation [84]. Targeting neddylation activation may be a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of RA.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5

An overview of TRAF6 in the pathogenesis of RA. (a) The role of TRAF6 in RA-FLS on the pathogenesis of RA. LPS regulates NF-κB and AP-1 activation by inducing TLR4/MyD88/TRAF6/c-Src, leading to the induced high expression of VCAM-1 and immune cell infiltration of the synovium. NOD2 protein activates TRAF6, IKK, and NF-κB, leading to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. In IL-1β-stimulated RA-FLS, the increased autoubiquitination of K63-linked TRAF6 enhances the binding of TRAF6 and TAK1 and induces IL-6 and IL-8 synthesis. IL-17 induces the upregulation of RANKL and osteoclast differentiation mediated by the Act1/TRAF6/NF-κB and AP-1 pathways. (b) IRE1α contributes to the development of inflammatory arthritis. In the early phase of TLR stimulation, the TRAF6-mediated K48-linked polyubiquitin chain leads to the degradation of the IRE1α protein, thereby inhibiting PP2A recruitment, phosphorylating the IRE1α protein, and positively regulating IRE1α activation. In the late phase of stimulation, TRAF6 destroys the IRE1α protein to terminate signal transduction. (c) IFN-γ production by T cell accelerates TRAF6 proteolysis, resulting in the strong inhibition of RANKL-induced NF-κB and JNK activation, and finally inhibiting osteoclastogenesis.

The abnormal expression of TRAF6 in a variety of immune cells is associated with the pathogenesis of RA. In RA, macrophages are major sources of inflammatory mediators. The synovial TRAF6 expression level in RA positively correlated with synovitis severity and macrophage density [85]. Macrophages produce inflammatory cytokines by TLR-mediated signaling during RA. Inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) activation is significantly increased in the macrophages from the synovial fluid of RA patients (Figure 5(b)). Additionally, mice with bone myeloid loss due to the IRE1α gene are also protected from inflammatory arthritis. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a phosphatase that inhibits IRE1α phosphorylation. Further analysis reveals that at the early phase of TLR stimulation, TRAF6-mediated polyubiquitination appears to positively regulate IRE1α activation by suppressing PP2A recruitment and IRE1α protein degradation. In the late phase of stimulation, TRAF6 destroys the IRE1α protein to terminate signal transduction [86]. Activated T cells promote osteoclastogenesis and regulate bone loss in RA through RANKL expression [87]. However, T cell production by IFN-γ strongly inhibits osteoclastogenesis by interfering with the RANKL-RANK signaling pathway (Figure 5(c)). This is because IFN-γ accelerates TRAF6 proteolysis by participating in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, resulting in the strong inhibition of the activation of RANKL-induced transcription factor NF-κB and JNK [15]. The proteins of the RANK/RANKL pathway expressed by neutrophils mediate important functions of neutrophils during the abnormal immune response and bone remodeling in RA, including RANKL, OPG, and RANK. Unexpectedly, healthy and inflammatory neutrophils continue to express TRAF6, which is not a limiting factor for RANK-mediated neutrophil function [88]. In addition, the expression of miR-146a is increased in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of RA patients, but the two targets of miR-146a, TRAF6 and IRAK1, express similar levels between RA patients and control individuals [89]. However, the RNA level of miR-146a was decreased in RA tissues [90]. Recently, new studies have found that iguratimod treatment increases miR-146a while reducing cell proliferation and IRAK1 and TRAF6/JNK1 pathways in RA-FLS in a dose-dependent manner. Iguratimod can improve the progression of RA by regulating the expression of IRAK1 mediated by the miR-146a and TRAF6/JNK1 pathway [91]. In addition to miR-146a, miR-146b can promote the expression of TRAF6 and activate NF-κB signaling [92]. miR-345-3p suppressed the activation of the TAK1/p38/NF-κB pathway by targeting TRAF6, and the overexpression of TRAF6 eliminates the biological function of miR-345-3p [93]. miR-125b-5p directly binds to the 3UTR of TRAF6 mRNA in human osteoarthritic (OA) chondrocytes, and negatively regulates the TRAF6/MAPKs/NF-κB pathway [94]. These findings indicate that targeting miR-146a, miR-146b, miR-345-3p, and miR-125b-5p can be potential treatment strategies for RA. More importantly, TRAF6 can be a potential promising target for RA treatment.

Taken together, TRAF6 is a critical mediator in the inflammatory pathway and activity of osteoclasts. We believe that the pathologic role of TRAF6 in RA is not limited to a certain type of immune cell. Rather, the overall RA pathology can be demonstrated to result from the combined action of TRAF6 on multiple cell types including macrophages, Th17 cells, and synoviocytes.

5.2. Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Some studies have shown that decreased miR-146a could upregulate TRAF6 and further contribute to the pathogenesis of LN. TRAF6 is a direct target of miR-146a in kidney tissue. miR-146a rs2910164 interfered with the production of mature miR-146a, thereby promoting the expression of TRAF6 [95]. The expression of miR-146a is significantly decreased in the renal tissues of patients with LN, while the expression of TRAF6 is elevated. The upregulation of miR-146a or downregulation of TRAF6 can significantly inhibit the NF-κB transcriptional activity of glomerular mesangial cells and inhibit inflammatory factor synthesis, such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, as well as reduce the chemotactic effects of phagocytes [96]. In addition, compared with healthy controls, LN patients have decreased miR-146a in PBMC, while TRAF6 expression increased. TRAF6 is positively correlated with serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α activities. miR-146a reduction and TRAF6 upregulation increase the likelihood of the progression and recurrence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within one year [97]. Interestingly, miR-146a is enriched in urinary exosomes in patients with LN [98]. Because urine is a potential liquid biopsy medium for patients, the risk of LN is associated with miR-146a, which may be a biomarker and therapeutic target for predicting LN in SLE patients. In addition, circulating miR-203 expression was downregulated in active LN patients. The overexpression of miR-203 inhibited the activation of IL-β, IL-6, and TNF-α induced by TRAF6 in human mesangial cells (HRMC) and the human renal tubular epithelial cell line (HK-2) [99]. A reduction in circulating miR-203 is a candidate diagnostic biomarker for active LN in humans. Nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1), a novel lncRNA, accelerated renal mesangial cell injury by directly targeting miR-146b, promoting the expression of TRAF6, and activating the NF-κB signaling in lupus nephritis [92]. This indicates the role of the NEAT1/miR-146b/TRAF6 axis in the pathogenesis of LN. miR-146b may also be a potential therapeutic target for LN.

In addition to the regulatory mechanism of miR-146a on TRAF6, the TLR signaling mechanism is involved in the pathogenesis of LN. (E)-2-(2-Chlorostyryl)-3,5,6-trimethylpyrazine (CSTMP) is a useful agent for the treatment of LN due to the inhibition of the TLR4/MyD88/TAK1/TRAF6/IRAK1 pathway [100]. TANK is a negative regulator of TLR signaling. In TANK-/- macrophages, the TLR-induced polyubiquitination of TRAF6 is upregulated; meanwhile, classical NF-κB activation is also elevated. In addition, TANK-/- mice spontaneously develop lupus autoimmune nephritis. TANK inhibits TLR signaling by controlling TRAF6 ubiquitination, which is involved in the development of LN [101].

5.3. Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common inflammatory autoimmune disease that affects the function of the central nervous system (CNS), for which the most common experimental model is experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Nlrc3-/- mice exhibit worsening EAE, because NLRC3 reduces the K63-linked TRAF6 ubiquitination in CD4⁺ T cells to limit NF-κB activation [46]. The binding of TRAF3 to IL-17R interferes with the formation of the receptor signaling activation complex IL-17R-Act1-TRAF6. This complex significantly inhibits the IL-17-induced expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokine genes. In contrast, the disruption of this complex leads to the development of EAE [102]. Histone 3 Lys27 trimethyl transferase Ezh2 promotes the ubiquitination of Lys48-linked and the degradation of TRAF6. The deletion of Ezh2 reduces the activation of macrophages and microglia, attenuating the autoimmune inflammation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [103]. Additionally, both MHCII-CD40-TRAF2/3/5-/- and MHCII-CD40-TRAF6-/- mice (CD40-deficient mice expressing a chimeric CD40 transgene with mutations at the TRAF2/3/5 or TRAF6 binding site, respectively, under the control of the MHCII promotor) show a reduction in clinical signs of EAE and prevent demyelination. However, only MHCII-CD40-TRAF6-/-mice show a decrease in myeloid and lymphoid cell infiltration into the CNS, accompanied by a decrease in TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ levels [104]. Therefore, blocking the CD40-TRAF6 interaction may be a promising treatment for MS.

5.4. Other Autoimmune Diseases

The pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases is related to the regulation of TRAF6 by miR-146a. The pathogenesis of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is associated with the complex regulation of miR-146a and TRAF6. The expression level of miR-146a in GO eyelid adipose tissue is significantly higher than that in non-GO tissues [105]. The relative expression of miR-146a in the plasma of GO patients is significantly increased. The overexpression of miR-146a significantly promotes the viability and mitosis of orbital fibroblasts [106]. miR-146a inhibits orbital fibrosis and reduces the expression of TRAF6 by inhibiting the TGF-β signaling pathway in orbital fibroblasts [105]. However, the circulating miR-146a of GO patients is reduced [107]. This opposite result still needs further clarification. Silencing miR-146a in B cells effectively ameliorates the clinical myasthenic symptoms in mice with ongoing experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Interestingly, miR-146a inhibition has no effect on the expression of TRAF6 and IRAK1 in B cells. This result indicates that the function of miR-146a in B cells does not involve TRAF6 and IRAK1 [108]. In addition, the miR-146a and TRAF6 genes are significantly overexpressed in the PMBCs of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome, while the expression of the IRAK1 gene is significantly reduced. Since IRAK1 is considered to be a key gene in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus, the pathogenesis of the two diseases is different [109]. TRAF6 may be a specific biomarker for Sjögren’s syndrome.

In addition, the conditional deletion of TRAF6 expression in murine thymic epithelial cells (TRAF6-ΔTEC mice) results in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) [110]. In TRAF6-ΔT mice, the loss of TRAF6 is closely related to autoimmune sialadenitis via the activation of the inflammation-induced chemokine-chemokine receptor system, such as Th1 cell attractant chemokine CCL2 and its cognate receptor CCR2 or Th17 cell attractant chemokine CCL20 and its cognate receptor CCR6. Therefore, TRAF6-ΔT mice can be an effective model of autoimmune sialadenitis [111]. In macrophages, IRAK1 interacts with TRAF6, which promotes the pathogenesis of SLE by enhancing NF-κB signaling and proinflammatory cytokine production. Inhibition of the activity of the IRAK1-TRAF6-NF-κB pathway ameliorates SLE by attenuating macrophage activity and reducing the overproduction of macrophage inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α [112]. B cells are considered to be a key component leading to the complex pathophysiology of SLE. TRAF6 is significantly overexpressed in the peripheral B cells of SLE patients, and TRAF6 can be used as a biomarker for estimating disease in peripheral B cells [113]. The B cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats (BANK1) has been genetically associated with SLE and other autoimmune diseases. Georg et al. found that in mouse splenic B cells, BANK1 colocalizes with TLR7 and TLR9 and has five functional TRAF6 binding motifs that interact with TRAF6. The C-terminal domain of BANK1-full-length and the N-terminal domain of the BANK1-Delta2 are necessary for this binding [114]. These findings suggest that the different binding ability of BANK1 variants to TRAF6 is related to the risk of developing SLE. A chimeric protein vaccine composed of the cholera toxin B subunit fused to proinsulin (CTB-INS) is shown to suppress type 1 diabetes (T1D) onset in NOD mice and upregulate the biosynthesis of the tryptophan catabolic enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1) in DCs. When TRAF2, TRAF3, and TRAF6 blocking peptides are added to vaccinated DCs, IDO1 biosynthesis is inhibited. The CTB-INS vaccine uses a TNFR-dependent signaling pathway resulting in the suppression of dendritic cell-mediated T1D autoimmunity [115].

5.5. TRAF6 as a Therapeutic Target of ADs

Here, we summarize the important role of TRAF6 in immunity and autoimmune diseases. Given the critical role of TRAF6 in DC activation and survival, Treg cell production, and Th17 differentiation, TRAF6 is a suitable therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. In fact, there have been many attempts to treat autoimmune diseases with TRAF6 as a target. The transfection of lentiviral-TRAF6-shRNA inhibits the expression of TRAF6 in RA-FLS, resulting in decreased proinflammatory cytokines and MMPs such as IL-1β, IL-8, IL-6, TNF-α, MMP-13, and MMP-3 [116]. In vivo, the inhibition of TRAF6 using mice-specific TRAF6 siRNA inhibit serum anti-collagen II antibodies, MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9, thereby reducing the severity of arthritis and joint inflammation. In vitro, the level of MMP produced by IL-lβ-stimulated human RA-FLS is reduced by anti-TRAF6 monoclonal antibodies, significantly inhibiting the migration and invasion of RA-FLS [117]. After TNF inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, osteoclast differentiation and activity as well as TRAF6 expression are decreased in RA patients by directly reducing the number of osteoclast precursors and inhibiting the intracellular signaling pathway of TRAF6 [118]. This evidence suggests that reducing the expression of TRAF6 may be a useful strategy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Blocking the interaction of TRAF6 with its upstream or downstream molecules is also an effective treatment strategy for autoimmune diseases. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a potent anti-inflammatory molecule, inhibits TRAF6-associated K63 autoubiquitination to block the binding of TRAF6 and TAK1 and reduces the polyubiquitination of TAK1 phosphorylation and K48 linkages, thereby inhibiting RA symptoms in rats [82]. In preclinical in vivo mouse models, C25-140, an inhibitor of the TRAF6-Ubc13 interaction, can reduce NF-κB activation, improving the disease outcomes for autoimmune psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis [119]. The CD40-TRAF6-interacting small molecule inhibitor (SMI) not only reduces the transendothelial migration capacity of monocytes but also reduces central nervous system- (CNS-) infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages during neuroinflammation. In addition, SMI reduces the severity of EAE symptoms in rats but not in mice. This suggests that the inhibition of the CD40-TRAF6 pathway may represent a beneficial therapeutic strategy to reduce monocyte recruitment and macrophage activation in the CNS, but may not be sufficient to completely prevent the clinical symptoms of EAE. SMI has the potential to act as a combination therapy against MS [120].

6. The Role of TRAF6 in Cancer

Multiple studies have found that TRAF6 expression is increased in a variety of tumor tissues compared to normal tissues. A total of 193 cancers (59.6%) are identified to have high TRAF6 expression [121], including uterine fibroids [122], glioma [123], pancreatic cancer [124], breast cancer [125], glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [126], colorectal cancer [127], and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) [128].

TRAF6 is related to the proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis of tumor cells. When it is overexpressed, it can endow cells with at least three of the known hallmarks of cancer, including maintaining proliferation signals, resisting cell death, and inducing angiogenesis. Fifty-three of 90 gastric cancers (58.9%) were found to overexpress TRAF6 [129]. The inhibition of TRAF6 in BGC-823 gastric cancer cells, multiple myeloma cells, and human glioma cell lines can reduce proliferation, invasion, and migration and promote apoptosis, while the overexpression of TRAF6 shows the opposite effect [123, 129, 130]. Similarly, the inhibition of TRAF6 can inhibit the migration and invasion of human lung cancer SPC-A1 cells, MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines, SCCHN cells, and GBM cells and promote their apoptosis [125, 126, 128, 131]. In addition, the downregulation of TRAF6 can destroy the tumorigenicity of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [124].

High expression of TRAF6 is associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Han et al. found that the expression of TRAF6 is significantly positively correlated with late N, the pathological stage, and a poor prognosis [129]. High TRAF6 expression leads to poor prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and promotes lymphatic metastasis [128]. The survival rate of colorectal cancer patients with high expression of TRAF6 is poor [127]. Moreover, TRAF6 has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for GBM [126]. In addition, cancer cachexia is considered as a side effect of cancer. Bilir et al. first showed that patients with cancer cachexia have elevated levels of TRAF6, which is closely related to overall survival [132].

The abnormal expression of TRAF6 in immune cells plays an important role in the antitumor response. The antitumor efficacy of Th9 is related to the upregulation of TRAF6 expression. TRAF6-/- Th9 cells have lower frequencies and decreased proliferation, and the insufficient persistence of TRAF6-/- Th9 cells also nullified their antitumor ability. This effect appears to apply only to Th9 cells because the antitumor function was similar between wild-type Th17 and TRAF6-/- Th17 cells in vivo [133]. In addition, TRAF6-deficient Tregs are dysfunctional in vivo. Mice with the Treg-restricted deletion of TRAF6 are resistant to implanted tumors and display enhanced antitumor immunity [134]. Similarly, the TRAF6 inhibitor decreases the population of intratumor Tregs by impeding the migration of Tregs towards the tumor, thus enhancing T cell-mediated antitumor immunity and thereby inhibiting the growth of Hepa1-6 tumor in immunocompetent mice, but not in immunodeficient mice [135]. In view of the dynamic interaction between cancer cells and the microenvironment, it is important to consider how the expression of TRAF6 in immune cells affects cancer progression.

The TRAF6 protein can be used as a drug target protein for cancer differentiation therapy. Through virtual screening, Chen et al. propose that the TCM compounds diiodotyrosine and saussureamine C may be potential candidate compounds as TRAF6 protein anticancer drugs [136]. A combined treatment of ionizing radiation (IR) with a proteasome inhibitor (MG132) shows synergistic cell-killing effects and induces endoplasmic reticulum stress in human pancreatic cancer cells, which results from the increased autophagy induction through the inhibition of TRAF6 [137]. In addition, TRAF6 has a carcinogenic role in the development of human oral cancer cells, and bortezomib and IR treatment can inhibit the growth of oral tumors. Bortezomib reduces the expression of TRAF6 protein through autophagy-mediated lysosomal degradation. Bortezomib also inhibits the IR-induced TRAF6 ubiquitination and TRAF6-mediated Akt activation. Therefore, the combination of proteasome inhibitors, IR therapy, and TRAF6 inhibition may be a new therapeutic strategy in oral squamous cell carcinoma [138]. Bortezomib induces apoptosis in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia through the autophagy-mediated degradation of the TRAF6 protein [139]. Rigosertib, a multikinase inhibitor, has selective cytotoxicity to diffuse large B cell lymphoma, which is related to its ability to reduce the expression of unmodified and sulfonated TRAF6 and inhibit the nuclear entry of TRAF6 [140]. Cinchonine, a member of the Cinchona alkaloid family, could complex with the RING domain of TRAF6, leading to the disruption of the binding with its natural ligand, the Ubc13 protein, thereby inhibiting the AKT and TAK1 signaling pathways and inducing the apoptosis of cancer cells [141]. Qian et al. switched the RING domain mutations of TRAF6 to the corresponding sequences in the rest of the TRAF family members, which all showed defects in their interaction with Ubc13, and confirmed that these substitutions could underlie the failure of these TRAFs to interact with Ubc13. The RING of TRAF6 does not function alone, but functions together with the neighboring sequences in TRAF6, including the residues preceding the RING, and the first zinc finger plays a structural role [142]. These findings indicate that the interaction of TRAF6 with Ubc13 is specific for TRAF6, but not for the other members of the TRAF family, highlighting the unique critical biological roles of TRAF6 in multiple signaling pathways. Therefore, the RING domain of TRAF6 can be regarded as a potential antitumor target. Doxorubicin is one of the most effective molecules used to treat various tumors. Interestingly, doxorubicin-mediated cell death is particularly dependent on TRAF6, and the TRAF6 binding peptide protects the doxorubicin-mediated late induction of NF-κB and cell death [143]. In short, TRAF6 may represent a new cancer prognostic biomarker or potential therapeutic target.

7. Conclusion

In this review, we mainly discuss the role of TRAF6 in immune cells and its relationship to the development of certain autoimmune diseases and cancer. Although TRAF6 plays an indispensable role in regulating the development, homeostasis, and activation of immune cells, the excessive activation of immune cells may be a cause for the development of autoimmune diseases. How to balance the relationship between the activation of immune cells and autoimmune diseases is a problem that needs to be further explored. In fact, in addition to autoimmune diseases and cancer, TRAF6 is also involved in the pathogenesis of other diseases, including cardiovascular diseases [144] and central nervous system diseases [145]. Our progress in understanding the regulation of immune responses by TRAF6 will prompt us to develop new therapeutic strategies. Drugs can be developed to target the RING domain or TRAF domain of TRAF6 to modulate the activity of E3 ubiquitin ligase of TRAF6 and protein to protein interactions. In the future, we hope to have a more comprehensive understanding of TRAF6 and further facilitate the use of TRAF6 as an effective therapeutic target for multiple diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no financial or other conflicts of interest.

References

H. Wu and J. R. Arron, “TRAF6, a molecular bridge spanning adaptive immunity, innate immunity and osteoimmunology,” Bioessays, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1096–1105, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Cao, J. Xiong, M. Takeuchi, T. Kurama, and D. V. Goeddel, “TRAF6 is a signal transducer for interleukin-1,” Nature, vol. 383, no. 6599, pp. 443–446, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Deng, C. Wang, E. Spencer et al., “Activation of the IkappaB kinase complex by TRAF6 requires a dimeric ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme complex and a unique polyubiquitin chain,” Cell, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 351–361, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Lomaga, W. C. Yeh, I. Sarosi et al., “TRAF6 deficiency results in osteopetrosis and defective interleukin-1, CD40, and LPS signaling,” Genes & Development, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1015–1024, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Lomaga, J. T. Henderson, A. J. Elia et al., “Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) deficiency results in exencephaly and is required for apoptosis within the developing CNS,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. 7384–7393, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Naito, H. Yoshida, E. Nishioka et al., “TRAF6-deficient mice display hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 13, pp. 8766–8771, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ogino, M. Kasai, F. Kajiura, M. Matsumoto, and J.-i. Inoue, “Dependence of self-tolerance on TRAF6-directed development of thymic stroma,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5719, pp. 248–251, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Walsh, J. Lee, and Y. Choi, “Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) regulation of development, function, and homeostasis of the immune system,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 266, no. 1, pp. 72–92, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wahren-Herlenius and T. Dorner, “Immunopathogenic mechanisms of systemic autoimmune disease,” The Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9894, pp. 819–831, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shoenfeld, C. Selmi, E. Zimlichman, and M. E. Gershwin, “The autoimmunologist: geoepidemiology, a new center of gravity, and prime time for autoimmunity,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 325–330, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Cho and P. K. Gregersen, “Genomics and the multifactorial nature of human autoimmune disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 17, pp. 1612–1623, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Marrack, J. Kappler, and B. L. Kotzin, “Autoimmune disease: why and where it occurs,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 899–905, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Ballestar, “Epigenetic alterations in autoimmune rheumatic diseases,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 263–271, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Kasumba and N. Grandvaux, “Therapeutic targeting of RIG-I and MDA5 might not lead to the same Rome,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 116–127, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Takayanagi, K. Ogasawara, S. Hida et al., “T-cell-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis by signalling cross-talk between RANKL and IFN-gamma,” Nature, vol. 408, no. 6812, pp. 600–605, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Bradley and J. S. Pober, “Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs),” Oncogene, vol. 20, no. 44, pp. 6482–6491, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Deshaies and C. A. Joazeiro, “RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 399–434, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Park, “Structure of TRAF family: current understanding of receptor recognition,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Kim, J. Y. Choi, E. A. Bhat et al., “Crystal structure of TRAF1 TRAF domain and its implications in the TRAF1-mediated intracellular signaling pathway,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 25526, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Lee and S. Y. Lee, “Modulation of life and death by the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs),” Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ye, J. R. Arron, B. Lamothe et al., “Distinct molecular mechanism for initiating TRAF6 signalling,” Nature, vol. 418, no. 6896, pp. 443–447, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Arron, M. Vologodskaia, B. R. Wong et al., “A positive regulatory role for Cbl family proteins in tumor necrosis factor-related activation-induced cytokine (trance) and CD40L-mediated Akt activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 32, pp. 30011–30017, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yu, H. Yi, C. Guo et al., “Pattern recognition scavenger receptor CD204 attenuates Toll-like receptor 4-induced NF-kappaB activation by directly inhibiting ubiquitination of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 6,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 21, pp. 18795–18806, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Xie, “TRAF molecules in cell signaling and in human diseases,” Journal of Molecular Signaling, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 7, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, E. Elmira, S. Rohondia, J. Wang, J. Liu, and Q. P. Dou, “A patent review of the ubiquitin ligase system: 2015-2018,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 919–937, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ohtake, Y. Saeki, S. Ishido, J. Kanno, and K. Tanaka, “The K48-K63 branched ubiquitin chain regulates NF-κB signaling,” Molecular Cell, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 251–266, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. W. Zeng, L. X. Liao, H. N. Lv et al., “Natural small molecule FMHM inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response by promoting TRAF6 degradation via K48-linked polyubiquitination,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, article 14715, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Dainichi, R. Matsumoto, A. Mostafa, and K. Kabashima, “Immune control by TRAF6-mediated pathways of epithelial cells in the EIME (epithelial immune microenvironment),” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ishida, S. Mizushima, S. Azuma et al., “Identification of TRAF6, a novel tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor protein that mediates signaling from an amino-terminal domain of the CD40 cytoplasmic region,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 46, pp. 28745–28748, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Wong, R. Josien, S. Y. Lee, M. Vologodskaia, R. M. Steinman, and Y. Choi, “The TRAF family of signal transducers mediates NF-κB activation by the TRANCE receptor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 43, pp. 28355–28359, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qian, C. Liu, J. Hartupee et al., “The adaptor Act1 is required for interleukin 17-dependent signaling associated with autoimmune and inflammatory disease,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 247–256, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Thome and J. Tschopp, “TCR-induced NF-kappaB activation: a crucial role for Carma1, Bcl10 and MALT1,” Trends in immunology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 419–424, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Cohen, “The TLR and IL-1 signalling network at a glance,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 127, no. 11, pp. 2383–2390, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawasaki and T. Kawai, “Toll-like receptor signaling pathways,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Häcker, V. Redecke, B. Blagoev et al., “Specificity in Toll-like receptor signalling through distinct effector functions of TRAF3 and TRAF6,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7073, pp. 204–207, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawai and S. Akira, “Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity,” Immunity, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 637–650, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Ea, L. Sun, J. Inoue, and Z. J. Chen, “TIFA activates IkappaB kinase (IKK) by promoting oligomerization and ubiquitination of TRAF6,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 43, pp. 15318–15323, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Yang, J. Zhu, S. Sun et al., “The coiled-coil domain of TRAF6 is essential for its auto-ubiquitination,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 432–439, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Conze, C. J. Wu, J. A. Thomas, A. Landstrom, and J. D. Ashwell, “Lys63-linked polyubiquitination of IRAK-1 is required for interleukin-1 receptor- and toll-like receptor-mediated NF-kappaB activation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 3538–3547, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. P. Xia, L. Sun, X. Chen et al., “Direct activation of protein kinases by unanchored polyubiquitin chains,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7260, pp. 114–119, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chariot, “The NF-κB-independent functions of IKK subunits in immunity and cancer,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 404–413, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Mu, S. K. Gudey, and M. Landstrom, “Non-Smad signaling pathways,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 347, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Deregibus, S. Buttiglieri, S. Russo, B. Bussolati, and G. Camussi, “CD40-dependent activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway mediates endothelial cell survival and in vitro angiogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 20, pp. 18008–18014, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Wong, D. Besser, N. Kim et al., “TRANCE, a TNF family member, activates Akt/PKB through a signaling complex involving TRAF6 and c-Src,” Molecular Cell, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1041–1049, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. King, T. Kobayashi, P. J. Cejas et al., “TRAF6 is a T cell-intrinsic negative regulator required for the maintenance of immune homeostasis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1088–1092, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Uchimura, Y. Oyama, M. Deng et al., “The innate immune sensor NLRC3 acts as a rheostat that fine-tunes T cell responses in infection and autoimmunity,” Immunity, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1049–1061.e6, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xiao, S. Balasubramanian, W. Liu et al., “OX40 signaling favors the induction of TH9 cells and airway inflammation,” Nature Immunology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 981–990, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Cejas, M. C. Walsh, E. L. Pearce et al., “TRAF6 inhibits Th17 differentiation and TGF-beta-mediated suppression of IL-2,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 23, pp. 4750–4757, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shimo, H. Yanai, D. Ohshima et al., “TRAF6 directs commitment to regulatory T cells in thymocytes,” Genes to Cells, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 437–447, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Muto, H. Kotani, T. Kondo et al., “TRAF6 is essential for maintenance of regulatory T cells that suppress Th2 type autoimmunity,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, article e74639, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Pearce, M. C. Walsh, P. J. Cejas et al., “Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7251, pp. 103–107, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Walsh, E. L. Pearce, P. J. Cejas, J. Lee, L. S. Wang, and Y. Choi, “IL-18 synergizes with IL-7 to drive slow proliferation of naive CD8 T cells by costimulating self-peptide-mediated TCR signals,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 193, no. 8, pp. 3992–4001, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. Jalukar, B. S. Hostager, and G. A. Bishop, “Characterization of the roles of TNF receptor-associated factor 6 in CD40-mediated B lymphocyte effector functions,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 623–630, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Manning, S. S. Pullen, D. J. Souza, M. Kehry, and R. J. Noelle, “Cellular responses to murine CD40 in a mouse B cell line may be TRAF dependent or independent,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ahonen, E. Manning, L. D. Erickson et al., “The CD40-TRAF6 axis controls affinity maturation and the generation of long-lived plasma cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 451–456, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. V. Pham, H. J. Zhou, Y. C. Lin-Lee et al., “Nuclear tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 in lymphoid cells negatively regulates c-Myb-mediated transactivation through small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 modification,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 8, pp. 5081–5089, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kobayashi, T. S. Kim, A. Jacob et al., “TRAF6 is required for generation of the B-1a B cell compartment as well as T cell-dependent and -independent humoral immune responses,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 3, article e4736, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Luftig, E. Prinarakis, T. Yasui et al., “Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 activation of NF-kappaB through IRAK1 and TRAF6,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 26, pp. 15595–15600, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wu, H. Nakano, and Z. Wu, “The C-terminal activating region 2 of the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 activates NF-kappaB through TRAF6 and TAK1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 4, pp. 2162–2169, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Arcipowski, L. L. Stunz, J. P. Graham, Z. J. Kraus, T. J. Vanden Bush, and G. A. Bishop, “Molecular mechanisms of TNFR-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) utilization by the oncogenic viral mimic of CD40, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 12, pp. 9948–9955, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Arcipowski, L. L. Stunz, and G. A. Bishop, “TRAF6 is a critical regulator of LMP1 functions in vivo,” International Immunology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 149–158, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kobayashi, P. T. Walsh, M. C. Walsh et al., “TRAF6 is a critical factor for dendritic cell maturation and development,” Immunity, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 353–363, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sun, M. Walsh, A. V. Villarino et al., “TLR ligands can activate dendritic cells to provide a MyD88-dependent negative signal for Th2 cell development,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 742–751, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Han, M. C. Walsh, P. J. Cejas et al., “Dendritic cell expression of the signaling molecule TRAF6 is critical for gut microbiota-dependent immune tolerance,” Immunity, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1211–1222, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Han, M. C. Walsh, K. S. Kim et al., “Dendritic cell expression of the signaling molecule TRAF6 is required for immune tolerance in the lung,” International Immunology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 71–78, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Zou, W. Y. Hu, and W. Wu, “TNF family molecule LIGHT regulates chemokine CCL27 expression on mouse embryonic stem cell-derived dendritic cells through NF-kappaB activation,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 87–92, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Shortman and Y. J. Liu, “Mouse and human dendritic cell subtypes,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 151–161, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ito, E. Esashi, T. Akiyama, J. Inoue, and A. Miyajima, “IL-18 produced by thymic epithelial cells induces development of dendritic cells with CD11b in the fetal thymus,” International Immunology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1253–1263, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Mason, J. Fiore, T. Kobayashi, K. S. Masek, Y. Choi, and C. A. Hunter, “TRAF6-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase activation differentially regulates the production of interleukin-12 by macrophages in response to Toxoplasma gondii,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 5662–5667, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Pathak, S. Basu, A. Bhattacharyya, S. Pathak, M. Kundu, and J. Basu, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lipoarabinomannan-mediated IRAK-M Induction Negatively Regulates Toll-like Receptor-dependent Interleukin-12 p40 Production in Macrophages,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 52, pp. 42794–42800, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lee, I. Y. Lee, H. J. Yun et al., “BAT3 negatively regulates lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-κB signaling through TRAF6,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 478, no. 2, pp. 784–790, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ben, B. Jiang, D. Wang et al., “Major vault protein suppresses obesity and atherosclerosis through inhibiting IKK–NF-κB signaling mediated inflammation,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1801, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, H. Hu, N. Greeley et al., “STAT3 restrains RANK- and TLR4-mediated signalling by suppressing expression of the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc13,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 5798, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ye, H. Wu, L. Sheng et al., “Oncogenic potential of truncated RXRα during colitis-associated colorectal tumorigenesis by promoting IL-6-STAT3 signaling,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1463, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Luu, C. J. Greenhill, A. Majoros, T. Decker, B. J. Jenkins, and A. Mansell, “STAT1 plays a role in TLR signal transduction and inflammatory responses,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 761–769, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Vande Walle, N. van Opdenbosch, P. Jacques et al., “Negative regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by A20 protects against arthritis,” Nature, vol. 512, no. 7512, pp. 69–73, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Sparks and K. H. Costenbader, “Rheumatoid arthritis in 2017: protective dietary and hormonal factors brought to light,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 71-72, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Haj Hensvold, P. K. Magnusson, V. Joshua et al., “Environmental and genetic factors in the development of anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis: an epidemiological investigation in twins,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 375–380, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Arranz, I. Gutiérrez-Cañas, M. Carrión et al., “VIP reverses the expression profiling of TLR4-stimulated signaling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 3065–3073, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. L. Chi, Y. C. Chuang, Y. W. Chen, C. C. Lin, L. D. Hsiao, and C. M. Yang, “The CO donor CORM-2 inhibits LPS-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression and leukocyte adhesion in human rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 171, no. 12, pp. 2993–3009, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. W. Kim, Y. J. Kwon, B. W. Park, J. J. Song, Y. B. Park, and M. C. Park, “Differential expressions of NOD-like receptors and their associations with inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 630–637, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. K. Singh, S. Umar, S. Riegsecker, M. Chourasia, and S. Ahmed, “Regulation of transforming growth factor β-Activated kinase activation by epigallocatechin-3-gallate in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts: suppression of K63-Linked autoubiquitination of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 347–358, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. W. Kim, H. R. Kim, B. M. Kim, M. L. Cho, and S. H. Lee, “Th17 cytokines regulate osteoclastogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 185, no. 11, pp. 3011–3024, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Liu, K. Chen, Q. Zhang et al., “TRAF6 neddylation drives inflammatory arthritis by increasing NF-κB activation,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 528–538, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-J. Zhu, L. Dai, D.-H. Zheng et al., “Upregulation of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 correlated with synovitis severity in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 14, no. 3, article R133, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Qiu, Z. Zheng, L. Chang et al., “Toll-like receptor-mediated IRE1α activation as a therapeutic target for inflammatory arthritis,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 32, no. 18, pp. 2477–2490, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-Y. Kong, H. Yoshida, I. Sarosi et al., “OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis,” Nature, vol. 397, no. 6717, pp. 315–323, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. E. Poubelle, A. Chakravarti, M. J. Fernandes, K. Doiron, and A. A. Marceau, “Differential expression of RANK, RANK-L, and osteoprotegerin by synovial fluid neutrophils from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and by healthy human blood neutrophils,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 9, no. 2, article R25, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Pauley, M. Satoh, A. L. Chan, M. R. Bubb, W. H. Reeves, and E. K. Chan, “Upregulated miR-146a expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 10, no. 4, article R101, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhao, B. Chen, X. Peng et al., “Quercetin suppresses migration and invasion by targeting miR-146a/GATA6 axis in fibroblast-like synoviocytes of rheumatoid arthritis,” Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 221–227, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kong, J. Gao, L. Ji, Y. Peng, J. Zhang, and D. Zhao, “Iguratimod ameliorates rheumatoid arthritis progression through regulating miR-146a mediated IRAK1 expression and TRAF6/JNK1 pathway: an in vivo and in vitro study,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
L. H. Zhang, B. Xiao, M. Zhong et al., “LncRNA NEAT1 accelerates renal mesangial cell injury via modulating the miR-146b/TRAF6/NF-κB axis in lupus nephritis,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 382, no. 3, pp. 627–638, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wei, Y. Tu, L. Zuo et al., “MiR-345-3p attenuates apoptosis and inflammation caused by oxidized low-density lipoprotein by targeting TRAF6 via TAK1/p38/NF-kB signaling in endothelial cells,” Life Sciences, vol. 241, article 117142, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Rasheed, N. Rasheed, W. A. Abdulmonem, and M. I. Khan, “MicroRNA-125b-5p regulates IL-1β induced inflammatory genes via targeting TRAF6-mediated MAPKs and NF-κB signaling in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 6882, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wu, J. Wang, and F. Li, “Dysregulation of miRNA-146a contributes to the development of lupus nephritis via targeting of TRAF6,” Personalized Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Z. Zheng, Y. B. Shu, Y. L. Luo, and J. Luo, “The role of miR-146a in modulating TRAF6-induced inflammation during lupus nephritis,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1041–1048, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhu, Z. Xue, and L. Di, “Regulation of MiR-146a and TRAF6 in the diagnose of lupus nephritis,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 23, pp. 2550–2557, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Z. Chen, X. D. Zhang, Y. Chen, and Y. B. Wu, “The role of circulating miR-146a in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F,” Medicine, vol. 96, no. 20, article e6775, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang and X. Zhang, “Downregulated miR-203 attenuates IL-β, IL-6, and TNF-α activation in TRAF6-treated human renal mesangial and tubular epithelial cells,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 324–331, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Ding, W. Liao, X. He, W. Xiang, and Q. Lu, “CSTMP exerts anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-induced human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells by inhibiting TLR4-mediated NF-κB pathways,” Inflammation, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 849–859, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawagoe, O. Takeuchi, Y. Takabatake et al., “TANK is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling and is critical for the prevention of autoimmune nephritis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 965–972, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhu, W. Pan, P. Shi et al., “Modulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through TRAF3-mediated suppression of interleukin 17 receptor signaling,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 12, pp. 2647–2662, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Yuan et al., “Macrophage/microglial Ezh2 facilitates autoimmune inflammation through inhibition of Socs3,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 215, no. 5, pp. 1365–1382, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. B. M. Aarts, T. T. P. Seijkens, P. J. H. Kusters et al., “Macrophage CD40 signaling drives experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 247, no. 4, pp. 471–480, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. Jang, S. J. Park, M. K. Chae, J. H. Lee, E. J. Lee, and J. S. Yoon, “Role of microRNA-146a in regulation of fibrosis in orbital fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ orbitopathy,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 407–414, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Wang, F. E. Chen, and Z. W. Long, “Mechanism of microRNA-146a/Notch2 signaling regulating IL-6 in Graves ophthalmopathy,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1285–1297, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wei, M. Guan, Y. Qin et al., “Circulating levels of miR-146a and IL-17 are significantly correlated with the clinical activity of Graves’ ophthalmopathy,” Endocrine Journal, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1087–1092, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Zhang, G. Jia, Q. Liu et al., “Silencing miR-146a influences B cells and ameliorates experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis,” Immunology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zilahi, T. Tarr, G. Papp, Z. Griger, S. Sipka, and M. Zeher, “Increased microRNA-146a/b, TRAF6 gene and decreased IRAK1 gene expressions in the peripheral mononuclear cells of patients with Sjogren's syndrome,” Immunology Letters, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 165–168, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Bonito, C. Aloman, M. I. Fiel et al., “Medullary thymic epithelial cell depletion leads to autoimmune hepatitis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 3510–3524, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Noguchi, N. Kamiyama, S. Hidano et al., “Autoimmune sialadenitis is associated with the upregulation of chemokine/chemokine receptor pairs in T cell-specific TRAF6-deficient mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 504, no. 1, pp. 245–250, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ji, X. Hou, W. Liu et al., “Paeoniflorin inhibits activation of the IRAK1-NF-κB signaling pathway in peritoneal macrophages from lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 124, pp. 223–229, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Iwata, K. Yamaoka, H. Niiro et al., “Increased Syk phosphorylation leads to overexpression of TRAF6 in peripheral B cells of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Lupus, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 695–704, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Georg, A. Díaz-Barreiro, M. Morell, A. L. Pey, and M. E. Alarcón-Riquelme, “BANK1 interacts with TRAF6 and MyD88 in innate immune signaling in B cells,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 954–965, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N.-S. Kim, J. C. Mbongue, D. A. Nicholas et al., “Chimeric vaccine stimulation of human dendritic cell indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase occurs via the non-canonical NF-κB pathway,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 2, article e0147509, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-J. Zhu, T.-C. Yang, Q. Wu et al., “Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 6 inhibition mitigates the pro-inflammatory roles and proliferation of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes,” Cytokine, vol. 93, pp. 26–33, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, W. Chen, L. Wang, F. Li, C. Zhang, and L. Xu, “Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 promotes migration of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2761–2766, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. P. Perpétuo, J. Caetano-Lopes, A. M. Rodrigues et al., “Effect of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy on osteoclasts precursors in rheumatoid arthritis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 2690402, 10 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Brenke, G. M. Popowicz, K. Schorpp et al., “Targeting TRAF6 E3 ligase activity with a small-molecule inhibitor combats autoimmunity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 293, no. 34, pp. 13191–13203, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. B. M. Aarts, T. T. P. Seijkens, P. J. H. Kusters et al., “Inhibition of CD40-TRAF6 interactions by the small molecule inhibitor 6877002 reduces neuroinflammation,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 105, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Liu, T. Zhang, J. Ye et al., “TNF receptor-associated factor 6 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: clinical and prognostic implications,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 138, no. 11, pp. 1853–1863, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Plewka, P. Madej, D. Plewka et al., “The TRAF2 and TRAF6 expression in myomas and myometrium of women in reproduction and perimenopausal age,” Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 407–416, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Peng, Y. Shuangzhu, J. Yongjie, Z. Xinjun, and L. Ying, “TNF receptor-associated factor 6 regulates proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion of glioma cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 377, no. 1-2, pp. 87–96, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Rong, D. Wang, W. Wu et al., “TRAF6 is over-expressed in pancreatic cancer and promotes the tumorigenicity of pancreatic cancer cells,” Medical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 11, p. 260, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shen, L. Li, S. Yang et al., “Regulatory role of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 in breast cancer by activating the protein kinase B/glycogen synthase kinase 3β signaling pathway,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 2269–2273, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sun, B. Zhao, K. Du, and P. Liu, “TRAF6 correlated to invasion and poor prognosis of glioblastoma via elevating MMP9 expression,” NeuroReport, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 127–133, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zhu, Z. Cheng, Y. Huang et al., “TRAF6 promotes the progression and growth of colorectal cancer through nuclear shuttle regulation NF-kB/c-jun signaling pathway,” Life Sciences, vol. 235, article 116831, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, Y.-C. Li, L. Wu et al., “TRAF6 regulates tumour metastasis through EMT and CSC phenotypes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1337–1349, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Han, L. Zhang, W. Qiu, and X. Yi, “TRAF6 promotes the invasion and metastasis and predicts a poor prognosis in gastric cancer,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Liu, S. Tamashiro, S. Baritaki et al., “TRAF6 activation in multiple myeloma: a potential therapeutic target,” Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 155–163, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. He, C. Huang, G. Lin, and Y. Ye, “siRNA-induced TRAF6 knockdown promotes the apoptosis and inhibits the invasion of human lung cancer SPC-A1 cells,” Oncology Reports, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1933–1940, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bilir, H. Engin, M. Can, Y. B. Temi, and D. Demirtas, “The prognostic role of inflammation and hormones in patients with metastatic cancer with cachexia,” Medical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 56, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lu, Q. Wang, G. Xue et al., “Th9 Cells Represent a Unique Subset of CD4⁺ T Cells Endowed with the Ability to Eradicate Advanced Tumors,” Cancer Cell, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1048–1060.e7, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ni, W. Kou, J. Gu et al., “TRAF6 directs FOXP3 localization and facilitates regulatory T-cell function through K63-linked ubiquitination,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 38, no. 9, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wu, R. Xue, H. Peng et al., “Traf6 inhibitor boosts antitumor immunity by impeding regulatory T cell migration in Hepa1-6 tumor model,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 77, article 105965, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-C. Chen, W.-Y. Lee, H.-Y. Chen, and C. Y.-C. Chen, “In silico investigation of potential TRAF6 inhibitor from traditional Chinese medicine against cancers,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 429486, 14 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-W. Chiu, S.-W. Lin, L.-C. Lin et al., “Synergistic antitumor effects of radiation and proteasome inhibitor treatment in pancreatic cancer through the induction of autophagy and the downregulation of TRAF6,” Cancer Letters, vol. 365, no. 2, pp. 229–239, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Wu, W.-S. Wu, L.-C. Lin et al., “Bortezomib enhances radiosensitivity in oral cancer through inducing autophagy-mediated TRAF6 oncoprotein degradation,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 91, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fang, G. Rhyasen, L. Bolanos et al., “Cytotoxic effects of bortezomib in myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia depend on autophagy-mediated lysosomal degradation of TRAF6 and repression of PSMA1,” Blood, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 858–867, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Dai, L.-Y. Hung, R.-Y. Chen, C.-H. Lai, and K.-C. Chang, “ON 01910.Na inhibits growth of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by cytoplasmic sequestration of sumoylated C-MYB/TRAF6 complex,” Translational Research, vol. 175, pp. 129–143.e13, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qi, A. R. Pradipta, M. Li et al., “Cinchonine induces apoptosis of HeLa and A549 cells through targeting TRAF6,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 35, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Yin, S. C. Lin, B. Lamothe et al., “E2 interaction and dimerization in the crystal structure of TRAF6,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 658–666, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gangadharan, M. Thoh, and S. K. Manna, “Late phase activation of nuclear transcription factor kappaB by doxorubicin is mediated by interleukin-8 and induction of apoptosis via FasL,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 671–683, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abdullah, J. M. Berthiaume, and M. S. Willis, “Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 as a nuclear factor kappa B-modulating therapeutic target in cardiovascular diseases: at the heart of it all,” Translational Research, vol. 195, pp. 48–61, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Dou, X. Tian, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, and G. Chen, “Roles of TRAF6 in central nervous system,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1306–1313, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Jingjing Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2928

Downloads

1745

Citations

BioMed Research International

Mechanism by which TRAF6 Participates in the Immune Regulation of Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Structure of TRAF6 and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System

3. TRAF6 Signaling Mechanism

4. Regulatory Effects of TRAF6 on Various Immune Cells

4.1. T Cells

4.1.1. CD4+ T Cells

4.1.2. CD8+ T Cells

4.2. B Cells

4.3. Dendritic Cells

4.3.1. TRAF6 Contributes to the Maturation of DCs

4.3.2. TRAF6 Is Essential for the Development of DC Subsets

4.4. Macrophages

5. The Role of TRAF6 in Autoimmune Diseases

5.1. Rheumatoid Arthritis

5.2. Lupus Nephritis

5.3. Multiple Sclerosis

5.4. Other Autoimmune Diseases

5.5. TRAF6 as a Therapeutic Target of ADs

6. The Role of TRAF6 in Cancer

7. Conclusion

Conflicts of Interest

References

Copyright

4.1.1. CD4⁺ T Cells

4.1.2. CD8⁺ T Cells