RAB9A Plays an Oncogenic Role in Human Liver Cancer Cells

Sun, Pengfei; Li, Lei; Li, Zhongchao

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5691671

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 5691671 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5691671

RAB9A Plays an Oncogenic Role in Human Liver Cancer Cells

Pengfei Sun,¹Lei Li,¹and Zhongchao Li¹

Academic Editor: Dimitra Gkika

Received11 Nov 2019

Revised17 Feb 2020

Accepted06 Apr 2020

Published30 Apr 2020

Abstract

Background. RAB9, as a member of the Rab GTPase family, is required for the transport of the mannose-6-phosphate receptor (MPR) from late endosomes to trans-Golgi network (TGN). However, the role of RAB9A in tumors, including liver cancer, is still unknown. Methods. We used pcDNA3.1 plasmid to upregulate the expression of RAB9A in Hep3b cells and used specific shRNA to downregulate the expression of RAB9A in HepG2 cells. Biological functions of RAB9A were performed by CCK-8 assay, colony formation assay, apoptosis analysis, transwell assays, and wound healing assays. Finally, an in-depth mechanism study was performed by western blot. Results. RAB9A promoted the proliferation and clonality of Hep3b and HepG2 cells. RAB9A also inhibited apoptosis and the activation of mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. In addition, RAB9A promoted the invasion and migration of Hep3b and HepG2 cells. Importantly, RAB9A activated the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in human liver cancer cells. A double-effect inhibitor (BEZ235) significantly hindered the effect of RAB9A overexpression on the proliferation and invasion of Hep3b cells. Conclusion. Our data suggest that RAB9A plays a carcinogenic role in human liver cancer progression partially through AKT signaling pathways, suggesting that RAB9A may serve as a potential therapeutic target for liver cancer therapy.

1. Introduction

The occurrence and development of liver cancer is the most serious consequence of uncontrolled liver regeneration [1]. At present, primary liver cancer is an incurable disease [2]. Its annual mortality rate is about 100%, which means that most cases cannot survive for one year [3]. Conventional treatments include chemotherapy, arterial embolization, surgical resection, and radiofrequency ablation. However, the recurrence rate after receiving treatment is still as high as 70% or more. Therefore, it is necessary and urgent to explore the specific molecular mechanisms of the occurrence and development of liver cancer.

RAB9 is a member of the Rab GTPase family [4]. Members of this family are primarily located on different organelle membranes and together with their specific effectors to play a central role in regulating vesicle-mediated transport [5]. RAB9 is mainly located in the late endosomal membrane and is required for the transport of the mannose-6-phosphate receptor (MPR) from late endosomes to trans-Golgi network (TGN) [6]. In addition, RAB9 plays an important role in lysosomal biogenesis and late endosomal morphology [7]. It can also serve as a cellular target for certain pathogens and play an important role in pathogenic infections [8].

RAB9 has two isoforms, RAB9A and RAB9B. One study has shown that Rab9 is abnormally highly expressed in breast cancer tissues and plays critical roles in the biological action of breast cancer cells [9]. Rab9 is considered a good candidate for a new breast cancer treatment strategy. In addition, RAB9A knockdown can inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of melanoma cells and induce apoptosis [10]. These data indicate that RAB9A may be involved in the regulation of tumor progression. However, the role of RAB9A in other tumors, including liver cancer, is still unknown.

In this study, we examined the effects of RAB9A on the biological function of hepatoma cells by function-gaining and function-losing experiments. Finally, we found that RAB9A plays a procancer role in liver cancer cells by affecting the activation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Human liver cancer cell lines, Hep3b and HepG2, were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Hyclone, Logan, UT) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) at 37°C in 5% CO₂.

2.2. Plasmid, shRNAs, and Transfection

The RAB9A cDNA sequence was cloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector. And recombinant plasmid was transfected into Hep3b cells to upregulate RAB9A expression (RAB9A-OV). shRNAs were synthesized and transfected into HepG2 cells to downregulate RAB9A expression (RAB9A-KD) (Ruibo, Guangzhou, China). Transfection of shRNA and plasmid was performed by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA).

2.3. Western Blot

After transfection for 48 h, cell lysates were prepared by using RIPA buffer. The protein separation was performed by using 10% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis, which was followed by transmembrane onto a PVDF membrane. After blocking in 5% nonfat milk, the protein bands were washed with TBST buffer and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with the corresponding secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The visualization of protein bands was performed by using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Scientific).

2.4. CCK-8 Assay

The cells were seeded into a 96-well plate with 3000 cells per well. 10 μl CCK-8 solution was added into each well at different time points (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h). After incubation for 2 h, the absorbance at 450 nm was detected by a microplate reader.

2.5. Colony Formation Assay

Cells were seeded in a 6 cm petri dish at 500 cells and normally cultured for 14 days. Then the colonies were fixed with methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Visible colonies were photographed and counted manually.

2.6. Flow Cytometry Detection for Cell Apoptosis

Transfected cells were stained using an Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences). Then, cells were analyzed through BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with BD FACSDiva software. Cells were discriminated into viable cells, dead cells, early apoptosis cells, and apoptosis cells.

2.7. Transwell Assay

Cell invasion was evaluated by using Matrigel-coated Transwell chambers (BD Biosciences). cells in 200 μl of DMEM medium containing no serum were added into the upper chamber. The lower chamber was added with 500 μl of DMEM medium containing 10% FBS. Then, the cells were normally cultured for 24 h. Invaded cells on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 10 min. Cell number was counted under a microscope (Nikon TE2000).

2.8. Wound Healing Assays

Cells were cultured to the appropriate confluence in 6-well plates. The wound was created using sterile plastic tips. After washing with PBS, cells were cultured for 24 h with serum-free medium. Images were taken using a microscope. An average of five random widths of each wound was measured for quantitation.

2.9. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

ELISA was used to measure the concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 (cat. no. ab100606; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and MMP9 (cat. no. ab100610; Abcam) in cell lysates. The samples from cells were collected after inoculation for 48 h. All experiments followed the manufacturer’s protocol. The total protein concentration was normalized to the concentration in the sample before transfection.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All the data analysis was performed by using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software). All experiments were performed in triplicate. Comparison between two groups was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s -test. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. RAB9A Promotes the Proliferation and Colony Formation of Human Liver Cancer Cells

In order to investigate the biological function of RAB9A in human liver cancer, loss- and gain-of-function assays were performed. The protein expression of RAB9A was significantly upregulated in Hep3b cells (Figures 1(a) and 1(b), ), and was downregulated in HepG2 cells (Figure 1(a) and 1(c), ). The results of CCK8 assay indicated that overexpression of RAB9A significantly promoted the proliferation of Hep3b cells (Figure 2(a), ) and RAB9A knockdown obviously inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 cells (Figure 2(b), ). Furthermore, colony cell number was also significantly increased when RAB9A was overexpressed (Figure 2(c)) and was decreased when silence of RAB9A (Figure 2(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2. RAB9A Inhibits Cell Apoptosis and Mitochondrial Apoptotic Pathway Activation in Human Liver Cancer Cells

Cell apoptosis results are shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), which suggested that the apoptosis percentage of Hep3b cells was significantly decreased when RAB9A was overexpressed and the apoptosis percentage of HepG2 cells was significantly increased when RAB9A silencing. Overexpression of RAB9A also led to a significant downregulation of proapoptotic protein Bax and down-stream effector cleaved caspase 3, while upregulation of antiapoptotic protein Bcl2 and down-stream effector total caspase 3 (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)). When RAB9A was downregulated, the opposite result was obtained (Figures 3(c) and 3(e)). These data suggested that RAB9A inhibited the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway activation in Hep3b and HepG2 cells.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

3.3. RAB9A Promotes Cell Invasion and Migration

We continued to investigate whether RAB9A could affect the cell invasion and migration of human liver cancer cells. As showed in transwell assays, the invasion ability of Hep3b cells was obviously upregulated when RAB9A was overexpressed (Figure 4(a)), and the invasion ability of HepG2 cells was obviously downregulated when RAB9A silencing (Figure 4(b)). In addition, the results of wound healing assay showed that when RAB9A was silenced in HepG2 cells, the healing wound width was dwarfed compared to NC cells (Figure 4(d)). When RAB9A was overexpressed, the opposite result was obtained (Figure 4(c)). MMP2 and MMP9 are the two critical MMPs that mediate tumor cell invasion. Unsurprisingly, the overexpression of RAB9A induced the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in Hep3b cells; while the deletion of RAB9A suppressed the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in HepG2 cells (Figures 4(e) and 4(f)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.4. RAB9A Promotes the Malignant Behavior of Liver Cancer Cells by Activating the AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway

In order to investigate the action mechanism underlying the procancer effect of RAB9A in human liver cancer cells, we proposed that the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway might be associated with the biological function of RAB9A. As a result, overexpression of RAB9A led to increased phosphorylation level of AKT and mTOR proteins (Figure 5), and RAB9A knockdown led to decreased phosphorylation level of AKT and mTOR proteins (Figure 5). These data suggested that RAB9A activated the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in human liver cancer cells.

(a)

(b)

(c)

To reveal whether RAB9A promoted the malignant behavior of liver cancer cells by activating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, a double-effect inhibitor (BEZ235) which inhibits AKT and mTOR phosphorylation was used for complementation experiments. As shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), the treatment of BEZ235 effectively inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT and mTOR. In addition, the treatment of BEZ235 significantly hindered the effect of RAB9A overexpression on the proliferation and invasion of Hep3b cells (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

4. Discussion

In our study, we first observed that RAB9A acted as an oncogene in the progression of human liver cancer. We found that RAB9A significantly promoted the proliferation, colony formation, invasion, and migration of human liver cancer cells. In addition, overexpression of RAB9A inhibited apoptosis.

A previous study reports that RAB9A functions as an oncogene in melanoma and breast cancer cells [9, 10]. To identify the function of RAB9A in liver cancer, we used plasmid to upregulate RAB9A in Hep3b cells and used shRNA to downregulate RAB9A in HepG2 cells. CCK-8 and clone formation assay showed that RAB9A promoted the proliferation of liver cancer cells. Flow analysis showed that RAB9A inhibited apoptosis. In addition, the analysis of apoptosis-related proteins showed that the expression of the proapoptotic proteins Bax and cleaved caspase 3 was downregulated while the expression of antiapoptotic protein Bcl2 was upregulated. These results explained the mechanism by which RAB9A led to decreased apoptosis. The scratch and transwell assay suggested the inhibition of migration and invasion of HepG2 by knockdown of RAB9A. Our findings are consistent with the role of RAB9A in melanoma and breast cancer cells. Based on these results, RAB9A also plays an important oncogenic role in the progression of liver cancer.

Rabs work together with their effectors to play critical roles in regulating the vesicle-mediated transport [11]. Different Rabs can bind their specific effectors, such as the Rab4/Rab22-Rabenosyn-5 [12] and Rab6-Rab6IP1 complexes [13]. To date, several Rab9 effectors have been identified, including p40, Tip47, GCC185, and RhoBTB3, all of which are involved in MPR recycling [14–16]. In addition, a novel RAB9 interacting protein, PP2A, is identified [17]. RAB9 binds to the scaffold subunit of PP2A (PPP2R1A) and competes with the catalytic subunit of PP2A (PPP2CA) when binding. This competitive combination plays an important role in controlling the catalytic activity of PP2A. PP2A catalytic activity is impaired in some solid tumors and leukemia. Therefore, identifying proteins that interact with RAB9A in liver cancer cells is one of our future research directions and will provide new targets for the treatment of liver cancer.

Like other small GTPases, Rabs circulate between two states, the GTP-bound active state and the GDP-bound inactive state [18]. The transformation is assisted by the guanine exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) [19, 20]. However, RAB9 interacts with PPP2R1A in a GTP-independent manner [17]. Therefore, we cannot determine that the role of RAB9A in liver cancer cells is GTP-dependent or GTP-independent.

In this study, we found that RAB9A activated the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in human liver cancer cells. Overexpression of RAB9A led to increased phosphorylation level of AKT and mTOR proteins, and RAB9A knockdown led to decreased phosphorylation level of AKT and mTOR proteins. AKT/mTOR signaling pathways are widely involved in intracellular cell proliferation, survival, protein synthesis, and other physiological activities [21]. In addition, the treatment of BEZ235 significantly hindered the effect of RAB9A overexpression on the proliferation and invasion of Hep3b cells. These data reveal that RAB9A promoted the malignant behavior of liver cancer cells by activating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identify that RAB9A promotes the tumor aggressive progression of human liver cancer in vitro, which may be mediated by blocking AKT signaling pathways. Our study provides a novel perspective on the potential role of RAB9A in liver cancer therapy. In addition, little is known about the specific molecular mechanisms by which RAB9A functions in liver cancer cells.

Abbreviation

MPR:	Mannose-6-phosphate receptor
TGN:	trans-Golgi network
LIHC:	Liver hepatocellular carcinoma.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

I give my consent for publication on behalf of all authors and patients involved.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest among all authors.

Authors’ Contributions

Pengfei Sun is responsible for the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. All authors drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version to be published. Zhongchao Li is the one accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the project of “A comparative study of the effects of pancreaticogastrointestinal anastomosis on proximal gastric function after pancreaticoduodenectomy”.

References

J. H. Sun, Q. Luo, L. L. Liu, and G. B. Song, “Liver cancer stem cell markers: progression and therapeutic implications,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 3547–3557, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Li and Z. H. Ye, “Microenvironment of liver regeneration in liver cancer,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 555–560, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Marengo, C. Rosso, and E. Bugianesi, “Liver cancer: connections with obesity, fatty liver, and cirrhosis,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 67, pp. 103–117, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Barr and D. G. Lambright, “Rab GEFs and GAPs,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 461–470, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Stenmark, “Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 513–525, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Barbero, L. Bittova, and S. R. Pfeffer, “Visualization of Rab9-mediated vesicle transport from endosomes to the trans-Golgi in living cells,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 511–518, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. G. Ganley, K. Carroll, L. Bittova, and S. Pfeffer, “Rab9 GTPase regulates late endosome size and requires effector interaction for its stability,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5420–5430, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. McGourty, T. L. Thurston, S. A. Matthews, L. Pinaud, L. J. Mota, and D. W. Holden, “Salmonella inhibits retrograde trafficking of mannose-6-phosphate receptors and lysosome function,” Science, vol. 338, no. 6109, pp. 963–967, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, X. Wang, Z. Zhang, B. Xiao, B. An, and J. Zhang, “The overexpression of Rab9 promotes tumor progression regulated by XBP1 in breast cancer,” OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. 12, pp. 1815–1824, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Liang, Z. Zhang, X. Qin et al., “Long noncoding RNA ZFAS1 promotes tumorigenesis through regulation of miR-150-5p/RAB9A in melanoma,” Melanoma Research, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 569–581, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Grosshans, D. Ortiz, and P. Novick, “Rabs and their effectors: achieving specificity in membrane traffic,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 32, pp. 11821–11827, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Eathiraj, X. Pan, C. Ritacco, and D. G. Lambright, “Structural basis of family-wide Rab GTPase recognition by rabenosyn-5,” Nature, vol. 436, no. 7049, pp. 415–419, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Recacha, A. Boulet, F. Jollivet et al., “Structural basis for recruitment of Rab6-interacting protein 1 to Golgi via a RUN domain,” Structure, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Carroll, J. Hanna, I. Simon, J. Krise, P. Barbero, and S. R. Pfeffer, “Role of Rab9 GTPase in facilitating receptor recruitment by TIP47,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5520, pp. 1373–1376, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. C. Ikonomov, D. Sbrissa, K. Mlak et al., “Active PIKfyve associates with and promotes the membrane attachment of the late endosome-to-trans-Golgi network transport factor Rab9 effector p40,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 51, pp. 50863–50871, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, S. Wang, T. Shen, J. Chen, and J. Ding, “Crystal structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD complex reveals the molecular basis for the binding specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2,” Structure, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1408–1420, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sacco, A. Mattioni, K. Boldt et al., “A subset of RAB proteins modulates PP2A phosphatase activity,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 32857, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhen and H. Stenmark, “Cellular functions of Rab GTPases at a glance,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 128, no. 17, pp. 3171–3176, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Wittmann and M. G. Rudolph, “Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the GTP-binding protein Rab9 implicated in endosome-to-TGN vesicle trafficking,” Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 580–582, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yoshimura, A. Gerondopoulos, A. Linford, D. J. Rigden, and F. A. Barr, “Family-wide characterization of the DENN domain Rab GDP-GTP exchange factors,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 367–381, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Martini, M. C. de Santis, L. Braccini, F. Gulluni, and E. Hirsch, “PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and cancer: an updated review,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 372–383, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Pengfei Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

749

Downloads

1566

Citations